What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Boston Herald Says Randy Moss to GB Almost Done (1 Viewer)

David Yudkin

Footballguy
I know that there has been rumblings over this for awhile now, but it's starting to get a lot of play from more credible media sources . . .

Source: Packers close to deal for Moss

By Michael Felger

Boston Herald Patriots Beat Columnist

Thursday, March 15, 2007 - Updated: 10:37 AM EST

For those holding out hope that the Patriots’ plans to revamp the wide receiver position included trading for Randy Moss, we have some bad news for you.

A source in Wisconsin said today that the Packers and Raiders are on the verge of announcing a trade that would send the troubled receiver to Green Bay in exchange for backup quarterback Aaron Rodgers.

There are expected to be other particulars in the deal. According to the source, Green Bay would also give up a seventh-round pick in 2008, while the Packers would receive Raiders tight end Courtney Anderson as part of the deal. The Packers would also receive a conditional pick from the Raiders in the 2009 draft which would be based on Rodgers’ production in Oakland the next two seasons.

The source indicated that Moss has agreed to restructure his contract, which calls for $20 million in base salary the next two years. Moss and Packers quarterback Brett Favre are said to have been talking on the phone throughout the process. Press conferences could be held as early as Friday.
LINKThis also fuels speculation that Oakland will take Calvin Johnson with the top pick in the 2007 draft.

 
Wow, that would be huge. Getting Moss would significantly improve the WR corp (which needed help bigtime) and give Favre a true deep threat. Giving A. Rogers and a late pick seems like a steal for one of the best WR's ever.

Moss has had attitude/injury problems over the past couple years but I think a lot of people are prematurely thinking he's done. Look at a guy like Galloway that was left for dead a couple years back. His QB wasn't as good and he doesn't have nearly the talent that Moss has and he finished 5th and 15th over the past 2 years.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What do you think this deal - if it goes through - would do to Drivers value?
Driver did pretty well with Walker around, so I expect he would still be a fantasy WR1. I have outlined in other threads in the past that GB over Favre's career has often fielded two very good fantasy options. I doubt he'd be Top 5 again like last season but Top 10 seems reasonable. Given that they also seem to have lost some in the ground game (at least for now), Favre may be airing it out more in 2007.
 
I think this is an AWESOME deal for the Raiders. Rogers should be a fine fit for Kiffin's system if he's bringing over some of the elements from USC (which remains to be seen). Plus, he already knows the whole travel-money-groupies system of being an NFL player, so the ramp up time may well be shorter. Just as importantly, it allows the Raiders to take the best player in the draft with the #1 pick (CJ), essentially killing three birds with one stone (1. Trade Moss 2. Get a QB 3. Get the BPA with the #1 pick)

 
If this happens, Kudos to Thompson. That's a good deal for Green Bay.

Courteny Anderson would be a very nice compliment to Franks. He's a little better than the departed David Martin, so that's a nice replacement for him.

I'm still skeptical about Moss, but this seems like a fairly low risk deal for Green Bay, assuming the contract has been redone.

 
What does this do to the Packers draft plans?

A lot of mocks I see have them taking Lynch, but with a guy like Moss, you aren't acquiring him to play with some scrub after Favre retires, which should be next year. Does this turn Green Bay's attention to a QB to replace Favre and let Morency and a FA (Dillon/Brown/Dayne...) compete?

 
I think this is an AWESOME deal for the Raiders. Rogers should be a fine fit for Kiffin's system if he's bringing over some of the elements from USC (which remains to be seen). Plus, he already knows the whole travel-money-groupies system of being an NFL player, so the ramp up time may well be shorter. Just as importantly, it allows the Raiders to take the best player in the draft with the #1 pick (CJ), essentially killing three birds with one stone (1. Trade Moss 2. Get a QB 3. Get the BPA with the #1 pick)
Is Aaron Rodgers really an upgrade over Brooks/Walter? If so, not by much...
 
What does this do to the Packers draft plans?A lot of mocks I see have them taking Lynch, but with a guy like Moss, you aren't acquiring him to play with some scrub after Favre retires, which should be next year. Does this turn Green Bay's attention to a QB to replace Favre and let Morency and a FA (Dillon/Brown/Dayne...) compete?
If Russell slips from #1, that increases the slim chance one of the QBs will be available for the Pack.
 
I think this is an AWESOME deal for the Raiders. Rogers should be a fine fit for Kiffin's system if he's bringing over some of the elements from USC (which remains to be seen). Plus, he already knows the whole travel-money-groupies system of being an NFL player, so the ramp up time may well be shorter. Just as importantly, it allows the Raiders to take the best player in the draft with the #1 pick (CJ), essentially killing three birds with one stone (1. Trade Moss 2. Get a QB 3. Get the BPA with the #1 pick)
Is Aaron Rodgers really an upgrade over Brooks/Walter? If so, not by much...
I disagree "a whole lot."
 
What does this do to the Packers draft plans?A lot of mocks I see have them taking Lynch, but with a guy like Moss, you aren't acquiring him to play with some scrub after Favre retires, which should be next year. Does this turn Green Bay's attention to a QB to replace Favre and let Morency and a FA (Dillon/Brown/Dayne...) compete?
I don't think it changes things at all. Thompson is a BPA guy, so if Lynch is the highest rated player, that's who they'll draft. This would also bump up Ingle Martin's dynasty value quite a bit!
 
What does this do to the Packers draft plans?A lot of mocks I see have them taking Lynch, but with a guy like Moss, you aren't acquiring him to play with some scrub after Favre retires, which should be next year. Does this turn Green Bay's attention to a QB to replace Favre and let Morency and a FA (Dillon/Brown/Dayne...) compete?
I don't think they go QB in round 1...but they may address it round 2 even....or they may like Ingle Martin...who knows...I don't think it changes needing a possible RB at this point (barring a free agent move)...because eventually they will have to turn it over to the new QB, and it would be nice to have an established ground game at that point.
 
What do you think this deal - if it goes through - would do to Drivers value?
I'd think everything would take a bit of hit, receptions, yards and tds'. Last year he finished as the #5 wr largely because he was the only wr on the team that could run a route and catch a ball and Favre absolutely locked onto him. He was #2 in the league with 171 targets and that is sure to drop. I still like him but I'd guess he'd probably drop into the teens, 13th-17th.
 
Favre and Moss will probably be drafted much higher than they should be in most leagues next season.
While I don't necessarily disagree with you, Favre ranked 8th last year without Moss. There have been COUNTLESS debates as to what impact having Moss to throw to has on QBs. (Remember all the Moss made Culpepper threads and Collins will be Top 5 arguments?). Where would you predict Favre will rank at the end of the year for QBs?
 
Favre and Moss will probably be drafted much higher than they should be in most leagues next season.
While I don't necessarily disagree with you, Favre ranked 8th last year without Moss. There have been COUNTLESS debates as to what impact having Moss to throw to has on QBs. (Remember all the Moss made Culpepper threads and Collins will be Top 5 arguments?). Where would you predict Favre will rank at the end of the year for QBs?
since '02 he's finished 11th, 10th, 6th, 13th and 8th so I'd say top 10 is pretty likely with an upside to top 5-6 especially if they don't fill their RB void and are forced to air it out.
 
What do you think this deal - if it goes through - would do to Drivers value?
I would think it can only help his production.No more straight double teams as teams will have to pay attention to Moss out there as well.
didnt driver have a record number of passes thrown his way last year or am I wrong there? Those would obviously go down quite a bit.Who gets drafted first moss or driver?
 
Favre and Moss will probably be drafted much higher than they should be in most leagues next season.
While I don't necessarily disagree with you, Favre ranked 8th last year without Moss. There have been COUNTLESS debates as to what impact having Moss to throw to has on QBs. (Remember all the Moss made Culpepper threads and Collins will be Top 5 arguments?). Where would you predict Favre will rank at the end of the year for QBs?
since '02 he's finished 11th, 10th, 6th, 13th and 8th so I'd say top 10 is pretty likely with an upside to top 5-6 especially if they don't fill their RB void and are forced to air it out.
I mentioned pretty much the same thing in Post 6--only I don't know if he can squeeze into the Top 5 again.
 
I'm sorry. AND Courtney Anderson?

This would be an unbelievable fleecing if this goes through as advertised.

Excellent work by Thompson.

 
John Madden is going to wet himself trying to commentate the Green Bay games this year....

He already had a man crush on Brett Favre, now it will become an all out infatuation!!!!

 
Just on Cold Pizza they report that there is no interest from the Packers to acquire Moss and that Aaron Rodgers would not be part of any deal if they were. It went on to say that the only way the Pack would consider Moss is to pick him up if he were cut.
 
I think this is an AWESOME deal for the Raiders. Rogers should be a fine fit for Kiffin's system if he's bringing over some of the elements from USC (which remains to be seen). Plus, he already knows the whole travel-money-groupies system of being an NFL player, so the ramp up time may well be shorter. Just as importantly, it allows the Raiders to take the best player in the draft with the #1 pick (CJ), essentially killing three birds with one stone (1. Trade Moss 2. Get a QB 3. Get the BPA with the #1 pick)
Is Aaron Rodgers really an upgrade over Brooks/Walter? If so, not by much...
I disagree "a whole lot."
You think Rodgers is a starting NFL QB?
 
Just on Cold Pizza they report that there is no interest from the Packers to acquire Moss and that Aaron Rodgers would not be part of any deal if they were. It went on to say that the only way the Pack would consider Moss is to pick him up if he were cut.
Guess will find out if the people on Cold Pizza know anything. My guess is that they don't.
 
Just on Cold Pizza they report that there is no interest from the Packers to acquire Moss and that Aaron Rodgers would not be part of any deal if they were. It went on to say that the only way the Pack would consider Moss is to pick him up if he were cut.
Guess will find out if the people on Cold Pizza know anything. My guess is that they don't.
The Raiders the other day also claimed that they had not called anyone to discuss a potential Moss deal either, so there clearly is a lot of stonewalling going on here.
 
What do you think this deal - if it goes through - would do to Drivers value?
I would think it can only help his production.No more straight double teams as teams will have to pay attention to Moss out there as well.
didnt driver have a record number of passes thrown his way last year or am I wrong there? Those would obviously go down quite a bit.Who gets drafted first moss or driver?
Probably Moss but I still think Driver outproduces him. Driver will still be Favre's security blanket and catch all the underneath stuff while Moss stretches the field. I do think Driver's numbers drop a little from last year but I still think he's and 70-80 catch guys with 1000-1200 yards....probably at the lower end of those ranges.
 
I dont' see how anyone could make a definitive judgement on Rodgers at this point.
That's just it. He is a big unkown. His only action in any meaningful game has been two seperate halves of games the Packers were losing big time, the Ravens game in 2005 and the Patriots game last year. Both times, the defenses just blitzed the hell out of him, not having to worry about the running game at all. The one positive is that he handled himself quite well in the shadow of his own goalline, getting the offense out of trouble in the Patriots game. Of course, after the initial first down, he went on to break his foot.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm not a big fan of the QBs in this draft, but I'm not a big fan of Rodgers, either.

The question here is whether the step up/down from Moss to CJ is worth the step up/down from Russel/Quinn to Rodgers. I think both are a step down, although I agree that CJ is a much better fit for Oakland than Moss is. Overall, though, I think the Raiders are getting hosed here.

 
I'm not a big fan of the QBs in this draft, but I'm not a big fan of Rodgers, either. The question here is whether the step up/down from Moss to CJ is worth the step up/down from Russel/Quinn to Rodgers. I think both are a step down, although I agree that CJ is a much better fit for Oakland than Moss is. Overall, though, I think the Raiders are getting hosed here.
This deal makes sense if the Raiders simply do not plan on having Moss around and would cut him for the cap space. THey can sign CJ long term (6 years) if they go that route. They can then figure if Walters or ROgers is the answer, and if not draft a QB next year (or look at one in free agency). Maybe they spend this year and next getting the OL and the rest of the offense in place, allow a drafted QB to come in and sit a year. It's not a bad plan -- especially since CJ is considered the #1 prospect.With that said, if this trade goes down, I would not be shocked to see the Raiders trade out of the #1 spot. Maybe pressure Cleveland into swapping spots. And maybe even further back.I could see Kiffen trying to trade as far back as he could and stockpile picks with the hope that he could get Kalil (who I think will be one heck of a center) And maybe he feels Jarrett is just as good and already knows the offense (although I don't think Jarret will be a stud in the NFL). Of course that is just wild speculation.
 
I dont' see how anyone could make a definitive judgement on Rodgers at this point.
That's just it. He is a big unkown. His only action in any meaningful game has been two seperate halves of games the Packers were losing big time, the Ravens game in 2005 and the Patriots game last year. Both times, the defenses just blitzed the hell out of him, not having to worry about the running game at all. The one positive is that he handled himself quite well in the shadow of his own goalline, getting the offense out of trouble in the Patriots game. Of course, after the initial first down, he went on to break his foot.
I'll never trust a Tedford QB and think Rodgers' upside is Dilfer. There have just been too many QB's he has helped get drafted too high (Dilfer, Akili Smith, Harrington, Boller) to give me much faith in Rodgers. You never know what can happen, but I haven't seen anything so far to make me change my mind.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top