What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Brady Injury Update (1 Viewer)

Boston

Footballguy
http://www.boston.com/sports/football/patr...ack_for_opener/

Source: Brady on track for opener

By Christopher L. Gasper and Shira Springer

Globe Staff / January 27, 2009

Email| Print| Single Page| Yahoo! Buzz| ShareThisText size – + TAMPA -- Tom Brady is progressing on pace in his rehabilitation from reconstructive left knee surgery and is now dropping back and throwing passes, according to a medical source familiar with the Patriots quarterback's case. No additional surgical procedures are planned, according to NFL and medical sources.

Since Brady suffered a postoperative infection, there was concern that the damaged knee would require more surgery to deal with the buildup of scar tissue and other possible complications that could prevent him from being ready for the 2009 season.

The medical source who has been consulted about Brady's injury said Brady is "on track to be fine for the opening game of the season.

"Based on anybody else doing an ACL rehab, he's going right along. He had a shaky start, but he's caught up," said the source.

The source added that Brady, who suffered torn anterior cruciate and medial collateral ligaments in the Patriots' opener against the Chiefs Sept. 7 and had surgery to repair both ligaments Oct. 6, is throwing, running, doing his skill drills, and getting in shape.

Still, the sources acknowledged that Brady has "laxity" in the MCL and some stiffness in the joint. Additionally, sources said Brady has not regained full range of motion, though it is not unusual for patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction to have lingering range-of-motion issues, especially in cases of infection.

An infection after Brady's surgery required at least two surgical irrigations of the area and a six-week course of antibiotics that delayed the start of his rehab. The infection is no longer considered an issue and the rehabilitation schedule has not been significantly compromised.

As the intensity of football-related and other rehab activity increases, all indications are Brady will continue making steady progress. NFL sources, however, caution that there remains a lot of work before the opener, with months of rigorous rehabilitation remaining.

Brady is continuing to rehab under the auspices of both Dr. Neal S. ElAttrache, who performed his surgery in Los Angeles, and the Patriots medical staff. ElAttrache has flown between LA and Boston to follow up with Brady.

While the Patriots obviously want Brady, the 2007 NFL MVP, back for the start of the 2009 season, the greater concern is how strong the knee will be when he returns, how long the knee will hold up, and how it will affect his play.

Brady, who turns 32 in August, and the Patriots likely will not have definitive answers to those questions until this summer, when the quarterback can test himself in game-like situations at training camp.

All the more reason for the Patriots to place the franchise tag on backup quarterback Matt Cassel, who proved a more than capable starter while filling in for Brady. The Patriots can't franchise Cassel, preventing the QB from becoming an unrestricted free agent, until Feb. 5.

Still, the latest reports on Brady's knee seem more encouraging than a month ago, when an NBCSports.com report said both the ACL and MCL were loose and a second reconstructive surgery would be required.

The report said the second surgery could cost Brady the 2009 season.

Now it appears that barring an unanticipated setback, Brady is on track to play in 2009. But whether he'll be the same player he was before the knee injury when he returns remains to be seen.

Former Patriots and current Steelers cornerback Fernando Bryant said Brady's mere presence will help the Patriots.

"I'm a big Brady fan. I hope he comes back," said Bryant, who was cut by the Patriots out of training camp. , yesterday during Super Bowl Media Day. "He's one of the coolest guys I've ever met in my life. In my 10 years in the NFL, I've never seen a quarterback that interacts with the team the way he does: offense, defense, and special teams. I'm not going to lie. He's special."

 
This is great news .... Now, what will happen to Cassel??
I think Cassel gets traded as long as Brady's career is not over (which looks very improbable). The Pats have too many holes to fill to have that much money tied up in QBs. Without Cassel's 14 mil from being franchised the Pats are in good cap shape to fill some holes on defense as well as signing some of their 2009 soon-to-be free agents. Add in what you get in return from dealing Cassel and the Pats have an opportunity to have a productive offseason. Keeping Cassel is a luxury the Pats can not afford but there is no way they are letting him walk without getting something in return.As for QB I expect the Pats to sign a legit veteran free agent to go along with O'Connell and than pray to the football Gods that Brady is ready to go in 2009.
 
I'm really hoping NE does the usual and keeps the press, the NFL, and the FF world guessing so I can snatch Brady up with some value next August.

 
Hope this will not mean Brady will have issues with movement after his retirement through medical quick fixes - I hear Giselle likes to dance...

 
FWIW, I have been told by some of the same people reporting these things that the Brady saga will have stories come out saying he is on, behind, or ahead of schedule from here on out with all parties involved having some sources to support their particular position. The funny part is they could all be accurate as each would be providing an opinion from someone else. As this particular article even notes, we are a long way away from being able to give Brady a clean bill of health.

The other thing that I interpret differently than others might is the line in the article that says "based on anybody else doing an ACL rehab." Notice they did not say "other professional athletes." It's obviously a good thing that Brady is now trying to get started doing some basic things, but only Brady will really know how he's doing, when he can start doing certain movements, etc. I'm not saying that he will have issues or not, but asking other people about his condition seems a bit like guesswork for or against his recovery timeline. But be prepared for a wide range of reporting on how he is doing.

I have also been told that the key sign for the Pats is what they do with Cassel. He's very likely to be franchised. That's not the issue. The issue is what they do after that. If they trade him right away that would be a clear sign that the Pats think Brady will be fine for 2009. If they don't trade him at all that means they still have some serious questions. I have also heard that thte Pats might franchise Cassel, take a wait and see approach, but still trade him several months down the road once they feel Brady truly is good to go and on track for a Week One recovery date.

 
I have also been told that the key sign for the Pats is what they do with Cassel. He's very likely to be franchised. That's not the issue. The issue is what they do after that. If they trade him right away that would be a clear sign that the Pats think Brady will be fine for 2009. If they don't trade him at all that means they still have some serious questions. I have also heard that thte Pats might franchise Cassel, take a wait and see approach, but still trade him several months down the road once they feel Brady truly is good to go and on track for a Week One recovery date.
That's exactly what I've been saying. Coming out of the Pats' brass, you'll get all kinds of stories. They've always been wishy-washy on injuries and giving up info, so what we hear in the media won't always tell us the real picture. Cassel is the one you pay attention to. They will definitely franchise him. I also think it depends on if there are players they could really use in the draft THIS year, will help determine if they want to trade him before or after the draft. If they see someone they really want, they could trade him before if they think Brady will be ok. But if they can hold off and there is no one they absolutely have to have in this year's draft, they could hold out for 2010 picks and wait closer to training camp...
 
I have also been told that the key sign for the Pats is what they do with Cassel. He's very likely to be franchised. That's not the issue. The issue is what they do after that. If they trade him right away that would be a clear sign that the Pats think Brady will be fine for 2009. If they don't trade him at all that means they still have some serious questions. I have also heard that thte Pats might franchise Cassel, take a wait and see approach, but still trade him several months down the road once they feel Brady truly is good to go and on track for a Week One recovery date.
That's exactly what I've been saying. Coming out of the Pats' brass, you'll get all kinds of stories. They've always been wishy-washy on injuries and giving up info, so what we hear in the media won't always tell us the real picture. Cassel is the one you pay attention to. They will definitely franchise him. I also think it depends on if there are players they could really use in the draft THIS year, will help determine if they want to trade him before or after the draft. If they see someone they really want, they could trade him before if they think Brady will be ok. But if they can hold off and there is no one they absolutely have to have in this year's draft, they could hold out for 2010 picks and wait closer to training camp...
Another outcome as far as a Cassel trade may be shaping up like an established position player (say a CB or LB) combined with say a 2nd or 3rd round pick for Cassel. It doesn't have to be just a high pick, as I'm guessing the Pats would prefer someone they could use right away vs someone that has to get some seasoning to be a key contributor.On a side note, I'm interested in the theory behind the Pats having to take a CB in the first because their CBs were awful last year (seen that in many a mock so far). They took two last year in the draft and Hobbs is servicable. IMO, they didn't do that the last couple years (first round CB), so I'm curious if they would look to do that now. IMO, I think they will try to snag Cushing OLB form USC. LB corps is probably in worse shape (at least age wise) than the CBs at this point.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top