timschochet
Footballguy
Of course I had him on my bench today. And I didn't watch the game. Pretty impressive numbers as a rookie. Was this a one week wonder, or can we expect this guy to be at least a legitimate WR2 the rest of the year?
Pretty sure he didn't start this thread to tell you about his lineup as much as he was starting a discussion about Cooks, how he looked, and if he was legit going forward. thanks for your contribution though, can't wait to hear from you again, you seem to have a wealth of knowledge. Maybe you won't be in such a bad mood next week when your team doesn't get beat because the guy you were playing started cooks.No one cares about your lineupOf course I had him on my bench today.
1. I did 2 searches; I typed in "Cooks", and I typed in "Brandin". I didn't find anything other than comparison threads- Cooks and somebody else.There is already an 8 page thread about Cooks in the Shark Pool Leave this repetitive thread shtick in the FFA.....or nowhere.
You suck at the search feature. It has 8 pages and is on the first page. It is not legitimate to start a separate thread to discuss a player when there is already one.1. I did 2 searches; I typed in "Cooks", and I typed in "Brandin". I didn't find anything other than comparison threads- Cooks and somebody else.2. I think it's legitimate to start new threads once the actual season starts. Things change.There is already an 8 page thread about Cooks in the Shark Pool Leave this repetitive thread shtick in the FFA.....or nowhere.
3. Why the #### do you care? Drop the hostility once in a while.
OK, so I suck at it. Again, why do you care so much? My intention was to get some info, that's all. You obviously despise me, you've made that clear again and again. Why even enter the thread?You suck at the search feature. It has 8 pages and is on the first page. It is not legitimate to start a separate thread to discuss a player when there is already one.1. I did 2 searches; I typed in "Cooks", and I typed in "Brandin". I didn't find anything other than comparison threads- Cooks and somebody else.2. I think it's legitimate to start new threads once the actual season starts. Things change.There is already an 8 page thread about Cooks in the Shark Pool Leave this repetitive thread shtick in the FFA.....or nowhere.
3. Why the #### do you care? Drop the hostility once in a while.
I feel like this venom is a bit unwarranted. Unfortunately, I didn't get to see the game today but wouldn't mind a fresh thread to discuss today's specific performance.You suck at the search feature. It has 8 pages and is on the first page. It is not legitimate to start a separate thread to discuss a player when there is already one.1. I did 2 searches; I typed in "Cooks", and I typed in "Brandin". I didn't find anything other than comparison threads- Cooks and somebody else.2. I think it's legitimate to start new threads once the actual season starts. Things change.There is already an 8 page thread about Cooks in the Shark Pool Leave this repetitive thread shtick in the FFA.....or nowhere.
3. Why the #### do you care? Drop the hostility once in a while.
I would have called out anyone who started a duplicative thread like this that I noticed. Since you have almost 80k posts and do this repeatedly in the FFA, you do not get any leeway. This is a prime example of the downward spiral of these boards.OK, so I suck at it. Again, why do you care so much? My intention was to get some info, that's all. You obviously despise me, you've made that clear again and again. Why even enter the thread?You suck at the search feature. It has 8 pages and is on the first page. It is not legitimate to start a separate thread to discuss a player when there is already one.1. I did 2 searches; I typed in "Cooks", and I typed in "Brandin". I didn't find anything other than comparison threads- Cooks and somebody else.2. I think it's legitimate to start new threads once the actual season starts. Things change.There is already an 8 page thread about Cooks in the Shark Pool Leave this repetitive thread shtick in the FFA.....or nowhere.
3. Why the #### do you care? Drop the hostility once in a while.
jesus tim you've been on this board forever and a day. figure it out man.OK, so I suck at it. Again, why do you care so much? My intention was to get some info, that's all. You obviously despise me, you've made that clear again and again. Why even enter the thread?You suck at the search feature. It has 8 pages and is on the first page. It is not legitimate to start a separate thread to discuss a player when there is already one.1. I did 2 searches; I typed in "Cooks", and I typed in "Brandin". I didn't find anything other than comparison threads- Cooks and somebody else.2. I think it's legitimate to start new threads once the actual season starts. Things change.There is already an 8 page thread about Cooks in the Shark Pool Leave this repetitive thread shtick in the FFA.....or nowhere.
3. Why the #### do you care? Drop the hostility once in a while.
I'm with you. Been here since before day one when they changed over the original board. I don't post much, mostly because of this.Bonezerelli said:There's a lot of anger thrown out so easily on FBG boards. Hence why I rarely post. Slap, while your intention is good, your delivery could be different. This place used to be fun, now it's not. Attacks are much of the reason why. :(
This the duplicate topic, or this the senseless crybaby stalking and #####ing?Slapdash said:I would have called out anyone who started a duplicative thread like this that I noticed. Since you have almost 80k posts and do this repeatedly in the FFA, you do not get any leeway. This is a prime example of the downward spiral of these boards.timschochet said:OK, so I suck at it. Again, why do you care so much? My intention was to get some info, that's all. You obviously despise me, you've made that clear again and again. Why even enter the thread?Slapdash said:You suck at the search feature. It has 8 pages and is on the first page. It is not legitimate to start a separate thread to discuss a player when there is already one.timschochet said:1. I did 2 searches; I typed in "Cooks", and I typed in "Brandin". I didn't find anything other than comparison threads- Cooks and somebody else.2. I think it's legitimate to start new threads once the actual season starts. Things change.Slapdash said:There is already an 8 page thread about Cooks in the Shark Pool Leave this repetitive thread shtick in the FFA.....or nowhere.
3. Why the #### do you care? Drop the hostility once in a while.
The England is good here.I just assume not read through 8 pages of mostly preseason nonsense. .
He's the new Lance Moore. Saints will go back to Stills once he's back you would think. Seemed like there was a lot of Cooks in the slot which is usually Jimmy Graham's favourite position.I for one did not watch the game either and am interested in hearing from someone who did watch the game to give us their take on what they saw. will this sort of production continue into next week and after Stills gets back, or will defenses learn how to shut him down better in the coming weeks.
For the record, I don't think that repetitive threads are the reason that these boards are spiraling downward (if indeed they are.) It's ugliness, ripping other people, rude insults and the like. I try to avoid doing that.Slapdash said:I would have called out anyone who started a duplicative thread like this that I noticed. Since you have almost 80k posts and do this repeatedly in the FFA, you do not get any leeway. This is a prime example of the downward spiral of these boards.timschochet said:OK, so I suck at it. Again, why do you care so much? My intention was to get some info, that's all. You obviously despise me, you've made that clear again and again. Why even enter the thread?Slapdash said:You suck at the search feature. It has 8 pages and is on the first page. It is not legitimate to start a separate thread to discuss a player when there is already one.timschochet said:1. I did 2 searches; I typed in "Cooks", and I typed in "Brandin". I didn't find anything other than comparison threads- Cooks and somebody else.2. I think it's legitimate to start new threads once the actual season starts. Things change.Slapdash said:There is already an 8 page thread about Cooks in the Shark Pool Leave this repetitive thread shtick in the FFA.....or nowhere.
3. Why the #### do you care? Drop the hostility once in a while.
Not sure, but remember, the Saints were playing with a lead, and my guess would be also had far less TOP in the 2nd half.Per Rotoworld:
Brandin Cooks caught seven passes for 77 yards and a touchdown and rushed once for 18 yards in the Saints' Week 1 loss to the Falcons. Analysis: Cooks exploded for 86 total yards and a score in the first half, but was bottled up after the break. The Saints emphasized getting Cooks the ball early, lining him up all over the formation and getting him an early carry on an end around. If that usage continues, Cooks could develop into a borderline WR2 in New Orleans' high-powered attack.
What changed in the 2nd half? Did the defense adjust to him, or did the offense just have a different plan?
who? Lol cooks deserves to be the wr 1 or 2 going forward. ..Looked good but remember Stills was inactive
Yeah, I'm not sure where this is coming from. Stills is a good player, but he's gonna hurt Joe Morgan and Meachem, not Cooks. For a rookie in his first game, Cooks was awesome yesterday.who? Lol cooks deserves to be the wr 1 or 2 going forward. ..Looked good but remember Stills was inactive
yes he was my friend. doesn't play at all like a rookie but more like a Steve smith in his prime... Can cut on a dime and has awesome hands... Brees was targeting him in the endzone and got picked off didn't get the ball their in time but imagine he had close to 90 and 2 tds.... that's a nice start 7-8 on 8 targets... Looks to be heavily involved in a high passing volume team.Yeah, I'm not sure where this is coming from. Stills is a good player, but he's gonna hurt Joe Morgan and Meachem, not Cooks. For a rookie in his first game, Cooks was awesome yesterday.who? Lol cooks deserves to be the wr 1 or 2 going forward. ..Looked good but remember Stills was inactive
Conversations, positions, facts, opinions are established in previous threads; but because you are too lazy.......actually I think you are a control freak. Just do a ####### a search and carry on the conversions already established.For the record, I don't think that repetitive threads are the reason that these boards are spiraling downward (if indeed they are.) It's ugliness, ripping other people, rude insults and the like. I try to avoid doing that.I would have called out anyone who started a duplicative thread like this that I noticed. Since you have almost 80k posts and do this repeatedly in the FFA, you do not get any leeway. This is a prime example of the downward spiral of these boards.OK, so I suck at it. Again, why do you care so much? My intention was to get some info, that's all. You obviously despise me, you've made that clear again and again. Why even enter the thread?You suck at the search feature. It has 8 pages and is on the first page. It is not legitimate to start a separate thread to discuss a player when there is already one.1. I did 2 searches; I typed in "Cooks", and I typed in "Brandin". I didn't find anything other than comparison threads- Cooks and somebody else.2. I think it's legitimate to start new threads once the actual season starts. Things change.There is already an 8 page thread about Cooks in the Shark Pool Leave this repetitive thread shtick in the FFA.....or nowhere.
3. Why the #### do you care? Drop the hostility once in a while.