If it went backward, it's a lateral. But it's REALLY close. Remember, you have to follow the ball, not the players' feet. It's really close.i just watched the replay a few times and i agree it's close, but to me it looks like a lateral (i think Moore catches it at the exact lateral mark on the field that Brees releases it)if it is a lateral, then i think that makes this play technically a rush since a lateral is not a forward passjust my![]()
exactly... i was following the ball ... i think following the feet makes it definitely backwards ... a lateral is backwards or sideways, but not forward ... i am 100% it was not forward, which makes it not a pass IMO ... it looked to be 100% sideways to me, but if i am wrong then my 2nd choice is backwards by a few inches (definitely not forward)i think the evidence that it didn't go forward is convincing enough that Brees will lose a TD pass on this and it will be turned into a rush for Moorefull disclosure: i have no FF interest in this play whatsoeverIf it went backward, it's a lateral. But it's REALLY close. Remember, you have to follow the ball, not the players' feet. It's really close.i just watched the replay a few times and i agree it's close, but to me it looks like a lateral (i think Moore catches it at the exact lateral mark on the field that Brees releases it)if it is a lateral, then i think that makes this play technically a rush since a lateral is not a forward passjust my![]()
Interesting. I'm biased because I have Brees....but the film doesn't look conclusive enough that they should overturn it. That said, since I own Brees, no doubt that this will be ruled a lateral.exactly... i was following the ball ... i think following the feet makes it definitely backwards ... a lateral is backwards or sideways, but not forward ... i am 100% it was not forward, which makes it not a pass IMO ... it looked to be 100% sideways to me, but if i am wrong then my 2nd choice is backwards by a few inches (definitely not forward)i think the evidence that it didn't go forward is convincing enough that Brees will lose a TD pass on this and it will be turned into a rush for Moorefull disclosure: i have no FF interest in this play whatsoeverIf it went backward, it's a lateral. But it's REALLY close. Remember, you have to follow the ball, not the players' feet. It's really close.i just watched the replay a few times and i agree it's close, but to me it looks like a lateral (i think Moore catches it at the exact lateral mark on the field that Brees releases it)if it is a lateral, then i think that makes this play technically a rush since a lateral is not a forward passjust my![]()
yea, it's close, but to me it looks like he plants just behind the 9 yards line and then is moving slightly backwards as he throws it to Moore ... so, to me the ball looks like it leaves his hand right about the 9.6 yard line and gets caught by Moore at the same spot or just behind (maybe at the 9.8 yard line?) ... i just don't see how it went forward (especially with having to overcome Brees' backwards momentum as he threw it)Interesting. I'm biased because I have Brees....but the film doesn't look conclusive enough that they should overturn it. That said, since I own Brees, no doubt that this will be ruled a lateral.exactly... i was following the ball ... i think following the feet makes it definitely backwards ... a lateral is backwards or sideways, but not forward ... i am 100% it was not forward, which makes it not a pass IMO ... it looked to be 100% sideways to me, but if i am wrong then my 2nd choice is backwards by a few inches (definitely not forward)i think the evidence that it didn't go forward is convincing enough that Brees will lose a TD pass on this and it will be turned into a rush for Moorefull disclosure: i have no FF interest in this play whatsoeverIf it went backward, it's a lateral. But it's REALLY close. Remember, you have to follow the ball, not the players' feet. It's really close.i just watched the replay a few times and i agree it's close, but to me it looks like a lateral (i think Moore catches it at the exact lateral mark on the field that Brees releases it)if it is a lateral, then i think that makes this play technically a rush since a lateral is not a forward passjust my![]()
This is exactly how I saw it. I immediately knew it was close and went back and watched over and over before I even saw the extra point.I went back and watched it ten or fifteen times after someone in the thread noted that it was close, when I first watched it live I honestly didn't notice, but it was indeed VERY close to a backwards pass.I could honestly see it getting scored either way, but I think it was a (very slightly) forward pass. If you ignore where the players' feet are when they throw/catch the ball and instead focus on what matters - the path of the ball - it appears to be going about a quarter of a yard forward.It should be noted that I'm playing AGAINST Brees this week. I'd be surprised if they change the call from how it's been scored as of right now - as a pass TD - since it's probably close enough to go either way.
BACK, AND TO THE LEFT. BACK...AND TO THE LEFT.No dog in the fight. Let me get that out of the way.
I would be stunned if the NFL turned this into a rushing TD.
First, it was extremely close and in the larger scope, it's not worth going all Zapruder film on.
Yes, it should be.If it is deemed a lateral, how does the NFL work that and when would it be reversed? Maybe a dumb question, but just wondering.Also,In my league, the batted pass that Brees caught at the end of the game was recorded as a reception. Should it be?
In a yahoo league I had a score change on a thursday morning a few weeks back, couldnt tell ya when NFL releases the final stats.If it is deemed a lateral, how/when will the NFL reverse that and when would it be changed in box score/stats? Maybe a dumb question, but just wondering.
Iwannabeacowboybaby! said:This is exactly how I saw it. I immediately knew it was close and went back and watched over and over before I even saw the extra point.mcdons3 said:I went back and watched it ten or fifteen times after someone in the thread noted that it was close, when I first watched it live I honestly didn't notice, but it was indeed VERY close to a backwards pass.I could honestly see it getting scored either way, but I think it was a (very slightly) forward pass. If you ignore where the players' feet are when they throw/catch the ball and instead focus on what matters - the path of the ball - it appears to be going about a quarter of a yard forward.It should be noted that I'm playing AGAINST Brees this week. I'd be surprised if they change the call from how it's been scored as of right now - as a pass TD - since it's probably close enough to go either way.
nice pass, prettyboy. i think it definitely went backward, but i'd also be somewhat surprised if they changed it to a rushing td since it really doesn't matter and if they change it then there will be crying.BACK, AND TO THE LEFT. BACK...AND TO THE LEFT.No dog in the fight. Let me get that out of the way.
I would be stunned if the NFL turned this into a rushing TD.
First, it was extremely close and in the larger scope, it's not worth going all Zapruder film on.
Last night it looked like DeMarcus Ware owned Drew BreesTrey said:I think it's a pass because I own Drew Brees.
I'd be shocked if they didn't. This doesn't impact the game like instant replay. Elias Sports Bureau whose job is to get all scoring right (announced each Thursday morning) cares enough to split hairs on the most unimportant details. They don't care about FFL, only about making sure to get all official statistics correct.From someone who won last week due to a stat change on a SJax rush turned into a pass, I suspect this will also be changed.No dog in the fight. Let me get that out of the way.
I would be stunned if the NFL turned this into a rushing TD.
First, it was extremely close and in the larger scope, it's not worth going all Zapruder film on.
I looked at it several times. I'm not convinced by any stretch that it was a lateral. Also, the only way they could make a 100% determination is if they had a camera sitting exactly on the 10-yard line, and I don't believe they have that.I'd be shocked if they didn't. This doesn't impact the game like instant replay. Elias Sports Bureau whose job is to get all scoring right (announced each Thursday morning) cares enough to split hairs on the most unimportant details. They don't care about FFL, only about making sure to get all official statistics correct.From someone who won last week due to a stat change on a SJax rush turned into a pass, I suspect this will also be changed.No dog in the fight. Let me get that out of the way.
I would be stunned if the NFL turned this into a rushing TD.
First, it was extremely close and in the larger scope, it's not worth going all Zapruder film on.
I went back and watched it few times. I believe it'll stay as is, although I'd love for it to be changed to a lateral as my opponent in both leagues had Brees as their QB. Still, Brees' final stat line as it stands now is FAR better than what I was realistically hoping for/expecting yesterday at this time.I looked at it several times. I'm not convinced by any stretch that it was a lateral. Also, the only way they could make a 100% determination is if they had a camera sitting exactly on the 10-yard line, and I don't believe they have that.I'd be shocked if they didn't. This doesn't impact the game like instant replay. Elias Sports Bureau whose job is to get all scoring right (announced each Thursday morning) cares enough to split hairs on the most unimportant details. They don't care about FFL, only about making sure to get all official statistics correct.From someone who won last week due to a stat change on a SJax rush turned into a pass, I suspect this will also be changed.No dog in the fight. Let me get that out of the way.
I would be stunned if the NFL turned this into a rushing TD.
First, it was extremely close and in the larger scope, it's not worth going all Zapruder film on.
Updates are usually posted Wednesday evenings.Has there been any update on this? Will we know if it was considered by Elias and determined to be scored correctly?
A shovel pass can be caught past the line of scrimmage, too.Another reason any ball caught behind the line of scrimmage should be considered a run by the NFL.Shovel "passes" are stat padders, too.
True, but I don't think I have ever seen one.If it were beyond the LOS, then it would be alright!A shovel pass can be caught past the line of scrimmage, too.Another reason any ball caught behind the line of scrimmage should be considered a run by the NFL.Shovel "passes" are stat padders, too.
If what you stated is what happened and that is how Elias views it...then it likely gets overturned. Going straight sideways constitutes a lateral which ends up being a run. The Warner to Boldin play was eerily similar, in fact that might have been more obvious and easier to see based on the camera angles given.The question again is how much time Elias reviews any play, what plays do they even choose to review, and ultimately how much importance is placed on "getting it right". I guess nobody knows that answer, we'll just have to see what comes out tomorrow night.Not enough evidence. Unless the camera was right on the 10 yard line, I don't know how you could be sure if it is a lateral or a pass. It looked to me like he released it at the 10 (it seems like it was released behind his body) and it travelled straight sideways staying on the 10. As other people mentioned, I doubt Elias is going to spend that much time on this.
God, I hope you're right.Brees is the NFL's GOLDEN BOY!
They would not dare mess with his stats.

So ultimately what you're saying is, "Hopefully nobody at Elias played against Drew Brees in their fantasy playoffs this past weekend."Jeremy said:God, I hope you're right.Brees is the NFL's GOLDEN BOY!
They would not dare mess with his stats.![]()

So ultimately what you're saying is, "Hopefully nobody at Elias played against Drew Brees in their fantasy playoffs this past weekend."Jeremy said:God, I hope you're right.Brees is the NFL's GOLDEN BOY!
They would not dare mess with his stats.![]()
![]()
I think I would still win by 1 point, but that's way too close for comfort.In regards to the Warner/Boldin TD.... it was originally scored as a run, then changed to a pass...would they really change it again?daverichard (CBS Fantasy Guy) on twitter:
"Heads up: In conjunction with Elias Sports Bureau, we're reviewing Wk15 TDs by Warner & Brees to see if they were passes or laterals."
Linkage
according to your link brees will remain td pass, still reviewing warner/boldinbroncofan13000 said:In regards to the Warner/Boldin TD.... it was originally scored as a run, then changed to a pass...would they really change it again?rowmacks said:daverichard (CBS Fantasy Guy) on twitter:
"Heads up: In conjunction with Elias Sports Bureau, we're reviewing Wk15 TDs by Warner & Brees to see if they were passes or laterals."
Linkage
A few years ago (2002 maybe???), a Brady to Faulk 74 yd TD pass was changed to a 74 yd TD run for Faulk 10 days later.It's extremely rare for the Elias Sports Bureau to change a pass to a run. I check their stat changes every week and I can't remember it happening in the last 5 years.