I don't get how anyone can say he's a good broadcaster. I just think the people calling and analyzing games have to have some credibility in the sport they are calling and analyzing. In addition, a lot of times the unknown can work in peoples favor. So in the past, Millen seemed great and beleiveable because of the unknown and people could think what they were hearing from him had credibility because they haven't been proven different. Well that is all completely out the window at this point. He's so bad, I second guess myself watching the game. For example, I may see a LB make a great play and tackle the RB behind the line of scrimmage. Then after the game on Monday's, I listen to Millen say the LB made a great play on that same play. I immediately start to think..."was that a great play"? I mean, it is obvious Millen can't judge anything on the football field correctly, so maybe it wasn't a great play. Maybe the RB made a bad read and the LB was just he beneficiary of being in the right place at the right time? Then I fall asleep confused.