schaef2k
Footballguy
Last edited by a moderator:
Really? I'm not a Clev. fan, I like Charlie Frye, and I've always been a fan of Romeo because he seems like such a classy guy, I've been under the impression he was getting that franchise turned around in the right direction.
I like Romeo but he just it just looks like he has no fire. Emotionless on the sideline, after the game interviews are a joke. He is as bad a Butch Davis. When you get your ### handed to you can not sit there and say “well we did some things well, we have to work on some things” every week or his best line “if the play would have worked then it would have been a good play”. Are you kidding me!I can only hope he shows some fire in the locker room.Really? I'm not a Clev. fan, I like Charlie Frye, and I've always been a fan of Romeo because he seems like such a classy guy, I've been under the impression he was getting that franchise turned around in the right direction.
You're right, he should show more fire in post-game.....maybe use Denny Green as a role model. Then Crennel would be a great coach.I like Romeo but he just it just looks like he has no fire. Emotionless on the sideline, after the game interviews are a joke. He is as bad a Butch Davis. When you get your ### handed to you can not sit there and say “well we did some things well, we have to work on some things” every week or his best line “if the play would have worked then it would have been a good play”. Are you kidding me!I can only hope he shows some fire in the locker room.Really? I'm not a Clev. fan, I like Charlie Frye, and I've always been a fan of Romeo because he seems like such a classy guy, I've been under the impression he was getting that franchise turned around in the right direction.
Watch a Browns game. He is a statue on the sideline, no emotion. He doesn't look like he inspires his team and he's ok with loosing.Butch Davis IIYou're right, he should show more fire in post-game.....maybe use Denny Green as a role model. Then Crennel would be a great coach. rolleyes1.gif
ooof...that bad? I thought he had built a fairly solid group of young guys to build around. Frye, Edwards, KWII, Droughns, seem to be a fairly solid group to build around. The loss of LeCharles Bently really set the tone for Cleveland.......god can you guys up there every catch a break???Watch a Browns game. He is a statue on the sideline, no emotion. He doesn't look like he inspires his team and he's ok with loosing.Butch Davis IIYou're right, he should show more fire in post-game.....maybe use Denny Green as a role model. Then Crennel would be a great coach. rolleyes1.gif
The public personality we see of a coach has very little with his passion for the game or his ability to be a leader of men. For every Bill Cowher there is at least one the Bill Belichek (sp) etc. Firey emotion is near the top of things overrated by fans. Bad teams often look passionless.Watch a Browns game. He is a statue on the sideline, no emotion. He doesn't look like he inspires his team and he's ok with loosing.Butch Davis IIYou're right, he should show more fire in post-game.....maybe use Denny Green as a role model. Then Crennel would be a great coach. rolleyes1.gif
Romeo got a mulligan for 2005 because the front office blew the team up. Its 2006, he's not gonna get a mulligan again. Romeo is 1-5. He has done nothing to turn this team around at this point.Really? I'm not a Clev. fan, I like Charlie Frye, and I've always been a fan of Romeo because he seems like such a classy guy, I've been under the impression he was getting that franchise turned around in the right direction.
Browns statement says Carthon resigned10:08 a.m.The Browns are terming the dismissal of offensive coordinator Maurice Carthon a resignation. In a statement issued this morning, the club stated it had “accepted the resignation“ of Carthon. WKYC Channel 3’s Jim Donovan reported Monday night that coach Romeo Crennel was ordered to fire Carthon by owner Randy Lerner and General Manager Phil Savage. The club made no reference to Carthon’s successor in its statement. It is expected that play-calling duties will be given to offensive line coach Jeff Davidson, who was promoted to assistant head coach in the offseason. If that is the case, Jeff Uhlenhake, Davidson’s assistant, could coach the offensive line. Crennel will meet the media today at 1:30 p.m.
And the Browns haven't been this year... seriously if you're going to say that about Butch give Romeo a bigger break. Bentley, McGinist, Baxter, Droughns, JJ, and not too mention still recovering KWII and Braylon and this team is still going through some big growing pains. The play calling on offense has been downright awful but you all knew when you brought Romeo in you weren't doing so for his offense so he will need to team up with a talented offensive mind and they have the talent, except for RB, to make that offense something good if not great.BGP said:As a comparison, Butch Davis went 7-9 in his first year as the head coach of the Browns. In his second year, he went 9-7 and made the playoffs. That was way ahead of expectations - that club had far less talent than the 2006 edition does. Then in each of the next 3 years, the Browns were devastated by injuries.
Probably the same as before this news. He and Winslow both have tremendous talent but they're not going to jump to the next level until Frye gets some more experience under his belt. So he'll probably continue to be sporadic in his production.What is Edwards outlook for this week and the remainder of the season ?
I haven't followed the Browns much this year. What were some of the calls and personnel decisions the witer is talking about?-------------------------------------------------------------------------Just quoted from the article because it's funny.Carthon, who made controversial play-calls and questionable personnel decisions in each game this year, was informed of the decision by coach Romeo Crennel.
"Let's switch things up this year, Maurice.""OK""Um, that's not what I meant."Under Carthon, who never was a team's primary offensive play-caller until Crennel gave him the responsibility, the Browns were 32nd in points last year and 26th in overall offensive yards. Through six games this year, they were 26th in points per game and 32nd in offensive yards.
Well, there have been THREE different ownership groups in the first 7 years of this franchise.1. Al Lerner and Carmen Policy.2. Randy Lerner and Carmen Policy.3. Randy Lerner (Policy's ownership stake was bought out).One of the issues is that ownership hasn't even been stable.At what point do Browns' fans point the finger at ownership? This team is 37-81 (31% wins) since they returned in 1999 under the Lerners. Modell actually looks pretty good next to these guys.
Running the ball on 3rd and 8's will do this to an OC.From the article:
I haven't followed the Browns much this year. What were some of the calls and personnel decisions the witer is talking about?-------------------------------------------------------------------------Just quoted from the article because it's funny.Carthon, who made controversial play-calls and questionable personnel decisions in each game this year, was informed of the decision by coach Romeo Crennel."Let's switch things up this year, Maurice.""OK""Um, that's not what I meant."Under Carthon, who never was a team's primary offensive play-caller until Crennel gave him the responsibility, the Browns were 32nd in points last year and 26th in overall offensive yards. Through six games this year, they were 26th in points per game and 32nd in offensive yards.![]()
As will having Kellen Winslow on the sideline for 3rd downs.Running the ball on 3rd and 8's will do this to an OC.From the article:
I haven't followed the Browns much this year. What were some of the calls and personnel decisions the witer is talking about?-------------------------------------------------------------------------Just quoted from the article because it's funny.Carthon, who made controversial play-calls and questionable personnel decisions in each game this year, was informed of the decision by coach Romeo Crennel."Let's switch things up this year, Maurice.""OK""Um, that's not what I meant."Under Carthon, who never was a team's primary offensive play-caller until Crennel gave him the responsibility, the Browns were 32nd in points last year and 26th in overall offensive yards. Through six games this year, they were 26th in points per game and 32nd in offensive yards.![]()
Part of it is the predictability of the offense. For example after the Browns-Panthers game, some of the Panthers were saying it was easy to tell what play was coming. Part of it is third down. On third and short they call slow-developing sweeps to Vickers or take Kellen Winslow out of the game.From the article:
I haven't followed the Browns much this year. What were some of the calls and personnel decisions the witer is talking about?Carthon, who made controversial play-calls and questionable personnel decisions in each game this year, was informed of the decision by coach Romeo Crennel.
Well Carthon loves his fullbacks. 3rd and 1 or 4th and 1 it’s usually a screen pass to the fullback. Don’t get me wrong I love Terrell Smith but the guy can’t catch to save his life. I think I’ve watched the Brown try to run for short yardage once this year. The infamous fullback pass on 4th and 1.Another problem is personnel packages. Winslow off the field in critical situations and the overall predictability of the plays.Maybe if he actually sat in the booth and not the sidelines he might see the plays a bit better also.I haven't followed the Browns much this year. What were some of the calls and personnel decisions the witer is talking about?
I have seen many, many fans complain about Romeo not losing his #### on the sideline when we lose. Honestly, what kind of ######ed argument is this? How many times have you seen Bill Belichick freak out on the sidelines? And how many rings does he have? Who cares what he looks like on the sidelines?It's fans/media like this that like to stir the pot up in Cleveland, making obscure complaints with no sensible football based arguments. Year after year, fans expect a complete freaking turnaround and a trip to the Superbowl. Wake up guys, Romeo's not going to build Rome in a year. Give the guy some time, he's a good coach and is finally supported by some decent management.In any case, it's good to see Carthon go. The arguments against his playcalling are sound (too many FB plays, yikes). Although most Browns fans just want Frye to throw to KW2/BE on every down (morons, maybe sometimes these guys aren't open?!). I would caution those people who want the Browns to "open up the offense" to look back at the Denver game and see how well we did with passing on every down. Things will get better, but don't expect much to change until Davidson has time to figure stuff out.schaef2k said:Watch a Browns game. He is a statue on the sideline, no emotion. He doesn't look like he inspires his team and he's ok with loosing.Butch Davis IIYou're right, he should show more fire in post-game.....maybe use Denny Green as a role model. Then Crennel would be a great coach. rolleyes1.gif
I think I am missing your point considering the following... Detroit has Kevin Jones and Roy Williams, Arizona has Edge, Fitz and Boldin, the Raiders Randy Moss and the Browns LeCharles Bentley, Braylon Edwards and KWII. Talent has nothing to do with winning or did you fall asleep during the Patriots dynasty?And for the record I think the Browns have a pretty decent roster talent wise, they have just caught the injury bug a lot.I don't know if Crennel is a good coach or not. And I really don't care since I'm not a Browns fan. But the bottom line is that NFL coaches will usually not win unless they have the best players. You can talk about chemistry, playcalling, clock management, etc, but without superior talent most coaches (even very good ones) will consistently lose. Cleveland is not a very talented team. Therefore they are not going to win many games, no matter who is the coach. Firing the OC probably won't make much of a difference until the Browns improve the talent on the field. The same goes for the Lions, Cardinals, Raiders, etc. You can blame the coaching and perhaps rightfully so, but I place more blame on the players and the GM. Does it really matter who is the coach of the Browns when you have superior talent on the Bengals, Steelers, and Ravens? Does anyone honestly think the Browns are capable of a winning season with their current roster compared to the other teams in their division and the AFC as a whole?
I think I am missing your point considering the following... Detroit has Kevin Jones and Roy Williams, Arizona has Edge, Fitz and Boldin, the Raiders Randy Moss and the Browns LeCharles Bentley, Braylon Edwards and KWII. Talent has nothing to do with winning or did you fall asleep during the Patriots dynasty?And for the record I think the Browns have a pretty decent roster talent wise, they have just caught the injury bug a lot.I don't know if Crennel is a good coach or not. And I really don't care since I'm not a Browns fan. But the bottom line is that NFL coaches will usually not win unless they have the best players. You can talk about chemistry, playcalling, clock management, etc, but without superior talent most coaches (even very good ones) will consistently lose.
Cleveland is not a very talented team. Therefore they are not going to win many games, no matter who is the coach. Firing the OC probably won't make much of a difference until the Browns improve the talent on the field. The same goes for the Lions, Cardinals, Raiders, etc. You can blame the coaching and perhaps rightfully so, but I place more blame on the players and the GM. Does it really matter who is the coach of the Browns when you have superior talent on the Bengals, Steelers, and Ravens? Does anyone honestly think the Browns are capable of a winning season with their current roster compared to the other teams in their division and the AFC as a whole?
So you're saying he attended the Art Shell School of Football Coaching?schaef2k said:Watch a Browns game. He is a statue on the sideline, no emotion. He doesn't look like he inspires his team and he's ok with loosing.Butch Davis IIYou're right, he should show more fire in post-game.....maybe use Denny Green as a role model. Then Crennel would be a great coach. rolleyes1.gif
That is exactly my point. All of those teams have a handful of players that are top shelf talent. But that's it. Now compare those rosters to the rosters of other teams in their respective divisions. Cleveland is arguably the least talented team in the AFC North. Sure they are decent, but Pitt, Cinci, and Baltimore are all better. And the Patriots established a Dynasty because they had a very talented, well balanced roster. Bill Belichick is a great coach, but he had a great team too. Don't buy into the myth that the Patriots were a David vs. Goliath team. They were the Goliath, just without the flash and hype. They were also the best team in their Division at the time. It all starts by winning your Division games. Send Belicheck back to the Browns and he finishes below .500 guaranteed.I think I am missing your point considering the following... Detroit has Kevin Jones and Roy Williams, Arizona has Edge, Fitz and Boldin, the Raiders Randy Moss and the Browns LeCharles Bentley, Braylon Edwards and KWII. Talent has nothing to do with winning or did you fall asleep during the Patriots dynasty?And for the record I think the Browns have a pretty decent roster talent wise, they have just caught the injury bug a lot.I don't know if Crennel is a good coach or not. And I really don't care since I'm not a Browns fan. But the bottom line is that NFL coaches will usually not win unless they have the best players. You can talk about chemistry, playcalling, clock management, etc, but without superior talent most coaches (even very good ones) will consistently lose. Cleveland is not a very talented team. Therefore they are not going to win many games, no matter who is the coach. Firing the OC probably won't make much of a difference until the Browns improve the talent on the field. The same goes for the Lions, Cardinals, Raiders, etc. You can blame the coaching and perhaps rightfully so, but I place more blame on the players and the GM. Does it really matter who is the coach of the Browns when you have superior talent on the Bengals, Steelers, and Ravens? Does anyone honestly think the Browns are capable of a winning season with their current roster compared to the other teams in their division and the AFC as a whole?
Well you do need talent to win but good coaching will get you more wins with less talent.The difference between the Browns talent and the rest of there division is really 2 maybe 3 things.Oline- The oline in Cleveland has sucked every year since their return. Savage brought in Bentley (out for the year), Ephram (drugs), Halen (retires) and Sowells (roockie+injured). Now it's Freley at C.Dline- Big Ted is just a stop gap for who ever they get next year. The rest are not spectacular, Roye has his moments but they can get it done.QB- Is Frye the guy? I don't know. He makes mistakes but he's young, can move pretty good, throws a nice ball and he's got fire.If our top 3 CBs don't get injured then this would have been a strength. We've been playing the #4+ CBs all year. LB fine, WR fine, TE fine, RB fine (can always use a good back though).I think Savage has done well. Perkins and Wilson are the only real disappointments so far. Savage is light years above the previous Browns talent evaluators. Next year he will draft oline and dline and plug some vets into the remaining holes and the Browns will be right with the rest of the division talent wise.Coaching wise.....TBDSorry for the bookThat is exactly my point. All of those teams have a handful of players that are top shelf talent. But that's it. Now compare those rosters to the rosters of other teams in their respective divisions. Cleveland is arguably the least talented team in the AFC North. Sure they are decent, but Pitt, Cinci, and Baltimore are all better. And the Patriots established a Dynasty because they had a very talented, well balanced roster. Bill Belichick is a great coach, but he had a great team too. Don't buy into the myth that the Patriots were a David vs. Goliath team. They were the Goliath, just without the flash and hype. They were also the best team in their Division at the time. It all starts by winning your Division games. Send Belicheck back to the Browns and he finishes below .500 guaranteed.I think I am missing your point considering the following... Detroit has Kevin Jones and Roy Williams, Arizona has Edge, Fitz and Boldin, the Raiders Randy Moss and the Browns LeCharles Bentley, Braylon Edwards and KWII. Talent has nothing to do with winning or did you fall asleep during the Patriots dynasty?And for the record I think the Browns have a pretty decent roster talent wise, they have just caught the injury bug a lot.I don't know if Crennel is a good coach or not. And I really don't care since I'm not a Browns fan. But the bottom line is that NFL coaches will usually not win unless they have the best players. You can talk about chemistry, playcalling, clock management, etc, but without superior talent most coaches (even very good ones) will consistently lose. Cleveland is not a very talented team. Therefore they are not going to win many games, no matter who is the coach. Firing the OC probably won't make much of a difference until the Browns improve the talent on the field. The same goes for the Lions, Cardinals, Raiders, etc. You can blame the coaching and perhaps rightfully so, but I place more blame on the players and the GM. Does it really matter who is the coach of the Browns when you have superior talent on the Bengals, Steelers, and Ravens? Does anyone honestly think the Browns are capable of a winning season with their current roster compared to the other teams in their division and the AFC as a whole?
You trying to give BGP a heart attack. And Cowher is already home.Im just praying the Steelers let Cowher go. Nothing would mean more to the Browns fans then to see our favorite son come home.
No offense to Romeo as I do think he has done a solid job in lieu of the parts he has to work with.
I just wish they would either do horrible and get the high draft pick or make the playoffs. Cause these 6-10, 7-9 seasons are such a tease.
![]()
Braylon Edwards and JJ down?I agree... giving a coach 15-16 months is too long. They need to get things turned around in 2-3 weeks or move on to the next guy.
Cleveland has the worst talent in the NFL and have for several years. You could bring back Vince Lombardi and he'd be 1-5. Just cracks me up that people think changing coordinators is going to change the fact that Cleveland has the worst o-line in football, the worst receiving corp in football, the worst starting RB in football and one of the bottom 5 QBs in the league.
Sure, all they need is a coach to get excited on the sidelines and that ought to do the trick. Forget for a minute that Kellen Winslow is probably the only player on the team that would start for another NFL franchise. Talent isn't that important.![]()
I think you misunderstand where he comes from in the school of talking to the press IE Parcells and BB. He's not crafty in his speech like them but he's giving you the same nothing they do by saying standard answers. For example-right now BP could say "We're gonna start the QB that gives us the best chance to win, this sunday" and...that's telling us nothing. Awaiting to hear something, that's annoying but in the same right, you don't coach thru the press. From what I understand, the players really respect +appreciate that.I like Romeo but he just it just looks like he has no fire. Emotionless on the sideline, after the game interviews are a joke. He is as bad a Butch Davis. When you get your ### handed to you can not sit there and say “well we did some things well, we have to work on some things” every week or his best line “if the play would have worked then it would have been a good play”. Are you kidding me!I can only hope he shows some fire in the locker room.Really? I'm not a Clev. fan, I like Charlie Frye, and I've always been a fan of Romeo because he seems like such a classy guy, I've been under the impression he was getting that franchise turned around in the right direction.
Some good info here, Davidson's been around. Carthon's still young, he'll find work. BP or BB would probably hire him this second to be their RB coach is they had an openning.Browns starting OG Joe Andruzzi did a radio interview around 5:45 eastern tonite on 850 AM WKNR with regards to this.
+ He said the offense had been "confused" in the huddle for the last year and a half - all of Carthon's tenure. A lot of guys were not comfortable.
+ He raved about Jeff Davidson, who will replace Carthon. Andruzzi has worked with Davidson for the past 6 years, as they both came over to the Browns along with Crennel. He said Davidson was one of the he signed with the Browns. He says Davison has a lot of respect, is very smart, and was long overdue to get this opportunity. Andruzzi noted that it was easy to "get on the same page" with Davidson, which I took more to mean that Carthon wasn't good at that. Andruzzi said to expect the same base offense, but "little changes" ... and I think Andruzzi believes the play-calling will be much better.
Jamal Lewis says hi.the worst starting RB in football
Oh, yeah Ron Dayne is no longer startingJamal Lewis says hi.the worst starting RB in football
I know teams can turn it around quickly in today's NFL, but your expectations are a little crazy, in my opinion. You admit that RC had nothing to work with in 2005, but you still expect them to contend for the playoffs in 2007? Giving the guy only two offseasons to turn a garbage team into a playoff team is asking an awful lot. When you consider the injuries he's had to deal with, I think saying that he's "behind the curve" is a little harsh.I see the expectations of Crennel this way:2005: no expectations2006: should see progress, or some flashes of a good team developing. Upset some good clubs.2007: should contend for a playoff spot.Right now, Crennel is behind the curve. His team need a second half rally against the Raiders or it would be 0-6. Its not time to fire Crennel yet, but progress needs to be shown before this year is out. If this team is 1-5 next year, Crennel should be on the verge of getting canned.
I know teams can turn it around quickly in today's NFL, but your expectations are a little crazy, in my opinion. You admit that RC had nothing to work with in 2005, but you still expect them to contend for the playoffs in 2007? Giving the guy only two offseasons to turn a garbage team into a playoff team is asking an awful lot. When you consider the injuries he's had to deal with, I think saying that he's "behind the curve" is a little harsh.I see the expectations of Crennel this way:2005: no expectations2006: should see progress, or some flashes of a good team developing. Upset some good clubs.2007: should contend for a playoff spot.Right now, Crennel is behind the curve. His team need a second half rally against the Raiders or it would be 0-6. Its not time to fire Crennel yet, but progress needs to be shown before this year is out. If this team is 1-5 next year, Crennel should be on the verge of getting canned.