Armageddon T. Thunderbird
Footballguy
"There's no 'I' in team""Yeah, well there ain't no 'Key' either"
We continue to see that Tampa Bay fans are the biggest bandwagon-jumpers ever. A decade ago, your stadium looked like an Arizona Cardinals game. Now you all are ready to get rid of everyone who helped you win your first championship, less than a year after the fact. Nice fans, Tampa Bay. How about some loyalty for those that got you the title? Green Bay would never treat their champs like this.What an idiot. I guess going out of your way to point out that you think Parcells is a better coach in an interview isn't going to the media? Playing like crap and not having your head in the game (two false starts by a WR) isn't really dogging it, but I'd rather him dog it than get open and drop passes or cost the team yards with stupid penaties. As a Buc fan I say good riddance. Hopefully Sapp will be right behind you and the door will hit both of you in the ### on your way to NY you POS media whores. Get some people in who are there to play football and not get their face on TV as much as possible.This could explain alot"Honestly, I'm very disappointed because I really wanted to win another championship with this team," he said. "I was never Gruden's guy. He never liked me. I told him I'd rather retire than play for him in 2004. But I also told him I wouldn't be a distraction, I wouldn't go to the media with it and I didn't. I don't know why they released me. I was playing hard, I wasn't dogging it. Tell everyone I'm in New York looking for apartments."
I think Keyshawn has an advantage here.If he retires and files his papers BEFORE June 1, wouldn't he count for 8 million on the salary cap, jst the same as if the Bucs cut him now? Sure he'd have to pay some of his signing bonus back, but if he wanted to be spiteful here's a way he could do it.Of course then the Bucs would own his rights, which may make playing again difficultAm I correct in my assumptions?Another perspective: Keyshawn is not getting screwed. He is getting paid for the next 6 games to do nothing. If the Bucs give him the roster bonus ($1M or $2M), that is part of his contract and he needs to honor it. But how many people get paid an extra $1M just to do nothing? In theory, TB could pay Keyshawn the rest of his contract, keep in inactive, and Keyshawn doesn't play football for the next 4 years. Is Keyshawn really screwed with $20M+?I still believe Keyshawn is untradable due to his large salary in the coming years ($5M next year). Paying Keyshawn a bonus just adds to the cap hit when TB eventually trades/releases him, so that makes no sense.Paolontonio on ESPN 2 just said that the Bucs are considering paying Meshawn a $1m bonus next year in order to have rights to him untill the start of next season and thereby guaranteeing that they would get some kind of compensation from any other team considering signing Meshawn...This is kind of telling that the Bucs are gonna try to make an example of Meshawn...sort of looks like they'll be playing hardball with "give me the damn ball"...
Our rules actually cover it and allow for the owner that has him to make a waiver move. Although I only see him moving in one league and that is my 3 keeper league. All other 8 keeper and dynasties have to wait and see where he goes.Our league cuts off FA pickups at week 10 (IR only). What's fair way to deal with MeShaun??
Interesting thought. Though I think it would be bad public relations. Your looking at a player who is seen as a trouble maker. His agent is telling the coach how to call plays. He's making it known that he does not intend to play next year for Tampa. I'm pretty sure they know that the "i'd rather retire than play for you next year" is percieved as a threat and a way to get out of his current contract. And if what the TB organization is saying is correct he is also missing meetings and not performing required tasks such as studying play books. The players union will probably being treading lightly.I'm wondering if the Tampa GM might be getting a call from the NFL Player's Union right about now.
Yeah and the conversation would go something like this...union--- come on Rich take it easy and please promise us you won't be doing the same thing with Sapp anytime soon...Rich McKay---well we are looking at his contract as we speak, there are no promises to be made at this time...it's open season on detractors, you'll here about it thru the media when we make a decision...I'm wondering if the Tampa GM might be getting a call from the NFL Player's Union right about now.
How the hell does TO get lumped in with a great cellmate, err teammate, like Irvin.......and an underperforming, overpaid media slut like Meshawn?There are a number of things that I really dislike about Michael Irvin, but I don't ever recall him being anything but a team guy. I certainly don't remember him complaining about touches.That takes guts and sends a message to everyone. To all the Michael Irvin/Terrell Owen-esque receivers out there whining about getting balls thrown their way.F
Not to hijack the thread, but what happened to Freeman??Now you all are ready to get rid of everyone who helped you win your first championship, less than a year after the fact. Nice fans, Tampa Bay. How about some loyalty for those that got you the title? Green Bay would never treat their champs like this.
Anyone?I think Keyshawn has an advantage here.If he retires and files his papers BEFORE June 1, wouldn't he count for 8 million on the salary cap, jst the same as if the Bucs cut him now? Sure he'd have to pay some of his signing bonus back, but if he wanted to be spiteful here's a way he could do it.Of course then the Bucs would own his rights, which may make playing again difficultAm I correct in my assumptions?
Freeman dropped a pass for Green Bay on Sunday. Not sure what you're asking there, but if you are talking about him leaving Green Bay, what's your point? People leave town all the time. It's not like he was run out of town (obviously, since he was re-signed) and it would've been easy to do so - Freeman actually was committing crimes, unlike Keyshawn or Sapp. Freeman has been welcomed back warmly by Packer fans.Not to hijack the thread, but what happened to Freeman??
Actually, Keyshawn's never been like that either. Keyshawn would prefer to do everything. His complaint has always been not being relied on enough.:rotflmao: :rotflmao:![]()
![]()
The union stands up for all of them, regardless of how big of a horse's a*s they are. They don't report to the public, they report to the players that pay their dues to be a member of the union. They obviously don't care about PR since they back all the juice heads and criminals. They will be against this, but, as long as Keyshawn gets paid, they don't have much to complain about, unless they could prove it was done to avoid paying some performance bonuses.Anyone know if Keyshawn had bonuses for performance in his contract?Interesting thought. Though I think it would be bad public relations. Your looking at a player who is seen as a trouble maker. His agent is telling the coach how to call plays. He's making it known that he does not intend to play next year for Tampa. I'm pretty sure they know that the "i'd rather retire than play for you next year" is percieved as a threat and a way to get out of his current contract. And if what the TB organization is saying is correct he is also missing meetings and not performing required tasks such as studying play books. The players union will probably being treading lightly.
Can't say, but if he did, he couldn't have been within striking distance of them.Anyone know if Keyshawn had bonuses for performance in his contract?
Let's not forget that it was Parcells who traded a 25-year-old "stud" receiver in his prime. That doesn't happen very often. Keyshawn may love Parcells, but I don't think that road goes both ways.Keyshawn would end up in Dallas next year
Exactly what I was thinking Cazador... I can't see Parcells/Dallas being interested in Keyshawn at all.In fact, as a life-long Lions fan I'm almost positive that he'll unfortunately end up in Detroit if it's at all possible. Millen (if he's still around in the offseason, I'm guessing that he will be) is always saying, "We need more RATS on this team... More A-Holes." Or something to that effect. Well, here's a HUGE one.Let's not forget that it was Parcells who traded a 25-year-old "stud" receiver in his prime. That doesn't happen very often. Keyshawn may love Parcells, but I don't think that road goes both ways.
Detroit is going to get some competition from AZ. After all, he may be an underperformer now, but he could put some butts in the empty seats. It wouldn't be the first time they shelled out bucks for an over the hill player.Exactly what I was thinking Cazador... I can't see Parcells/Dallas being interested in Keyshawn at all.In fact, as a life-long Lions fan I'm almost positive that he'll unfortunately end up in Detroit if it's at all possible. Millen (if he's still around in the offseason, I'm guessing that he will be) is always saying, "We need more RATS on this team... More A-Holes." Or something to that effect. Well, here's a HUGE one.
I'll take a shot at this. I am certain of the ramifications during the offseason. I am reasoning into the in-season ramifications.Keyshawn contract runs through 2007 (4 years after this year)I have heard cap hit is $8M (also heard $7M) to cut him now.Let's assume that is in addition to what he already counts against the cap this year, since that is a sunk cost.Finally, Keyshawn has a roster bonus of $2M (also heard $1M) in the 2004 offseason.If Keyshawn is cut after 6/1/04 and after the $2M bonus payout, his cap hit is $10M. $2.5M hits in 2004, $7.5M in 2005.If Keyshawn is cut between 3/1/04 and 5/31/04 and after the $2M bonus payout, his cap hit is $10M in 2004, $0 in 2005.If Keyshawn is cut between 3/1/04 and 5/31/04 and before the $2M bonus payout, is cap hit is $8M in 2004, $0 in 2005.Now to the parts I am less certain about:If Keyshawn is cut now (during the season), I think the cap hit will be $2M in 2003 and $6M in 2004. This is in addition to the cap space Keyshawn already takes up. Note that he has a prorated signing bonus taking up cap room. Plus TB is required to pay him his full salary this year too. However, if he is waived and claimed off waivers, then Keyshawns remainin salary probably no longer counts against TB.If a player retires, I believe there is a list (like injured reserve) for placing retired players. The team retains his rights (like the Redskins waived Deion Sanders late last year and then San Diego claimed him). Therefore, the team probably decides when the player goes on the list and when the cap hit occurs.Anyone?I think Keyshawn has an advantage here.If he retires and files his papers BEFORE June 1, wouldn't he count for 8 million on the salary cap, jst the same as if the Bucs cut him now? Sure he'd have to pay some of his signing bonus back, but if he wanted to be spiteful here's a way he could do it.Of course then the Bucs would own his rights, which may make playing again difficultAm I correct in my assumptions?
For what? They're not breaking the CBA. The player is still getting paid. It's not like they're fining him for his salary or anything like that.Why on Earth would Keyshawn want to retire? What's the wrost thing the Bucs can do, keep paying him? Cut him right before training camp? Somebody would still sign him. The Bucs are kidding themselves if anybody's going to give something for a guy who has that kind of contract. And I want to see them squeeze under the March 1 cap figure with a ~ $7 Mil cap hit (Keyshawn's 2004 base salary of 5 Mil + 1 or 2 Mil roster bonus + amortized signing bonus) for a guy who you don't want to play. That's almost 10% of your cap tied up on the off chance somebody is stoopid enough to fork over a conditional 2nd round pick. That's why I don't buy all of this June 1 stuff. On or off the roster, he's still a huge cap hit with that contract. The only way they could trade him would be if Keyshawn would agree to a reduced contract but there's no way that Keyshawn and his agent would try to help the Bucs trade him when they would probably prefer to be released so they could negotiate with whomever they wanted.I'm wondering if the Tampa GM might be getting a call from the NFL Player's Union right about now.
and you would be just as productive.I should call the Bucs. I'd be happy to sit on the bench for a FRACTION of what they're going to be paying KJ.
How does this comment make him a bandwagon jumper? You're blasting a guy for agreeing with the decision of THE COACH WHO GOT US THE CHAMPIONSHIP. True, Keyshawn was on the team that got us a title, but his best year was in 2001. 2002 he had one touchdown. It's coming to light now that this guy was continually late, missed team meetings, complained to coaches both during and between games, and this despite the fact that there is a column on Gruden's play card with plays designed for Keyshawn to get the ball. As a Bucs fan, I am definitely a million times more behind Gruden than I could ever have been for Keyshawn.We continue to see that Tampa Bay fans are the biggest bandwagon-jumpers ever. A decade ago, your stadium looked like an Arizona Cardinals game. Now you all are ready to get rid of everyone who helped you win your first championship, less than a year after the fact. Nice fans, Tampa Bay. How about some loyalty for those that got you the title? Green Bay would never treat their champs like this.What an idiot. I guess going out of your way to point out that you think Parcells is a better coach in an interview isn't going to the media? Playing like crap and not having your head in the game (two false starts by a WR) isn't really dogging it, but I'd rather him dog it than get open and drop passes or cost the team yards with stupid penaties. As a Buc fan I say good riddance. Hopefully Sapp will be right behind you and the door will hit both of you in the ### on your way to NY you POS media whores. Get some people in who are there to play football and not get their face on TV as much as possible.This could explain alot"Honestly, I'm very disappointed because I really wanted to win another championship with this team," he said. "I was never Gruden's guy. He never liked me. I told him I'd rather retire than play for him in 2004. But I also told him I wouldn't be a distraction, I wouldn't go to the media with it and I didn't. I don't know why they released me. I was playing hard, I wasn't dogging it. Tell everyone I'm in New York looking for apartments."
You must have missed the part where he said, "As a Buc fan I say good riddance. Hopefully Sapp will be right behind you and the door will hit both of you in the ### on your way to NY you POS media whores." I've never seen any group of fans turn so quickly on two stars who helped their teams to a championship. And for what? For being talkative to the press. My God, we would've run Curt Schilling out of AZ years ago if people cared about whether or not he was a media whore. All I care is that he's a law abiding citizen who helped win us a World Series. He's A-OK in my book for life. Apparently if he was a Devil Ray, TB fans (not that there are any) would want him out.How does this comment make him a bandwagon jumper? You're blasting a guy for agreeing with the decision of THE COACH WHO GOT US THE CHAMPIONSHIP. True, Keyshawn was on the team that got us a title, but his best year was in 2001. 2002 he had one touchdown. It's coming to light now that this guy was continually late, missed team meetings, complained to coaches both during and between games, and this despite the fact that there is a column on Gruden's play card with plays designed for Keyshawn to get the ball. As a Bucs fan, I am definitely a million times more behind Gruden than I could ever have been for Keyshawn.We continue to see that Tampa Bay fans are the biggest bandwagon-jumpers ever. A decade ago, your stadium looked like an Arizona Cardinals game. Now you all are ready to get rid of everyone who helped you win your first championship, less than a year after the fact. Nice fans, Tampa Bay. How about some loyalty for those that got you the title? Green Bay would never treat their champs like this.What an idiot. I guess going out of your way to point out that you think Parcells is a better coach in an interview isn't going to the media? Playing like crap and not having your head in the game (two false starts by a WR) isn't really dogging it, but I'd rather him dog it than get open and drop passes or cost the team yards with stupid penaties. As a Buc fan I say good riddance. Hopefully Sapp will be right behind you and the door will hit both of you in the ### on your way to NY you POS media whores. Get some people in who are there to play football and not get their face on TV as much as possible.This could explain alot"Honestly, I'm very disappointed because I really wanted to win another championship with this team," he said. "I was never Gruden's guy. He never liked me. I told him I'd rather retire than play for him in 2004. But I also told him I wouldn't be a distraction, I wouldn't go to the media with it and I didn't. I don't know why they released me. I was playing hard, I wasn't dogging it. Tell everyone I'm in New York looking for apartments."
Broncos | K. Johnson Waived From Practice Squad - from www.KFFL.comTue, 18 Nov 2003 18:43:27 -0800USAToday.com reports the Denver Broncos have waived FB Kyle Johnson from the team's practice squad.Kyle Johnson (RB-Broncos) better watch his back!
Lame. Keyshawn and Sapp have been controversial their entire careers. Yes, Tampa Bay (like every team in the NFL) has its share of bandwagon fans as well as die-hards. If someone likes those players and defends them, you cry 'homer'. If someone doesn't like them, you get to say 'bandwagon fan'.I've never seen any group of fans turn so quickly on two stars who helped their teams to a championship.
Broncos | K. Johnson Waived From Practice Squad - from www.KFFL.comTue, 18 Nov 2003 18:43:27 -0800USAToday.com reports the Denver Broncos have waived FB Kyle Johnson from the team's practice squad.now thats just scary
coaches don't get championships. players do.THE COACH WHO GOT US THE CHAMPIONSHIP.
anyone?just thought i'd highlight this issue since it's been lost in all the hubbub.is there any chance he's back this year? if they need to deactivate him for each game (as opposed to the whole season at once), then this is not an irreversible decision, correct? or is it more like the injured reserve, where you know for certain he's done for the year?
Did you even watch the last Superbowl? Go watch the SI DVD on the Bucs championship and if you don't think that game came out the way it come out because of both the players and, in a large part, the coaching of Jon Gruden, I'll be surprised.coaches don't get championships. players do.THE COACH WHO GOT US THE CHAMPIONSHIP.
Go ask any Eagle fan if they don't think Gruden outcoached Reid in the NFC Championship game.coaches don't get championships. players do.THE COACH WHO GOT US THE CHAMPIONSHIP.
TB had to announce something. They now want nothing to do with Keyshawn. No practices, no games, no hanging out at the facilities, nothing. It would have been very obvious on Monday if Keyshawn was not starting, not dressed for the game, and not on the active roster.I still believe the Keyshawn is untradable due to his large figures ($5M in 2004). I don't think anyone would think he is worth that much based on his production, even if he were a model citizen. So deactivating him has the upside of getting him away from the team (which TB obviously wants) while not hurting his trade value.Bummer about Key. I knew before I hit this site that a bunch of losers would be badmouthing the guy -- he has had a bad rap since he wrote that silly book. The thing is -- he is a workhorse. I have seen him drop a few more balls than I would like but I have never seen anyone play as hard as this guy. He is a MAJOR reason for last year's superbowl. Having said that, the Bucs would not have won last year without Gruden either. Since there was little chance that Keyshawn was going to be a Buc next year then I guess it is better in the long run that the Bucs did what they did. At least they keep Gruden happy and Gruden will be around long enough to right the ship. Still, I have to wonder why McKay would show his cards to the world like this. It seems to me that you bench Key or restrict his playing time and then try to trade him in the offseason. As it is, nobody is going to offer much in the way of compensation for a player they know the Bucs will have to waive. Oh well, as much as I like Gruden and Key, I have the most confidence in McKay -- the man is a great GM and I trust that he knows what he is doing.