i would go with andre johnson over lee evensat bust of the year already. In regards to Evans you get what you paid for with Losman. Hartwell wasn't going to be a three down LB anyway so his production was going to be limited as a result.
AJ went in the late 2nd / early 3rd in many leagues. I got Evans in the 7th, which IIRC was about his ADP.i would go with andre johnson over lee evensat bust of the year already. In regards to Evans you get what you paid for with Losman. Hartwell wasn't going to be a three down LB anyway so his production was going to be limited as a result.
INTs and TDs are difficult to predict. Ed Reed is getting about the same number of T+A as last year. So you are surprised that Reed is getting fewer INTs or you expected more T+A?ed reed.
Sorry, here's the fixed version:Rodney HarrisonA player injured is not a bust
im surprised the 46 D hasnt produced any big plays for him, yes. i believe he was the first safety chosen in most deep IDP leagues, and unless he gets some big plays, his value will be very pedestrian. of course you can say the same thing about peppers.INTs and TDs are difficult to predict. Ed Reed is getting about the same number of T+A as last year. So you are surprised that Reed is getting fewer INTs or you expected more T+A?ed reed.
Then according to you guys like Sean Taylor and Michael Boulware are busts. I think you need to define what a bust is first and then go from there because I wouldn't consider them busts due to the tackles.im surprised the 46 D hasnt produced any big plays for him, yes. i believe he was the first safety chosen in most deep IDP leagues, and unless he gets some big plays, his value will be very pedestrian. of course you can say the same thing about peppers.INTs and TDs are difficult to predict. Ed Reed is getting about the same number of T+A as last year. So you are surprised that Reed is getting fewer INTs or you expected more T+A?ed reed.
Kevin Williams
I agree with the 46 D the expected nbr of big plays was up. But there was still more uncertainty than R Harrison however with the tackles' predictability. I agree with Peppers. I am personally more surprised at Peppers' stats so far than Ed Reed. Not that I expected zero big plays from Reed at this point.im surprised the 46 D hasnt produced any big plays for him, yes. i believe he was the first safety chosen in most deep IDP leagues, and unless he gets some big plays, his value will be very pedestrian. of course you can say the same thing about peppers.INTs and TDs are difficult to predict. Ed Reed is getting about the same number of T+A as last year. So you are surprised that Reed is getting fewer INTs or you expected more T+A?ed reed.
As I mentioned in the other thread, Boulware is producing very average tackle numbers so far. Far from top 10 numbers.Then according to you guys like Sean Taylor and Michael Boulware are busts. I think you need to define what a bust is first and then go from there because I wouldn't consider them busts due to the tackles.im surprised the 46 D hasnt produced any big plays for him, yes. i believe he was the first safety chosen in most deep IDP leagues, and unless he gets some big plays, his value will be very pedestrian. of course you can say the same thing about peppers.INTs and TDs are difficult to predict. Ed Reed is getting about the same number of T+A as last year. So you are surprised that Reed is getting fewer INTs or you expected more T+A?ed reed.
I agree. Bulluck has disappointed me so far. But remember that he started even slower last year but started to light it up in week #6. I am not worried yet.While he hasn't quite attained "bust" status, when you consider where he was taken in most drafts, Keith Bulluck being ranked 34th in both solos and FPs (my league anyways) has got to be considered a major disappointment. Hopefully he'll come around.
You get what you pay for when you take a DT instead of a DE. A disappointment, for sure, but he's a DT, so there was always that chance that he might not put up huge numbers. Considering the Queens D hasn't been stopping anyone at the LOS, it's about par for the course.Kevin Williams
Good call on the slow start. Bulluck started off last year with 20 solos through four games, like this year. He finished the year averaging 7.5 solos over the final 11 games.I agree. Bulluck has disappointed me so far. But remember that he started even slower last year but started to light it up in week #6. I am not worried yet.While he hasn't quite attained "bust" status, when you consider where he was taken in most drafts, Keith Bulluck being ranked 34th in both solos and FPs (my league anyways) has got to be considered a major disappointment. Hopefully he'll come around.
Agreed. was one of my 10 keepers. Which is tough to keep a DL when LB's hold the most value; 1 pt per tak 2 pt per sck, 3 pt per ff, 4 pt per int. We are proposing tackles to go to 2pts for DL in 06..not done deal yet.peppers
Stop blaming the victim. JP Losman aka Just Plain Lousy is the bust of the year.Lee Evans. I don't care what forum it's in, he's the bust of the year.
Yeah, I'm not blaming Evans, but that doesn't make him any less of a bust.Stop blaming the victim. JP Losman aka Just Plain Lousy is the bust of the year.Lee Evans. I don't care what forum it's in, he's the bust of the year.
Great stuff guys.Sure hopes he holds true to last year's form.Good call on the slow start. Bulluck started off last year with 20 solos through four games, like this year. He finished the year averaging 7.5 solos over the final 11 games.I agree. Bulluck has disappointed me so far. But remember that he started even slower last year but started to light it up in week #6. I am not worried yet.While he hasn't quite attained "bust" status, when you consider where he was taken in most drafts, Keith Bulluck being ranked 34th in both solos and FPs (my league anyways) has got to be considered a major disappointment. Hopefully he'll come around.
I had Bulluck last year and if i recall he had a couple of bad runs due to injuries on the front defensive line. he was getting taken out of the play quite regularly...then...as you indicate the line got healthy and KB was back on top.Great stuff guys.Sure hopes he holds true to last year's form.Good call on the slow start. Bulluck started off last year with 20 solos through four games, like this year. He finished the year averaging 7.5 solos over the final 11 games.I agree. Bulluck has disappointed me so far. But remember that he started even slower last year but started to light it up in week #6. I am not worried yet.While he hasn't quite attained "bust" status, when you consider where he was taken in most drafts, Keith Bulluck being ranked 34th in both solos and FPs (my league anyways) has got to be considered a major disappointment. Hopefully he'll come around.
You mean top 5 RB Thomas Jones who was expected to be Benson's backup? How do you define bust?Based on how high FBG had him ranked, I have to consider Thomas Jones a bust. That said, I think it would have been unwise to use a high pick on him regardless of what FBG said. I've had him on my radar all season, ready to jump at him at the first sign of a breakout, but it's not looking like that will happen anytime soon.
Sorry, I meant Carolina safety Thomas Davis. I'm ######ed. Will edit immediately.You mean top 5 RB Thomas Jones who was expected to be Benson's backup? How do you define bust?Based on how high FBG had him ranked, I have to consider Thomas Jones a bust. That said, I think it would have been unwise to use a high pick on him regardless of what FBG said. I've had him on my radar all season, ready to jump at him at the first sign of a breakout, but it's not looking like that will happen anytime soon.
I took Sean Jones in the second round of my dynasty draft because FBG had him ranked right behind Davis earlier in the offseasonBased on how high FBG had him ranked, I have to consider Thomas Davis a bust. That said, I think it would have been unwise to use a high pick on him regardless of what FBG said. I've had him on my radar all season, ready to jump at him at the first sign of a breakout, but it's not looking like that will happen anytime soon.
How much did you expect from a first year starting QB on a middle of the road team? The Bills' defense was the main reason they did as well as they did last year. Most people agreed that Losman would struggle.Stop blaming the victim. JP Losman aka Just Plain Lousy is the bust of the year.Lee Evans. I don't care what forum it's in, he's the bust of the year.
If most people assumed Losman would struggle, wouldn't it follow that they wouldn't take Lee Evans very high?For IDP, it's either Thomas Davis, Julius Peppers, Nappy Harris, Greenwood or Hartwell.How much did you expect from a first year starting QB on a middle of the road team? The Bills' defense was the main reason they did as well as they did last year. Most people agreed that Losman would struggle.Stop blaming the victim. JP Losman aka Just Plain Lousy is the bust of the year.Lee Evans. I don't care what forum it's in, he's the bust of the year.
Ummm, yep that's why it's hard to consider Evans a bust. Why would anyone with half a brain think that he'd do well? What's your point?If most people assumed Losman would struggle, wouldn't it follow that they wouldn't take Lee Evans very high?
For IDP, it's either Thomas Davis, Julius Peppers, Nappy Harris, Greenwood or Hartwell.
Thanks for the compliment You're right - no QB has ever been good their first year, and no WR has ever had a decent season in that situation.Ummm, yep that's why it's hard to consider Evans a bust. Why would anyone with half a brain think that he'd do well? What's your point?If most people assumed Losman would struggle, wouldn't it follow that they wouldn't take Lee Evans very high?
For IDP, it's either Thomas Davis, Julius Peppers, Nappy Harris, Greenwood or Hartwell.
Second that. I traded Brooks and Lloyd for Bulluck and a #3 next year in my IDP Dynasty keep 10 league..Please remove K Bulluck from this list
Tillman is a stud who was injured last year.Reminds me of Charles Tillman in the 2004 rankings.