Pretty sure I saw on a broadcast a few weeks ago that the Raiders' opponents had the highest combined win percentage in 2006.Also, no such thing as a last-place schedule since most of their games were determined years in advance.This division is looking like it's going to be a scramble for 9 wins and the Raiders could definitely surprise with their last place schedule.
Great question. Do you think that if Lamont is healthy he will still be spelled a bit? Do you think he is healthy? Or do you think its going to be Rhodes and Fargas while LJ2 gets healthy?Most importantly, who is starting at RB this week for the 1st place Raiders?
Bye week news is tough to come by. I don't think anyone has an answer for you.Lamont has a back that has bothered him for a while, and injured it on a harmless looking play. When is he back? I haven't seen an answer. And when he's back, are the Raiders going to just give him the rock? Again, no one knows, but with Rhodes, Fargas, and Bush waiting in the wings, I would expect some kind of RBBC.Most importantly, who is starting at RB this week for the 1st place Raiders?
On the one hand, improvement by a bad team is going to lead to fans getting outrageous expectations. On the other other hand, I think most Raider fans think they have a ways to gUm, I don't believe it is possible to win a division without actually winning a divisional game.It's funny how these Raider fans win one game against an 0-5 Miami team and suddenly they think they have the right to start talking "Division Title".
Talk about objectivism.Um, I don't believe it is possible to win a division without actually winning a divisional game.It's funny how these Raider fans win one game against an 0-5 Miami team and suddenly they think they have the right to start talking "Division Title".
If you did, then they were wrong. SD plays NE and Baltimore while the Raiders play Cleveland and Miami. Other than that, their schedules are the same.Pretty sure I saw on a broadcast a few weeks ago that the Raiders' opponents had the highest combined win percentage in 2006.
Yes there is. The AFC West plays the AFC South and the NFC North. Then the Chargers get NE and Baltimore, both first in the East and North.The Chiefs get Cin and NYJ, both second in the East and North. The Broncos get Pit and Buf, both third in the East and North.The Raiders get Mia and Cle, both last in the AFC East and North.Also, no such thing as a last-place schedule since most of their games were determined years in advance.
Not to mention the Raiders already competed with the Broncos in Denver. That game was very close and the Raiders should beat them at home.Stompin said:Talk about objectivism.Um, I don't believe it is possible to win a division without actually winning a divisional game.It's funny how these Raider fans win one game against an 0-5 Miami team and suddenly they think they have the right to start talking "Division Title".The AFC West is an incredibly soft division this year, and given how KC, DEN and SD have played this year, it is not unreasonable to assume the Raiders can compete with any of them this year.Looking at the rest of their schedule, I think an 8-8 season is also a reasonable outcome, and again, given how weak this division is looking at this point in time, a few extra wins could indeed help them win the division with a relatively mediocre record compared to other AFC teams.Not saying it's going to happen, but to say that a division title is completely out of reach isn't exactly right, either.
Could you kindly tell me when was last time that Raiders beat an AFC West team?Rest assured, the Raiders are still the WORST team in the division.
Actually, he's right...technically. When you take into account the overall strength of schedule from 2006. The Chargers have 2 games against the 2-14 Raiders, and the Raider have 2 games against the 14-2 Chargers.If you did, then they were wrong. SD plays NE and Baltimore while the Raiders play Cleveland and Miami. Other than that, their schedules are the same.Pretty sure I saw on a broadcast a few weeks ago that the Raiders' opponents had the highest combined win percentage in 2006.
Actually, he's right...technically. When you take into account the overall strength of schedule from 2006. The Chargers have 2 games against the 2-14 Raiders, and the Raider have 2 games against the 14-2 Chargers.If you did, then they were wrong. SD plays NE and Baltimore while the Raiders play Cleveland and Miami. Other than that, their schedules are the same.Pretty sure I saw on a broadcast a few weeks ago that the Raiders' opponents had the highest combined win percentage in 2006.
The winds of change are howling, brother.Broncos and Chiefs both look inferior to the Raiders as of the 1st quarter of this season.Could you kindly tell me when was last time that Raiders beat an AFC West team?Rest assured, the Raiders are still the WORST team in the division.
The Chargers just scored again...Could you kindly tell me when was last time that Raiders beat an AFC West team?Rest assured, the Raiders are still the WORST team in the division.
Actually, he's right...technically. When you take into account the overall strength of schedule from 2006. The Chargers have 2 games against the 2-14 Raiders, and the Raider have 2 games against the 14-2 Chargers.If you did, then they were wrong. SD plays NE and Baltimore while the Raiders play Cleveland and Miami. Other than that, their schedules are the same.Pretty sure I saw on a broadcast a few weeks ago that the Raiders' opponents had the highest combined win percentage in 2006.
Good point, that Raiders / Broncos game IN DENVER was not even close. You are right, this is pretty cut and dry.Could you kindly tell me when was last time that Raiders beat an AFC West team?Rest assured, the Raiders are still the WORST team in the division.
Oops...Actually, he's right...technically. When you take into account the overall strength of schedule from 2006. The Chargers have 2 games against the 2-14 Raiders, and the Raider have 2 games against the 14-2 Chargers.If you did, then they were wrong. SD plays NE and Baltimore while the Raiders play Cleveland and Miami. Other than that, their schedules are the same.Pretty sure I saw on a broadcast a few weeks ago that the Raiders' opponents had the highest combined win percentage in 2006.
Yes, and Shanahan still owns the Raiders. That ain't gonna change.The Chargers just scored again...Could you kindly tell me when was last time that Raiders beat an AFC West team?Rest assured, the Raiders are still the WORST team in the division.![]()
![]()
![]()
Actually, it says a little more about the division they are in than it does about them... And I don't think they're bad. They're decent.^^^^^^^^^^^ 20-5. you know your team is bad when they can only move into first place during their bye week
Nope.This division is looking like it's going to be a scramble for 9 wins and the Raiders could definitely surprise with their last place schedule.
Hey Raider Fan,Wake me up when you guys actually win an AFC West game (maybe next year sometime)Until then, enjoy your semi-permanent place in the AFC West BASEMENT!On the one hand, improvement by a bad team is going to lead to fans getting outrageous expectations. On the other other hand, I think most Raider fans think they have a ways to gUm, I don't believe it is possible to win a division without actually winning a divisional game.It's funny how these Raider fans win one game against an 0-5 Miami team and suddenly they think they have the right to start talking "Division Title".n yet another hand, the division appears to be weak.And on yet another hand, I wouldn't be barreling into threads calling out fans that haven't been bragging that much, after Norv Turner just steamrolled my team, at home, for our 3rd loss in a row.
When was the last time Kansas City even got to the super bowl?Hey Raider Fan,Wake me up when you guys actually win an AFC West game (maybe next year sometime)Until then, enjoy your semi-permanent place in the AFC West BASEMENT!On the one hand, improvement by a bad team is going to lead to fans getting outrageous expectations. On the other other hand, I think most Raider fans think they have a ways to gUm, I don't believe it is possible to win a division without actually winning a divisional game.It's funny how these Raider fans win one game against an 0-5 Miami team and suddenly they think they have the right to start talking "Division Title".n yet another hand, the division appears to be weak.And on yet another hand, I wouldn't be barreling into threads calling out fans that haven't been bragging that much, after Norv Turner just steamrolled my team, at home, for our 3rd loss in a row.
BusterTBronco is a Chief fan?When was the last time Kansas City even got to the super bowl?Hey Raider Fan,Wake me up when you guys actually win an AFC West game (maybe next year sometime)Until then, enjoy your semi-permanent place in the AFC West BASEMENT!On the one hand, improvement by a bad team is going to lead to fans getting outrageous expectations. On the other other hand, I think most Raider fans think they have a ways to gUm, I don't believe it is possible to win a division without actually winning a divisional game.It's funny how these Raider fans win one game against an 0-5 Miami team and suddenly they think they have the right to start talking "Division Title".n yet another hand, the division appears to be weak.And on yet another hand, I wouldn't be barreling into threads calling out fans that haven't been bragging that much, after Norv Turner just steamrolled my team, at home, for our 3rd loss in a row.
![]()
And the Raiders haven't been there in 20+ years.Blue-Kun said:When was the last time Kansas City even got to the super bowl?BusterTBronco said:Hey Raider Fan,Wake me up when you guys actually win an AFC West game (maybe next year sometime)Until then, enjoy your semi-permanent place in the AFC West BASEMENT!On the one hand, improvement by a bad team is going to lead to fans getting outrageous expectations. On the other other hand, I think most Raider fans think they have a ways to gUm, I don't believe it is possible to win a division without actually winning a divisional game.It's funny how these Raider fans win one game against an 0-5 Miami team and suddenly they think they have the right to start talking "Division Title".n yet another hand, the division appears to be weak.And on yet another hand, I wouldn't be barreling into threads calling out fans that haven't been bragging that much, after Norv Turner just steamrolled my team, at home, for our 3rd loss in a row.
![]()
And the Raiders haven't been there in 20+ years.Blue-Kun said:When was the last time Kansas City even got to the super bowl?BusterTBronco said:Hey Raider Fan,Wake me up when you guys actually win an AFC West game (maybe next year sometime)Until then, enjoy your semi-permanent place in the AFC West BASEMENT!On the one hand, improvement by a bad team is going to lead to fans getting outrageous expectations. On the other other hand, I think most Raider fans think they have a ways to gUm, I don't believe it is possible to win a division without actually winning a divisional game.It's funny how these Raider fans win one game against an 0-5 Miami team and suddenly they think they have the right to start talking "Division Title".n yet another hand, the division appears to be weak.And on yet another hand, I wouldn't be barreling into threads calling out fans that haven't been bragging that much, after Norv Turner just steamrolled my team, at home, for our 3rd loss in a row.
![]()
I keep forgetting that one, seeing as they forgot to show up and all.And the Raiders haven't been there in 20+ years.Blue-Kun said:When was the last time Kansas City even got to the super bowl?BusterTBronco said:Hey Raider Fan,Wake me up when you guys actually win an AFC West game (maybe next year sometime)Until then, enjoy your semi-permanent place in the AFC West BASEMENT!On the one hand, improvement by a bad team is going to lead to fans getting outrageous expectations. On the other other hand, I think most Raider fans think they have a ways to gUm, I don't believe it is possible to win a division without actually winning a divisional game.It's funny how these Raider fans win one game against an 0-5 Miami team and suddenly they think they have the right to start talking "Division Title".n yet another hand, the division appears to be weak.And on yet another hand, I wouldn't be barreling into threads calling out fans that haven't been bragging that much, after Norv Turner just steamrolled my team, at home, for our 3rd loss in a row.
![]()
2003 down?
Nice in a row? Really? Interesting.Kevin Ashcraft said:HAHACHIEFS......are 4-3Jarrad Page is becoming a Raider killer....intercepted Aaron Brooks last season in the endzone w/ under a minute to play to seal a 4-point win IIRC, and today he intercepts Culpepper with under 1:00 to play to seal a 2 point win.Oh and BTW, KC has now won NICE in a row against the the Faiders!
That's pretty remarkable considering the way they looked at the beginning of the season.Kevin Ashcraft said:CHIEFS......are 4-3
Sorry about your small penis.Watchout. The Raiders are 2-5.
Try to be more boring. I dare you.Oh, I beg to differ. You're the fan of the team with the 2-5 record, not me.The Raiders ARE who we thought they WERE.Bad. Quite bad.
Really weak. Taking a shot at a team that is struggling is not good form. Troll somewhere else.Watchout. The Raiders are 2-5.
Par for the course. The funny part is, the Broncos aren't winning the Super Bowl either. So at the end of the day, both teams will be at home eating Cheetos during the big game, only the Raiders will have a better draft choice. Whatever.Really weak. Taking a shot at a team that is struggling is not good form. Troll somewhere else.Watchout. The Raiders are 2-5.