The guy was a stud last season with all sorts of garbage at QB. I think Culpepper is pretty worthless but I'm not sure he's any worse than Kitna and Orlovsky were last season. I think Calvin will be just fine. One thing Culpepper can still do is throw the deep ball and the Ravens have all sorts of problems with big plays in the secondary.FBG seems to have him rated pretty high this week in the Wednesday cheatsheets.I wonder if that assumed Culpepper was starting?Is he still a top 10 with Culpepper chucking the ball?
Soured?As a Calvin owner, the emoticon above represents how I'm feeling at the moment
Packersfan has a man-crush on Calvin. May take what he says with a grain of salt.The guy was a stud last season with all sorts of garbage at QB. I think Culpepper is pretty worthless but I'm not sure he's any worse than Kitna and Orlovsky were last season. I think Calvin will be just fine. One thing Culpepper can still do is throw the deep ball and the Ravens have all sorts of problems with big plays in the secondary.FBG seems to have him rated pretty high this week in the Wednesday cheatsheets.I wonder if that assumed Culpepper was starting?Is he still a top 10 with Culpepper chucking the ball?
I have the same man love but do not feel great about his prospects this week.I plead guilty to thePackersfan has a man-crush on Calvin. May take what he says with a grain of salt.The guy was a stud last season with all sorts of garbage at QB. I think Culpepper is pretty worthless but I'm not sure he's any worse than Kitna and Orlovsky were last season. I think Calvin will be just fine. One thing Culpepper can still do is throw the deep ball and the Ravens have all sorts of problems with big plays in the secondary.FBG seems to have him rated pretty high this week in the Wednesday cheatsheets.I wonder if that assumed Culpepper was starting?Is he still a top 10 with Culpepper chucking the ball?I have the same man love but do not feel great about his prospects this week.
but I still believe what I wrote. Culpepper's (only?) strength is the deep ball and that's a major issue with the Baltimore secondary. It's also a major strength of Megatron's game as we all know. If Calvin can put up elite numbers with the likes of Kitna and Orlovsky I think he can do well with Culpepper. But yes, I got the man love for Megatron. 
Never. Ever. Bench Calvin Johnson. Ever.
I'm right there with you. Hopefully it pays off for me. I traded S. Rice straight up for him the week Calvin was coming back from his injury. I do agree there is alot to love. Bad D, Lions playinhg from behind, tons of targets, incredible talent. Hopefully I make it to next week to take advantage of the juicy matchups.I plead guilty to thePackersfan has a man-crush on Calvin. May take what he says with a grain of salt.The guy was a stud last season with all sorts of garbage at QB. I think Culpepper is pretty worthless but I'm not sure he's any worse than Kitna and Orlovsky were last season. I think Calvin will be just fine. One thing Culpepper can still do is throw the deep ball and the Ravens have all sorts of problems with big plays in the secondary.FBG seems to have him rated pretty high this week in the Wednesday cheatsheets.I wonder if that assumed Culpepper was starting?Is he still a top 10 with Culpepper chucking the ball?I have the same man love but do not feel great about his prospects this week.
but I still believe what I wrote. Culpepper's (only?) strength is the deep ball and that's a major issue with the Baltimore secondary. It's also a major strength of Megatron's game as we all know. If Calvin can put up elite numbers with the likes of Kitna and Orlovsky I think he can do well with Culpepper. But yes, I got the man love for Megatron.
![]()
about Calvin's prospects this week for several reasons:also the running game will be zero, so more passes thrown than usual, thus more targets for CJ...I'm veryabout Calvin's prospects this week for several reasons:
The Ravens are ranked 15th against the pass giving up 215 yards a game.
The Ravens secondary is banged up.
After all the PI pentalties on Monday Night their corners may be hesitant to play physical with Calvin.
Calvin is probably as healthy as he's been since the start of the season.
Culpepper should obviously trust CJ to "go up and get it" after the late grab he made in traffic. (It was an absolute thing of beauty.)
The Lions offensive line has been protecting a little better and Calvin has been getting open deep.
...and Megatron is uncoverable.
I'm seeing a monster game like 7 for 140 and 2 TDs.![]()
Not soured, just don't have a good feeling about is all. I don't think I would every sit a guy as good as Calvin, even if I had incredible depth. I'm just not thrilled with the situation this week. I'm certainly rooting for Culpepper to throw to Calvin at least 15xSoured?:X As a Calvin owner, the emoticon above represents how I'm feeling at the moment

Let's add in that Culpepper is auditioning for a new gig. Who can help him most with that? Calvin Johnson. I would expect more targets to Calvin than Stafford's average per week.However, targets is one thing, connecting is another.Culpepper = lots of targets for CJI doubt he'll check down to someone else, or have time to.
I don't see the bolded as a negative thing in only 5 full career starts together. There aren't any huge games there, but there are 3 TDs. Calvin also caught a 38 yarder at the end of the Bengal game from Culpepper and was targeted on the 2 point conversion try.I don't know if Daunte will hit Calvin with a couple deep balls in this game, but it won't be for lack of trying if they can't connect.Calvin's previous games with Culpepper at QB:
2-92, 0 TD vs Jax
6-65, 1 TD vs Car
3-66, 1 TD vs. TB
5-66, 0 TD vs Ten
3-84, 1 TD vs Min
1-2, 0 TD vs Pit (injured)
Also worth noting is that he has only one catch over 50 yards, and only two catches over 40 yards with Culpepper at QB. So the "Cpepp will just throw it up deep to Calvin like he did with Moss" stigma doesn't really seem to apply that well.
CJ actually had 2 catches of 51 and 41 in the Jags game.29 yd in the CAR gameCalvin's previous games with Culpepper at QB:
2-92, 0 TD vs Jax
6-65, 1 TD vs Car
3-66, 1 TD vs. TB
5-66, 0 TD vs Ten
3-84, 1 TD vs Min
1-2, 0 TD vs Pit (injured)
Also worth noting is that he has only one catch over 50 yards, and only two catches over 40 yards with Culpepper at QB. So the "Cpepp will just throw it up deep to Calvin like he did with Moss" stigma doesn't really seem to apply that well.
CJ actually had 2 catches of 51 and 41 in the Jags game.29 yd in the CAR gameCalvin's previous games with Culpepper at QB:
2-92, 0 TD vs Jax
6-65, 1 TD vs Car
3-66, 1 TD vs. TB
5-66, 0 TD vs Ten
3-84, 1 TD vs Min
1-2, 0 TD vs Pit (injured)
Also worth noting is that he has only one catch over 50 yards, and only two catches over 40 yards with Culpepper at QB. So the "Cpepp will just throw it up deep to Calvin like he did with Moss" stigma doesn't really seem to apply that well.
A 41 yd in the TB game
and a 70 in the MIN game.
, no excellent posting. You feeling okay today? I think think this is the first post from you on Calvin that you weren't completely bashing him.Let's add in that Culpepper is auditioning for a new gig. Who can help him most with that? Calvin Johnson. I would expect more targets to Calvin than Stafford's average per week.However, targets is one thing, connecting is another.Culpepper = lots of targets for CJI doubt he'll check down to someone else, or have time to.
amazing how a good week changes everything, eh?You feeling okay today? I think think this is the first post from you on Calvin that you weren't completely bashing him.Let's add in that Culpepper is auditioning for a new gig. Who can help him most with that? Calvin Johnson. I would expect more targets to Calvin than Stafford's average per week.However, targets is one thing, connecting is another.Culpepper = lots of targets for CJI doubt he'll check down to someone else, or have time to.
That's called coaching. I berate my players. I humiliate them in front of their teammates, challenging them to play their best. No idea what is wrong with this POS Nick Folk though. He has responded like a man in a coma for 50 years.You feeling okay today? I think think this is the first post from you on Calvin that you weren't completely bashing him.Let's add in that Culpepper is auditioning for a new gig. Who can help him most with that? Calvin Johnson. I would expect more targets to Calvin than Stafford's average per week.However, targets is one thing, connecting is another.Culpepper = lots of targets for CJI doubt he'll check down to someone else, or have time to.
That's exactly my dilemma.I'm leaning towards CJ based on this thread.Hmm now I am torn....rice or magatron....ahhhhh the pressure
Refer to post #13 fellas.That's exactly my dilemma.I'm leaning towards CJ based on this thread.Hmm now I am torn....rice or magatron....ahhhhh the pressure
marshall and calvin it is :(Refer to post #13 fellas.That's exactly my dilemma.I'm leaning towards CJ based on this thread.Hmm now I am torn....rice or magatron....ahhhhh the pressure
I don't think the Cardinals are all that stout defensively. Alex Smith was able to get things done Monday night without much trouble when he needed to. But I agree Megatron's value takes a major hit with Culpepper at QB. Culpepper is just done. The positive is Calvin is all the Lions have left so he will get a ton of targets. But I'd view him as a WR2 without Stafford and I'd adjust my lineup accordingly. I also wouldn't start him over Rice and Austin if those were my options.Well, he was a bust with Culpepper at the helm.I'm playing Sidney Rice and Miles Austin instead of CJ this week against a stout Arizona D, especially since it looks like Stafford will be out again.
Stanton is worse than Culpepper.Wait until after practice today to see if Drew stanton gets some reps. Culpepper was a total bust last week and will not be with the team next year. If the Lions were smart they would see what Stanton can do.
Yeah, but if you have other studs, then the decision is easier. CJ is now only a borderline stud, IMO.I predicted a big game for CJ last week and it didn't happen, but benching a player of Calvin Johnson's caliber after a poor outing is a mistake.
Trading WR Calvin Johnson would net Lions bevy of good talent
The Lions are facing their own Curtis Granderson moment.
If it wasn't apparent before, it should be clear now after the Bailout in Baltimore. The Lions are looking at 2012 -- at the earliest -- before they're relevant, leaving them with no alternative but to re-evaluate the worth of their one measurable asset.
Calvin Johnson is worth more in draft picks than he is in the lineup.
Trade him.
Send him to a team confident that they're a big-play receiver away from a championship and get in return a bounty of early-round draft picks that could help the Lions address their No. 1 problem -- a cavernous void of talent.
One star doesn't matter on a team this wretched. Popularity doesn't matter. Merchandising doesn't matter. Good behavior doesn't matter.
Just as the Tigers understood that and traded Granderson and Edwin Jackson last week, the Lions must accept the truth. Even at the risk of public scorn, they must trade Johnson at the apex of his marketability.
Maybe that's a loser's mentality, but the Lions are losers.
Trading Johnson would stamp the final punctuation on Matt Millen's disastrous tenure -- the fourth wide receiver taken in the first round in six years no longer on the team.
What's funny is they actually drafted a genuine playmaker in Johnson, but he's someone the Lions can't fully utilize because of numerous holes elsewhere on both sides of the ball.
Looking back, 2007 will be remembered as the Lions' worst draft of an already distressing decade. I wrote when they tabbed Johnson second overall that it was stupid not to trade him right away because impact receivers remain the easiest to accumulate of any position, and the Lions could possibly help themselves with four of the draft's first 65 picks.
But the Lions argued that they accomplished both. They kept Johnson but also engineered deals that gave them three second-round picks.
The first second-round pick, Michigan State quarterback Drew Stanton, apparently isn't good enough to get on the field -- even at the end of a blowout loss. The other two second-round choices, defensive end Ikaika Alama-Francis and safety Gerald Alexander, are no longer with the team.
Last year, general manager Martin Mayhew fleeced Dallas for first-, third- and sixth-round picks by sending Roy Williams to the Cowboys before the trading deadline.
Johnson should command a higher price.
It won't be a popular move, but the first step in demanding accountability is honestly assessing how to best use your best player.
Possibly, but Stanton is under contract for next year and Culpepper is not. The Lions need to see if Stanton can backup Stafford.Stanton is worse than Culpepper.Wait until after practice today to see if Drew stanton gets some reps. Culpepper was a total bust last week and will not be with the team next year. If the Lions were smart they would see what Stanton can do.
In his last five games, Johnson has put up 27-415-3. That's including one game with Culpepper (who has nothing left) and one game where he could barely move because he was injured. Project those numbers out to a full season and it comes to 86-1,328-10. He's most certainly a stud. The question now, though, is how much of an impact does Culpepper have on his ability to produce stud-like numbers? Based on last week, it's obviously a major factor. However, the schedule the rest of the way is hardly imposing for Calvin and he is going to get double-digit targets most games and you know the Lions are going to try to hit him for big plays downfield. He's more of a risk now without question as long as Culpepper is at QB. But the guy is an elite talent and I believe his floor is reasonable and his ceiling immense. So that's a guy I'm going to start.But as always, it comes down to your other options. Would I start Megatron over Austin and Rice this week? No I would not. But would I sit him in favor of guys like Holmes, Crabtree or Britt (all of whom I like)? No I wouldn't do that either.14 weeks have been played at this point. In my PPR league, Calvin Johnson is ranked #25 year to date. He's directly below Burleson and above Housh.This is not stud material. It continues to boggle my mind when people label him a stud. He is what he is at this point in the season.Treat him as a stud at your own risk.KY
How do you know this? Stanton has never been given a real chance to play.Stanton is worse than Culpepper.Wait until after practice today to see if Drew stanton gets some reps. Culpepper was a total bust last week and will not be with the team next year. If the Lions were smart they would see what Stanton can do.
It's my opinion on the limited time he has played. He played in a game this year when Culpepper went down (I think it was against Green Bay) and he looked terrible. He played in limited time last year (I think it was on Thanksgiving) and he looked terrible. Their offense moves the best with Stafford in.How do you know this? Stanton has never been given a real chance to play.Stanton is worse than Culpepper.Wait until after practice today to see if Drew stanton gets some reps. Culpepper was a total bust last week and will not be with the team next year. If the Lions were smart they would see what Stanton can do.
I'm all for whatever gets Calvin the ball.How do you know this? Stanton has never been given a real chance to play.Stanton is worse than Culpepper.Wait until after practice today to see if Drew stanton gets some reps. Culpepper was a total bust last week and will not be with the team next year. If the Lions were smart they would see what Stanton can do.