This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I think the next few weeks will be pretty telling. They have ARI, DAL, and PHI the next 3 weeks. If the offense can progress well in that stretch, watch out. The following three games will be STL, CLE, and DET. Campbell's trade value could be sky high at that point. He follows that up with a tough stretch of PIT, DAL, SEA, NYG, and BAL.
not sure what 'sucktitude' means..not sure what people mean when they say 'uber' , either...
all you need to see in Campbell is that the O/U for this weekend's game is 42 pts, down from earlier in the week..but Washington is still favored.That can only mean loads of scoring by each team in an epic shootout! I'd be shocked if Campbell doesn't throw for 300+ yards and 2+tds on sunday..he might be more of a week-2-week starter, but anytime I see the vegas line showing an O/u that is higher than,say, 44 pts, I'm putting any/all players I have from either team , in my starting lineup. 
Vegas likes this new offense and realizes their defense is going to give up quite a few pts,too..means more shootouts!
The Colt Brennan pick was a smart pick as he was value where they got him, and I like his promise. Still, Brennan is a two-year project (a little reminiscent of Romo IMHO, though I'm not predicting that level of success necessarily) and shouldn't get anywhere near the field even as a backup until 2009, and anywhere near the starting lineup until 2010 unless there's an injury to everyone ahead of him (I think this is Collins' last year in Washington, though I could be wrong), or the latter half of 2009 in the event that Campbell is busting hard. The wisdom behind the pick is that Brennan's learning curve seems to be very well synched up to the amount of time it should reasonably take to determine if Campbell is a legit starter and to master the WCO if he can. Campbell, however, looks good and figures to keep that starting job IMHO if he doesn't get derailed with another injury, for example. Brennan's value is long term, and more in the mold of a guy like Matt Schaub.
Actually, since high school. This is true even though Saunders was there for two years (2006-07) because Gibbs put the shackles on the offense and didn't really let Saunders run it is way until Collins took over late last year given Gibbs' deep mistrust of young QB's and how mistake prone they are. This is also the first time that Campbell has had a fully healthy starting WR corps; Moss especially has been hampered by nagging leg injuries over the last two years even though he was in the lineup at times. Still, it's noteworthy that Campbell has continuously shown improvement in Washington despite the adversity - he led the team on two late-game comebacks in Tampa and in Dallas just before he was injured that were impressive even though they ended up getting derailed by INT's. It's not been dramatic improvement like you've seen from other young QB's, so he's still under the radar, but it's there.
Are you starting him this week?
...and a fumble. In fact he fumbled in 5 straight games end of last year. This is exatly the kind of up n down I'm talking about. Maybe it's the new system thing, not sure
x2Another good game for him: 22/30/193 2/0. Also note that those numbers came despite a very cold spell in the 2nd Q where he was only 1-for-6. The Cards weren't giving the 'Skins any deep throws, so they took underneath stuff all day which explains the low ypa, but it's impressive in its own right because Campbell has been accurate enough to hit those patterns. He's thrown 4 TD's versus 0 INT's in 3 games, and his year-to-date rating is ~90 or so. He's definitely a player to buy, though you may if you're inclined to do that want to wait until after what may be two rough road games @ Philly and @ Dallas before doing that to get him at a better price.
