Relax. Posting one ranking for discussion is ok around here.Can you explain to me why you are violating the rules of the board by posting proprietary information?
Relax. Posting one ranking for discussion is ok around here.Can you explain to me why you are violating the rules of the board by posting proprietary information?
Is that really not ok now? It used to be. I'm not sure how much value the Top 200 forward has if there can be no discussion whatsoever of its contents around here.Relax. Posting one ranking for discussion is ok around here.Can you explain to me why you are violating the rules of the board by posting proprietary information?![]()
It wasn't before.Relax. Posting one ranking for discussion is ok around here.Can you explain to me why you are violating the rules of the board by posting proprietary information?
It wasn't before.Relax. Posting one ranking for discussion is ok around here.Can you explain to me why you are violating the rules of the board by posting proprietary information?
Yes it was. It's been ok for years.It wasn't before.Relax. Posting one ranking for discussion is ok around here.Can you explain to me why you are violating the rules of the board by posting proprietary information?
Why don't we lets the mods do the moderating?Can you explain to me why you are violating the rules of the board by posting proprietary information?
Not to turn this isn't a pissing contest, but I've been using these boards since 1999. I had a different username which I forgot because I didn't use the boards for a six month stretch in 2003. Regardless, get off your high horse.It wasn't before.Relax. Posting one ranking for discussion is ok around here.Can you explain to me why you are violating the rules of the board by posting proprietary information?at a 5 digit member telling people what is ok.i don't think you know.
A bit late for that. Thanks to mac daddy for finally posting something relevant.Not to turn this isn't a pissing contest, but
It wasn't before.Relax. Posting one ranking for discussion is ok around here.Can you explain to me why you are violating the rules of the board by posting proprietary information?at a 5 digit member telling people what is ok.i don't think you know.
It has always been acceptable. You won't find one instance where it wasn't okay to post a singular ranking for discussion.It wasn't before.Relax. Posting one ranking for discussion is ok around here.Can you explain to me why you are violating the rules of the board by posting proprietary information?
What if 250 members all post one ranking?It has always been acceptable. You won't find one instance where it wasn't allowed to post a singular ranking for discussion.It wasn't before.Relax. Posting one ranking for discussion is ok around here.Can you explain to me why you are violating the rules of the board by posting proprietary information?
He averages a lot of fantasy points/game.His injury "seems" to be over.His bye is over.He has a QB who will get him the ball.His team scores a lot.Can anyone explain why Housh is WR8 on Top 250 Forward?
What if all the people in China jump at the same time? OMFG the earth will spin out of orbit!!!What if 250 members all post one ranking?![]()
It wasn't before.Relax. Posting one ranking for discussion is ok around here.Can you explain to me why you are violating the rules of the board by posting proprietary information?at a 5 digit member telling people what is ok.i don't think you know.
MSULions said:bagger said:EdwardCat said:It wasn't before.DevilintheDetail said:Relax. Posting one ranking for discussion is ok around here.EdwardCat said:Can you explain to me why you are violating the rules of the board by posting proprietary information?at a 5 digit member telling people what is ok.i don't think you know.
at a 2 digit member thinking he's better than everyone.apparently he does know!
![]()
I don't believe you.I'm sure the mods can find your old username if you give them any information about it (email used when you signed up, part of the name, etc.)EdwardCat said:Not to turn this isn't a pissing contest, but I've been using these boards since 1999. I had a different username which I forgot because I didn't use the boards for a six month stretch in 2003. Regardless, get off your high horse.
Thanks Mud. I know this is based on subjective projections but I'm still alarmed that the almighty Dodds ranked him above Johnson, DJax, Roy, and Driver.Mod already said it was cool so everyone stop witching.I can see Housh being #8 even with his schedule (and I don't own him - have Chad though). He's been consitantly thrown to on both deep and short passes. He's caught short balls and taken them the distance - good power, moves and speed ala a smaller bolden. That and with Henry out at least 2 more weeks (my opinion it will be more because he's a total loser), he's going to be targeted as much or more than he has been.There's some hopefully logical discussion for you.Mud out
bagger said:EdwardCat said:It wasn't before.DevilintheDetail said:Relax. Posting one ranking for discussion is ok around here.EdwardCat said:Can you explain to me why you are violating the rules of the board by posting proprietary information?at a 5 digit member telling people what is ok.i don't think you know.
Wow, I haven't seen one of these numbskull posts for a couple of years. Well played.bagger said:EdwardCat said:It wasn't before.DevilintheDetail said:Relax. Posting one ranking for discussion is ok around here.EdwardCat said:Can you explain to me why you are violating the rules of the board by posting proprietary information?at a 5 digit member telling people what is ok.i don't think you know.
Egg Zachary!Too many people on these boards act like they are the policeand like they are SOOOOOO inconvenienced by posts that might not follow the letter of the rulesrelax and chilltry to encourage interaction from newer members dont try to act like they are the new kid in school that you are trying to keep outta your cliqueBuzzworth said:Why don't we lets the mods do the moderating?EdwardCat said:Can you explain to me why you are violating the rules of the board by posting proprietary information?
errr someone is a little too proud of their digits.bagger said:EdwardCat said:It wasn't before.DevilintheDetail said:Relax. Posting one ranking for discussion is ok around here.EdwardCat said:Can you explain to me why you are violating the rules of the board by posting proprietary information?at a 5 digit member telling people what is ok.i don't think you know.
True. Of course, at the same time, Charlie Batch is also the #2 QB in points per game in one of my leagues (sandwiched right between McNabb and Manning). Then, of course, there's Stallworth... who even with his bomb in week 4 is the #4 WR in my league in points per game. I'm also reminded that, after 2 games, Lee Evans was something like the 80th WR in that league, too.Two games does not a representative sample make.mac daddy said:He is leading most leagues in points per game played (missed the first two games and had a bye, so has only played in 2 games), and is averaging 90 yards and a TD.
I didn't know people were still referring to members' #s around here. That's a shame. Most boards nowadays don't have member #s. It's nice to remind myself every so often why I've blocked bagger.bagger said:EdwardCat said:It wasn't before.DevilintheDetail said:Relax. Posting one ranking for discussion is ok around here.EdwardCat said:Can you explain to me why you are violating the rules of the board by posting proprietary information?at a 5 digit member telling people what is ok.i don't think you know.
That crack made me laugh after a crap day...kudos.Back on topic...Hush is a must start every week and I don't see too many guys behind him that I would start over him. My guess is the FBG staff thinks the Bengals offense is going to catch fire and the chances of Henry poaching yards and TDs from Hush is being diminished by the week.JuniorNB said:What if 250 members all post one ranking?Shick! said:It has always been acceptable. You won't find one instance where it wasn't allowed to post a singular ranking for discussion.EdwardCat said:It wasn't before.DevilintheDetail said:Relax. Posting one ranking for discussion is ok around here.EdwardCat said:Can you explain to me why you are violating the rules of the board by posting proprietary information?![]()
You are wise beyond your years Master Yoda.Two games does not a representative sample make.
apparently you guys can't read.The 2-digit member number just oVVned all of you.It wasn't before.Relax. Posting one ranking for discussion is ok around here.Can you explain to me why you are violating the rules of the board by posting proprietary information?at a 5 digit member telling people what is ok.i don't think you know.
at a 2 digit member thinking he's better than everyone.apparently he does know!
![]()
![]()
![]()
It wasn't before.Relax. Posting one ranking for discussion is ok around here.Can you explain to me why you are violating the rules of the board by posting proprietary information?at a 5 digit member telling people what is ok.i don't think you know.
@ someone who thinks having a 2 digit member number on a FF fourm is a BIG DEAL....So what you are saying is you have been a loser longer than most!! Congrats!!!
![]()
I don't know about you, but I'm not going to stop subscribing simply because someone posted a small portion of their content one week. The 250 Forward is good, but it's a minor cog in the information they provide, and all of this stuff is so volatile anyway. I'm not going to try to tell the FBG staff how to run their business, but I think they realize that as well.What if 250 members all post one ranking?It has always been acceptable. You won't find one instance where it wasn't allowed to post a singular ranking for discussion.It wasn't before.Relax. Posting one ranking for discussion is ok around here.Can you explain to me why you are violating the rules of the board by posting proprietary information?![]()
they're just hopping in the boat today.bump
Bagger...why would you bump this when it makes you look bad? You claimed that a 5-digit member didn't know what he was talking because he was a 5-digit member, yet Shick! confirmed that DevilintheDetail was correct.MelvinTScupper...you may want to brush up on your reading comprehension skills.Let's let this thread die, please? Of the 46 total replies maybe 8 are relevant.bump