eighsse2
Footballguy
This topic has come up briefly at times. But still curious as to the ultimate truth of the issue.
Suppose every owner in your dynasty league aside from yourself has unanimously skewed valuations. Say everyone overvalues RB's versus the other positions (overvalue meaning valuing them more highly than any logical, statistical analysis would). Then, if you want to acquire a RB in a trade, you must pay far more than you "should" have to. If you want to acquire a RB with a draft pick, you will have to dig deeper into the RB list than you "should" have to with that specific pick (and also you must be passing up on several better "BPA"s). The obvious conclusions are, Take the way better BPA with that draft pick, dummy! and Don't trade for a RB, dummy; you'll have to overpay! And while you're at it, trade away that solid RB that you do have, you'll get better value than you deserve!
But then ... Where do you get your RB's if the values are all skewed like that? You still have to have RB's. The monopolized opinions, even if they're wrong, force the values to change to the market value dictated by the rest of the league.
Free agency is a good answer, I suppose. Use draft picks to grab the non-RB BPAs that fall to you, and then do your best to grab RB's off waivers after there is an injury to the starter.
There's no black and white answer, just wondering what decisions you would make in that situation. You can imagine it to an extreme, you know, where trading Justin Jefferson for a RB might only get you someone like Pollard or Jacobs; and where a 16th pick in the rookie draft would leave you to choose from the QB2, the WR3, or the RB13 of the class.
Suppose every owner in your dynasty league aside from yourself has unanimously skewed valuations. Say everyone overvalues RB's versus the other positions (overvalue meaning valuing them more highly than any logical, statistical analysis would). Then, if you want to acquire a RB in a trade, you must pay far more than you "should" have to. If you want to acquire a RB with a draft pick, you will have to dig deeper into the RB list than you "should" have to with that specific pick (and also you must be passing up on several better "BPA"s). The obvious conclusions are, Take the way better BPA with that draft pick, dummy! and Don't trade for a RB, dummy; you'll have to overpay! And while you're at it, trade away that solid RB that you do have, you'll get better value than you deserve!
But then ... Where do you get your RB's if the values are all skewed like that? You still have to have RB's. The monopolized opinions, even if they're wrong, force the values to change to the market value dictated by the rest of the league.
Free agency is a good answer, I suppose. Use draft picks to grab the non-RB BPAs that fall to you, and then do your best to grab RB's off waivers after there is an injury to the starter.
There's no black and white answer, just wondering what decisions you would make in that situation. You can imagine it to an extreme, you know, where trading Justin Jefferson for a RB might only get you someone like Pollard or Jacobs; and where a 16th pick in the rookie draft would leave you to choose from the QB2, the WR3, or the RB13 of the class.