What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Cards lock up Fitz (1 Viewer)

Is there anyone that's not overpaid in the Shark Pool's mind outside of Manning, Rodgers, Brady, Brees, Rivers and Roethlisberer? Rookies shouldn't get a lot of money. Veterans over 30 shouldn't get a lot of money. QBs that haven't proven themselves to be superstars shouldn't get a lot of money. Chris Johnson shouldn't get a ton of money. Larry Fitzgerald now, too, shouldn't get a lot of money. I'm shuked.

I think the perfect Shark Pool team would go 8-8 and use 40% of the salary cap.

 
Wow. That is a horrible deal for the Cardinals. No receiver is worth that type of money.
With the new CBA you will see more contracts like this for the top players.Nice to see he'll spend the rest of his career as a Cardinal. It was important of the franchise to secure this.
 
Is there anyone that's not overpaid in the Shark Pool's mind outside of Manning, Rodgers, Brady, Brees, Rivers and Roethlisberer? Rookies shouldn't get a lot of money. Veterans over 30 shouldn't get a lot of money. QBs that haven't proven themselves to be superstars shouldn't get a lot of money. Chris Johnson shouldn't get a ton of money. Larry Fitzgerald now, too, shouldn't get a lot of money. I'm shuked.I think the perfect Shark Pool team would go 8-8 and use 40% of the salary cap.
Not speaking for others, but for me, I just see WR as a position where a ton of money should not be spent. You want to overspend on a player, do it on a D Tackle, D End, or a Left Tackle.
 
Wow. That is a horrible deal for the Cardinals. No receiver is worth that type of money.
With the new CBA you will see more contracts like this for the top players.Nice to see he'll spend the rest of his career as a Cardinal. It was important of the franchise to secure this.
Alot of the free agents didn't sign for what I would call big money, so I was surprised at the size of this contract (fully understanding that Fitzgerald is one of the premier players at his position). I think the Chris Johnson contract will be telling.
 
Wow. That is a horrible deal for the Cardinals. No receiver is worth that type of money.
:goodposting: Larry's one of the best, but he's still just a WR.
Not sure what the Cardinals were thinking. The 50 mil guaranteed is just ridiculous money.
He's one of the few guarantees in the NFL. He has it all and is staple in the community.Jerry rice II is priceless.
Teams shouldn't pay players based on what they do in the community. There is a salary cap in the NFL and teams have to build the best team they can under the restraints of the cap. Throwing that much money at a wide receiver, in my opinion, is not a smart move. Especially when you have a sieve of a defense.
 
Wow. That is a horrible deal for the Cardinals. No receiver is worth that type of money.
With the new CBA you will see more contracts like this for the top players.Nice to see he'll spend the rest of his career as a Cardinal. It was important of the franchise to secure this.
Alot of the free agents didn't sign for what I would call big money, so I was surprised at the size of this contract (fully understanding that Fitzgerald is one of the premier players at his position). I think the Chris Johnson contract will be telling.
In the long term, Fitz is worth much more than Chris Johnson.This contract will be the new norm for the premier QBs and WRs...RBs not so much because they have such a short shelf life.
 
Wow. That is a horrible deal for the Cardinals. No receiver is worth that type of money.
With the new CBA you will see more contracts like this for the top players.Nice to see he'll spend the rest of his career as a Cardinal. It was important of the franchise to secure this.
Alot of the free agents didn't sign for what I would call big money, so I was surprised at the size of this contract (fully understanding that Fitzgerald is one of the premier players at his position). I think the Chris Johnson contract will be telling.
In the long term, Fitz is worth much more than Chris Johnson.This contract will be the new norm for the premier QBs and WRs...RBs not so much because they have such a short shelf life.
:goodposting: Investing a lot in a rb is suicide. Investing in one of the best wrs to ever play the game who will be elite for 5-8 more years is a good move.It isn't like fitz wouldn't have got this kind of deal in the open market. With the new salary cap it could be argued the cards got a steal.
 
Between the Center in Carolina today, and Fitz tonight...Johnson is going to ask for AROD money at this point. 10 yr/$200m with $120m in guaranteed money.

 
Glad to see the Cards lock him him up. Fitz has been a rock throughout his time there.

Teams shouldn't pay players based on what they do in the community.
And sure they should. When that player is Fitz and he's a pillar of society and a Hall of Fame talent.I'm not arguing the size of the contract. I'm just saying the smart owners keep the guys who are involved in the community AND superstar players.

If fans like the player they are more likely to come watch them. It also makes the fans happy which in turn makes the franchise image better. Fitz is loved by his city.

...and all that equals $$ for the franchise.

 
Letting Fitz go would have crushed the Cards in AZ for quite a while, the sheer loss of revenue due to fans not going to the games etc. after losing Fitz makes this a no brainer.

 
If you asked a cardinal fan who was their favorite player I'd bet 90%+ would say fitz.

He makes a ton of money for the cardinals, without him no one cares about that team.

 
Letting Fitz go would have crushed the Cards in AZ for quite a while, the sheer loss of revenue due to fans not going to the games etc. after losing Fitz makes this a no brainer.
:bs:So are you saying when Larry retires, the stadium is going to empty out? Stars come and go man.
 
If you asked a cardinal fan who was their favorite player I'd bet 90%+ would say fitz.He makes a ton of money for the cardinals, without him no one cares about that team.
Probably more since the team has been stripped of 90% of it's talent since the SB run. He's basically the only one left besides Dockett.
 
Letting Fitz go would have crushed the Cards in AZ for quite a while, the sheer loss of revenue due to fans not going to the games etc. after losing Fitz makes this a no brainer.
:bs:So are you saying when Larry retires, the stadium is going to empty out? Stars come and go man.
No, but our stadium was empty for many years before Larry...You must be super out of touch with the Cardinals fans and the State of AZ if you don't think that letting Fitz go via FA wouldn't have a major adverse effect on the amount of fans going to the games in the immediate future.
 
If you asked a cardinal fan who was their favorite player I'd bet 90%+ would say fitz.He makes a ton of money for the cardinals, without him no one cares about that team.
Probably more since the team has been stripped of 90% of it's talent since the SB run. He's basically the only one left besides Dockett.
Wilson is very popular too.
Oh yeah, good catch. Wilson is right behind Larry in terms of popularity.
 
Another thing to remember too...Larry is a team guy.

If the Cards need him to restructure in the future, pretty sure Larry will step up.

 
Another thing to remember too...Larry is a team guy.If the Cards need him to restructure in the future, pretty sure Larry will step up.
We'll see. He said as much to keep Boldin, but unfortunately that didn't work.He deserves props for sticking to his principle of re-signing after they got his hand picked QB rather than waiting to see how it played out during the season.
 
Letting Fitz go would have crushed the Cards in AZ for quite a while, the sheer loss of revenue due to fans not going to the games etc. after losing Fitz makes this a no brainer.
:bs:So are you saying when Larry retires, the stadium is going to empty out? Stars come and go man.
No, but our stadium was empty for many years before Larry...You must be super out of touch with the Cardinals fans and the State of AZ if you don't think that letting Fitz go via FA wouldn't have a major adverse effect on the amount of fans going to the games in the immediate future.
Let's not gloss over the fact that it was 100 degrees at kickoff "before Larry" and now it's not.A small percentage of people would be upset, but they're easy to bring back when things start rolling and new stars are born.
 
Letting Fitz go would have crushed the Cards in AZ for quite a while, the sheer loss of revenue due to fans not going to the games etc. after losing Fitz makes this a no brainer.
:bs:So are you saying when Larry retires, the stadium is going to empty out? Stars come and go man.
No, but our stadium was empty for many years before Larry...You must be super out of touch with the Cardinals fans and the State of AZ if you don't think that letting Fitz go via FA wouldn't have a major adverse effect on the amount of fans going to the games in the immediate future.
Let's not gloss over the fact that it was 100 degrees at kickoff "before Larry" and now it's not.A small percentage of people would be upset, but they're easy to bring back when things start rolling and new stars are born.
You seem... Out of touch.
 
Another thing to remember too...Larry is a team guy.If the Cards need him to restructure in the future, pretty sure Larry will step up.
We'll see. He said as much to keep Boldin, but unfortunately that didn't work.He deserves props for sticking to his principle of re-signing after they got his hand picked QB rather than waiting to see how it played out during the season.
No doubt he would step up. He and Kevin are both happy to be Cards for the rest of their careers. The team is starting to gel, Fitz & Kev want to win and are working hard to get things turned around, and the Cards have two fine leaders on the team. Fans would be suprised at just how hard Fitz worked to get his "hand picked QB" and I think they are both on the right track to success out there. There was never a doubt this deal was going to get done.(On another note regarding who the #2 WR will be this year? Expect Roberts to edge out Doucet.)I'm too tired to search the thread that was discussing that.
 
Letting Fitz go would have crushed the Cards in AZ for quite a while, the sheer loss of revenue due to fans not going to the games etc. after losing Fitz makes this a no brainer.
:bs:So are you saying when Larry retires, the stadium is going to empty out? Stars come and go man.
No, but our stadium was empty for many years before Larry...You must be super out of touch with the Cardinals fans and the State of AZ if you don't think that letting Fitz go via FA wouldn't have a major adverse effect on the amount of fans going to the games in the immediate future.
Let's not gloss over the fact that it was 100 degrees at kickoff "before Larry" and now it's not.A small percentage of people would be upset, but they're easy to bring back when things start rolling and new stars are born.
You seem... Out of touch.
This just in: pro sports works because teams are constantly churning their rosters with newer, younger talent. There might be a short term bottoming when a popular player leaves, but with all other things the same, those people eventually come back.
 
Letting Fitz go would have crushed the Cards in AZ for quite a while, the sheer loss of revenue due to fans not going to the games etc. after losing Fitz makes this a no brainer.
:bs:So are you saying when Larry retires, the stadium is going to empty out? Stars come and go man.
No, but our stadium was empty for many years before Larry...You must be super out of touch with the Cardinals fans and the State of AZ if you don't think that letting Fitz go via FA wouldn't have a major adverse effect on the amount of fans going to the games in the immediate future.
Let's not gloss over the fact that it was 100 degrees at kickoff "before Larry" and now it's not.A small percentage of people would be upset, but they're easy to bring back when things start rolling and new stars are born.
You seem... Out of touch.
This just in: pro sports works because teams are constantly churning their rosters with newer, younger talent. There might be a short term bottoming when a popular player leaves, but with all other things the same, those people eventually come back.
I understand that. But you don't churn the roster just to churn it. Losing The best WR of his generation for nothing would be a costly mistake. You also seem to be downplaying Fitz's role in the offense. Not to mention that we're talking about Phoenix here. Assuming any sort of attendance is a guarantee is silly. Fitzgerald or not.
 
Letting Fitz go would have crushed the Cards in AZ for quite a while, the sheer loss of revenue due to fans not going to the games etc. after losing Fitz makes this a no brainer.
:bs: So are you saying when Larry retires, the stadium is going to empty out? Stars come and go man.
No, but our stadium was empty for many years before Larry...You must be super out of touch with the Cardinals fans and the State of AZ if you don't think that letting Fitz go via FA wouldn't have a major adverse effect on the amount of fans going to the games in the immediate future.
Let's not gloss over the fact that it was 100 degrees at kickoff "before Larry" and now it's not.A small percentage of people would be upset, but they're easy to bring back when things start rolling and new stars are born.
Fitzgeralds aren't born every day.He's crystal clean character wise, one of the hardest workers in the NFL, and has disgusting talent to boot.

He's a once in a generation talent, no team can afford to lose a player like him, he'll be in the record books when his career is over.

***edited to add: You're a poor excuse for a cardinal fan, if you are one. Shame on you for taking Jerry II for granted.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Letting Fitz go would have crushed the Cards in AZ for quite a while, the sheer loss of revenue due to fans not going to the games etc. after losing Fitz makes this a no brainer.
:bs: So are you saying when Larry retires, the stadium is going to empty out? Stars come and go man.
No, but our stadium was empty for many years before Larry...You must be super out of touch with the Cardinals fans and the State of AZ if you don't think that letting Fitz go via FA wouldn't have a major adverse effect on the amount of fans going to the games in the immediate future.
Let's not gloss over the fact that it was 100 degrees at kickoff "before Larry" and now it's not.A small percentage of people would be upset, but they're easy to bring back when things start rolling and new stars are born.
Fitzgeralds aren't born every day.He's crystal clean character wise, one of the hardest workers in the NFL, and has disgusting talent to boot.

He's a once in a generation talent, no team can afford to lose a player like him, he'll be in the record books when his career is over.

***edited to add: You're a poor excuse for a cardinal fan, if you are one. Shame on you for taking Jerry II for granted.
"Once in a generation talent"? You're being sensational to emphasize your side of the debate. He's a fantastic receiver who does all the things you say, but that doesn't make you a generational player. In fact, if you extrapulate his past stats over the course of his career and he wouldn't even be up for debate as a first ballot HOFer. Besides, stats only go the other opposite way so I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt.
 
Letting Fitz go would have crushed the Cards in AZ for quite a while, the sheer loss of revenue due to fans not going to the games etc. after losing Fitz makes this a no brainer.
:bs: So are you saying when Larry retires, the stadium is going to empty out? Stars come and go man.
No, but our stadium was empty for many years before Larry...You must be super out of touch with the Cardinals fans and the State of AZ if you don't think that letting Fitz go via FA wouldn't have a major adverse effect on the amount of fans going to the games in the immediate future.
Let's not gloss over the fact that it was 100 degrees at kickoff "before Larry" and now it's not.A small percentage of people would be upset, but they're easy to bring back when things start rolling and new stars are born.
Fitzgeralds aren't born every day.He's crystal clean character wise, one of the hardest workers in the NFL, and has disgusting talent to boot.

He's a once in a generation talent, no team can afford to lose a player like him, he'll be in the record books when his career is over.

***edited to add: You're a poor excuse for a cardinal fan, if you are one. Shame on you for taking Jerry II for granted.
Cool. You're making it sound like I said he sucks or I dislike him which is incorrect.

 
Letting Fitz go would have crushed the Cards in AZ for quite a while, the sheer loss of revenue due to fans not going to the games etc. after losing Fitz makes this a no brainer.
:bs:So are you saying when Larry retires, the stadium is going to empty out? Stars come and go man.
No, but our stadium was empty for many years before Larry...You must be super out of touch with the Cardinals fans and the State of AZ if you don't think that letting Fitz go via FA wouldn't have a major adverse effect on the amount of fans going to the games in the immediate future.
Let's not gloss over the fact that it was 100 degrees at kickoff "before Larry" and now it's not.A small percentage of people would be upset, but they're easy to bring back when things start rolling and new stars are born.
Just ####### awful. Small percentage. ####### ridiculous.
 
Letting Fitz go would have crushed the Cards in AZ for quite a while, the sheer loss of revenue due to fans not going to the games etc. after losing Fitz makes this a no brainer.
:bs:So are you saying when Larry retires, the stadium is going to empty out? Stars come and go man.
No, but our stadium was empty for many years before Larry...You must be super out of touch with the Cardinals fans and the State of AZ if you don't think that letting Fitz go via FA wouldn't have a major adverse effect on the amount of fans going to the games in the immediate future.
Let's not gloss over the fact that it was 100 degrees at kickoff "before Larry" and now it's not.A small percentage of people would be upset, but they're easy to bring back when things start rolling and new stars are born.
Just ####### awful. Small percentage. ####### ridiculous.
:lmao: You guys crack me up.Did the Chargers do OK attendance wise after they let LT walk? How about when the Seahawks let Alexander go?
 
Worth every penny.
You forgot the sarcasm emote. 50 Million guaranteed for anyone is nuts this year, espescially a WR.
No it's not. Teams are spending 30 mill guaranteed on losers, fitz is a guaranteed stud, one of the best wrs in history. After rice, and he could pass him when it's all over, there has been no better.
You're either an overt Cardinal homer or are trolling to get a rise out of people. Fitz is not even the best WR in football today. Stop it.
 
Letting Fitz go would have crushed the Cards in AZ for quite a while, the sheer loss of revenue due to fans not going to the games etc. after losing Fitz makes this a no brainer.
:bs:So are you saying when Larry retires, the stadium is going to empty out? Stars come and go man.
No, but our stadium was empty for many years before Larry...You must be super out of touch with the Cardinals fans and the State of AZ if you don't think that letting Fitz go via FA wouldn't have a major adverse effect on the amount of fans going to the games in the immediate future.
Let's not gloss over the fact that it was 100 degrees at kickoff "before Larry" and now it's not.A small percentage of people would be upset, but they're easy to bring back when things start rolling and new stars are born.
Just ####### awful. Small percentage. ####### ridiculous.
:lmao: You guys crack me up.Did the Chargers do OK attendance wise after they let LT walk? How about when the Seahawks let Alexander go?
Terrible examples. Again awful.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top