benson_will_lead_the_way
Footballguy
I am biased in favor of Benson. But I am curious as to what the general public would see the starter.
Are you trying to imply something or should I just read between the lines?It will be GIVEN to Benson.
End of story.
He won't earn jack squat.
hahahahaha....simply one of the best posts I have ever seenAre you trying to imply something or should I just read between the lines?It will be GIVEN to Benson.
End of story.
He won't earn jack squat.![]()
couldn't say it better myself....there is a difference between Grade A(Benson) and Grade B(Jones) meatMajor Bears fan here, and honestly, I want to see Benson carry the load this year. TJ was very good for 2 yrs, and would be an awesome backup, but I think Benson is just what the doctor ordered for this team
What has Benson done other than hold out an entire training camp and pull up lame when the team needed him most last season? On the other hand, all Jones did was essentially provide every bit of offense the Bears mustered the last two years. I'm not happy about his stance with the OTA's, and if he holds out of training camp then I say go with Benson. But, if he shows up and in shape then I say give the ball to Jones until Benson proves he can do something with it.couldn't say it better myself....there is a difference between Grade A(Benson) and Grade B(Jones) meatMajor Bears fan here, and honestly, I want to see Benson carry the load this year. TJ was very good for 2 yrs, and would be an awesome backup, but I think Benson is just what the doctor ordered for this team
That is absolutely correct...he's making the decision for Angelo and Lovie easy.You don't draft a guy 4th overall, pay him millions and let him be a backup if you see the opportunity to GIVE him the job.
Thomas Jones is his own worst enemy by missing VOLUNTARY team activities.
What has Benson done other than hold out an entire training camp and pull up lame when the team needed him most last season? On the other hand, all Jones did was essentially provide every bit of offense the Bears mustered the last two years. I'm not happy about his stance with the OTA's, and if he holds out of training camp then I say go with Benson. But, if he shows up and in shape then I say give the ball to Jones until Benson proves he can do something with it.couldn't say it better myself....there is a difference between Grade A(Benson) and Grade B(Jones) meatMajor Bears fan here, and honestly, I want to see Benson carry the load this year. TJ was very good for 2 yrs, and would be an awesome backup, but I think Benson is just what the doctor ordered for this team
He was better than Jones if you look at Yards Per Carrybtw... Adrian Peterson was better than Benson last year.
I'm really not sure how anyone who has actually watched every down of Chicago Bear football the past 2 seasons cannot...1) have the utmost of respect for Thomas Jones as a football player.He was better than Jones if you look at Yards Per Carrybtw... Adrian Peterson was better than Benson last year.
If you look at statistics....Thomas Jones is pretty much equal to Anthony Thomas in his days with Chicago and only slightly better than James Allen.If you are the #7 overall pick and it take you 6 years to finally gain over 1000 yards in a season....something is seriously wrong.I'm really not sure how anyone who has actually watched every down of Chicago Bear football the past 2 seasons cannot...1) have the utmost of respect for Thomas Jones as a football player.He was better than Jones if you look at Yards Per Carrybtw... Adrian Peterson was better than Benson last year.
2) wonder how miserable the offensive output would have been had he NOT been there.
3) honestly think that Benson, at this point at least, deserves the starting job.
Thomas Jones has really been the only bright spot on an utterly miserable offensive football team for two entire years. He has absolutely earned the starting job without question, provided he makes all the mandatory camps/meetings.
Thomas Jones: 98.4 Y/G; 0.55 TDs/G; 4.12 YPCAnthony Thomas: 75.3 Y/G; 0.41 TDs/G; 3.88 YPCIf you look at statistics....Thomas Jones is pretty much equal to Anthony Thomas in his days with Chicago and only slightly better than James Allen.
as someone who swore 4 years ago that Thomas Jones sucked eggs, it pains me to sayI'm really not sure how anyone who has actually watched every down of Chicago Bear football the past 2 seasons cannot...1) have the utmost of respect for Thomas Jones as a football player.He was better than Jones if you look at Yards Per Carrybtw... Adrian Peterson was better than Benson last year.
2) wonder how miserable the offensive output would have been had he NOT been there.
3) honestly think that Benson, at this point at least, deserves the starting job.
Thomas Jones has really been the only bright spot on an utterly miserable offensive football team for two entire years. He has absolutely earned the starting job without question, provided he makes all the mandatory camps/meetings.
And by "pretty much" you mean if you discount Anthony Thomas' ####ty 2002 and 2004?Thomas Jones has done nothing short of pulling a miracle producing what he has produced in that offense the past two years.If you look at statistics....Thomas Jones is pretty much equal to Anthony Thomas in his days with Chicago and only slightly better than James Allen.
Where are you getting these stats from?Thomas Jones: 98.4 Y/G; 0.55 TDs/G; 4.12 YPCAnthony Thomas: 75.3 Y/G; 0.41 TDs/G; 3.88 YPCIf you look at statistics....Thomas Jones is pretty much equal to Anthony Thomas in his days with Chicago and only slightly better than James Allen.
So you are going to discount Thomas Jones' first 4 years in the league as well.I am not talking fantasy numbers but those are pretty close. You fail to include that Anthony Thomas has rushed for over 1000 yards twice in his career and with the bears....neither Thomas Jones has or will do again. Also the YPC which were identicle 4.3 from 2001 with A-train to this past year of 2005 with Jones. It just happened that Anthony Thomas didn't get his starting job until a few games into that season and still was rookie of the year that season....oh wait wasn't Thomas Jones drafted that same season....how did he do...373 yards rushing.And by "pretty much" you mean if you discount Anthony Thomas' ####ty 2002 and 2004?Thomas Jones has done nothing short of pulling a miracle producing what he has produced in that offense the past two years.If you look at statistics....Thomas Jones is pretty much equal to Anthony Thomas in his days with Chicago and only slightly better than James Allen.
Edit: infact, Thomas' best season in Chicago still did not equal Jones' 2004 or 2005.
Thomas, 2001: 1183 rushyds, 7 rushTDs, 22 rec, 178 recyds... 178 FPs
Jones, 2004: 948 rushyds, 7 rushTDs, 56 rec, 427 recyds... 180 FPs
Jones, 2005: 1335 rushyds, 9 rushTDs, 26 rec, 143 recyds... 202 FPs
Lots of places have those numbers. I got them from the data dominator. I looked at the careers of both running backs during their times with the Bears only.Where are you getting these stats from?Thomas Jones: 98.4 Y/G; 0.55 TDs/G; 4.12 YPCAnthony Thomas: 75.3 Y/G; 0.41 TDs/G; 3.88 YPCIf you look at statistics....Thomas Jones is pretty much equal to Anthony Thomas in his days with Chicago and only slightly better than James Allen.
What are the career numbers?Did you count games not played due to injury?Lots of places have those numbers. I got them from the data dominator. I looked at the careers of both running backs during their times with the Bears only.Where are you getting these stats from?Thomas Jones: 98.4 Y/G; 0.55 TDs/G; 4.12 YPCAnthony Thomas: 75.3 Y/G; 0.41 TDs/G; 3.88 YPCIf you look at statistics....Thomas Jones is pretty much equal to Anthony Thomas in his days with Chicago and only slightly better than James Allen.
I only counted games played. I didn't do the career numbers because the only question was which player did better as a Bear.What are the career numbers?Did you count games not played due to injury?Lots of places have those numbers. I got them from the data dominator. I looked at the careers of both running backs during their times with the Bears only.Where are you getting these stats from?Thomas Jones: 98.4 Y/G; 0.55 TDs/G; 4.12 YPCAnthony Thomas: 75.3 Y/G; 0.41 TDs/G; 3.88 YPCIf you look at statistics....Thomas Jones is pretty much equal to Anthony Thomas in his days with Chicago and only slightly better than James Allen.
Yup. Grade B meat only averages 4.3 yards per carry, while Grade A manages 4.1.couldn't say it better myself....there is a difference between Grade A(Benson) and Grade B(Jones) meatMajor Bears fan here, and honestly, I want to see Benson carry the load this year. TJ was very good for 2 yrs, and would be an awesome backup, but I think Benson is just what the doctor ordered for this team
Theres a reason they picked the guy 4th in the draft.What has Benson done other than hold out an entire training camp and pull up lame when the team needed him most last season? On the other hand, all Jones did was essentially provide every bit of offense the Bears mustered the last two years. I'm not happy about his stance with the OTA's, and if he holds out of training camp then I say go with Benson. But, if he shows up and in shape then I say give the ball to Jones until Benson proves he can do something with it.couldn't say it better myself....there is a difference between Grade A(Benson) and Grade B(Jones) meatMajor Bears fan here, and honestly, I want to see Benson carry the load this year. TJ was very good for 2 yrs, and would be an awesome backup, but I think Benson is just what the doctor ordered for this team
Bears' front office is clueless?Theres a reason they picked the guy 4th in the draft.What has Benson done other than hold out an entire training camp and pull up lame when the team needed him most last season? On the other hand, all Jones did was essentially provide every bit of offense the Bears mustered the last two years. I'm not happy about his stance with the OTA's, and if he holds out of training camp then I say go with Benson. But, if he shows up and in shape then I say give the ball to Jones until Benson proves he can do something with it.couldn't say it better myself....there is a difference between Grade A(Benson) and Grade B(Jones) meatMajor Bears fan here, and honestly, I want to see Benson carry the load this year. TJ was very good for 2 yrs, and would be an awesome backup, but I think Benson is just what the doctor ordered for this team
This is eerily reminescent of the Henry/McGahee debate a couple years ago. Not saying I disagree with you, but the fact that one player has carried the team (Henry did it on a broken leg) does not always mean he will keep his job.I'm really not sure how anyone who has actually watched every down of Chicago Bear football the past 2 seasons cannot...1) have the utmost of respect for Thomas Jones as a football player.He was better than Jones if you look at Yards Per Carrybtw... Adrian Peterson was better than Benson last year.
2) wonder how miserable the offensive output would have been had he NOT been there.
3) honestly think that Benson, at this point at least, deserves the starting job.
Thomas Jones has really been the only bright spot on an utterly miserable offensive football team for two entire years. He has absolutely earned the starting job without question, provided he makes all the mandatory camps/meetings.
Yea, real clueless. Look at what the "clueless" front office has done to that roster and get back to me geniusBears' front office is clueless?Theres a reason they picked the guy 4th in the draft.What has Benson done other than hold out an entire training camp and pull up lame when the team needed him most last season? On the other hand, all Jones did was essentially provide every bit of offense the Bears mustered the last two years. I'm not happy about his stance with the OTA's, and if he holds out of training camp then I say go with Benson. But, if he shows up and in shape then I say give the ball to Jones until Benson proves he can do something with it.couldn't say it better myself....there is a difference between Grade A(Benson) and Grade B(Jones) meatMajor Bears fan here, and honestly, I want to see Benson carry the load this year. TJ was very good for 2 yrs, and would be an awesome backup, but I think Benson is just what the doctor ordered for this team
The thing about Jones is that he excels in receiving and blocking, two things that the minicamp reports were saying that Benson supposedly dedicated himself to in the offseason, but was still showing deficiencies. I have TJ, I know the end is probably near in Chicago for him, but this year I think at worst he will be 3rd down back because of what I mentioned above and has a good chance of remaining the starter. Worst case scenario, I think he should be comparable to Chris Perry with huge upside if he keeps the #1 spot.Unfortunately, he hired Rosenhaus and missed that OTA's and I have a feeling that it will end up costing him in the end. Eventually, Benson was going to get a chance to show what he can do, why would you open the door for him?B. NuggetThis is eerily reminescent of the Henry/McGahee debate a couple years ago. Not saying I disagree with you, but the fact that one player has carried the team (Henry did it on a broken leg) does not always mean he will keep his job.
redraft or dynastyi only play dynasty,no way benson or white can be had that late. burress and mason should go later. swap wr for rb.How crazy would this be:
rd1: Peyton Manning
rd2: Terrell Owens
rd3: Plaxico Burres
rd4: Tony Gonzalez
rd5: Derrick Masonn
rd6: Cedric Benson
rd7: LenDale White
rd8: Curtis Martin
![]()
I live in the now... so I'm not much of a dynasty player.Naturally, this is a redraft roster.redraft or dynastyi only play dynasty,no way benson or white can be had that late. burress and mason should go later. swap wr for rb.How crazy would this be:
rd1: Peyton Manning
rd2: Terrell Owens
rd3: Plaxico Burres
rd4: Tony Gonzalez
rd5: Derrick Masonn
rd6: Cedric Benson
rd7: LenDale White
rd8: Curtis Martin
![]()
Even the best front offices get it wrong sometimes. See the last 9 players of the New England Patriots 2001 draft (all 9 of whom are currently OoF- Out of Football).Edit: See, also, Drew Brees/Phillip Rivers.Yea, real clueless. Look at what the "clueless" front office has done to that roster and get back to me genius
There was something seriously wrong. He was playing in Arizona.If you are the #7 overall pick and it take you 6 years to finally gain over 1000 yards in a season....something is seriously wrong.
As a Bears fan that has watched every minute of Bears games the last two years, this post is spot on. Jones has actually been the Bears Offensive MVP in my opinion the last two years. He has gone against the eight man fronts and he has made something out of nothing. I understand that there are a lot of fantasy owners out there who have been burnt by Jones in the past, but that does not take away from the fact that Jones has done very well the last three years (his final year in Tampa included). I would also agree that Peterson looked better than Benson did last year. I think it is a very good problem for the Bears to have, Jones has shown he is susceptable to injury and we have 2 very good backups. Eventually Benson will be forced into the starting lineup due to the fact that he was taken 4th overall, but it will not be because Jones has under performed.I'm really not sure how anyone who has actually watched every down of Chicago Bear football the past 2 seasons cannot...1) have the utmost of respect for Thomas Jones as a football player.He was better than Jones if you look at Yards Per Carrybtw... Adrian Peterson was better than Benson last year.
2) wonder how miserable the offensive output would have been had he NOT been there.
3) honestly think that Benson, at this point at least, deserves the starting job.
Thomas Jones has really been the only bright spot on an utterly miserable offensive football team for two entire years. He has absolutely earned the starting job without question, provided he makes all the mandatory camps/meetings.
try again.Bears and Jones lovers fail to understand that this isn't about Jones' inability to produce, but Benson's ability to outproduce Jones... by a lot.Last year, I got beat up pretty bad on this board for suggesting that the Bears were dumb for drafting Benson, when they had Thomas Jones on the roster.
I argued that his time in AZ was a joke and that he looked great in Tampa when given limited opportunities.
I also pointed to Jones' decent first season with the Bears and yet got blasted by nearly every poster on the thread.
As a result of the Jones hate, the Bears offense and the Benson situation, I drafted Jones in the 10th round!
I plan to get him very late again this year, so keep the hate rolling fellas.
Thomas Jones will outplay Ced Benson AGAIN and will be my cheap #2 or #3 back.
based on........????????try again.Bears and Jones lovers fail to understand that this isn't about Jones' inability to produce, but Benson's ability to outproduce Jones... by a lot.Last year, I got beat up pretty bad on this board for suggesting that the Bears were dumb for drafting Benson, when they had Thomas Jones on the roster.
I argued that his time in AZ was a joke and that he looked great in Tampa when given limited opportunities.
I also pointed to Jones' decent first season with the Bears and yet got blasted by nearly every poster on the thread.
As a result of the Jones hate, the Bears offense and the Benson situation, I drafted Jones in the 10th round!
I plan to get him very late again this year, so keep the hate rolling fellas.
Thomas Jones will outplay Ced Benson AGAIN and will be my cheap #2 or #3 back.
try again.Bears and Jones lovers fail to understand that this isn't about Jones' inability to produce, but Benson's ability to outproduce Jones... by a lot.Last year, I got beat up pretty bad on this board for suggesting that the Bears were dumb for drafting Benson, when they had Thomas Jones on the roster.
I argued that his time in AZ was a joke and that he looked great in Tampa when given limited opportunities.
I also pointed to Jones' decent first season with the Bears and yet got blasted by nearly every poster on the thread.
As a result of the Jones hate, the Bears offense and the Benson situation, I drafted Jones in the 10th round!
I plan to get him very late again this year, so keep the hate rolling fellas.
Thomas Jones will outplay Ced Benson AGAIN and will be my cheap #2 or #3 back.
I honestly feel bad for Jones. He's a very solid RB. I was hoping TB would have been able to hold onto him and let Pittman go instead...
While it seems Jones can't catch a break, and he's a great guy and a good RB, Benson will be the starter, not because he earned it, but because he will be the better RB.
This is why Jones has been asking for a trade this whole time.
He was a steal last year though. People forgot that in '04 he led the league in Rushing until Grossman got hurt.
This year though, don't make the mistake trying to be a, unless you also plan on drafting him as your RB5 who could go the entire year without starting a game.
I agree that Benson got hurt in his first half as a starter, but I'm just saying that Peterson is probably among the best 3rd string running backs in the league. I know it was against the 49ers, but Peterson went for 120 yards and a touchdown in what was primarily just the second half after Benson got hurt. He is no real threat to be named the starter over Jones or Benson, however it could probably ease the decision to trade Jones in the future. In a related note, KFFL just mentioned that Peterson was signed to a three year extension.try again.Bears and Jones lovers fail to understand that this isn't about Jones' inability to produce, but Benson's ability to outproduce Jones... by a lot.Last year, I got beat up pretty bad on this board for suggesting that the Bears were dumb for drafting Benson, when they had Thomas Jones on the roster.
I argued that his time in AZ was a joke and that he looked great in Tampa when given limited opportunities.
I also pointed to Jones' decent first season with the Bears and yet got blasted by nearly every poster on the thread.
As a result of the Jones hate, the Bears offense and the Benson situation, I drafted Jones in the 10th round!
I plan to get him very late again this year, so keep the hate rolling fellas.
Thomas Jones will outplay Ced Benson AGAIN and will be my cheap #2 or #3 back.
I honestly feel bad for Jones. He's a very solid RB. I was hoping TB would have been able to hold onto him and let Pittman go instead...
While it seems Jones can't catch a break, and he's a great guy and a good RB, Benson will be the starter, not because he earned it, but because he will be the better RB.
This is why Jones has been asking for a trade this whole time.
He was a steal last year though. People forgot that in '04 he led the league in Rushing until Grossman got hurt.
This year though, don't make the mistake trying to be a, unless you also plan on drafting him as your RB5 who could go the entire year without starting a game.
Whats more moronic is people trying to make a big deal out of Peterson out-producing Benson last year. Benson hasnt gotten a real chance yet, and part of that is his own fault, but like I said up above, this guy has the pedigree to be one of the best backs in the league. This is a perfect offense for his strengths, and if he starts from day 1 I expect huge #s. More than TJ, at his best, could give.
MLBrandow I am also curious as to why you think this. I admitedly did not watch a lot of Benson in college, besides highlight reals. I know that picking them 4th overall the Bears must have seen something pretty special, and I understand he had good numbers and some sweet plays at Texas, but I don't know if I would put him in the ultra-special zone. As a Bears fan having watched studs like Enis and Salaam fizzle out, I am a little cautious and Jones hasn't shown me anything that would say that he should lose his job.based on........????????try again.Bears and Jones lovers fail to understand that this isn't about Jones' inability to produce, but Benson's ability to outproduce Jones... by a lot.Last year, I got beat up pretty bad on this board for suggesting that the Bears were dumb for drafting Benson, when they had Thomas Jones on the roster.
I argued that his time in AZ was a joke and that he looked great in Tampa when given limited opportunities.
I also pointed to Jones' decent first season with the Bears and yet got blasted by nearly every poster on the thread.
As a result of the Jones hate, the Bears offense and the Benson situation, I drafted Jones in the 10th round!
I plan to get him very late again this year, so keep the hate rolling fellas.
Thomas Jones will outplay Ced Benson AGAIN and will be my cheap #2 or #3 back.
This may go a long way in explaining why the Bears don't consider Jones the answer as a full time RB. Obviously, he is a very good RB, but he does have some weaknesses.Braden (New Brunswick, NJ): Where does Thomas Jones rank in your overall running back metrics, will Cedric Benson be able to fill his shoes? K.C. Joyner: (4:30 PM ET ) One of the ways I look at running backs is to see how they ranked on different kinds of running plays. For example, Jones ranked in the top 5 in both the dive play and the draw play in yards per attempt. The problem with Jones was that he did poorly on the Bears bread and butter run, which is the isolation play. Jones ranked 29th in that category, with only 2.9 yards per run. I think Benson has the ability to fill his shoes. He spent most of last season behind the curve because of his holdout. We should get a better feel of how good Benson really is this year after a full camp.
That is a telling stat and in Chicago it is all about getting the opportunity. Once the Bears gave Anthony Thomas a shot, he out produced James Allen. The same can be said of Benson over Thomas Jones. Jones is a good back but he would be so much better in a Zone-blocking running team(I.E. Atlanta, Denver, and now GB to name a few) b/c he is a scat back that has that quick little cut. But in a power running team Benson will prove to be the difference and now with Peterson backing him up and locked up for a while(at the league minimum) Chicago's running game will be amazing for years. Now the Bears just need to find a good FB that can stay healthy...Runnels?K.C. Joyner, the stat guy on ESPN, had a chat yesterday & had this to say about Jones/Benson:
This may go a long way in explaining why the Bears don't consider Jones the answer as a full time RB. Obviously, he is a very good RB, but he does have some weaknesses.Braden (New Brunswick, NJ): Where does Thomas Jones rank in your overall running back metrics, will Cedric Benson be able to fill his shoes?
K.C. Joyner: (4:30 PM ET ) One of the ways I look at running backs is to see how they ranked on different kinds of running plays. For example, Jones ranked in the top 5 in both the dive play and the draw play in yards per attempt. The problem with Jones was that he did poorly on the Bears bread and butter run, which is the isolation play. Jones ranked 29th in that category, with only 2.9 yards per run.
I think Benson has the ability to fill his shoes. He spent most of last season behind the curve because of his holdout. We should get a better feel of how good Benson really is this year after a full camp.
If you saw Benson in college or limited opportunities last season with the Bears you would see the SPECIAL part of his game. Curtis Enis tore his knee and basically had a degenerative condition with it and his knee cap that would have prevented him from playing for a extended period of time after the injury. Salaam rushed for over 1000 yards his rookie season and showed talent(exclude fumbles) but he just smoked too much weed.MLBrandow I am also curious as to why you think this. I admitedly did not watch a lot of Benson in college, besides highlight reals. I know that picking them 4th overall the Bears must have seen something pretty special, and I understand he had good numbers and some sweet plays at Texas, but I don't know if I would put him in the ultra-special zone. As a Bears fan having watched studs like Enis and Salaam fizzle out, I am a little cautious and Jones hasn't shown me anything that would say that he should lose his job.based on........????????try again.Bears and Jones lovers fail to understand that this isn't about Jones' inability to produce, but Benson's ability to outproduce Jones... by a lot.Last year, I got beat up pretty bad on this board for suggesting that the Bears were dumb for drafting Benson, when they had Thomas Jones on the roster.
I argued that his time in AZ was a joke and that he looked great in Tampa when given limited opportunities.
I also pointed to Jones' decent first season with the Bears and yet got blasted by nearly every poster on the thread.
As a result of the Jones hate, the Bears offense and the Benson situation, I drafted Jones in the 10th round!
I plan to get him very late again this year, so keep the hate rolling fellas.
Thomas Jones will outplay Ced Benson AGAIN and will be my cheap #2 or #3 back.