It was probably higher immediately after he was drafted 4th overall in the NFL draft.He really is reborn now, for Dynasty leagues his value has never been higher
Even then i remember he didnt go too high because of Tj's sharing the roleIt was probably higher immediately after he was drafted 4th overall in the NFL draft.He really is reborn now, for Dynasty leagues his value has never been higher
Not to be nitpicky, but the offseason before last year, he was going in the 2nd/3rd round of startup dynasty drafts, after Jones was shipped off to NYJ.I have been impressed with Benson. He isn't a worldbeating talent, obviously, but he has proven serviceable. The problem is that Cinci will not be winning much moving forward, abandoning the run early on.Even then I remember he didnt go too high because of TJ's sharing the roleIt was probably higher immediately after he was drafted 4th overall in the NFL draft.He really is reborn now, for Dynasty leagues his value has never been higher
There are quite a few reasons to not bank on Benson, but the last three weeks he has scored 6, 7 and 17 points in our standard scoring league. This is on a sucky team with no QB and no observable leadership from management...With the possibility of a new coaching staff next year, his dynasty prospects still leave a lot to be desired. However, he is touching the ball, and in my league that makes you golden. Next year is gravy for any astute dynasty owner that may have picked him up.Even in one of my leagues where I have Westbrook and Jackson, he warrants consideration with their injuries and such.Not to be nitpicky, but the offseason before last year, he was going in the 2nd/3rd round of startup dynasty drafts, after Jones was shipped off to NYJ.I have been impressed with Benson. He isn't a worldbeating talent, obviously, but he has proven serviceable. The problem is that Cinci will not be winning much moving forward, abandoning the run early on.Even then I remember he didnt go too high because of TJ's sharing the roleIt was probably higher immediately after he was drafted 4th overall in the NFL draft.He really is reborn now, for Dynasty leagues his value has never been higher
I hope so too, but he only signed a 1 year deal. We'll see what they do about that.I hope Benson will prove to Cincy he can be their back next year and they dont need to draft a 1st round RB
While I agree about the Jags being overrated, it's still hard to overlook just what he did today. Having just perused the schedule, I see that Cinn. gets to face Houston next week. I have already decided that he starts for me.Jaguars defense is very overrated so I wouldn't put too much stock in Benson performing well against them. He's definitely getting the opportunity to perform so we'll see what happens.
Cincy is on a bye next week. They played Houston last week.While I agree about the Jags being overrated, it's still hard to overlook just what he did today. Having just perused the schedule, I see that Cinn. gets to face Houston next week. I have already decided that he starts for me.Jaguars defense is very overrated so I wouldn't put too much stock in Benson performing well against them. He's definitely getting the opportunity to perform so we'll see what happens.
Even with Fitzpatrick in he managed to get over 100. and i dont think he fumbled. He has taken over for perry and even caught a few passes. If he puts together some solid games going forward they will have to resign him. At least I hope so, want to keep him as an option for next year....I hope so too, but he only signed a 1 year deal. We'll see what they do about that.I hope Benson will prove to Cincy he can be their back next year and they dont need to draft a 1st round RB
Thanks to the hurricane moving houston's and balts bye week to week 2. The schedule was redone so cinci is off and balt plays houston.and damn it, i started Fred Taylor over Bensen thinking the roles would be reversed!Cincy is on a bye next week. They played Houston last week.While I agree about the Jags being overrated, it's still hard to overlook just what he did today. Having just perused the schedule, I see that Cinn. gets to face Houston next week. I have already decided that he starts for me.Jaguars defense is very overrated so I wouldn't put too much stock in Benson performing well against them. He's definitely getting the opportunity to perform so we'll see what happens.
Hearst didn't sign mid-season. He signed in pre-season and then sat on the bench while top pick Ki-Jana Carter started the first 4 games. Then Carter got benched and Hearst was inserted as the starter.TakiToki said:It's kinda reminiscent of Garrison Hearst signing mid-season with the Bengals after flopping mightily with his first team. I'm not saying Benson will go on to tear it up over the remainder of his career like Hearst did, by any stretch of the imagination. Just an interesting bit of potential deja vu.
You're right. Memory fades as time goes along.Hearst didn't sign mid-season. He signed in pre-season and then sat on the bench while top pick Ki-Jana Carter started the first 4 games. Then Carter got benched and Hearst was inserted as the starter.TakiToki said:It's kinda reminiscent of Garrison Hearst signing mid-season with the Bengals after flopping mightily with his first team. I'm not saying Benson will go on to tear it up over the remainder of his career like Hearst did, by any stretch of the imagination. Just an interesting bit of potential deja vu.
I benched him for Moore. If I had started him, I would have won my matchup by 1 point. I'm still not sold on Benson, but this latest outing makes it more tempting to plug him in as a #2 with the right matchup.I started Benson the last 3 weeks with Parker being hurt...Naturally I benched him for Parker this week![]()
The Bears had to let him go cause he was effecting the chemistry of the team. He was a downer. I think Benson simply needed a change of scenery.Benson has never been as bad as he has been made out to be. He actually ran really well against Sea and Denver last year before he got injured and was done. Also, the off-season stuff was way overblown as always. He was acquitted in court for the BUI. I wish the Bears had kept him. A combo of Forte and Benson would have been awesome to wear down defenses down the line when the weather gets worse. I picked him up in one my dynasty leagues during our draft this year because someone just dropped him. I am now reaping the rewards. When Palmer comes back next year and is healthy, and the Bengals improve their OL some in the off-season, you will see Benson produce well as a FF RB going forward.
Those be some pretty important weeks there for most.I still don't like his schedule (excepting Weeks 14, 16, and 17), but he's worth squirreling away for depth.
I believe The Who said it best... "Won't get fooled again."Riffraff said:As of Nov 6th, three weeks after taking the starting job...Tefertiller, Bloom, and Pasquino do not have Benson in their top 60 dynasty RBs.I find this interesting that the hate continues.
Welcome to Week 5.Drop McFadden for Benson?
Definitely an oversight.Riffraff said:As of Nov 6th, three weeks after taking the starting job...Tefertiller, Bloom, and Pasquino do not have Benson in their top 60 dynasty RBs.I find this interesting that the hate continues.
38. Cedric Benson, CIN | Age: 25.7 | Value Score: 18
I cannot speak for Jeff or Sigmund, but I want to see more. Benson signed a one-year deal, so he has a good chance to be elsewhere next year. I am open-minded to his upside. Benson is only 25 and could still make a difference.I believe The Who said it best... "Won't get fooled again."Riffraff said:As of Nov 6th, three weeks after taking the starting job...Tefertiller, Bloom, and Pasquino do not have Benson in their top 60 dynasty RBs.I find this interesting that the hate continues.
Again, it's most definitely an oversight, not an intentional decision to leave him out of the top 60. Those dynasty rankings are not updated by many FBGs and are not super reliable, and it's likely he was accidentally just left off.It's a top 60 listing. Not that I'm expecting top 30 or anything, but 60 is pretty deep.Got a few fullbacks listed, Caddy who may not play again and wasn't doing so well before he got hurt, a guy on the IR that's a 3rd stringer, and couple other old guys that are on the IR. All listed over Benson. Just saying...
Other than perhaps Bloom - likely - I'd take Chris' (F&L) dynasty rankings over the FBG Dynasty rankings from the paid content any day.I think it is utterly insane that a 25 year-old STARTING running back playing on a one year deal on an admittedly moribund franchise, who was drafted #4 OVERALL after a stellar NCAA career at Texas can't crack a top 60 dynasty list of so called experts. Sorry guys. I respect the heck out of the Jeffs, but Benson's omission at this stage from a list of 60 RBs is ridiculous.He's a major riser on F&L's recently updated dynasty rankings if that makes you feel better!![]()
38. Cedric Benson, CIN | Age: 25.7 | Value Score: 18
Sigmund Bloom said:Benson will be in my top 60 when I update my rankings.
IT IS A MISTAKEHow many times do I have to say that? No way did they intend to exclude him. He was just never on previous lists and so was easy to overlook. I'm sure they'll all have him in their top 40 or so after the next update.The_U said:I think it is utterly insane that a 25 year-old STARTING running back playing on a one year deal on an admittedly moribund franchise, who was drafted #4 OVERALL after a stellar NCAA career at Texas can't crack a top 60 dynasty list of so called experts. Sorry guys. I respect the heck out of the Jeffs, but Benson's omission at this stage from a list of 60 RBs is ridiculous.
Well Otis, A) until they do, it's a poor list - this is part of the PAID content and B) Jeff T said himself just above he needs to "see more", which is fine. That's Jeff's opinion and I respect it. I personally do not need to see more however. As just an example, I see no value in a guy like Selvin Young - whatsoever; yet he appears on that list in a spot where I feel Benson could be.Your BOLD argument or defense of the guys holds no water. These are experts per what the industry deems an expert; i.e. someone who is paid for their valued opinion on content they deliver to an audience. Are you seriously telling me it's acceptable to look at an 'outdated' list, make a few swaps up and down that list and call it "new content"? Paid at that? Sorry. I'm not buying what you're selling. I'm a mild mannered dude, and as stated, respect ALL three dynasty rankers' work on this site, and have for years prior to their becoming staff, but this is a me overreacting to what I've considered less than stellar dynasty content - and all I care about is regularly updated rankings -all season long. This has never been the case in years past and I know I am not the only person who's noticed that. It's been pointed out countless times this season in the Shark Pool.IT IS A MISTAKEHow many times do I have to say that? No way did they intend to exclude him. He was just never on previous lists and so was easy to overlook. I'm sure they'll all have him in their top 40 or so after the next update.The_U said:I think it is utterly insane that a 25 year-old STARTING running back playing on a one year deal on an admittedly moribund franchise, who was drafted #4 OVERALL after a stellar NCAA career at Texas can't crack a top 60 dynasty list of so called experts. Sorry guys. I respect the heck out of the Jeffs, but Benson's omission at this stage from a list of 60 RBs is ridiculous.
I think you're missing my point. If you want to criticize their diligence, that's fine, but I wasn't speaking to that. I just think it's hilarious that people are in here going OMG ARE YOU SERIOUS BENSON ISNT EVEN IN THE TOP 60 OMG THESE RANKINGS SUCK. It obviously wasn't a choice they made to specifically include him -- it's clear to anyone who pays attention and thinks any of this stuff through at all that they aren't purposely saying the guy is not in the top 60, he just slipped out of the rankings. You want to remind them to include him? Fine, that makes perfect sense to me. But repeatedly people in the SP have seemed to suggest that they think it's a "crazy" ranking to put him outside the top 60, when it's far more likely that it was just an oversight.Well Otis, A) until they do, it's a poor list - this is part of the PAID content and B) Jeff T said himself just above he needs to "see more", which is fine. That's Jeff's opinion and I respect it. I personally do not need to see more however. As just an example, I see no value in a guy like Selvin Young - whatsoever; yet he appears on that list in a spot where I feel Benson could be.Your BOLD argument or defense of the guys holds no water. These are experts per what the industry deems an expert; i.e. someone who is paid for their valued opinion on content they deliver to an audience. Are you seriously telling me it's acceptable to look at an 'outdated' list, make a few swaps up and down that list and call it "new content"? Paid at that? Sorry. I'm not buying what you're selling. I'm a mild mannered dude, and as stated, respect ALL three dynasty rankers' work on this site, and have for years prior to their becoming staff, but this is a me overreacting to what I've considered less than stellar dynasty content - and all I care about is regularly updated rankings -all season long. This has never been the case in years past and I know I am not the only person who's noticed that. It's been pointed out countless times this season in the Shark Pool.IT IS A MISTAKEHow many times do I have to say that? No way did they intend to exclude him. He was just never on previous lists and so was easy to overlook. I'm sure they'll all have him in their top 40 or so after the next update.The_U said:I think it is utterly insane that a 25 year-old STARTING running back playing on a one year deal on an admittedly moribund franchise, who was drafted #4 OVERALL after a stellar NCAA career at Texas can't crack a top 60 dynasty list of so called experts. Sorry guys. I respect the heck out of the Jeffs, but Benson's omission at this stage from a list of 60 RBs is ridiculous.
I'm done with this.
42 Cedric Benson, CIN