boots11234
Footballguy
6 for 73???? He will not be a top 10 WR. Book it!! Maybe that hit a few weeks ago was too much for him?!?!?!
There are several O-line injuries, right? Are those guys going to be healthy soon or were they long term injuries? i.e., can we expect improvement from the O-line?And the blame rests solely on their o-line. Palmer simply doesn't have the time to get the ball deep.
My 2nd round pick (#18 in 10-teamer). I picked him as the 1st WR off the board in our league. Definitely not good value thus far.Houshmanzadeh went in late 4th round.6 for 73???? He will not be a top 10 WR. Book it!! Maybe that hit a few weeks ago was too much for him?!?!?!
I agree. CJ has been the model of consistency over the last few years - he'll get his. His receptions and yardage are actually not that bad, and TDs are the most random stat anyways. They'll come.He's a great buy low candidate. Just like Hines Ward was until this week.
Please tell me that this is not your evidence that CJ is not his go to guy anymore. (I can only assume that the answer to your question is Housh.) While I would listen to arguments that this is the case, they would certainly have to be better than this one. A few years back on 4th and forever in the playoffs, who did McNabb go to? (Freddie Mitchell). Does that make him the goto guy?Throw out the Pittsburg game for CJ, because he was still hurt from the shot the week before, and throw out the first 2 weeks for TJ because he didn't play, and their targets look almost identical. I see it just like a Harrison/Wayne situation. CJ/Harrison are better and draw the double teams, while TJ/Wayne really benefit - thus resulting in similar production. Again, over the last 3 years, CJ is as steady as they come:'03: 90-1355-10'04: 95-1274-9'05: 97-1432-9I fully expect him to AT LEAST get back to his normal production (about 46-600-5 over a half of a season). There are no reasons that I can see that would lead me to believe this year's start is anything but an aberration. The targets are there, he is healthy, the system hasn't changed. Yes, the O-line is struggling, but it wasn't exactly the best in the league in his first few years and he still produced. The numbers and TDs will come, be patient. There is certainly nothing to be gained by trading him now, since you won't get what he is worth. Also, recall 2004 when his first 5 games looked like this:week 1: 5-99-1week 2: 3-45-0week 3: 8-99-0week 4: 4-54-0week 5: byeweek 6: 3-37-0All he did from that point on was catch 72 passes for 940 yards and 8 TDs in his next 11 games (an average of 6.5-85-.72TD per game, or appx. 20pts/game in a ppr league).Who did Palmer turn to on the 4th down play for a gain of 32?
Did yo uwatch the game at all?I was referring to CJ #######.Please tell me that this is not your evidence that CJ is not his go to guy anymore. (I can only assume that the answer to your question is Housh.) While I would listen to arguments that this is the case, they would certainly have to be better than this one. A few years back on 4th and forever in the playoffs, who did McNabb go to? (Freddie Mitchell). Does that make him the goto guy?Who did Palmer turn to on the 4th down play for a gain of 32?
Throw out the Pittsburg game for CJ, because he was still hurt from the shot the week before, and throw out the first 2 weeks for TJ because he didn't play, and their targets look almost identical. I see it just like a Harrison/Wayne situation. CJ/Harrison are better and draw the double teams, while TJ/Wayne really benefit - thus resulting in similar production.
Again, over the last 3 years, CJ is as steady as they come:
'03: 90-1355-10
'04: 95-1274-9
'05: 97-1432-9
'06: 36-450-1 (7 games)
I fully expect him to AT LEAST get back to his normal production (about 46-600-5 over a half of a season). There are no reasons that I can see that would lead me to believe this is anything but an aberration. The targets are there, he is healthy, the system hasn't changed. Yes, the O-line is struggling, but it wasn't exactly the best in the league in his first few years. The production will come, be patient. There is certainly nothing to be gained by trading him now, since you won't get what he is worth.
Also, recall 2004 when his first 5 games looked like this:
week 1: 5-99-1
week 2: 3-45-0
week 3: 8-99-0
week 4: 4-54-0
week 5: bye
week 6: 3-37-0
All he did from that point on was catch 72 passes for 940 yards and 8 TDs in his next 11 games. (an average of 6.5-85-.72TD per game, or appx. 20pts/game in a ppr league)
No, I didn't see the game. I'm sorry that I assumed incorrectly. My analysis does not change one iota based on that fact. I see no reason to cuss at me. Good day, sir.Did yo uwatch the game at all?I was referring to CJ #######.Please tell me that this is not your evidence that CJ is not his go to guy anymore. (I can only assume that the answer to your question is Housh.) While I would listen to arguments that this is the case, they would certainly have to be better than this one. A few years back on 4th and forever in the playoffs, who did McNabb go to? (Freddie Mitchell). Does that make him the goto guy?Who did Palmer turn to on the 4th down play for a gain of 32?
Throw out the Pittsburg game for CJ, because he was still hurt from the shot the week before, and throw out the first 2 weeks for TJ because he didn't play, and their targets look almost identical. I see it just like a Harrison/Wayne situation. CJ/Harrison are better and draw the double teams, while TJ/Wayne really benefit - thus resulting in similar production.
Again, over the last 3 years, CJ is as steady as they come:
'03: 90-1355-10
'04: 95-1274-9
'05: 97-1432-9
'06: 36-450-1 (7 games)
I fully expect him to AT LEAST get back to his normal production (about 46-600-5 over a half of a season). There are no reasons that I can see that would lead me to believe this is anything but an aberration. The targets are there, he is healthy, the system hasn't changed. Yes, the O-line is struggling, but it wasn't exactly the best in the league in his first few years. The production will come, be patient. There is certainly nothing to be gained by trading him now, since you won't get what he is worth.
Also, recall 2004 when his first 5 games looked like this:
week 1: 5-99-1
week 2: 3-45-0
week 3: 8-99-0
week 4: 4-54-0
week 5: bye
week 6: 3-37-0
All he did from that point on was catch 72 passes for 940 yards and 8 TDs in his next 11 games. (an average of 6.5-85-.72TD per game, or appx. 20pts/game in a ppr league)
For the CJ owners who still believe!
No, I didn't see the game. I'm sorry that I assumed incorrectly. My analysis does not change one iota based on that fact. I see no reason to cuss at me. Good day, sir.Did yo uwatch the game at all?I was referring to CJ #######.Please tell me that this is not your evidence that CJ is not his go to guy anymore. (I can only assume that the answer to your question is Housh.) While I would listen to arguments that this is the case, they would certainly have to be better than this one. A few years back on 4th and forever in the playoffs, who did McNabb go to? (Freddie Mitchell). Does that make him the goto guy?Who did Palmer turn to on the 4th down play for a gain of 32?
Throw out the Pittsburg game for CJ, because he was still hurt from the shot the week before, and throw out the first 2 weeks for TJ because he didn't play, and their targets look almost identical. I see it just like a Harrison/Wayne situation. CJ/Harrison are better and draw the double teams, while TJ/Wayne really benefit - thus resulting in similar production.
Again, over the last 3 years, CJ is as steady as they come:
'03: 90-1355-10
'04: 95-1274-9
'05: 97-1432-9
'06: 36-450-1 (7 games)
I fully expect him to AT LEAST get back to his normal production (about 46-600-5 over a half of a season). There are no reasons that I can see that would lead me to believe this is anything but an aberration. The targets are there, he is healthy, the system hasn't changed. Yes, the O-line is struggling, but it wasn't exactly the best in the league in his first few years. The production will come, be patient. There is certainly nothing to be gained by trading him now, since you won't get what he is worth.
Also, recall 2004 when his first 5 games looked like this:
week 1: 5-99-1
week 2: 3-45-0
week 3: 8-99-0
week 4: 4-54-0
week 5: bye
week 6: 3-37-0
All he did from that point on was catch 72 passes for 940 yards and 8 TDs in his next 11 games. (an average of 6.5-85-.72TD per game, or appx. 20pts/game in a ppr league)
For the CJ owners who still believe!
Over the course of a full season, a per-game average of 6 receptions for 73 yards equates to season totals of 96 receptions for 1,168. A down year perhaps, but hardly horrible. People always overreact when top players are not delivering the big games. Remember two weeks ago when Hines Ward was having a bad season? Look at him now. Chad has been too productive for too long to be written off. The emergence of Henry and Housh will hurt his numbers, but he's still one of the best WRs to have on your squad.boots11234 said:6 for 73???? He will not be a top 10 WR. Book it!! Maybe that hit a few weeks ago was too much for him?!?!?!
He landed on it after the big catch.Wasn't it the same shoulder that landed him as probable this week?Is it just me or did johnson seem to be favoring his shoulder after that big catch. He also caught a shorter pass later in the game, I believe it was late in the 4th quarter.He looked like he was favoring his right arm.The commentators didn't say a thing and I have not heard any reports on this. I just thought I saw Cj favoring his arm.
Braham and Jones are both out, but most of the protections problems arose with Braham's injury. I'm trying to find a time table for his return, because I'm thinking he should be back any week now.tribecalledjeff said:There are several O-line injuries, right? Are those guys going to be healthy soon or were they long term injuries? i.e., can we expect improvement from the O-line?Courtjester said:And the blame rests solely on their o-line. Palmer simply doesn't have the time to get the ball deep.
Exactly- My opponent had Palmer, Rudi, and TJ against me this week, and I figured there was a ceiling on their numbers with Braham and Levi Jones out. I didn't fear one of those huge weeks they are capable of.But Chad is the most affected because of the time needed to go deep.Courtjester said:And the blame rests solely on their o-line. Palmer simply doesn't have the time to get the ball deep.