I have Chad, but I also have Tatum. Any other suggestions?Tatum Bell. Not yet a big name, but should put up big stats from here on out.
I hope you jumped all over that one.FWIW, I was just offered CJ and Cadillac for Frank Gore
You are insane if you think you will get any of those guys for Chad Johnson. There are roughly 40 wide receivers with better numbers than Chad right now. There are probably 1/2 dozen running backs with better numbers than Tatum/Parker/Brown/McGahee.Now, obviously we all expect CJ to put up better numbers, but if you are selling, you are selling real low. Real low.I'd be having a look at the teams in your league that have 3 or more solid RB's but are hurting at WR. You're much more likely to get a good deal out of those guys than randomly sending out trade offers to guys who have RB's you want.
In terms of fair value, other than Tatum, guys like Parker, McGahee and Ronnie would be solid returns.
I'd be more inclined to give up Chester Taylor if I could but if he doesn't bite, yah I'll take it.I hope you jumped all over that one.FWIW, I was just offered CJ and Cadillac for Frank Gore
funny, those are my other rb's along with deuce, and deuce was the only one the chad owner was interested in. frnakly, i'd be fine with dealing any one of those guys for CJ, straight up.You are insane if you think you will get any of those guys for Chad Johnson. There are roughly 40 wide receivers with better numbers than Chad right now. There are probably 1/2 dozen running backs with better numbers than Tatum/Parker/Brown/McGahee.Now, obviously we all expect CJ to put up better numbers, but if you are selling, you are selling real low. Real low.I'd be having a look at the teams in your league that have 3 or more solid RB's but are hurting at WR. You're much more likely to get a good deal out of those guys than randomly sending out trade offers to guys who have RB's you want.
In terms of fair value, other than Tatum, guys like Parker, McGahee and Ronnie would be solid returns.
In my league, I would offer up someone like Thomas Jones, or Lamont Jordan...definitely not a top 10 RB. That is crazy talk.
Paying alot IMOI just offered my Westbrook for Chad. Offer is still on the table.
Don't care about your scoring, and won't restrict discussion to such scoring - those kind of specific questions belong in a different venue.But, I'll tell you that I just saw a trade of Chad Johnson and DeAngelo Williams for Lee Evans and Chester Taylor in a PPR.i have chad and am looking to get a running back---which player should i be asking for?10yds=1pt1 reception=.5td=6
is that shocking??I offered Randy Moss for him & was turned down
Don't care about that scoring.Of course it pertains to his question and any replies if he's getting 1/2 a PPR.Marc Levin said:Don't care about your scoring, and won't restrict discussion to such scoring - those kind of specific questions belong in a different venue.But, I'll tell you that I just saw a trade of Chad Johnson and DeAngelo Williams for Lee Evans and Chester Taylor in a PPR.i have chad and am looking to get a running back---which player should i be asking for?
10yds=1pt
1 reception=.5
td=6
:whoosh:Don't care about that scoring.Of course it pertains to his question and any replies if he's getting 1/2 a PPR.Marc Levin said:Don't care about your scoring, and won't restrict discussion to such scoring - those kind of specific questions belong in a different venue.But, I'll tell you that I just saw a trade of Chad Johnson and DeAngelo Williams for Lee Evans and Chester Taylor in a PPR.i have chad and am looking to get a running back---which player should i be asking for?
10yds=1pt
1 reception=.5
td=6
Not sure what type of league you are in, but in most redraft leagues CJ would have gone in the second round. Generally speaking that means ten RBs taken before him (if not more). And that was during the draft when everyone thought CJ would be "the same old CJ."To me, that means that most owners would prefer a top 10 RB over CJ at his best. Not necessarily me, but most owners.What has CJ done to warrant a higher price tag then his draft rating????Not saying you should sell CJ low, just saying that you should consider what he would be worth at peak value (which was the beginning of the season). If you think he's still peak, go for it. If you feel he slipped, then your demands should slip as well.Of course all of this is relative to injuries and other non performers on the rosters.I'd need a top QB or RB for Chad. No way I'm selling low on him. The guy who said he wouldn't give up a top 10 RB for Chad would never get him off me.
What I am considering is that the top 10 RB's are mostly struggling this season compared to what they were doing last season. Ronnie Brown has been terrible and he's sitting at the bottom of a lot of top 10 RB lists right now. CJ isn't doing well yet but I will hang my hat on his track record.Not sure what type of league you are in, but in most redraft leagues CJ would have gone in the second round. Generally speaking that means ten RBs taken before him (if not more). And that was during the draft when everyone thought CJ would be "the same old CJ."To me, that means that most owners would prefer a top 10 RB over CJ at his best. Not necessarily me, but most owners.What has CJ done to warrant a higher price tag then his draft rating????Not saying you should sell CJ low, just saying that you should consider what he would be worth at peak value (which was the beginning of the season). If you think he's still peak, go for it. If you feel he slipped, then your demands should slip as well.Of course all of this is relative to injuries and other non performers on the rosters.I'd need a top QB or RB for Chad. No way I'm selling low on him. The guy who said he wouldn't give up a top 10 RB for Chad would never get him off me.
Isn't that a little inconsistent? Top RB's aren't living up to their expectations so they're not worth it but CJ despite not living up to his expectations is worth it?What I am considering is that the top 10 RB's are mostly struggling this season compared to what they were doing last season. Ronnie Brown has been terrible and he's sitting at the bottom of a lot of top 10 RB lists right now. CJ isn't doing well yet but I will hang my hat on his track record.
No. CJ is in a great offense and has the best track record of any receiver in the NFL not named Holt or Harrison. I will ride him til I die rather than trade him for Tom Jones or Julius Jones.Isn't that a little inconsistent? Top RB's aren't living up to their expectations so they're not worth it but CJ despite not living up to his expectations is worth it?What I am considering is that the top 10 RB's are mostly struggling this season compared to what they were doing last season. Ronnie Brown has been terrible and he's sitting at the bottom of a lot of top 10 RB lists right now. CJ isn't doing well yet but I will hang my hat on his track record.![]()
I hope CJ pays off for you, but that does seem like a lot to give.Last week got Chad Johnson for TJ Houshmandzadeh and Hines Ward.I don't see Housh outperforming Chad for the rest of the year, and Roethlisberger is crippling Ward.
I had Chambers, Galloway, Housh, Ward, and Cotchery, start 2 WR, and was getting no offers one for one for Ward.I think CJ will pan out.I hope CJ pays off for you, but that does seem like a lot to give.Last week got Chad Johnson for TJ Houshmandzadeh and Hines Ward.I don't see Housh outperforming Chad for the rest of the year, and Roethlisberger is crippling Ward.
That's what I was hoping for and couild have done it last week after Maroney's big week. But the guy had Harrison too, and I got greedy and tried for Harrison instead. I ended up giving Rhodes and Maroney for CJ. More than I wanted, but I had to get my WRs in order and make a run. I've only won once this seasonI just dealt Maroney for CJ
traded berrian/green/herron....for cj......If you can get Berrian or Jennings for him, you're doing very well.How sad is that?OH. There he is. I just found #85. He's sitting on my bench.
Let's bump this when Chad finishes as a top 8 receiver.If you can get Berrian or Jennings for him, you're doing very well.How sad is that?OH. There he is. I just found #85. He's sitting on my bench.
Can you bump a thread retroactively?Lemmiwinks said:Let's bump this when Chad finishes as a top 8 receiver.Bad_Mo said:If you can get Berrian or Jennings for him, you're doing very well.How sad is that?OH. There he is. I just found #85. He's sitting on my bench.
Can you bump a thread retroactively?Lemmiwinks said:Let's bump this when Chad finishes as a top 8 receiver.Bad_Mo said:If you can get Berrian or Jennings for him, you're doing very well.How sad is that?OH. There he is. I just found #85. He's sitting on my bench.