Chambers ---> Value go up or down? (1 Viewer)

[flranger]

Tons on debate on this one. In order to predict change in value assume:

Redraft

1 point for 10 yards

6 points per TD

1 point per reception

Looking forward to seeing the results on this one.

 

[Tenacious]

I didn't vote, I think his value goes down for the next few games, then up as we go down the stretch and into next season.

 

[Brutis]

Happy to see Rivers throwing chambers the ball over cleo.

 

[Max Power]

 

[AllVolUT]

Like you said, it'll take a handful of games for Chambers to get on the same page as Rivers.

IMO, Gates will get his regardless.

 

[CowboyFan]

Happy to see Rivers throwing chambers the ball over cleo.

Due to injuries, he has been in my starting lineup. Now, at least there is a chance he could be a 'good' starter.

 

[= Ice Man =]

No way this is a good move for Chambers. He goes from 11 targets a game to 6 or 7 max. That means he'll probably be catching 3-5 balls a game. How on Earth could that possibly be good for his owners? Chambers has 1 more target than all of San Diego's current WRs (71 vs 70), and 17 more than Gates. He may take some targets from Gates & the WRs, but he'll be lucky to get half as many targets as he was getting before. He moves from a WR2/3 to a WR3/4 IMO.

 

[Steeler07]

No way this is a good move for Chambers. He goes from 11 targets a game to 6 or 7 max. That means he'll probably be catching 3-5 balls a game. How on Earth could that possibly be good for his owners? Chambers has 1 more target than all of San Diego's current WRs (71 vs 70), and 17 more than Gates. He may take some targets from Gates & the WRs, but he'll be lucky to get half as many targets as he was getting before. He moves from a WR2/3 to a WR3/4 IMO.

7 targets in SD are better than 11 in Miami. Common sense.

 

[Jayrod]

No way this is a good move for Chambers. He goes from 11 targets a game to 6 or 7 max. That means he'll probably be catching 3-5 balls a game. How on Earth could that possibly be good for his owners? Chambers has 1 more target than all of San Diego's current WRs (71 vs 70), and 17 more than Gates. He may take some targets from Gates & the WRs, but he'll be lucky to get half as many targets as he was getting before. He moves from a WR2/3 to a WR3/4 IMO.

7 targets in SD are better than 11 in Miami. Common sense.

I agree with this line of thinking.I think he will get fewer opportunities, but his opportunities will be higher quality, hence I voted no change for Chambers' value.Gates I think loses a few targets a game. Some will argue that his opportunities will be higher quality as well, but I don't know that they will unless Chambers really looks good early. Teams will still try to take away Gates and Tomlinson and make Rivers beat them with the WR's. Hence, I voted a decline for Gates.

 

[bluesclues]

Chambers is not that good.

He cannot run shallow routes and is above average at the long ball.

He has not scored in many weeks, as well.

I think the Phins walked away with a great deal landing the 2nd rounder.