Gopher State
Footballguy
well week two goes to Thomas Jones. KC running game is a mess from a FF point
No, thats not true. It was late 1st Q, IIRC. You can check the nfl.com gamebook play by play.Still, way way too late in the game to be getting his hands on the ball.Is it true that he didn't get his first carry until the 3rd qtr?.. If so, then there is something going on that we just don't get. Not practicing hard?..
No this is not true. He had six whopping carries in the first half.Is it true that he didn't get his first carry until the 3rd qtr?.. If so, then there is something going on that we just don't get. Not practicing hard?..
They won a fluky game in a partial downpour in the home opener on Monday nite. Then beat a bad team with a backup QB by 2 pts.A win is a win in the NFL but let's not act like Haley is doing a great coaching job. IMO the Chiefs have won the 1st 2 games in spite of Haley, Weiss, and Cassell. As a Charles owner Im just hoping for a big 2nd half of the season when Jones starts to wear down and the 3 stooges in KC realize they have to give their best offensive player more touches if they want to continue winning games.Haley's feel has them 2-0.
The time to trade him was after last week.I gotta "feeling" I'm trading this guy at the next good offer. What a fantasy nightmare.
I'm inclined to agree. The Chiefs won't be able to keep winning these games ugly going forward with their otherwise woeful offense.They'll face a disgruntled and desperate 49ers team next week followed by the Colts and Texans after their bye.Furthermore, Thomas Jones won't have a softball run D like the Browns to rack up plodding yardage against every week to seemingly justify his "starter" status in Haley's eye.Best case scenario for Kansas City would be if Jones somehow got injured which would essentially force them to lean on Jamaal again and make their offense a potent weapon. But until then, Cassel will continue to struggle and Jamaal will remain a "backup" until this team starts losing games again.I'm actually looking to trade FOR Charles. At least if the negativity in this thread is any indication.
It's not about size, it's about how his body is built. Let's look at some photographs, shall we?Here are photographs of the backs you listed above. With the possible exception of Tiki Barber, notice how they are all built low to the ground. In particular, look at the length of their legs below the knee. This allows these backs to stay low to the ground and absorb hits with their shoulders rather than with their body.Omg... why do people keep saying this? Tell me why small backs like Emmitt Smith, Barry Sanders, Tiki Barber, Thurman Thomas, Marshall Faulk, Chris Johnson, ect... Can make it through their carries carrying the load then? Thomas Jones himself is a small back. LT isn't much bigger. Jamaal Charles is taller than all of those guys, and only slightly lighter than a few of them. MJD can carry the load, just like he proved last year.As I said in the other Charles thread, Jones is getting/will get substantial carries because Charles is not built to carry the full load. If Charles is given 300 carries he will not last a full season; it is as simple as that. It is best for the Chiefs to keep him healthy, and that means limiting his touches. I've been saying this since mid-August.
Wake up and smell the coffee.
Once again, like I said in the other thread...you guys act like Jamaal Charles is 140 lbs. He is 6' 200lbs. He is incredibilty fast, strong, flexible and athletic. He is in no more danger of injuring himself throughout the course of his season than guy who is 5-10 212 (Thomas Jones). Charles' elusiveness/agility also provides him with the ability to avoid too many big hits, unlike a different back who tries to run in a more thudding regard leading himself into huge hit after huge hit.
Once again... seriously flawed logic.
Barry Sanders
Tiki Barber
Thurman Thomas
Marshall Faulk
Chris Johnson
Thomas Jones
By contrast, look at the length of Charles' legs below the knee. You can see it better by watching videos, but even in photographs it's noticeably different from every runner listed above with the exception of Tiki Barber. Also, notice the lack of thickness in Charles' legs.
Jamaal Charles
Jamaal Charles
The length of Charles' legs below the knee is similar, however, to Jerious Norwood

They won a fluky game in a partial downpour in the home opener on Monday nite. Then beat a bad team with a backup QB by 2 pts.A win is a win in the NFL but let's not act like Haley is doing a great coaching job. IMO the Chiefs have won the 1st 2 games in spite of Haley, Weiss, and Cassell. As a Charles owner Im just hoping for a big 2nd half of the season when Jones starts to wear down and the 3 stooges in KC realize they have to give their best offensive player more touches if they want to continue winning games.Haley's feel has them 2-0.
If it wasn't a downpour holding SD's pass offense in check and a McCluster return TD, they don't beat SD. Heck, they probably wouldn't have won if Charles doesn't score a TD inspite of lack of carries. If Flowers doesn't return an INT for a TD, they might not beat Cleveland with Seneca Wallace.They are lucky to be 2-0 and they will not make the playoffs. Haley hasn't done anything to win the games. Charles, McCluster and Flowers have. They have 37 points in two games against meh defenses and 21 of them were on plays that won't happen every week. The Thomas Jones/Cassell led offense is averaging 8 points per game.I share your pain, and keep seeing the same thing in Dallas.FrostBite said:1 target, 1 reception, 27 yards. seriously Haley?I didn't watch the whole game but I remember seeing a Jones run and thinking... Charles would have taken that 3 yard run and made it 10+ yards easily. Then he puts Charles in on 3rd and 1 and runs a toss right. Brilliant.
Afterwards, Charles admitted to the Kansas City Star that he's the backup to Jones. “I don’t have any complaints,” he said. “Hey, man, as long as we win games around here, it doesn’t matter to me.”
Third offensive series, not quarter.theplayer11 said:Is it true that he didn't get his first carry until the 3rd qtr?.. If so, then there is something going on that we just don't get. Not practicing hard?..
I did for Rivers and McFadden in one of my keeper leagues. Charles and Mc will both be the same price next year so I rolled the dice there to upgrade from VY to Rivers. Sell high! Good week to trade Best (I won't though, lol).Babu Bhatt2 said:The time to trade him was after last week.OU#1 said:I gotta "feeling" I'm trading this guy at the next good offer. What a fantasy nightmare.
Looks like Haley is doing it right. Charles even admitted that he is the backup to TJ.Rick James said:the awful thing about all this is KC's record. They're 2-0, and I'm positive Haley sees that and thinks "well, I'm doing it right".Sure wish KC was 0-2 right now.
he didn't get a carry til late first last game and first carry was 56 yard td then he only had 6 carries in first half... instead of 50 50 split in week 2 they doubled Jones carries 22 to charles 11 while charles still held the better ypc 4.5 to 3.8. Charles also had 1 catch, I repeat 1 catch for 27 yards???? I really am confused about this whole thing and is beg to become a fantasy nightmare ... with 15-20 carries and 3-5 catches I doubt anyone argues he is a stud but with 12 touches a game he is nothing more then a back up or 3rd down backvandyt said:No, thats not true. It was late 1st Q, IIRC. You can check the nfl.com gamebook play by play.Still, way way too late in the game to be getting his hands on the ball.theplayer11 said:Is it true that he didn't get his first carry until the 3rd qtr?.. If so, then there is something going on that we just don't get. Not practicing hard?..

veryFrostBite said:1 target, 1 reception, 27 yards. seriously Haley?I didn't watch the whole game but I remember seeing a Jones run and thinking... Charles would have taken that 3 yard run and made it 10+ yards easily. Then he puts Charles in on 3rd and 1 and runs a toss right. Brilliant.
I thought the same thing.. tons of times chiefs went 3 and out and I thought to myself boy if charles was in here for some toss, screen passes or bubble screens or a run up the middle he would have had another first down, instead they like floundering around with jones and winning ugly ball games.. haley is just a weirdo what can you sayYou can say this, but it doesn't make it true, necessarily. It has worked so far thanks largely to great (scoring) plays by the defense and special teams and the fact that one of their opponents so far is likely to pick in the top 3, if not #1. Many of us feel that the Chiefs are 2-0 IN SPITE OF how Haley has used the rbs, not because of it. The end result has been wins, so Haley will continue as is, which at least temporarily severely limits Charles. The competition will get tougher, the Chiefs will not score tds on Defense/special teams every week. Eventually, things should improve for Charles...though he may not be the electric rb with top 5 potential that so many thought they drafted.The Chiefs are 30th in total offense right now. They will need more out of the offense soon enough.Looks like Haley is doing it right. Charles even admitted that he is the backup to TJ.Rick James said:the awful thing about all this is KC's record. They're 2-0, and I'm positive Haley sees that and thinks "well, I'm doing it right".Sure wish KC was 0-2 right now.
That right there is telling.You can say this, but it doesn't make it true, necessarily. It has worked so far thanks largely to great (scoring) plays by the defense and special teams and the fact that one of their opponents so far is likely to pick in the top 3, if not #1. Many of us feel that the Chiefs are 2-0 IN SPITE OF how Haley has used the rbs, not because of it. The end result has been wins, so Haley will continue as is, which at least temporarily severely limits Charles. The competition will get tougher, the Chiefs will not score tds on Defense/special teams every week. Eventually, things should improve for Charles...though he may not be the electric rb with top 5 potential that so many thought they drafted.The Chiefs are 30th in total offense right now. They will need more out of the offense soon enough.Looks like Haley is doing it right. Charles even admitted that he is the backup to TJ.Rick James said:the awful thing about all this is KC's record. They're 2-0, and I'm positive Haley sees that and thinks "well, I'm doing it right".
Sure wish KC was 0-2 right now.
first time I have seen someone quote someone with a one word "quote". That can't be proper english....ponchsox said:Charles knows he is the "backup" running back in KC? Not good news.
http://kansascity.sbnation.com/2010/9/19/1...-charles-chiefs
You are exactly right, as long as they win with the 30th ranked offense, they will keep playing that way. I'm betting that this defense/running game formula isn't one that the Chiefs have the personnel to effectively sustain for much longer. Regardless, Charles is no better than a #3 rb right now. Hopefully most that drafted him were able to get Best, Foster, Bradshaw, or another productive rb later in their drafts.I also heard a radio interview where he said something to the effect of "this is what you should expect from us, it is isn't going to be pretty, but it has worked so far and we are 2-0".To me, that means they aren't changing what is working...
Plus two games against the Raiders.weeks 5,6,7,8@ Ind@ HouJaxBufthe first 2 have Charles written all over them as they are weaker defenses and KC should finally be playing from behind all game. The next 2 are interesting because they are bad run defenses but KC might be ahead or in tight games. The hope is that after Charles has monster games vs Ind and Hou trying to lead his team back Haley is finally forced to use his best player more.That is my story and im sticking to it
Do you have some sort of blog I can subscribe to? Your knowledge is AMAZING.It's too bad some of you Charles owners wouldn't listen in the off-season/pre-season. It would have saved you a lot of headaches so far...
To recap:
1. Charles is the most talented and electrifying player on the team. Nobody is disputing this by saying TJ should be starting.
2. Haley doesn't seem to think he can handle the workload and pound the rock and grind out yards to win ugly games
3. Todd Haley thinks he is very smart, so far it is working because the defense/ST has made plays to keep the offense in games.
4. Cassell is the most indecisive 2-0 QB I've ever seen...
TJ was brought in to be the veteran leader and while it isn't sexy, his job is to grind it out and not turn it over, while Charles is the clear CHANGE OF PACE back right now.
I said it last week, I'm saying it again for the JC owners that don't seem to understand, nothing has changed for Haley and they are winning ugly and TJ has a defined role in this offense. There will be days when Charles busts multiple runs, but those are anybody's guess from what I can tell, barring injuries of course.
Quote from Haley “We have a clear-cut plan for how we want to start the game, how we want to do things,” Haley said. “Today was a grind-it-out type of day.”
I also heard a radio interview where he said something to the effect of "this is what you should expect from us, it is isn't going to be pretty, but it has worked so far and we are 2-0".
To me, that means they aren't changing what is working...
I would like a link to your blog, please.You know Fullback Fro, I respect your opinion on these boards, but could you please tell me what is inaccurate in my statement? I'm not necessarily saying listen to me, I'm talking about what Haley was saying about "riding the hot hand", "what TJ brings to the team in terms of leadership", "TJ's toughness was something they didn't have at the position", etc... and then made him the starter in pre-season and has gushed about him while calling Charles a "developing player".If the coach is quoted to saying TJ is the guy and then gives him TWICE as many carries and JC owners still cry about him not getting the carries, does that make it not true? TJ actually looked pretty good yesterday and his ypc dropped off later in the game when they were running out the clock and went super conservative with their playcalling to preserve the win.Get this, I think now is the time to buy low on JC in dynasty leagues. It is also the time to quit whining about your guy not getting carries early in the season (not to mention vultured if they ever make it to the goalline, we'll cross that bridge if/when we get there) when it has been painfully obvious that this was the plan for awhile.Some of us have been predicting a Chris Johnson 2008 season for Charles with TJ playing the LenDale role keeping him fresh and scoring goal line TDs, while the people that are heavily invested seem to think it is a crime that he isn't in line for a 2009 Chris Johnson season...this is a different team (thank God!) than the last 8 weeks of last season and so far, Haley thinks what he is doing is working so you aren't going to see a change from a very stubborn coach.If you aren't down with that, then we can agree to disagree and Charles owners will start a new thread each week right next to the Felix Jones thread.
:dorsalfin:You know Fullback Fro, I respect your opinion on these boards, but could you please tell me what is inaccurate in my statement? I'm not necessarily saying listen to me, I'm talking about what Haley was saying about "riding the hot hand", "what TJ brings to the team in terms of leadership", "TJ's toughness was something they didn't have at the position", etc... and then made him the starter in pre-season and has gushed about him while calling Charles a "developing player".If the coach is quoted to saying TJ is the guy and then gives him TWICE as many carries and JC owners still cry about him not getting the carries, does that make it not true? TJ actually looked pretty good yesterday and his ypc dropped off later in the game when they were running out the clock and went super conservative with their playcalling to preserve the win.Get this, I think now is the time to buy low on JC in dynasty leagues. It is also the time to quit whining about your guy not getting carries early in the season (not to mention vultured if they ever make it to the goalline, we'll cross that bridge if/when we get there) when it has been painfully obvious that this was the plan for awhile.Some of us have been predicting a Chris Johnson 2008 season for Charles with TJ playing the LenDale role keeping him fresh and scoring goal line TDs, while the people that are heavily invested seem to think it is a crime that he isn't in line for a 2009 Chris Johnson season...this is a different team (thank God!) than the last 8 weeks of last season and so far, Haley thinks what he is doing is working so you aren't going to see a change from a very stubborn coach.If you aren't down with that, then we can agree to disagree and Charles owners will start a new thread each week right next to the Felix Jones thread.
This has been repeated SEVERAL times in this thread. But to me it's a complete non-issue. Where is the actual quote from Charles saying that he is a "backup" or that he is the "number 2?" All he is saying is that "he doesn't have any complaints." Which is the right thing to say. He gains nothing by complaining about playing time and opportunity when the team is 2-0.As a Charles owner I was not blind to this situation coming into my draft. But it's a long season and cream usually has a way of rising to the top. I would be lying if I said I wasnt disappointed that Charles isnt getting more touches after 2 weeks but I drafted him b/c I think that he will be productive enough with the touches that he does get AND eventually I think he will get more touches.Jamaal Charles acknowledges he is No.2 RB behind Thomas Jones
According to Kent Babb of the Kansas City Star, after the Chiefs' win-ugly victory over the Cleveland Browns Jamaal Charles admitted he is the No.2 running back behind Thomas Jones. Charles, who many analysts pegged as the breakout star of 2010 after a great performance following Larry Johnson's trade last year, had half the carries as many carries as Jones and did not touch the ball until the Chiefs' first possession.
“I don’t have any complaints,” Charles said. “Hey, man, as long as we win games around here, it doesn’t matter to me.”
Charles is saying all of the right things and he seems sincere but how long can the Chiefs keep a talent like Charles on the bench? Haley didn’t explain Sunday when he was asked why Charles, who broke a 56-yard touchdown run last Monday against San Diego, hasn’t played more. He indicated that it was about the game plan and the Chiefs’ strengths against Cleveland. “We have a clear-cut plan for how we want to start the game, how we want to do things,” Haley said. “Today was a grind-it-out type of day.” “We have a clear-cut plan for how we want to start the game, how we want to do things,” Haley said. “Today was a grind-it-out type of day.”