Hard to tell how that would shake out as both RBs have performed when given the opportuntiy. I think you would probably see a RBBC until injury.Talk on Sirius Radio is the Vikings will not let Chester Taylor leave town without a contract. If he does sign with Minnesota, what would his value be? Would he be a similar to Westbrook in Childresses offense?
That looks like a good analysis to me.Assuming the RB's competing for time are M. Moore, C. Fason and C. Taylor, I could see Taylor being the featured runner, with touches stolen by Moore on 3rd downs and Fason near the goalline unless/until Taylor could wrest these carries away from the others. Moore strikes me as having plenty of talent to be a featured back, but it doesn't seem his body will allow him to ever reach this goal. Fason seems limited in what he can provide, but we haven't seen a lot of him yet so it may be too early to write him off. But if the Vikes sign Taylor (or M. Morris), I believe they will have been told the starting job is their's to lose and the contract details will reflect this.
Bennett did have one very good year:+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+Agree with Dave and Tick. good analysis. This is something that was planned from last year and it has always been advertised that Taylor would be featured back. Moore 3rd down back. Still to be seen is who gets goal line carries? Is O. Smith still in picture? How will Fason factor in?? Taylor may have better value then a RB has had in Minnisota in a long time if he gets goal line carries. That's a big if and personally I don;t see Taylor a rb 2 at this time but it's been years since I have seen a Minnisota RB a RB 1 OR 2. Taylor could be the first since Smith! But id rather have him a RB 3.
I have Taylor in a TD only keeper league so I'm going to have to follow this to see if I want to keep him or not. Fason was getting them last season, but that was with Tice. Is Taylor the kind of all-around RB that can carry the load anywhere on the field?Still to be seen is who gets goal line carries?
Listen if they like him enough to say they wont let him leave without a contract . To me it means they will make him the feature back .
If they needed RBBC or a tird down back they would not go after him.
Cause all they have on their roster are Moore ( 3rd down back only )
Fason ( short yardage back only ) so they do need a featured back ( no RBBC )
Why is Mike Tice still head coach?and Fason near the goalline
why is that a good posting? i respect his opinion but to dismiss a solid vet and a second year player as if they're 7th round rookie projects smells of "i'm a chester taylor" owner to mein philly childress didn't exactly give all the carries to any one player but taylor is going to go into minnesota and get 20+ carries a game? no way. just last season he didn't get much more than back-up work when jamal lewis was doing his best to fall forward at a paltry 3.4 clipListen if they like him enough to say they wont let him leave without a contract . To me it means they will make him the feature back .
If they needed RBBC or a tird down back they would not go after him.
Cause all they have on their roster are Moore ( 3rd down back only )
Fason ( short yardage back only ) so they do need a featured back ( no RBBC )![]()
They matched a 1 yr $3mil dollar offer made to him by the Browns.Didnt Baltimore resign Taylor last year?
NFL.com - Chester TaylorPosition: RB Height: 5-11 Weight: 213I think if Taylor ends up in Minn he is going to end up way overvalued in FF leagues. I imagine he would end up a late 2nd/early 3rd round and there's no way I would touch him at that spot. He seems to fit into a similar mold to the new RB Minny seems to bring in every year. I have no idea why they continue to bring in these little scat-backs and then complain that they don't have anyone that can carry the load every year.
Ah,thanks for the update. Didnt realize it was a one year tender.They matched a 1 yr $3mil dollar offer made to him by the Browns.Didnt Baltimore resign Taylor last year?
I find the whole Vikings need a running back like Westbrook argument silly. If you go back two years, people on this board were saying the same things about Westbrook that they are saying about Moore now. He’s got talent but he is only a third down back and will never be a featured back. Ya da Ya da Ya daWhy pay C Taylor 3 mil per year, when they have Moore 6 times cheaper and just as capable IMO?I actually would like to see Taylor in a "Westbrook" type of role in Minnesota. He would come a LOT cheaper than Edge, and if the Vikings could spend that extra money on the O-Line, LB and ???, it could be a v-e-r-y nice signing!![]()
NFL.com - Mewelde MoorePosition: RB Height: 5-11 Weight: 209NFL.com - Chester TaylorPosition: RB Height: 5-11 Weight: 213I think if Taylor ends up in Minn he is going to end up way overvalued in FF leagues. I imagine he would end up a late 2nd/early 3rd round and there's no way I would touch him at that spot. He seems to fit into a similar mold to the new RB Minny seems to bring in every year. I have no idea why they continue to bring in these little scat-backs and then complain that they don't have anyone that can carry the load every year.
![]()
Donnybrook,You're talking to the guy that was pimpin' Moore as the REAL S.O.D. on all the Minnesota chat boards right after they drafted him (and Burleson, for that matter). I think there are two issues related to Moore which are probably keeping him from filling a "Westbrook" role:I find the whole Vikings need a running back like Westbrook argument silly. If you go back two years, people on this board were saying the same things about Westbrook that they are saying about Moore now. He’s got talent but he is only a third down back and will never be a featured back. Ya da Ya da Ya daWhy pay C Taylor 3 mil per year, when they have Moore 6 times cheaper and just as capable IMO?I actually would like to see Taylor in a "Westbrook" type of role in Minnesota. He would come a LOT cheaper than Edge, and if the Vikings could spend that extra money on the O-Line, LB and ???, it could be a v-e-r-y nice signing!![]()
Well, thats quite a jump in logic there. Where have they said Moore is "too small"? And who is "they"? None of the same coaches or front office people are still there.NFL.com - Mewelde MoorePosition: RB Height: 5-11 Weight: 209NFL.com - Chester TaylorPosition: RB Height: 5-11 Weight: 213I think if Taylor ends up in Minn he is going to end up way overvalued in FF leagues. I imagine he would end up a late 2nd/early 3rd round and there's no way I would touch him at that spot. He seems to fit into a similar mold to the new RB Minny seems to bring in every year. I have no idea why they continue to bring in these little scat-backs and then complain that they don't have anyone that can carry the load every year.
![]()
And they've made it quite clear they think he's too small.
NFL.com - Mewelde MoorePosition: RB Height: 5-11 Weight: 209Well, thats quite a jump in logic there. Where have they said Moore is "too small"? And who is "they"? None of the same coaches or front office people are still there.NFL.com - Mewelde MoorePosition: RB Height: 5-11 Weight: 209NFL.com - Chester TaylorPosition: RB Height: 5-11 Weight: 213I think if Taylor ends up in Minn he is going to end up way overvalued in FF leagues. I imagine he would end up a late 2nd/early 3rd round and there's no way I would touch him at that spot. He seems to fit into a similar mold to the new RB Minny seems to bring in every year. I have no idea why they continue to bring in these little scat-backs and then complain that they don't have anyone that can carry the load every year.
![]()
And they've made it quite clear they think he's too small.
Moore is not a great inside runner, and is very injury prone. This has nothing to to with his size, just his ability. Taylor is everything the Vikings are looking for...hes a very good runner both inside and out, and hasnt shown the same propensity to injury that Moore has.
By your rationalization, Brian Childress would also think Brian Westbrook is "too small", along with guys like Curtis Martin, Tiki Barber, Clinton Portis, etc etc.
Fair enough.Donnybrook,You're talking to the guy that was pimpin' Moore as the REAL S.O.D. on all the Minnesota chat boards right after they drafted him (and Burleson, for that matter). I think there are two issues related to Moore which are probably keeping him from filling a "Westbrook" role:I find the whole Vikings need a running back like Westbrook argument silly. If you go back two years, people on this board were saying the same things about Westbrook that they are saying about Moore now. He’s got talent but he is only a third down back and will never be a featured back. Ya da Ya da Ya daWhy pay C Taylor 3 mil per year, when they have Moore 6 times cheaper and just as capable IMO?I actually would like to see Taylor in a "Westbrook" type of role in Minnesota. He would come a LOT cheaper than Edge, and if the Vikings could spend that extra money on the O-Line, LB and ???, it could be a v-e-r-y nice signing!![]()
1. His blocking skills. Probably one of the main reasons he hasn't filled a feature-back role in the Vikings offense to date is the fact that his blocking skills haven't been anything to write home about. If you're gonna roll with a 38 year QB and a very young/inexperienced QB2/3 (assuming Daunte is not in the picture), then you're one blown blocking assignment away from a 4-12 season. I think the Vikings don't trust Moore to protect their QB.
2. His injury history. He's had a lot of nagging injuries. Some will (and should) say that Moore hasn't had a chance to show what he can REALLY do as a feature back, but other will say that his lack of being able to stay on the field makes him too risky to have as the centerpiece of the Vikings running game.
I love Moore! I think he has a ton of potential. The two items listed above, however, are why I think Tice (and now Childress?) haven't trusted him enough to give him such a prominent role in the offense. My![]()
You are right because Reid called the plays. We really don't know how Childress is going to call plays or substitute. He has told the local media that he would like a 20+ carry back.why is that a good posting? i respect his opinion but to dismiss a solid vet and a second year player as if they're 7th round rookie projects smells of "i'm a chester taylor" owner to mein philly childress didn't exactly give all the carries to any one player but taylor is going to go into minnesota and get 20+ carries a game? no way. just last season he didn't get much more than back-up work when jamal lewis was doing his best to fall forward at a paltry 3.4 clipListen if they like him enough to say they wont let him leave without a contract . To me it means they will make him the feature back .
If they needed RBBC or a tird down back they would not go after him.
Cause all they have on their roster are Moore ( 3rd down back only )
Fason ( short yardage back only ) so they do need a featured back ( no RBBC )![]()
Moore might be 5 11 205 but he plays small , while Taylor at 213 plays like a 225 pound RB with skills.Well, thats quite a jump in logic there. Where have they said Moore is "too small"? And who is "they"? None of the same coaches or front office people are still there.NFL.com - Mewelde MoorePosition: RB Height: 5-11 Weight: 209NFL.com - Chester TaylorPosition: RB Height: 5-11 Weight: 213I think if Taylor ends up in Minn he is going to end up way overvalued in FF leagues. I imagine he would end up a late 2nd/early 3rd round and there's no way I would touch him at that spot. He seems to fit into a similar mold to the new RB Minny seems to bring in every year. I have no idea why they continue to bring in these little scat-backs and then complain that they don't have anyone that can carry the load every year.
![]()
And they've made it quite clear they think he's too small.
Moore is not a great inside runner, and is very injury prone. This has nothing to to with his size, just his ability. Taylor is everything the Vikings are looking for...hes a very good runner both inside and out, and hasnt shown the same propensity to injury that Moore has.
By your rationalization, Brian Childress would also think Brian Westbrook is "too small", along with guys like Curtis Martin, Tiki Barber, Clinton Portis, etc etc.
Linkeychester taylor arrived at the facility around 4:30 and will meet the media tonite at winter park.
recap: longwell signed, leber and taylor are here but nothing has been done.
should be interesting tonite.
Well, with this logic Ron Dayne is a scat back too.Moore might be 5 11 205 but he plays small , while Taylor at 213 plays like a 225 pound RB with skills.Well, thats quite a jump in logic there. Where have they said Moore is "too small"? And who is "they"? None of the same coaches or front office people are still there.NFL.com - Mewelde MoorePosition: RB Height: 5-11 Weight: 209NFL.com - Chester TaylorPosition: RB Height: 5-11 Weight: 213I think if Taylor ends up in Minn he is going to end up way overvalued in FF leagues. I imagine he would end up a late 2nd/early 3rd round and there's no way I would touch him at that spot. He seems to fit into a similar mold to the new RB Minny seems to bring in every year. I have no idea why they continue to bring in these little scat-backs and then complain that they don't have anyone that can carry the load every year.
![]()
And they've made it quite clear they think he's too small.
Moore is not a great inside runner, and is very injury prone. This has nothing to to with his size, just his ability. Taylor is everything the Vikings are looking for...hes a very good runner both inside and out, and hasnt shown the same propensity to injury that Moore has.
By your rationalization, Brian Childress would also think Brian Westbrook is "too small", along with guys like Curtis Martin, Tiki Barber, Clinton Portis, etc etc.