What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Chester Taylor (1 Viewer)

gdub

Footballguy
Getting ADP with the first pick, it seemed logical to grab Chester. I am wondering what kind of performance we could expect if ADP was on the shelf. Is he still capable of putting up RB1(top12) numbers if given the carries? Would he be given a full workload, get goalline carries, etc? I am trying to gauge his worth to other ADP owners out there. With a couple of quality backs sitting on the free agent list and bye weeks approaching, are other Chester owners looking to cut ties yet?

 
:blackdot:

Having just traded for AP, I am interested in hearing this

The Taylor owner in my league wanted A Bradshaw or D Brown. I said nice try.

 
Not saying that ADP will never got hurt, but I had Chester for 2 years sitting on my bench, ready to plug in if ADP were to ever miss time. He never did.

 
:fishy:Having just traded for AP, I am interested in hearing thisThe Taylor owner in my league wanted A Bradshaw or D Brown. I said nice try.
Redraft or dynasty? That seems like a reasonable offer in a redraft, depending on your league size. Not to say I'd make it, but it's in the ballpark.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would absolutely trade Bradshaw or Brown for Taylor if I had Peterson..no question. He's insurance..pure and simple.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not saying that ADP will never got hurt, but I had Chester for 2 years sitting on my bench, ready to plug in if ADP were to ever miss time. He never did.
AP has not shown in his short NFL career to be a player that you need to handcuff because of injury.If I had AP and CT - I would hold.If I had AP but not CT - I would hold or make a weak offer to get CT from his owner.If I just had CT - As long as my roster is larger enough I would keep him, but knowing that outside of an AP injury his value is almost zero.
 
Just because ADP has not been injured is no reason not to hand cuff him...injuries are unpredictable. Taylor would be a RB1 if ADP goes down.

 
I would absolutely trade Bradshaw or Brown for Taylor if I had Peterson..no question. He's insurance..pure and simple.
Do you mean this in redraft or dynasty (or both).I think in redraft I would probably trade one of those two for Taylor as well, on the chance that ADP got hurt it would keep the season alive. In Dynasty, not so much. Bradshaw and Brown both seem worth something more in Dynasty, to me. They are guys that will certainly score this year and if there are injuries on their teams they could score a lot this year, but they are not money in the bank this year (IMO). That said, if ADP is your only legit start outside of these two guys, then it would be tough to lose a sure starter for insurance on the bench even in redraft. It would just be easier to stomach in that scenario for me.
 
I'm in a league where the ADP owner fell asleep at the wheel and forgot to draft Chester - He got really panicked right before week 1 and coughed up Antonio Gates for Chester Taylor straight up. He had John Carlson as a backup TE and decided he could roll with him as his TE1 in exchange for the security of ADP's handcuff.

 
ADP is not "injury prone" per se, but his violent running style lends itself to a greater risk of injury than the average RB. He did get injured against Green Bay in 2007 and missed a couple of games with a knee sprain, but he certainly is not "injury prone" like we think of a Brian Westbrook, Cadillac Williams, Willis McGahee, etc.

 
I think he's one of, if not the most important handcuff in fantasy football.
This is correct. If AP is injured, Taylor is a competent RB playing on a team with one of the best offensive lines in football. If AP gets hurt, Taylor steps right in and is an automatic top 10 RB.
 
Seems like some of you think Chester can be a top ten back. Not to turn this into an assistant coach thread, but I am on the fence of picking up Bradshaw in a redraft and letting Chester go. My thought process is I could use Bradshaw as a spot start when my other rb's have byes/tough matchups. I really can't do that with Chester. I guess it really comes down to who is more likely to miss time...Jacobs or ADP. I think Bradshaw would be a top ten back too. I hate trying to guess who is more likely to get injured.

 
ADP is not "injury prone" per se, but his violent running style lends itself to a greater risk of injury than the average RB. He did get injured against Green Bay in 2007 and missed a couple of games with a knee sprain, but he certainly is not "injury prone" like we think of a Brian Westbrook, Cadillac Williams, Willis McGahee, etc.
Just out of curiosity, can someone pull up CT's stats during these games ADP missed?
 
Traded Willis McGahee straight up for Taylor and I have Rice. I plan on using Taylor in the Flex spot a few times when the game is a blowout. Nothing like having a decent hand-cuff for the #1 overall pick.

 
ADP is not "injury prone" per se, but his violent running style lends itself to a greater risk of injury than the average RB. He did get injured against Green Bay in 2007 and missed a couple of games with a knee sprain, but he certainly is not "injury prone" like we think of a Brian Westbrook, Cadillac Williams, Willis McGahee, etc.
Just out of curiosity, can someone pull up CT's stats during these games ADP missed?
Too busy to spend a lot of time on this, but here are the 2007 games where Taylor received at least 10 or more carries:WK TM OPP RSH YD TD TARG REC YD TD 6 MIN CHI 22 83 0 0 0 0 07 MIN DAL 10 47 0 4 3 19 011 MIN OAK 22 164 3 3 3 38 012 MIN NYG 31 77 1 2 2 12 0 13 MIN DET 14 70 1 3 2 17 017 MIN DEN 10 83 0 4 3 9 0
 
I think he's one of, if not the most important handcuff in fantasy football.
Yeah.. but so does everyone else. I drafted AP & didn't get Taylor. He went in like the 8th round or so in my 12 teamer. I was planning on taking him but needed other stuff..
 
Seems like some of you think Chester can be a top ten back. Not to turn this into an assistant coach thread, but I am on the fence of picking up Bradshaw in a redraft and letting Chester go. My thought process is I could use Bradshaw as a spot start when my other rb's have byes/tough matchups. I really can't do that with Chester. I guess it really comes down to who is more likely to miss time...Jacobs or ADP. I think Bradshaw would be a top ten back too. I hate trying to guess who is more likely to get injured.
He has all the tools to be a top 10 back if Peterson went down. He finished 11th in 2006 with 303 attempts, 1216 yards 6 scores. Also had 42 rec for 288 yards. So yes he could very well be a top 10 back if Peterson missed time.
 
jdoggydogg said:
Rushmore said:
I think he's one of, if not the most important handcuff in fantasy football.
This is correct. If AP is injured, Taylor is a competent RB playing on a team with one of the best offensive lines in football. If AP gets hurt, Taylor steps right in and is an automatic top 10 RB.
But he wasn't a top 10 RB before Peterson was drafted with mostly the same o-line. A very solid back for sure but more of a string RB2 than a RB1. And that was when he was 28, not 31.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
JHuber77 said:
gdub said:
Seems like some of you think Chester can be a top ten back. Not to turn this into an assistant coach thread, but I am on the fence of picking up Bradshaw in a redraft and letting Chester go. My thought process is I could use Bradshaw as a spot start when my other rb's have byes/tough matchups. I really can't do that with Chester. I guess it really comes down to who is more likely to miss time...Jacobs or ADP. I think Bradshaw would be a top ten back too. I hate trying to guess who is more likely to get injured.
He has all the tools to be a top 10 back if Peterson went down. He finished 11th in 2006 with 303 attempts, 1216 yards 6 scores. Also had 42 rec for 288 yards. So yes he could very well be a top 10 back if Peterson missed time.
it depends on the size of your bench. If you need a player to produce at some point this season then having him is not very productive.
 
If you have AP, Chester provides something you rarely get in this game-- peace of mind. If your #1 goes down, you plug in a guy who should perform like a fantasy #1 (maybe not as good as the actual #1, but as good or better than what your opponent is probably starting). He'd start for many teams in the NFL imo.

If you don't have AP, he's a lottery ticket. Might get you something good from the AP owner, or he might be called into service at some point and perform like a #1. It's up to you to decide if that's worth a roster spot. It is to me even without AP.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
But he wasn't a top 10 RB before Peterson was drafted with mostly the same o-line. A very solid back for sure but more of a string RB2 than a RB1. And that was when he was 28, not 31.
The point that he is 31 is really something worth thinking about. Is the fact that over-30 RBs decline because of career mileage, or because of age? I don't know for sure, but keep in mind that CT hasn't looked all that good in with his opportunities thus far.
 
Frankbot said:
I'm in a league where the ADP owner fell asleep at the wheel and forgot to draft Chester - He got really panicked right before week 1 and coughed up Antonio Gates for Chester Taylor straight up. He had John Carlson as a backup TE and decided he could roll with him as his TE1 in exchange for the security of ADP's handcuff.
was offered something similar Chester and Housh in exchange for Gates. In a TD-only league without a dedicated TE I might entertain it, though I'd have to cut somebody at some point and that kind of devalues the deal from my end.-QG
 
Adrian Peterson (Min - RB) Wed, Sep 23Recent NewsPeterson was limited in practice Wednesday with a back injury.Advice: The NFL's leading rusher was listed on the team's injury report, three days after rushing for 92 yards and a touchdown against the Lions. The team hosts San Francisco this Sunday.
Not saying its anything serious, but maybe you will get to find out this week vs San Fran
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top