Franknbeans
Footballguy
Pittsburgh - Kyle Fuller, CB, Virginia Tech

More than ok with any of these 3. Personally I think Donald goes top 10, and the Bears choose Pryor over HaHaOf the three teams I follow closely:
Chicago: I want Donald, but think we get HaHa or Pryor (whichever drops). Gun to my head, I say they get Calvin Pryor.
I feel the same way as these guys do with Chicago......... Would love Donald, but think they go Pryor as Donald will be gone.More than ok with any of these 3. Personally I think Donald goes top 10, and the Bears choose Pryor over HaHaOf the three teams I follow closely:
Chicago: I want Donald, but think we get HaHa or Pryor (whichever drops). Gun to my head, I say they get Calvin Pryor.
I hope not. I don't see WR as a supreme need based on their new offense, what will be available and what they need. Also, they are TERRIBLE at drafting WR's. Like New England bad. Loomis became GM in 2002. So 12 drafts resulting in 10 WR's:SaintsInDome2006 said:Saints - WR, Lee or Cooks
You must mean SINCE they took MSU's Charles Rogers over Andre Johnson?Lions @ #10 take CB Justin Gilbert.
Dennard is another possible but when 2 are close Lions always seem to go with the non-local guy.
Seferian-Jenkins is not a first-round talent.Packers would love to get Mosley, but cowboys are not going to pass on him. I think Packers go TE either Ebron or Seferian-Jenkins.
I don't know, I feel like I'm beating a drum - the scoring was down to 10th. The games they lost in NE, NYJ, CAR, STL had a lot to do with Brees having no outlet when Graham was taken away and Sproles minimized. I see them taking 1-2 WRs. I can't predict they will take a WR in the 1st but I think they need one of that caliber, no matter where they get him. Whether that means an Adams or Moncrief or Herron or Latimer, fine, but they need to replenish their talent level big time. They have Colston and Stills then x/y/z. I think they're planning to retool, and the 2nd pick could either be a small RB or a small slot WR. That's my wish list, my view of things.I hope not. I don't see WR as a supreme need based on their new offense, what will be available and what they need. Also, they are TERRIBLE at drafting WR's. Like New England bad. Loomis became GM in 2002. So 12 drafts resulting in 10 WR's:SaintsInDome2006 said:Saints - WR, Lee or Cooks
2003 - Kareem Kelly - 6th round - bust
2003 - Talman Gardner - 7th round - bust
2004 - Devery - 2nd round - decent career but bust for value
2005 - Chase Lyman - 5th - bust
2006 - Mike Hass - 6th - bust
2006 - Colston - 7th - steal
2007 - Meachem - 1st - decent career but bust for value
2008 - Adrian Arrington - 7th - bust
2012 - Nick Toon - 4th - TBD
2013 - Stills - 5th - TBD, but trending up
Definitely stay away from Pac-10 WRs! Another year of declining Colston, Stills is a solid speed WR2. Different types of WR's but hopefully Toon or Morgan emerge. Still have Meachem. They are obviously prepping for post Brees with more run heavy, D centric attack. I'd love for them to get a big project WR with a high ceiling low floor like Latimer or Moncrief but those guys will go before the 3rd and the two major needs are OLB and C. Maybe throw multiple late picks and bring in 1-2 good UDFA's at WR's. That's where they tend to excel.
I'm down with the best CB available for the Bengals as well.Bengals - Dennard
I'm down with the best CB available for the Bengals as well.Bengals - Dennard
-QG
Definitely. Love the pick, got lucky that he fell to us.I'm down with the best CB available for the Bengals as well.Bengals - Dennard
-QG![]()