What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Christine Michael (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ugh...still more coach speak. Sure, he's progressing well...but seems like baby steps. Fantasy owners don't have time for all of this. Basically, nothing has changed for Michael...still 3rd on the depth chart as he's always been.

I'm starting to worry about holding on to him (in leagues where contract years are involved). So he probably gets a few carries here and there again this year barring an injury to Turbin or Lynch.

We all assume next year will be his year...how many thought "this" year would be his year? How long do we wait? Who's to say they don't draft yet another talented back (or two) next year and we are revisiting the same things with Michael next year? Who's to say this doesn't turn into an ugly RBBC next year?

I wanna put a 4 yr contract on this guy, but my gut is now telling me to slow my roll. I paid dearly to acquire him since I bought in to the hype...but his inconsistency is killing him...AND me. He turns 25 next year...still young by all means but another year not knowing what his role will be.

 
Ugh...still more coach speak. Sure, he's progressing well...but seems like baby steps. Fantasy owners don't have time for all of this. Basically, nothing has changed for Michael...still 3rd on the depth chart as he's always been.

I'm starting to worry about holding on to him (in leagues where contract years are involved). So he probably gets a few carries here and there again this year barring an injury to Turbin or Lynch.

We all assume next year will be his year...how many thought "this" year would be his year? How long do we wait? Who's to say they don't draft yet another talented back (or two) next year and we are revisiting the same things with Michael next year? Who's to say this doesn't turn into an ugly RBBC next year?

I wanna put a 4 yr contract on this guy, but my gut is now telling me to slow my roll. I paid dearly to acquire him since I bought in to the hype...but his inconsistency is killing him...AND me. He turns 25 next year...still young by all means but another year not knowing what his role will be.
Not me. But keep in mind I'm a happy and patient Lynch owner (and not in a contract league) so I don't necessarily care one way or the other. If I were you I would continue to believe the talent.

 
Ugh...still more coach speak. Sure, he's progressing well...but seems like baby steps. Fantasy owners don't have time for all of this. Basically, nothing has changed for Michael...still 3rd on the depth chart as he's always been.

I'm starting to worry about holding on to him (in leagues where contract years are involved). So he probably gets a few carries here and there again this year barring an injury to Turbin or Lynch.

We all assume next year will be his year...how many thought "this" year would be his year? How long do we wait? Who's to say they don't draft yet another talented back (or two) next year and we are revisiting the same things with Michael next year? Who's to say this doesn't turn into an ugly RBBC next year?

I wanna put a 4 yr contract on this guy, but my gut is now telling me to slow my roll. I paid dearly to acquire him since I bought in to the hype...but his inconsistency is killing him...AND me. He turns 25 next year...still young by all means but another year not knowing what his role will be.
Not me. But keep in mind I'm a happy and patient Lynch owner (and not in a contract league) so I don't necessarily care one way or the other. If I were you I would continue to believe the talent.
Funny thing is I was in a bidding war for him. Now that I have him I don't think I'd be able to get much for him. Forced to hold him now.

 
Warpig said:
Ugh...still more coach speak. Sure, he's progressing well...but seems like baby steps. Fantasy owners don't have time for all of this. Basically, nothing has changed for Michael...still 3rd on the depth chart as he's always been.

I'm starting to worry about holding on to him (in leagues where contract years are involved). So he probably gets a few carries here and there again this year barring an injury to Turbin or Lynch.

We all assume next year will be his year...how many thought "this" year would be his year? How long do we wait? Who's to say they don't draft yet another talented back (or two) next year and we are revisiting the same things with Michael next year? Who's to say this doesn't turn into an ugly RBBC next year?

I wanna put a 4 yr contract on this guy, but my gut is now telling me to slow my roll. I paid dearly to acquire him since I bought in to the hype...but his inconsistency is killing him...AND me. He turns 25 next year...still young by all means but another year not knowing what his role will be.
I drafted him with expectations of watching him sit for the next 2-3 years. Then in 2015-16 I expected to see a battle between he and Turbin with Lynch leaving the team in some way. If anyone took him with the intention of starting him right year N+1 then I think their expectations were too high.

 
Warpig said:
Ugh...still more coach speak. Sure, he's progressing well...but seems like baby steps. Fantasy owners don't have time for all of this. Basically, nothing has changed for Michael...still 3rd on the depth chart as he's always been.

I'm starting to worry about holding on to him (in leagues where contract years are involved). So he probably gets a few carries here and there again this year barring an injury to Turbin or Lynch.

We all assume next year will be his year...how many thought "this" year would be his year? How long do we wait? Who's to say they don't draft yet another talented back (or two) next year and we are revisiting the same things with Michael next year? Who's to say this doesn't turn into an ugly RBBC next year?

I wanna put a 4 yr contract on this guy, but my gut is now telling me to slow my roll. I paid dearly to acquire him since I bought in to the hype...but his inconsistency is killing him...AND me. He turns 25 next year...still young by all means but another year not knowing what his role will be.
I drafted him with expectations of watching him sit for the next 2-3 years. Then in 2015-16 I expected to see a battle between he and Turbin with Lynch leaving the team in some way. If anyone took him with the intention of starting him right year N+1 then I think their expectations were too high.
Ditto. If you're the type of owner who felt comfortable paying a pretty high price for Michael prior to this or last season then chances are you also have some patience because immediate impact has never looked likely, apart from that brief window where Lynch was flirting with a hold out.

It's slightly disappointing that they continue to utilize Turbin, but Michael has looked like a strong talent throughout the preseason regardless. The fact that they've made a clear point to get him in with Wilson and the first team offense at times also indicates that they rate him pretty highly. It seems like his spot on the depth chart is primarily down to trust issues with the small things and the finer points. I think those skills are a lot more learnable than the actual running/receiving talent, where he appears to have an edge over Turbin. Add it all up and he's still a dynasty buy/hold from my perspective.

 
Warpig said:
Ugh...still more coach speak. Sure, he's progressing well...but seems like baby steps. Fantasy owners don't have time for all of this. Basically, nothing has changed for Michael...still 3rd on the depth chart as he's always been.

I'm starting to worry about holding on to him (in leagues where contract years are involved). So he probably gets a few carries here and there again this year barring an injury to Turbin or Lynch.

We all assume next year will be his year...how many thought "this" year would be his year? How long do we wait? Who's to say they don't draft yet another talented back (or two) next year and we are revisiting the same things with Michael next year? Who's to say this doesn't turn into an ugly RBBC next year?

I wanna put a 4 yr contract on this guy, but my gut is now telling me to slow my roll. I paid dearly to acquire him since I bought in to the hype...but his inconsistency is killing him...AND me. He turns 25 next year...still young by all means but another year not knowing what his role will be.
I drafted him with expectations of watching him sit for the next 2-3 years. Then in 2015-16 I expected to see a battle between he and Turbin with Lynch leaving the team in some way. If anyone took him with the intention of starting him right year N+1 then I think their expectations were too high.
Ditto. If you're the type of owner who felt comfortable paying a pretty high price for Michael prior to this or last season then chances are you also have some patience because immediate impact has never looked likely, apart from that brief window where Lynch was flirting with a hold out.

It's slightly disappointing that they continue to utilize Turbin, but Michael has looked like a strong talent throughout the preseason regardless. The fact that they've made a clear point to get him in with Wilson and the first team offense at times also indicates that they rate him pretty highly. It seems like his spot on the depth chart is primarily down to trust issues with the small things and the finer points. I think those skills are a lot more learnable than the actual running/receiving talent, where he appears to have an edge over Turbin. Add it all up and he's still a dynasty buy/hold from my perspective.
It seems clear that talent isn't Michael's problem. The issues are between his ears, and that takes time. Does anyone know his wonderlic score? How did he do in school? Is he more Johnny Manzel or Russell Wilson in his preparation?

 
It seems clear that talent isn't Michael's problem. The issues are between his ears, and that takes time. Does anyone know his wonderlic score? How did he do in school? Is he more Johnny Manzel or Russell Wilson in his preparation?
He had a really low wonderlic score and doesn't come across as the most academic guy. He does seem to have a positive personality though. He might not be a genius, but I don't think there's any indication that he's a mental case like Maurice Clarett or Lawrence Phillips.

 
It seems clear that talent isn't Michael's problem. The issues are between his ears, and that takes time. Does anyone know his wonderlic score? How did he do in school? Is he more Johnny Manzel or Russell Wilson in his preparation?
He had a really low wonderlic score and doesn't come across as the most academic guy. He does seem to have a positive personality though. He might not be a genius, but I don't think there's any indication that he's a mental case like Maurice Clarett or Lawrence Phillips.
Michael scored an 11 on the wonderlic. That definitely puts him on the low end of his class. Here are the bottom performers from last year:

7 Tavon Austin, WR, West Virginia

9 Chance Warmack, OG, Alabama

9 Sheldon Richardson, DT, Missouri

10 Darius Slay, CB, Mississippi State

11 Christine Michael, RB, Texas A&M

11 Cordarelle Patterson, WR, Tennessee

12 Justin Hunter, WR, Tennessee

 
Marshawn had a whopping 14. And it really wasn't until halfway through his 2nd year in Seattle that he started reeling off 100 yard games.

 
It seems clear that talent isn't Michael's problem. The issues are between his ears, and that takes time. Does anyone know his wonderlic score? How did he do in school? Is he more Johnny Manzel or Russell Wilson in his preparation?
He had a really low wonderlic score and doesn't come across as the most academic guy. He does seem to have a positive personality though. He might not be a genius, but I don't think there's any indication that he's a mental case like Maurice Clarett or Lawrence Phillips.
Michael scored an 11 on the wonderlic. That definitely puts him on the low end of his class. Here are the bottom performers from last year:

7 Tavon Austin, WR, West Virginia

9 Chance Warmack, OG, Alabama

9 Sheldon Richardson, DT, Missouri

10 Darius Slay, CB, Mississippi State

11 Christine Michael, RB, Texas A&M

11 Cordarelle Patterson, WR, Tennessee

12 Justin Hunter, WR, Tennessee
Frank Gore scored a 6. Ryan Fitzpatrick scored a 48. The wonderlic is almost completely irrelevant in general, and especially for a RB.

He was never going to get his shot this year, but next year, anyways. Lynch is his main problem, not "between his ears."

And Mo Clarette is completely different... his issues weren't that he had a low wonderlic, but that he drank vodka in his gatorade at practice.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It seems clear that talent isn't Michael's problem. The issues are between his ears, and that takes time. Does anyone know his wonderlic score? How did he do in school? Is he more Johnny Manzel or Russell Wilson in his preparation?
He had a really low wonderlic score and doesn't come across as the most academic guy. He does seem to have a positive personality though. He might not be a genius, but I don't think there's any indication that he's a mental case like Maurice Clarett or Lawrence Phillips.
Michael scored an 11 on the wonderlic. That definitely puts him on the low end of his class. Here are the bottom performers from last year:

7 Tavon Austin, WR, West Virginia

9 Chance Warmack, OG, Alabama

9 Sheldon Richardson, DT, Missouri

10 Darius Slay, CB, Mississippi State

11 Christine Michael, RB, Texas A&M

11 Cordarelle Patterson, WR, Tennessee

12 Justin Hunter, WR, Tennessee
Frank Gore scored a 6. Ryan Fitzpatrick scored a 48. The wonderlic is almost completely irrelevant in general, and especially for a RB.

He was never going to get his shot this year, but next year, anyways. Lynch is his main problem, not "between his ears."

And Mo Clarette is completely different... his issues weren't that he had a low wonderlic, but that he drank vodka in his gatorade at practice.
I realize that Lynch is his main problem. However, he isn't doing the right things, despite his talent, to overtake Turbin let alone Lynch. Learning takes time, and given his "11", it might take him even MORE time to process the game. He's playing with the big/fast boys now...talent helps, but so does experience....and a quick functioning brain wouldn't hurt either.

 
Frank Gore scored a 6. Ryan Fitzpatrick scored a 48. The wonderlic is almost completely irrelevant in general, and especially for a RB.

He was never going to get his shot this year, but next year, anyways. LYNCH & TURBIN are his main problems, not "between his ears."

And Mo Clarette is completely different... his issues weren't that he had a low wonderlic, but that he drank vodka in his gatorade at practice.
Fixed it for ya. Seems like the whole fervor over Michael is calming a bit. I don't have a horse in this race but Robert Turbin has shown he IS the heir apparent to Lynch.

 
RB is the easiest position in the NFL to learn and now we are making excuses about Wonderlic scores? My lord.
LOL, right ?

Total farce with the biuld up of CM. Should have sold early in training camp, although there are still the myopic owners who will pay a king's ransom for CM now.

SELL SELL SELL

 
RB is the easiest position in the NFL to learn and now we are making excuses about Wonderlic scores? My lord.
Just asked what he got to see if we might surmise how bright the kid is (or isn't). I don't hear anyone making any excuses. Care to share YOUR wonderlic score, jurb? :grad:

 
Marshawn had a whopping 14. And it really wasn't until halfway through his 2nd year in Seattle that he started reeling off 100 yard games.
So it took 4.5 years for him to "get it"?
Nah, just an interesting, likely unrelated point.
I think it has some relation. I mean the most appropriate comp for all of Seattle's backups is Lynch, is it not? I also think the point is moot now but probably was another valuable piece of info when people wanted to proclaim him king this offseason. I haven't tested the waters yet but I would be curious to see what the price tab is now if I could pair him with Turbin or Lynch.
 
Frank Gore (who has a legit learning disability) scored perhaps the worst Wonderlic score ever, 6. He's had no issues adapting to the NFL as a RB.

Also, RB as a position score the lowest of all positions in the NFL on the Wonderlic averaging a 16.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So how are people feeling about a #3 RB on the depth chart after two full preseasons? Do people finally realize he is not Barry Sanders just because Rotoworld says so?

 
So how are people feeling about a #3 RB on the depth chart after two full preseasons? Do people finally realize he is not Barry Sanders just because Rotoworld says so?
Bryce Brown currently sits #4 on the depth chart in Buffalo, and I would feel a lot better rostering him in a dynasty league than Jackson or Dixon.

It doesn't matter where things stand now for dynasty leaguers. It only starts to matter when Lynch goes down or leaves town. Beyond that, I don't see why anyone rostering Michael at the moment would feel worse about it now than when they originally drafted him. He looks good running the ball. He looks good catching the ball. He looks better protecting the passer. He's kept out of trouble. The coaching staff seems to like him a lot and value him.

It seems like a pretty safe bet that he's going to get a chance to carry the mail at some point in his career. When that time comes, he'll have even more value than he currently does before he ever steps on the field.

Given all that, I'm guessing most of the people who are rostering him are feeling pretty good about it.

 
So how are people feeling about a #3 RB on the depth chart after two full preseasons? Do people finally realize he is not Barry Sanders just because Rotoworld says so?
Bryce Brown currently sits #4 on the depth chart in Buffalo, and I would feel a lot better rostering him in a dynasty league than Jackson or Dixon.

It doesn't matter where things stand now for dynasty leaguers. It only starts to matter when Lynch goes down or leaves town. Beyond that, I don't see why anyone rostering Michael at the moment would feel worse about it now than when they originally drafted him. He looks good running the ball. He looks good catching the ball. He looks better protecting the passer. He's kept out of trouble. The coaching staff seems to like him a lot and value him.

It seems like a pretty safe bet that he's going to get a chance to carry the mail at some point in his career. When that time comes, he'll have even more value than he currently does before he ever steps on the field.

Given all that, I'm guessing most of the people who are rostering him are feeling pretty good about it.
I have no doubt, people have been blind to the fact he just isnt really that good. Hype is driving this train, it has to be, because over a season and two preseasons and camps and OTAs... The superstar who is Michael still sits third on the depth chart with all these high expectations, and you feel good about it?

He cant beat out Turbin yet, people need to jump of this train.

 
So how are people feeling about a #3 RB on the depth chart after two full preseasons? Do people finally realize he is not Barry Sanders just because Rotoworld says so?
Bryce Brown currently sits #4 on the depth chart in Buffalo, and I would feel a lot better rostering him in a dynasty league than Jackson or Dixon.

It doesn't matter where things stand now for dynasty leaguers. It only starts to matter when Lynch goes down or leaves town. Beyond that, I don't see why anyone rostering Michael at the moment would feel worse about it now than when they originally drafted him. He looks good running the ball. He looks good catching the ball. He looks better protecting the passer. He's kept out of trouble. The coaching staff seems to like him a lot and value him.

It seems like a pretty safe bet that he's going to get a chance to carry the mail at some point in his career. When that time comes, he'll have even more value than he currently does before he ever steps on the field.

Given all that, I'm guessing most of the people who are rostering him are feeling pretty good about it.
I have no doubt, people have been blind to the fact he just isnt really that good. Hype is driving this train, it has to be, because over a season and two preseasons and camps and OTAs... The superstar who is Michael still sits third on the depth chart with all these high expectations, and you feel good about it?

He cant beat out Turbin yet, people need to jump of this train.
We haven't yet hit week 1 in his second NFL season yet. Seems pretty early in his career to be calling that shot.

I'd recommend executing a tuck and roll for your own safety when you bail off the train, but something tells me that you never boarded it in the first place, or that you bailed a long time ago.

 
If he doesn't pass Turbin and / or make the active roster and start seeing a few carries as a backup by the end of this year, it'll be a pretty significant red flag. As of right now, it's not a huge deal IMO.

That said, it's pretty hard to even imagine an "Adrian Peterson level running talent" sitting in a 3rd string role for over a year. Great combine athlete =/= great football player.

 
If he doesn't pass Turbin and / or make the active roster and start seeing a few carries as a backup by the end of this year, it'll be a pretty significant red flag. As of right now, it's not a huge deal IMO.

That said, it's pretty hard to even imagine an "Adrian Peterson level running talent" sitting in a 3rd string role for over a year. Great combine athlete =/= great football player.
I agree with that in general.

I feel like it's pretty common for talented runners to come out of college raw in the passing game. RBs of that ilk who are drafted into less talented backfields have to refine that aspect of their game on the job (or split time in a RBBC). In more talented backfields, they sit until they round out their game, or until a slot opens ahead of them. It's hardly the giant red flag that some people are making it out to be in here.

If he's still in that situation three years after being drafted when Lynch is (probably) gone, then that speaks volumes. As things currently stand? Not so much.

 
Lol. I'm holding thanks, and I'd be perfectly willing to pay a 2015 2nd rounder to a disgruntled owner in other leagues.

When I drafted him I knew he was blocked for 2 years. So far his coaches say he's better than Turbin but is too inconsistent. I'll take the risk that'll he'll learn enough in his 2nd year plus OTAs and TC/PS next year to utilize that talent.

.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lol. I'm holding thanks, and I'd be perfectly willing to pay a 2015 2nd rounder to a disgruntled owner in other leagues.

When I drafted him I knew he was blocked for 2 years. So far his coaches say he's better than Turbin but is too inconsistent. I'll take the risk that'll he'll learn enough in his 2nd year plus OTAs and TC/PS next year to utilize that talent.

.
if you can get him for a 2nd that's robbery, hes still worth a 1st IMO and many people holding him probably still feel this way. Seattle likes Turbin and hes better than people expected him to be.

 
Lol. I'm holding thanks, and I'd be perfectly willing to pay a 2015 2nd rounder to a disgruntled owner in other leagues.

When I drafted him I knew he was blocked for 2 years. So far his coaches say he's better than Turbin but is too inconsistent. I'll take the risk that'll he'll learn enough in his 2nd year plus OTAs and TC/PS next year to utilize that talent.

.
Absolutely agree with this. In fact, even though I'm probably considered a Michael "hater" by the fan bois, I'd send a random future 1st for him in most situations.

The issue is that a single random future 1st probably isn't enough to even get talks started with many / most Michael owners. A pretty large subset of them are convinced he's a can't miss generational talent, which seems pretty unlikely.

 
So how are people feeling about a #3 RB on the depth chart after two full preseasons? Do people finally realize he is not Barry Sanders just because Rotoworld says so?
Bryce Brown currently sits #4 on the depth chart in Buffalo, and I would feel a lot better rostering him in a dynasty league than Jackson or Dixon.

It doesn't matter where things stand now for dynasty leaguers. It only starts to matter when Lynch goes down or leaves town. Beyond that, I don't see why anyone rostering Michael at the moment would feel worse about it now than when they originally drafted him. He looks good running the ball. He looks good catching the ball. He looks better protecting the passer. He's kept out of trouble. The coaching staff seems to like him a lot and value him.

It seems like a pretty safe bet that he's going to get a chance to carry the mail at some point in his career. When that time comes, he'll have even more value than he currently does before he ever steps on the field.

Given all that, I'm guessing most of the people who are rostering him are feeling pretty good about it.
I have no doubt, people have been blind to the fact he just isnt really that good. Hype is driving this train, it has to be, because over a season and two preseasons and camps and OTAs... The superstar who is Michael still sits third on the depth chart with all these high expectations, and you feel good about it?

He cant beat out Turbin yet, people need to jump of this train.
We haven't yet hit week 1 in his second NFL season yet. Seems pretty early in his career to be calling that shot.

I'd recommend executing a tuck and roll for your own safety when you bail off the train, but something tells me that you never boarded it in the first place, or that you bailed a long time ago.
Talent rises to the top, and if a great combine athlete can pass players like Turbin who many say is not special through two preseasons a full season OTAs and training camps and mini camps... its already a red flag. Still shocked people continue to bite the high praise. It is your choice to like him, feel free.

Athletes who recieve the praise this guy has in this thread should not be a #3 RB behind a guy like Turbin after that amount of time.

Sorry if it seems I'm trolling, but just hate seeing people get bit by guys liek this and David Wilson. Meaning guys who have not done anything to deserve their high praise getting treated like stars.

 
Lol. I'm holding thanks, and I'd be perfectly willing to pay a 2015 2nd rounder to a disgruntled owner in other leagues.

When I drafted him I knew he was blocked for 2 years. So far his coaches say he's better than Turbin but is too inconsistent. I'll take the risk that'll he'll learn enough in his 2nd year plus OTAs and TC/PS next year to utilize that talent.

.
Absolutely agree with this. In fact, even though I'm probably considered a Michael "hater" by the fan bois, I'd send a random future 1st for him in most situations.

The issue is that a single random future 1st probably isn't enough to even get talks started with many / most Michael owners. A pretty large subset of them are convinced he's a can't miss generational talent, which seems pretty unlikely.
I am in the same park as you. Many would consider me a hater, but I have Lynch and Turbin and have been trying to send something for Michael (2nd rounder at the best for insurance.)

There is a difference between not liking a guy and being a smart fantasy owner. You can not like Michael yet still want to acquire him for insurance because good owners know anything can happen. But with Michael, expectations should now come back to earth is all I'm saying. Which is, he is still a #3 RB behind a stud coming into his second year and even his performance on the field says he is nothing more.

 
Lol. I'm holding thanks, and I'd be perfectly willing to pay a 2015 2nd rounder to a disgruntled owner in other leagues.

When I drafted him I knew he was blocked for 2 years. So far his coaches say he's better than Turbin but is too inconsistent. I'll take the risk that'll he'll learn enough in his 2nd year plus OTAs and TC/PS next year to utilize that talent.

.
Absolutely agree with this. In fact, even though I'm probably considered a Michael "hater" by the fan bois, I'd send a random future 1st for him in most situations.The issue is that a single random future 1st probably isn't enough to even get talks started with many / most Michael owners. A pretty large subset of them are convinced he's a can't miss generational talent, which seems pretty unlikely.
I am in the same park as you. Many would consider me a hater, but I have Lynch and Turbin and have been trying to send something for Michael (2nd rounder at the best for insurance.)

There is a difference between not liking a guy and being a smart fantasy owner. You can not like Michael yet still want to acquire him for insurance because good owners know anything can happen. But with Michael, expectations should now come back to earth is all I'm saying. Which is, he is still a #3 RB behind a stud coming into his second year and even his performance on the field says he is nothing more.
If he's what you are sure he is to the point of trying to convince others that he's fools gold, it is completely inconsistent that you're willing to pay a future 2nd rounder for him.

 
Lol. I'm holding thanks, and I'd be perfectly willing to pay a 2015 2nd rounder to a disgruntled owner in other leagues.

When I drafted him I knew he was blocked for 2 years. So far his coaches say he's better than Turbin but is too inconsistent. I'll take the risk that'll he'll learn enough in his 2nd year plus OTAs and TC/PS next year to utilize that talent.

.
Absolutely agree with this. In fact, even though I'm probably considered a Michael "hater" by the fan bois, I'd send a random future 1st for him in most situations.

The issue is that a single random future 1st probably isn't enough to even get talks started with many / most Michael owners. A pretty large subset of them are convinced he's a can't miss generational talent, which seems pretty unlikely.
Also agree with Bronco there.

The only reason I wouldn't trade Michael for a random first is that it might reset the clock in terms of my wait. Not all rookies produce right away and with Michael you get to find out a year from now what you have. If Lynch is gone you'll find out what you need to know one way or another. With a 2015 rookie it might be 2017 before you're in the same position.

 
Lol. I'm holding thanks, and I'd be perfectly willing to pay a 2015 2nd rounder to a disgruntled owner in other leagues.

When I drafted him I knew he was blocked for 2 years. So far his coaches say he's better than Turbin but is too inconsistent. I'll take the risk that'll he'll learn enough in his 2nd year plus OTAs and TC/PS next year to utilize that talent.

.
Absolutely agree with this. In fact, even though I'm probably considered a Michael "hater" by the fan bois, I'd send a random future 1st for him in most situations.The issue is that a single random future 1st probably isn't enough to even get talks started with many / most Michael owners. A pretty large subset of them are convinced he's a can't miss generational talent, which seems pretty unlikely.
I am in the same park as you. Many would consider me a hater, but I have Lynch and Turbin and have been trying to send something for Michael (2nd rounder at the best for insurance.)

There is a difference between not liking a guy and being a smart fantasy owner. You can not like Michael yet still want to acquire him for insurance because good owners know anything can happen. But with Michael, expectations should now come back to earth is all I'm saying. Which is, he is still a #3 RB behind a stud coming into his second year and even his performance on the field says he is nothing more.
If he's what you are sure he is to the point of trying to convince others that he's fools gold, it is completely inconsistent that you're willing to pay a future 2nd rounder for him.
:shrug:

 
False Start said:
Bronco Billy said:
False Start said:
Coeur de Lion said:
Bronco Billy said:
Lol. I'm holding thanks, and I'd be perfectly willing to pay a 2015 2nd rounder to a disgruntled owner in other leagues.

When I drafted him I knew he was blocked for 2 years. So far his coaches say he's better than Turbin but is too inconsistent. I'll take the risk that'll he'll learn enough in his 2nd year plus OTAs and TC/PS next year to utilize that talent.

.
Absolutely agree with this. In fact, even though I'm probably considered a Michael "hater" by the fan bois, I'd send a random future 1st for him in most situations.The issue is that a single random future 1st probably isn't enough to even get talks started with many / most Michael owners. A pretty large subset of them are convinced he's a can't miss generational talent, which seems pretty unlikely.
I am in the same park as you. Many would consider me a hater, but I have Lynch and Turbin and have been trying to send something for Michael (2nd rounder at the best for insurance.)

There is a difference between not liking a guy and being a smart fantasy owner. You can not like Michael yet still want to acquire him for insurance because good owners know anything can happen. But with Michael, expectations should now come back to earth is all I'm saying. Which is, he is still a #3 RB behind a stud coming into his second year and even his performance on the field says he is nothing more.
If he's what you are sure he is to the point of trying to convince others that he's fools gold, it is completely inconsistent that you're willing to pay a future 2nd rounder for him.
:shrug:
Yeah, I can read, thanks. My comment was aimed at the context after what you had said in the immediately preceding post. I guess I should have quoted that too.

 
Rotoworld:

Seahawks coach Pete Carroll revealed Monday that Christine Michael (hamstring) is still "banged up."
Michael missed Seattle's preseason finale with a hamstring injury, and his Week 1 availability sounds doubtful with the Seahawks opening up on Thursday night. As to C-Mike's status, Carroll said he'll "figure it out" later in the week. It's worth noting Michael battled injuries throughout his college career. He is currently the Seahawks' No. 3 tailback behind Marshawn Lynch and Robert Turbin.

Source: Liz Mathews on Twitter
 
A healthy scratch is pretty telling on opening night. I don't know if he had a minor injury, perhaps the fans know more. I'm a fan of his potential but a healthy scratch is a player I would prefer to either see on someone else's roster or on the waiver wire but not on my redraft team.

 
A healthy scratch is pretty telling on opening night. I don't know if he had a minor injury, perhaps the fans know more. I'm a fan of his potential but a healthy scratch is a player I would prefer to either see on someone else's roster or on the waiver wire but not on my redraft team.
Talent so big that it can't not safely be released to the universe on game day. It will fold upon itself and implode. I kid.

Seriously, why is he a scratch for this game?

 
A healthy scratch is pretty telling on opening night. I don't know if he had a minor injury, perhaps the fans know more. I'm a fan of his potential but a healthy scratch is a player I would prefer to either see on someone else's roster or on the waiver wire but not on my redraft team.
Talent so big that it can't not safely be released to the universe on game day. It will fold upon itself and implode.I kid.

Seriously, why is he a scratch for this game?
Not sure but I saw it on NFLN. I assume it's a healthy scratch.

My issue or something I want to understand is why isn't he at least useful to give Lynch a breather. If he is as good as advertised then you would assume the coach wants him close by on speed dial. Not even suiting up is puzzling.

 
A healthy scratch is pretty telling on opening night. I don't know if he had a minor injury, perhaps the fans know more. I'm a fan of his potential but a healthy scratch is a player I would prefer to either see on someone else's roster or on the waiver wire but not on my redraft team.
Talent so big that it can't not safely be released to the universe on game day. It will fold upon itself and implode.I kid.

Seriously, why is he a scratch for this game?
Not sure but I saw it on NFLN. I assume it's a healthy scratch.

My issue or something I want to understand is why isn't he at least useful to give Lynch a breather. If he is as good as advertised then you would assume the coach wants him close by on speed dial. Not even suiting up is puzzling.
Hamstring. Been having issues since July 27

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top