This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
But IF it does and Dallas announces they've activated CMike just a few hours later... woo-boy is that gonna be a bad morning for you!
How is this surprising? Are people watching the games?
New York Jets offensive tackle D'Brickashaw Ferguson was named after the Thorn Birds character Ralph de Bricassart.
Certainly not objectively based on some of the comments.
...which is a higher rate than DeMarco Murray had last season...
Using dominant in the same sentence as the Dal oline based on THIS years performance is disingenuous. They have been nothing of the sort so far. Yeah, they were last year but that was... Last year. It's only been 2 games and they can certainly get back to form. I don't think we are going to see last year like effectiveness, though. Romo and Dez being out only compound the issue.
I hate to report this but had La'el been a first or second rounder he'd be a pretty big disappointment. He wouldn't have made the active roster two weeks in a row had Leary been healthy. He was well behind Mackenzy in practice last week. He's missed a ton of assignments and has pretty big issues in pass pro and basic play calling concepts. I went to a bunch of Cowboy practices in Oxnard and while the raw athleticism is there, the coaches were visibly frustrated every time.
I might drop Randle for Michael. I've got RB depth and I'm 2-0, why not do it for the upside?
Because the upside resides with the guy who is actually playing?
Only because he cant find playing time on a line full of veterans and studs. On most teams he would be starting. He'll come along, hyperbole be damned.
Michael can
Agreed. Any post in here talking about how great the OL is and how they just need Michael isn't watching. I posted earlier in here after week 1 and week 2 that the OL looked terrible based on all the hype of how good they were. The RBs may not be as good as Murray, but the OL blocking certainly isn't close to last year.
People seem to forget that Randle avg 6.7 you behind last years line. Obviously this year is different for a variety of reasons. The only two reasons anyone thinks Michael can come in and wow is either desperate for help on their team or is just hoping for that "I told you so" moment
Again, if you are serious, you need to watch the games. No one is averaging 4.5-5 ypc behind the line that we saw week 1 and 2.
I'm not either one of those i have solid 2 RB's but if i can get a third out of micheal that would be great. I really would like to see him succeed and do great with the cowboys but if he doesn't it is what it is and ill end up just cutting him and picking up the next flier. Hopefully he becomes something though becomes it would be nice to have 3 rb1's on my roster with a solid wr core.
You mean how someone above suggested trading away Randle (a starting RB with an OL that should play better) and keeping a RB that hasn't been active yet?
You gonna offer an inactive RB with 52 career attempts and 0 TDs to owners of known commodities such as AJ Green and Travis Kelce? LOL. It's not a good starting point if you actually want the other owner to take you seriously. I don't know about you, but when I get offered crap like that, I tend to not want to deal with the other owner at all. You'll have to sweeten that trade up a bit to get considered seriously IMO
I think he has a better shot at L Bell. I mean Bell has zero fantasy points this year, his owner is bound to be frustrated and a guy like c mike can totally turn his season around. Worth the risk IMOgod that offer made me angry.
Nah......I did the right thing dropping Michael for David Johnson. Then inserting Johnson into Randle's spot in my starting lineup.
Idk, I have a pretty good beer recipe we could talk aboutWonderllama said:
