What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Cincinnati at Tennessee*** (-3.5) 47.5u The Smashville in Nashville (1 Viewer)

GroveDiesel said:
Every so often Tannehill starts to get talked up like he is good. IMO, he’s a product of having such a dominant run game that teams have to respect. He’s a good fit for that offense, but he’s not the reason they win.
Click to expand...
I go the other way. I think Tannehill is underrated, and gets his mistakes held against him more than other QBs. I'd argue Tannehill is a better QB than Stafford or Prescott. 

 
As a Ravens fan, McPherson is the closest thing to Justin Tucker I’ve seen. Like Tucker, he hits dead center of the net almost every time 

 
travdogg said:
I go the other way. I think Tannehill is underrated, and gets his mistakes held against him more than other QBs. I'd argue Tannehill is a better QB than Stafford or Prescott. 
Click to expand...
That would be...a questionable argument when you throw Dak in there. Dak is much more measured than Tannehill. It doesn't even strike me as close, really. 

 
Kinda shocked to see the Bengals have never won a road playoff game before. Amazing for a team that has been to 2 Super Bowls.

 
travdogg said:
Amazing for a team that has been to 2 Super Bowls.
Click to expand...
They were the home field team for the Freezer Bowl against SD, so it shouldn't be that much of a surprise. It's only two Super Bowls in many, many years. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
rockaction said:
That would be...a questionable argument when you throw Dak in there. Dak is much more measured than Tannehill. It doesn't even strike me as close, really. 
Click to expand...
Dak has also had an elite OL pretty much his entire career, and has never really had an elite stretch. If you wanted to argue Dak is more consistent I'd be on board with that, but his highs aren't as high as Tannehill's. Tannehill was quietly the highest passer rating QB over the 19-20 seasons, before having a ton of injury woes at WR this year. 

 
Learn something new every day. I'd forgotten or never knew that the Ravens were the number one seed just a few years ago. 

 
travdogg said:
Tannehill was quietly the highest passer rating QB over the 19-20 seasons
Click to expand...


What rating? See, I don't really trust those, and the argument can easily be made it's because he has Henry that his raw stats look good. But Tannehill is almost universally considered not better than Dak. 

 
Obviously early but expecting Henry to be near his peak is not looking likely, especially if the Titans can't muster up a passing game.

 
Flaws already coming to the fore. CInci's OL is a problem. Three pressures already. 

Titans depend on Tannehill when there are eight or nine in the box. And he threw a pick. 

 
massraider said:
Network TV shows look weird to me now.

Like Hallmark movies.
Click to expand...
I'll say something not politically correct but largely true. It's for women now. And older folk. 

But those are Newtork TV's demographics, and they know it. Look at SNL and go no further. 

 
Defenses ahead of the game here so far.

Bengals Oline missing assignments and bad communication.  Have let both Dupree and Landry in almost untouched.

 
Cincy has GOT to build an O Line for Burrow now. Could probably get a good Interior guy where they’ll pick in the first round 

 
rockaction said:
What rating? See, I don't really trust those, and the argument can easily be made it's because he has Henry that his raw stats look good. But Tannehill is almost universally considered not better than Dak. 
Click to expand...
Which is why I think Tannehill is underrated. Not like Dak hasn't benefitted from a dominant running game in his career too. 

Henry's nice, but he's no higher than 3rd in importance to that offense.

 
rockaction said:
I'll say something not politically correct but largely true. It's for women now. And older folk. 

But those are Newtork TV's demographics, and they know it. Look at SNL and go no further. 
Click to expand...
I think I saw an ad for a show that stars some old guy who pimps medication to keep him in his zone. I don’t know what that means. 

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

QuizGuy66
*** Just In Time! The annual worst thread in the Shark Pool - the 2025 QuizGuy66 Season Prediction Thread *** (feel free to drop your own)
Replies
8
Views
970
IHEARTFF
I
JohnnyU
Let's talk about the big game Colts @ Chiefs
2
Replies
57
Views
838
Ministry of Pain
Ministry of Pain
JohnnyU
  • Sticky
Weekly Waiver Wire and FAAB Discussion - Week 13
2
Replies
55
Views
3K
Footballdaz
F

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top