Cleveland Browns (1 Viewer)

[jchapman70]

So I don't know about everyone else, but I love reading the daily updates Joe sends everyday. Something I have noticed is all the information given on why Cleveland likes this person or doesn't like that person. IE....Tannehill and RG3 (yeah...I'm not doing roman numerals). I guess if Cleveland were a winning football team I would put more stock in managements opinions. I would just be careful not to draft negatively on what the Cleveland people are saying....

That is all....just a quick observation and to give Joe big props on his daily e-mails...they are great!

-Jay

 

[ImTheScientist]

So I don't know about everyone else, but I love reading the daily updates Joe sends everyday. Something I have noticed is all the information given on why Cleveland likes this person or doesn't like that person. IE....Tannehill and RG3 (yeah...I'm not doing roman numerals). I guess if Cleveland were a winning football team I would put more stock in managements opinions. I would just be careful not to draft negatively on what the Cleveland people are saying....

That is all....just a quick observation and to give Joe big props on his daily e-mails...they are great!

-Jay

Jay, I don't understand what you are saying. First you say "if Cleveland were a winning football team I would put more stock in managements opinions", then you go onto say "I would just be careful not to draft negatively on what the Cleveland people are saying". Those two statements seem to contradict.

 

[DoubleG]

So I don't know about everyone else, but I love reading the daily updates Joe sends everyday. Something I have noticed is all the information given on why Cleveland likes this person or doesn't like that person. IE....Tannehill and RG3 (yeah...I'm not doing roman numerals). I guess if Cleveland were a winning football team I would put more stock in managements opinions. I would just be careful not to draft negatively on what the Cleveland people are saying....

That is all....just a quick observation and to give Joe big props on his daily e-mails...they are great!

-Jay

Jay, I don't understand what you are saying. First you say "if Cleveland were a winning football team I would put more stock in managements opinions", then you go onto say "I would just be careful not to draft negatively on what the Cleveland people are saying". Those two statements seem to contradict.

I think he just meant "Ignore Clevland" - kinda like everyone else in that division does.

 

[BuckeyeChaos]

So I don't know about everyone else, but I love reading the daily updates Joe sends everyday. Something I have noticed is all the information given on why Cleveland likes this person or doesn't like that person. IE....Tannehill and RG3 (yeah...I'm not doing roman numerals). I guess if Cleveland were a winning football team I would put more stock in managements opinions. I would just be careful not to draft negatively on what the Cleveland people are saying....

That is all....just a quick observation and to give Joe big props on his daily e-mails...they are great!

-Jay

Jay, I don't understand what you are saying. First you say "if Cleveland were a winning football team I would put more stock in managements opinions", then you go onto say "I would just be careful not to draft negatively on what the Cleveland people are saying". Those two statements seem to contradict.

I think he just meant "Ignore Clevland" - kinda like everyone else in that division does.

Ouch, very ouch baby

 

[daveR]

So I don't know about everyone else, but I love reading the daily updates Joe sends everyday. Something I have noticed is all the information given on why Cleveland likes this person or doesn't like that person. IE....Tannehill and RG3 (yeah...I'm not doing roman numerals). I guess if Cleveland were a winning football team I would put more stock in managements opinions. I would just be careful not to draft negatively on what the Cleveland people are saying....

That is all....just a quick observation and to give Joe big props on his daily e-mails...they are great!

-Jay

Jay, I don't understand what you are saying. First you say "if Cleveland were a winning football team I would put more stock in managements opinions", then you go onto say "I would just be careful not to draft negatively on what the Cleveland people are saying". Those two statements seem to contradict.

I think he just meant "Ignore Clevland" - kinda like everyone else in that division does.

Ignore at your own risk!Reputations are hard to shake. Just ask the Clippers. But, just like the post-Millen Lions, the Browns finally have competent people at the helm and are headed in the right direction.

Remember too, that a lot of what is said is conjecture and not direct quotes. One blurb quoted what beat writer Tony Grossi wrote in the Plain Dealer. Unfortunately he doesn't even work there anymore.

 

[Max Power]

So I don't know about everyone else, but I love reading the daily updates Joe sends everyday. Something I have noticed is all the information given on why Cleveland likes this person or doesn't like that person. IE....Tannehill and RG3 (yeah...I'm not doing roman numerals). I guess if Cleveland were a winning football team I would put more stock in managements opinions. I would just be careful not to draft negatively on what the Cleveland people are saying....

That is all....just a quick observation and to give Joe big props on his daily e-mails...they are great!

-Jay

Jay, I don't understand what you are saying. First you say "if Cleveland were a winning football team I would put more stock in managements opinions", then you go onto say "I would just be careful not to draft negatively on what the Cleveland people are saying". Those two statements seem to contradict.

I think he just meant "Ignore Clevland" - kinda like everyone else in that division does.

Ignore at your own risk!Reputations are hard to shake. Just ask the Clippers. But, just like the post-Millen Lions, the Browns finally have competent people at the helm and are headed in the right direction.

Remember too, that a lot of what is said is conjecture and not direct quotes. One blurb quoted what beat writer Tony Grossi wrote in the Plain Dealer. Unfortunately he doesn't even work there anymore.

Come on, it's still the Browns. GB Cleveland fans, but the Browns are lost right now.

 

[rizzler]

Browns Rule.

 

[bicycle_seat_sniffer]

looks like alot of Cover-Your-Butt bs to me

 

[MAC_32]

looks like alot of Cover-Your-Butt bs to me

I didn't feel that way til I read the RG3 report, the other 2 made sense though. The one constant with the Browns (other than losing obviously) since returning has been the PR staff, for reasons unknown. They're terrible. Make trade offer for RG3 in March, feel like we got taken for a ride, ##### about it, then 3 months later say Weeden was our guy all along. Yea, people will buy that.

 

[PlasmaDogPlasma]

looks like alot of Cover-Your-Butt bs to me

I agree that this is probably true when it comes to RGIII. They really didn't show interest in Flynn or Tannehill though. I will say that Holmgren was consistently going out of his way to praise Weeden very early in the process.

 

[DoubleG]

So I don't know about everyone else, but I love reading the daily updates Joe sends everyday. Something I have noticed is all the information given on why Cleveland likes this person or doesn't like that person. IE....Tannehill and RG3 (yeah...I'm not doing roman numerals). I guess if Cleveland were a winning football team I would put more stock in managements opinions. I would just be careful not to draft negatively on what the Cleveland people are saying....

That is all....just a quick observation and to give Joe big props on his daily e-mails...they are great!

-Jay

Jay, I don't understand what you are saying. First you say "if Cleveland were a winning football team I would put more stock in managements opinions", then you go onto say "I would just be careful not to draft negatively on what the Cleveland people are saying". Those two statements seem to contradict.

I think he just meant "Ignore Clevland" - kinda like everyone else in that division does.

Ouch, very ouch baby

I'm just joking. I think TRich will help quite a bit. The Browns do need more defense - but I do think they're finally on the right track at least.

 

[daveR]

So I don't know about everyone else, but I love reading the daily updates Joe sends everyday. Something I have noticed is all the information given on why Cleveland likes this person or doesn't like that person. IE....Tannehill and RG3 (yeah...I'm not doing roman numerals). I guess if Cleveland were a winning football team I would put more stock in managements opinions. I would just be careful not to draft negatively on what the Cleveland people are saying....

That is all....just a quick observation and to give Joe big props on his daily e-mails...they are great!

-Jay

Jay, I don't understand what you are saying. First you say "if Cleveland were a winning football team I would put more stock in managements opinions", then you go onto say "I would just be careful not to draft negatively on what the Cleveland people are saying". Those two statements seem to contradict.

I think he just meant "Ignore Clevland" - kinda like everyone else in that division does.

Ignore at your own risk!Reputations are hard to shake. Just ask the Clippers. But, just like the post-Millen Lions, the Browns finally have competent people at the helm and are headed in the right direction.

Remember too, that a lot of what is said is conjecture and not direct quotes. One blurb quoted what beat writer Tony Grossi wrote in the Plain Dealer. Unfortunately he doesn't even work there anymore.

Come on, it's still the Browns. GB Cleveland fans, but the Browns are lost right now.

Nope. Not "lost". Not even close.