Nice post lolLeshoure has a lot of knowledge that a rookie probably doesn't have, such as:
1. What rehabbing with the trainers is like
2. How/where to get weed in Detroit
3. How to interact with authority figures, such as the police
4. How the drug program in the NFL works
5. How not to get caught doing the same illegal act 3 times in a month
6. How to lose your job to back-ups in 10 easy steps
7. How not to drive when under the influence of MJ
8. Potty mouth - how to get it
He's flowing with knowledge and teams should invest heavily in him.
at his annual cost it isn't worth it for anyone but the lions unless he gets cut.wow no one likes him here.
I didn't see him in 2014, but am a bit surprised by such certainty in the negativity here. Interesting really
Most people didn't see him. He had 2 carries this season.Bri said:wow no one likes him here.
I didn't see him in 2014, but am a bit surprised by such certainty in the negativity here. Interesting really
Both would cost more than LeShoure. Given that he's in the last year of his contract I don't think he's worth more than a 7th. Detroit would be wise to take whatever they can get for him.No point giving up a pick for LeShoure when you get Tate or Gerhart off the street.
^ this. If he wasn't hurt early on no one would be talking about a RB issue in CLE.Dion lewis.
have him stashed on my IR in both dynasty leagues, and grabbed Leshoure for free off the wire.^ this. If he wasn't hurt early on no one would be talking about a RB issue in CLE.Dion lewis.
I still think they end up with Ben Tate. Tate and Lewis together make up a nice backfield IMOhave him stashed on my IR in both dynasty leagues, and grabbed Leshoure for free off the wire.^ this. If he wasn't hurt early on no one would be talking about a RB issue in CLE.Dion lewis.
zero investment with high possible return. If neither are poised to be the guy once the season starts, then back into the pool at no cost.
Exactly the kind of lottery tickets I want at the end of my bench in the off-season.
Dion Lewis is a good call.Dion lewis.
No way should Cleveland give up anything of value for a guy like Leshoure. However, if the right move came along for them to get him, for cheap it seems as though it could be a cheap fix.Dion Lewis is a good call.Dion lewis.
Baker and another free agent like Gerhart make sense too.
Maybe they draft a RB propsect to boot.
But isn't Leshoure almost cuttable at this point by DET? Where does he fit in? It seems that teams can wait and see if he just becomes available on the market if they want a looksie.
Supposedly Indy put in a call to Detroit about LeShoure prior to trading for Richardson and were shot down IIRC -- if Bell walks in FA I wouldn't be surprised to see LeShoure in that role in 2014. LeShoure looked OK in 2012 the first year back from his Achilles tear, and is still young and on a cheap rookie deal. Considering he'll make < $650K next year I don't see much reason for Detroit to give him away with Bell a RFA and Bush's history of getting banged up.No way should Cleveland give up anything of value for a guy like Leshoure. However, if the right move came along for them to get him, for cheap it seems as though it could be a cheap fix.Who knows where Leshoure will end up next year. In Detroit Bush is back for sure, but Bell is a free agent. Detroit may allow Bell to walk and make Leshoure relevant again as this is a new regime. In saying that Bush wanted the rb coach to stick around as a hold over and that has happened. Therefore, the rb coach may want Bell back in tandem with Bush.Dion Lewis is a good call.Dion lewis.
Baker and another free agent like Gerhart make sense too.
Maybe they draft a RB propsect to boot.
But isn't Leshoure almost cuttable at this point by DET? Where does he fit in? It seems that teams can wait and see if he just becomes available on the market if they want a looksie.
I would have to disagree. Leshoure could end up being a starter in this league still and end up being the lead guy in any RBBC. Starks will never be a starting RB in the league or get the most touches in any time share.Better off signing James Starks for a modest contract. At least when he plays, he's got some talent.
A little early to completely pass judgement on LeShoure, isn't it? He's 23, was a 2nd round pick, and the only extensive look we've had at him was immediately coming back from an Achilles tear. And he didn't look horrible IMO. Not great, either, but it's not at all unreasonable to think that he might be better the further out from the injury we get. He's a longshot FF-wise, certainly, but it's also a mistake to just completely close the book on him.Better off signing James Starks for a modest contract. At least when he plays, he's got some talent.
I have to agree with this. Running back more than any situation is all about getting a chance. Plenty of write offs have went on and had some pretty good years guys like Moreno, Thomas Jones etc. Are the odds in his favor? No, but much weirder things happen.A little early to completely pass judgement on LeShoure, isn't it? He's 23, was a 2nd round pick, and the only extensive look we've had at him was immediately coming back from an Achilles tear. And he didn't look horrible IMO. Not great, either, but it's not at all unreasonable to think that he might be better the further out from the injury we get. He's a longshot FF-wise, certainly, but it's also a mistake to just completely close the book on him.Better off signing James Starks for a modest contract. At least when he plays, he's got some talent.
I think the Lions put a 2nd round tender (~$2M) on him and hope they get the pick.As of now the Lions are saying LeShoure is still in their future plans. Why not? LeShoures contract is very team friendly for the coming season and Bush will surely miss 3-4 games, or be banged up enough to be limited. Bell is a RFA and will be back.
I agree. He still has a chance. But giving up a pick for a player like Leshoure when a guy like Starks costs you nothing is bad business. Tons of street free agents have similar upside. Plus he has off the field issues too. I'd pass on him.Coeur de Lion said:A little early to completely pass judgement on LeShoure, isn't it? He's 23, was a 2nd round pick, and the only extensive look we've had at him was immediately coming back from an Achilles tear. And he didn't look horrible IMO. Not great, either, but it's not at all unreasonable to think that he might be better the further out from the injury we get. He's a longshot FF-wise, certainly, but it's also a mistake to just completely close the book on him.Sabertooth said:Better off signing James Starks for a modest contract. At least when he plays, he's got some talent.
Nobody is giving up a 2nd round pick for Bell. No way. Maybe a 4th or 5th. But even that is doubtful. RBs are a dime a dozen.I think the Lions put a 2nd round tender (~$2M) on him and hope they get the pick.As of now the Lions are saying LeShoure is still in their future plans. Why not? LeShoures contract is very team friendly for the coming season and Bush will surely miss 3-4 games, or be banged up enough to be limited. Bell is a RFA and will be back.
Depends on how much money Starks gets. If it's a one year rental of LeShoure on his current deal ($645,000) for a late round pick vs Starks on a longer more expensive deal (which is a certainty, he's not a rookie), then it's a tough question.Not that it matters -- Detroit is just going to keep him around another year as cheap depth. $645,000 is nothing for a decent backup.I agree. He still has a chance. But giving up a pick for a player like Leshoure when a guy like Starks costs you nothing is bad business. Tons of street free agents have similar upside. Plus he has off the field issues too. I'd pass on him.Coeur de Lion said:A little early to completely pass judgement on LeShoure, isn't it? He's 23, was a 2nd round pick, and the only extensive look we've had at him was immediately coming back from an Achilles tear. And he didn't look horrible IMO. Not great, either, but it's not at all unreasonable to think that he might be better the further out from the injury we get. He's a longshot FF-wise, certainly, but it's also a mistake to just completely close the book on him.Sabertooth said:Better off signing James Starks for a modest contract. At least when he plays, he's got some talent.
More effective than Bush?Detroit homer here. Fyi bell isn't goin anywhere. He's a fan favorite, more effective then bush, younger , and more durable at a fraction of the cost. I'm pretty sure bell is the type that would sign a smaller contract with detroit versus going to another team.