What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Clinton Portis (1 Viewer)

tvaldivi

Footballguy
What is his value and where do you see him ranked among the other running backs for the rest of the year. What are some RB's that have the same value as him, does the goal line carries effect his value?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Cue mods/members telling you to move post to Asst Coach forum in 3...2...1

(and I'd keep Edge, ARI offense will be better with Warner)

 
What is his value and where do you see him ranked among the other running backs for the rest of the year. I have a chance to give up Edge for him, should I jump on it? What do you think?
I like Portis's value alot more. The RBBC isn't as scary now as many thought in the preseason. Clinton has looked much better than Betts and is now definetly the man in Washington. I think Portis ends up being a top ten guy for the rest of the year.
 
What is his value and where do you see him ranked among the other running backs for the rest of the year. I have a chance to give up Edge for him, should I jump on it? What do you think?
I like Portis's value alot more. The RBBC isn't as scary now as many thought in the preseason. Clinton has looked much better than Betts and is now definetly the man in Washington. I think Portis ends up being a top ten guy for the rest of the year.
Respectfully disagree.First, Edge is the clear #1 back. Portis has pulled away a bit, but Betts always looms. Second, Edge's sched from here on out is ridiculously easy -- EDGE: @STL CAR @WAS BYE @TB DET @CIN SF CLE @SEA @NO ATL...PORTIS: @ GB ARI (hard) @NE (hard) @NYJ PHI (hard) @DAL (hard) @TB BUF CHI @NYG @MIN (Week 16 championship)Everyone's opinion will likely differ here, but add this stuff to the fact that Warner is believe it not a QB upgrade from Leinart and will make D's respect the pass more, and I'd say Edge has, um, the edge here.AND POST THIS IN ASSISTANT COACH NEXT TIME! :moneybag:
 
I fixed the post so it belongs in this forum now, I initially meant it to be just a value thread for Portis, Ii shouldn't have included the tid bit about Edge, sorry.

 
I have both Edge and Portis. I need to start one each week alongside LT. Edge will get the nod EVERY week except week 9 (Portis VS Jets, Edge VS Bucs) unless something drastic happens, NO BRAINER.

 
I was an official Portis Pimp in the pre-season and picked him up in the 4th round to be my RB2, convinced I had gotten a Top 10 RB.

Four games in, I'm feeling like instead of a SOD, I got 3rd round value in the 4th. He's now fumbled his last two games, and has also gotten vultured at the goal line in both those games as well.

While I remain convinced Portis COULD put up Top 10 RB numbers if he got 20+ carries per game and all the goal line looks, it's now looking to me like he's going to get 15-17 carries per game and maybe one-half (or less) of the goal line carries. If he can pull out one huge game, I will try to sell high on Portis for a WR in the 10-20 range.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was an official Portis Pimp in the pre-season and picked him up in the 4th round to be my RB2, convinced I had gotten a Top 10 RB.Four games in, I'm feeling like instead of a SOD, I got 3rd round value in the 4th. He's now fumbled his last two games, and has also gotten vultured at the goal line in both those games as well.While I remain convinced Portis COULD put him Top 10 RB numbers if he got 20+ carries per game and all the goal line looks, it's now looking to me like he's going to get 15-17 carries per game and maybe one-half (or less) of the goal line carries. If he can pull out one huge game, I will try to sell high on Portis for a WR in the 10-20 range.
It sux but :goodposting:
 
I don't think there are 10 RBs I'd rather have than Portis. He's not fresh in anyone's mind because he has only played 4 games. The Skins are quietly a force in the NFC, Portis will be top-10.

 
I was an official Portis Pimp in the pre-season and picked him up in the 4th round to be my RB2, convinced I had gotten a Top 10 RB.Four games in, I'm feeling like instead of a SOD, I got 3rd round value in the 4th. He's now fumbled his last two games, and has also gotten vultured at the goal line in both those games as well.While I remain convinced Portis COULD put up Top 10 RB numbers if he got 20+ carries per game and all the goal line looks, it's now looking to me like he's going to get 15-17 carries per game and maybe one-half (or less) of the goal line carries. If he can pull out one huge game, I will try to sell high on Portis for a WR in the 10-20 range.
:goodposting:Portis in normal performance scoring, prorated for the bye, would rank 9th among RB's, and 10th in PPR leagues. And that was after one game of him splitting carries 50-50 with Betts, and with Campbell starting slowly but developing. I agree the team appears to be moderating his carries, which is a good thing frankly, but he's on pace for at least 250-270 carries looks every bit like a legit top 10 RB from here on out. And also keep in mind that Gibbs gets serious in December if his team's in the playoff hunt and will feed his workhorse. I could see Portis improving from his pace during fantasy playoffs.
 
I hope you're right. Even with his limited carries, Portis is on pace for 1200 rushing yards, 250 receiving yards, and 12 TDs.

And his current pace might well be at the low end of what we can expect. His 4.5 ypc average is great.

I guess I'm still just waiting for that kind of 130-yard, 2 TD performance that carries me to a win.

 
I hope you're right. Even with his limited carries, Portis is on pace for 1200 rushing yards, 250 receiving yards, and 12 TDs.And his current pace might well be at the low end of what we can expect. His 4.5 ypc average is great.I guess I'm still just waiting for that kind of 130-yard, 2 TD performance that carries me to a win.
Amen to that. One 65 yard TD scamper and everyone will remember CP. I drafted him in the 5th and am holding.
 
I was an official Portis Pimp in the pre-season and picked him up in the 4th round to be my RB2, convinced I had gotten a Top 10 RB.Four games in, I'm feeling like instead of a SOD, I got 3rd round value in the 4th. He's now fumbled his last two games, and has also gotten vultured at the goal line in both those games as well.While I remain convinced Portis COULD put him Top 10 RB numbers if he got 20+ carries per game and all the goal line looks, it's now looking to me like he's going to get 15-17 carries per game and maybe one-half (or less) of the goal line carries. If he can pull out one huge game, I will try to sell high on Portis for a WR in the 10-20 range.
It sux but :lmao:
What 10 RBs would you draft ahead of Portis if the draft were held today?
 
LT, Addai, Gore, Westbrook, Peterson, L. Johnson, Parker, Brown, Edge, Bush, R. Johnson, A. Peterson (no real order)

I can only think of maybe 12 11.

Edit: Peterson listed twice.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
LT, Addai, Gore, Westbrook, Peterson, L. Johnson, Parker, Brown, Edge, Bush, R. Johnson, A. Peterson (no real order)

I can only think of maybe 12.
If we're talking redraft (which I think we are), then the bolded ones I outright disagree with, while the italicized ones are questionable, obviously for a variety of reasons.
 
I was an official Portis Pimp in the pre-season and picked him up in the 4th round to be my RB2, convinced I had gotten a Top 10 RB.Four games in, I'm feeling like instead of a SOD, I got 3rd round value in the 4th. He's now fumbled his last two games, and has also gotten vultured at the goal line in both those games as well.While I remain convinced Portis COULD put him Top 10 RB numbers if he got 20+ carries per game and all the goal line looks, it's now looking to me like he's going to get 15-17 carries per game and maybe one-half (or less) of the goal line carries. If he can pull out one huge game, I will try to sell high on Portis for a WR in the 10-20 range.
It sux but :unsure:
What 10 RBs would you draft ahead of Portis if the draft were held today?
are you joking?and I am a portis owner.But a rb with an inury history, who has a more than proven back taking 10 carries a game from him, and is more likely to be used as a decoy than get the ball inside the 5?I might be able to name 20.
 
I was an official Portis Pimp in the pre-season and picked him up in the 4th round to be my RB2, convinced I had gotten a Top 10 RB.Four games in, I'm feeling like instead of a SOD, I got 3rd round value in the 4th. He's now fumbled his last two games, and has also gotten vultured at the goal line in both those games as well.While I remain convinced Portis COULD put him Top 10 RB numbers if he got 20+ carries per game and all the goal line looks, it's now looking to me like he's going to get 15-17 carries per game and maybe one-half (or less) of the goal line carries. If he can pull out one huge game, I will try to sell high on Portis for a WR in the 10-20 range.
It sux but :unsure:
What 10 RBs would you draft ahead of Portis if the draft were held today?
are you joking?and I am a portis owner.But a rb with an inury history, who has a more than proven back taking 10 carries a game from him, and is more likely to be used as a decoy than get the ball inside the 5?I might be able to name 20.
:no:Betts per-game carries, in order are: 17, 6, 7, 8. And the decoy stuff is baloney.
 
LT, Addai, Gore, Westbrook, Peterson, L. Johnson, Parker, Brown, Edge, Bush, R. Johnson, A. Peterson (no real order)

I can only think of maybe 12.
If we're talking redraft (which I think we are), then the bolded ones I outright disagree with, while the italicized ones are questionable, obviously for a variety of reasons.
Understood.I think we established our two differing opinions of Portis in another thread before the season started. I'm just not as high on him as most in CP's FBG threads.

I don't think Portis will suit up all 16 games & I'd take any of the 11 straight up in redraft.

(Portis owner x2)

;)

 
I was an official Portis Pimp in the pre-season and picked him up in the 4th round to be my RB2, convinced I had gotten a Top 10 RB.Four games in, I'm feeling like instead of a SOD, I got 3rd round value in the 4th. He's now fumbled his last two games, and has also gotten vultured at the goal line in both those games as well.While I remain convinced Portis COULD put him Top 10 RB numbers if he got 20+ carries per game and all the goal line looks, it's now looking to me like he's going to get 15-17 carries per game and maybe one-half (or less) of the goal line carries. If he can pull out one huge game, I will try to sell high on Portis for a WR in the 10-20 range.
It sux but ;)
What 10 RBs would you draft ahead of Portis if the draft were held today?
are you joking?and I am a portis owner.But a rb with an inury history, who has a more than proven back taking 10 carries a game from him, and is more likely to be used as a decoy than get the ball inside the 5?I might be able to name 20.
:no:Betts per-game carries, in order are: 17, 6, 7, 8. And the decoy stuff is baloney.
Agreed. If you've watched any Redskins games this year, it's pretty clear that Betts can't hold Portis's jock. Portis is averaging 4.5 ypc this year; Betts is at 2.7. And Portis has 37% of his team's offensive touchdowns this year, a number that puts him near the top of all running backs. As the Washington offense continues to improve, so will Portis. And he's already a top 10 RB right now!
 
What were you expecting from him? As far as I'm concerned he's proven to be a great value and will only get better as the season wears on.

I would only take LT, Addai, Westbrook, Parker, Brown, Edge and LJ ahead of Portis right now.

 
I don't understand the all the hate thrown CP's way.

He has been extremely consistent putting up double digit points all year, averaging about 70% of the carries in the backfield, in addition to scoring a TD in 3/4 games played.

Granted he has not had the "big" game yet but he still has 12 more games to play. I drafted him as my rb 3 and I couldn't be more happy with the pick.

P.S., Portis gets the goal line carries. Every once in awhile you see the fullback get the carry(Sellers TD) to keep the d honest, other then that, everything I have seen indicates he is the man at GL.

ETA - If a redraft was today, no doubt he is one of the top ten rb's off the board.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
LT, Addai, Gore, Westbrook, Peterson, L. Johnson, Parker, Brown, Edge, Bush, R. Johnson, A. Peterson (no real order)

I can only think of maybe 12 11.

Edit: Peterson listed twice.
"Job Qualifications?""Murder, Rape, Robbery, and Rape"

"You said rape twice"

"I like rape." <Blazing Saddles>

Seriously folks- Sellers worries me more than Betts. But Clinton Portis is top 10 in my league.

 
I think that chucking 25% of the carries to Betts only helps Portis in the long run. Keeps him fresh, healthy, and changes the pace of the running game a bit.

 
I was an official Portis Pimp in the pre-season and picked him up in the 4th round to be my RB2, convinced I had gotten a Top 10 RB.Four games in, I'm feeling like instead of a SOD, I got 3rd round value in the 4th. He's now fumbled his last two games, and has also gotten vultured at the goal line in both those games as well.While I remain convinced Portis COULD put him Top 10 RB numbers if he got 20+ carries per game and all the goal line looks, it's now looking to me like he's going to get 15-17 carries per game and maybe one-half (or less) of the goal line carries. If he can pull out one huge game, I will try to sell high on Portis for a WR in the 10-20 range.
It sux but :excited:
What 10 RBs would you draft ahead of Portis if the draft were held today?
are you joking?and I am a portis owner.But a rb with an inury history, who has a more than proven back taking 10 carries a game from him, and is more likely to be used as a decoy than get the ball inside the 5?I might be able to name 20.
Betts isn't getting 10 carries per game. Decoy stuff isn't true, name me 20 RBs that don't have a injury history. RBs get dinged up.
 
Portis is 21st RB in my scoring system, PPR, Rush yds, rec yds, td's we also have .3 pts/carry. 21st is NO WHERE NEAR top 10.

 
I was an official Portis Pimp in the pre-season and picked him up in the 4th round to be my RB2, convinced I had gotten a Top 10 RB.

Four games in, I'm feeling like instead of a SOD, I got 3rd round value in the 4th. He's now fumbled his last two games, and has also gotten vultured at the goal line in both those games as well.

While I remain convinced Portis COULD put him Top 10 RB numbers if he got 20+ carries per game and all the goal line looks, it's now looking to me like he's going to get 15-17 carries per game and maybe one-half (or less) of the goal line carries. If he can pull out one huge game, I will try to sell high on Portis for a WR in the 10-20 range.
It sux but :thumbup:
What 10 RBs would you draft ahead of Portis if the draft were held today?
are you joking?and I am a portis owner.

But a rb with an inury history, who has a more than proven back taking 10 carries a game from him, and is more likely to be used as a decoy than get the ball inside the 5?

I might be able to name 20.
Do it.
 
I was an official Portis Pimp in the pre-season and picked him up in the 4th round to be my RB2, convinced I had gotten a Top 10 RB.

Four games in, I'm feeling like instead of a SOD, I got 3rd round value in the 4th. He's now fumbled his last two games, and has also gotten vultured at the goal line in both those games as well.

While I remain convinced Portis COULD put him Top 10 RB numbers if he got 20+ carries per game and all the goal line looks, it's now looking to me like he's going to get 15-17 carries per game and maybe one-half (or less) of the goal line carries. If he can pull out one huge game, I will try to sell high on Portis for a WR in the 10-20 range.
It sux but :thumbup:
What 10 RBs would you draft ahead of Portis if the draft were held today?
are you joking?and I am a portis owner.

But a rb with an inury history, who has a more than proven back taking 10 carries a game from him, and is more likely to be used as a decoy than get the ball inside the 5?

I might be able to name 20.
Do it.
:goodposting: I wanna see these 20 RB's... Are we talking all time or currently playing? Because if it's currently playing, there is no way!

 
LT, Addai, Gore, Westbrook, Peterson, L. Johnson, Parker, Brown, Edge, Bush, R. Johnson, A. Peterson (no real order)

I can only think of maybe 12 11.

Edit: Peterson listed twice.
..and both Alexander and Portis fall outside of these guys from here on out??
 
LT, Addai, Gore, Westbrook, Peterson, L. Johnson, Parker, Brown, Edge, Bush, R. Johnson, A. Peterson (no real order)

I can only think of maybe 12 11.

Edit: Peterson listed twice.
..and both Alexander and Portis fall outside of these guys from here on out??
In my mind, yes. You heard me right. :coffee:
 
Portis is 21st RB in my scoring system, PPR, Rush yds, rec yds, td's we also have .3 pts/carry. 21st is NO WHERE NEAR top 10.
He's had his bye. Where is he in per game average?
The league I own Portis in:RB11 in pp week. (just a smidgin behind James (.5) and Barber (.6)) Not bad for a 3rd round pick. :coffee:
Same here. Like others, though, wishing they'd feed it to him 20 times a game.
 
LT, Addai, Gore, Westbrook, Peterson, L. Johnson, Parker, Brown, Edge, Bush, R. Johnson, A. Peterson (no real order)

I can only think of maybe 12 11.

Edit: Peterson listed twice.
"Job Qualifications?""Murder, Rape, Robbery, and Rape"

"You said rape twice"

"I like rape." <Blazing Saddles>

Seriously folks- Sellers worries me more than Betts. But Clinton Portis is top 10 in my league.
:coffee: @ Blazing Saddles. Sellers is interesting. He's emerging as a weapon, and I may have to eat some crow with regards to him stealing goalline touches from Portis but it's early. The coaches have been joking about how much Sellers has pestered them to get the ball, and the more they feed him the more they see how much of a mismatch he can be against people given his size and athleticism. He's essentially a larger Brandon Jacobs, and he probably catches better than Jacobs does though Jacobs is a more nimble runner. It helps that he never comes off the field given his role as a lead blocker and TE.

I still don't envision the team ever lining up Sellers as the deep back or one back and simply handing him the ball down at the goalline though. He's going to fill the traditional H-back role, and get occasional quick handoffs as the lead back as a change of pace, or get receptions off of play-action or due to ad-libbed roll-outs by Campbell like you saw a lot in 2005 or on Sunday against the Lions.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think that chucking 25% of the carries to Betts only helps Portis in the long run. Keeps him fresh, healthy, and changes the pace of the running game a bit.
:coffee: I've maintained for over two years that Portis is probably optimized around 270-290 carries in a season, which is what he was getting in Denver. Any more and he gets worn down, any less and you're wasting his talent on the bench.
 
I was an official Portis Pimp in the pre-season and picked him up in the 4th round to be my RB2, convinced I had gotten a Top 10 RB.Four games in, I'm feeling like instead of a SOD, I got 3rd round value in the 4th. He's now fumbled his last two games, and has also gotten vultured at the goal line in both those games as well.While I remain convinced Portis COULD put up Top 10 RB numbers if he got 20+ carries per game and all the goal line looks, it's now looking to me like he's going to get 15-17 carries per game and maybe one-half (or less) of the goal line carries. If he can pull out one huge game, I will try to sell high on Portis for a WR in the 10-20 range.
Latest thoughts on Portis? Green Bay's defense is tough, but another game, another fumble is not great.I'm still not sold on him as a Top 10 RB at this point.
 
The Redskins' O-line is a shambles due to injuries. Not sure anyone can put up good numbers. An article in the Washington Post today quoted Chris Cooley as saying that they could no longer run the ball to the right side of the line, where all the injuries have been. When asked if the opponents had noted that trend, he said "Definitely".

I don't see how you can be successful if you can only call plays in one direction in the NFL.

 
It seems like he's destined to get between 9 and 15 pts every week. Hes a solid RB2 but I traded away ADP (my Rb3) hoping that Portis would be a RB1 candidate. I just dont see that happening any more and wish I traded him away instead.

 
The Redskins' O-line is a shambles due to injuries. Not sure anyone can put up good numbers. An article in the Washington Post today quoted Chris Cooley as saying that they could no longer run the ball to the right side of the line, where all the injuries have been. When asked if the opponents had noted that trend, he said "Definitely".I don't see how you can be successful if you can only call plays in one direction in the NFL.
So much for the Redskins homers who said the backup RT was actually better than Jansen and that they should be able to also overcome the injury to Thomas.
 
My take on Portis, first I drafted him the 4th round of my performance redraft league:

He is currently the 12 best RB in my scoring system and has had his bye week.

Averaging 4.2 yards per carry (LT is averaging 4.3 yards per carry)

Overall I happy to have him as my #3 RB on my team.

The key is where you drafted him if you used a 1st or 2nd round pick, not a great value, but 3rd or later I think he is a value play.

 
he is always looking like he's dinged up every game. starting not to trust him. looking like a rb2 for the rest of the year.

 
Green Bay got shredded early on when the Skins ran left, but quickly adjusted. Basically, the Skins need Moss out there to help stretch the field, and they need a healthy O-line. Portis will probably put up RB2 numbers the rest of the year. Good news - Betts hardly got any carries yesterday.

 
His explosiveness is still there. The Redskins can't get the deep ball going, so there is no threat for the defenders not to play up and stop the short game.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top