TE U keeps churning them out.
It's a good group but Penn State lately has Friermuth, Strange, Theo Johnson, Gesicki and now Warren. We'll see what they do.TE U keeps churning them out.
They are but I think Iowa may still be the champ with Kittle, Laporta, Fant, TJH and Eric All.
It's a good group but Penn State lately has Friermuth, Strange, Theo Johnson, Gesicki and now Warren. We'll see what they do.TE U keeps churning them out.
They are but I think Iowa may still be the champ with Kittle, Laporta, Fant, TJH and Eric All.
I have Fannin number one - followed by Warren and Loveland.It's Warren and Loveland for me. Not a deep TE class IMO.
I have Fannin number one - followed by Warren and Loveland.It's Warren and Loveland for me. Not a deep TE class IMO.
Maybe Warren for a late 1st round pick in dynasty drafts, only because it's not a deep WR class either and the QBs are crap. This is a deep RB class, so if one isn't available toward the end of the first round in your dynasty draft, then maybe Warren. If your league has a ridiculous TE premium, then maybe a TE in the 1.06 / 1.07 range. There isn't a Brock Bowers in this class. I doubt any of the very few top end WRs will be there at the end of your first round, so going with a top end TE, which are few, might be in play.I have Fannin number one - followed by Warren and Loveland.It's Warren and Loveland for me. Not a deep TE class IMO.
I just did mock for my SF/TE premium/IDP leagueMaybe Warren for a late 1st round pick in dynasty drafts, only because it's not a deep WR class either and the QBs are crap. This is a deep RB class, so if one isn't available toward the end of the first round in your dynasty draft, then maybe Warren. If your league has a ridiculous TE premium, then maybe a TE in the 1.06 / 1.07 range. There isn't a Brock Bowers in this class. I doubt any of the very few top end WRs will be there at the end of your first round, so going with a top end TE, which are few, might be in play.I have Fannin number one - followed by Warren and Loveland.It's Warren and Loveland for me. Not a deep TE class IMO.
I think Fannin needs to be paired with a creative coach. He's not a prototypical TE. He's basically a large WR.I have Fannin number one - followed by Warren and Loveland.It's Warren and Loveland for me. Not a deep TE class IMO.
Tell me more about Fannin...I have not seen him play this year...his stats this year are impressive...I see him listed at 230...will that be an issue?
That would suck because of Kittle.Warren to the 49ers, confirmed.
At pick #14 (currently), that would be pretty high. Most mocks have him in the low-mid 20's.Warren to the 49ers, confirmed.
That would suck because of Kittle.start both like Gronk and the murderer in New England.Warren to the 49ers, confirmed.
I see you misquoted me by adding text to my post on your reply. That's OK though.....ths timeThat would suck because of Kittle.start both like Gronk and the murderer in New England.Warren to the 49ers, confirmed.
No way the 49ers take him...but fun to think it with my son at Penn State and me a 49ers fan.
Oops...I see you misquoted me by adding text to my post on your reply. That's OK though.....ths timeThat would suck because of Kittle.start both like Gronk and the murderer in New England.Warren to the 49ers, confirmed.
No way the 49ers take him...but fun to think it with my son at Penn State and me a 49ers fan.![]()
He'd look real good in deep forest green. Just sayin.....
I have Fannin number one - followed by Warren and Loveland.It's Warren and Loveland for me. Not a deep TE class IMO.
Tell me more about Fannin...I have not seen him play this year...his stats this year are impressive...I see him listed at 230...will that be an issue?
He won’t, he’s too good.I have Fannin number one - followed by Warren and Loveland.It's Warren and Loveland for me. Not a deep TE class IMO.
Tell me more about Fannin...I have not seen him play this year...his stats this year are impressive...I see him listed at 230...will that be an issue?
I'm a PSU fan and they played Bowling Green this year. Fannin had the best game of any opposing player all year. The one thing I remember is him being very tough to tackle, which after PSU's performance vs Jeanty is really saying something. He was a problem.
Bowling Green was winning at halftime largely because of Fannin. He and Warren are both great players but very different playstyles. I'm hoping Fannin goes under the radar a bit so I can scoop him late in dynasty.
Do you think he will be more productive than Kyle Pitts?He won’t, he’s too good.I have Fannin number one - followed by Warren and Loveland.It's Warren and Loveland for me. Not a deep TE class IMO.
Tell me more about Fannin...I have not seen him play this year...his stats this year are impressive...I see him listed at 230...will that be an issue?
I'm a PSU fan and they played Bowling Green this year. Fannin had the best game of any opposing player all year. The one thing I remember is him being very tough to tackle, which after PSU's performance vs Jeanty is really saying something. He was a problem.
Bowling Green was winning at halftime largely because of Fannin. He and Warren are both great players but very different playstyles. I'm hoping Fannin goes under the radar a bit so I can scoop him late in dynasty.
Tex
WHAT? Kyle Pitts is the greatest TE EVER!!! I know this because everyone told me this when he was drafted. I traded him straight up in a 14 team PPR DEVY league for TreyVeon Henderson in November of 2023. Not sure how that will turn out, but I don't feel bad about it as of today.Do you think he will be more productive than Kyle Pitts?He won’t, he’s too good.I have Fannin number one - followed by Warren and Loveland.It's Warren and Loveland for me. Not a deep TE class IMO.
Tell me more about Fannin...I have not seen him play this year...his stats this year are impressive...I see him listed at 230...will that be an issue?
I'm a PSU fan and they played Bowling Green this year. Fannin had the best game of any opposing player all year. The one thing I remember is him being very tough to tackle, which after PSU's performance vs Jeanty is really saying something. He was a problem.
Bowling Green was winning at halftime largely because of Fannin. He and Warren are both great players but very different playstyles. I'm hoping Fannin goes under the radar a bit so I can scoop him late in dynasty.
Tex
I think Fannin is an interesting prospect, but somewhere along the lines of Pitts (not necessarily a bad thing). Probably a little more situationally dependent than your classic TE, hopefully whomever drafts him has a vision on what to do with him.WHAT? Kyle Pitts is the greatest TE EVER!!! I know this because everyone told me this when he was drafted. I traded him straight up in a 14 team PPR DEVY league for TreyVeon Henderson in November of 2023. Not sure how that will turn out, but I don't feel bad about it as of today.Do you think he will be more productive than Kyle Pitts?He won’t, he’s too good.I have Fannin number one - followed by Warren and Loveland.It's Warren and Loveland for me. Not a deep TE class IMO.
Tell me more about Fannin...I have not seen him play this year...his stats this year are impressive...I see him listed at 230...will that be an issue?
I'm a PSU fan and they played Bowling Green this year. Fannin had the best game of any opposing player all year. The one thing I remember is him being very tough to tackle, which after PSU's performance vs Jeanty is really saying something. He was a problem.
Bowling Green was winning at halftime largely because of Fannin. He and Warren are both great players but very different playstyles. I'm hoping Fannin goes under the radar a bit so I can scoop him late in dynasty.
Tex
Yeah, Loveland, Warren, and Fannin seem to be the only draft-able TEs in dynasty.I think Fannin is an interesting prospect, but somewhere along the lines of Pitts (not necessarily a bad thing). Probably a little more situationally dependent than your classic TE, hopefully whomever drafts him has a vision on what to do with him.WHAT? Kyle Pitts is the greatest TE EVER!!! I know this because everyone told me this when he was drafted. I traded him straight up in a 14 team PPR DEVY league for TreyVeon Henderson in November of 2023. Not sure how that will turn out, but I don't feel bad about it as of today.Do you think he will be more productive than Kyle Pitts?He won’t, he’s too good.I have Fannin number one - followed by Warren and Loveland.It's Warren and Loveland for me. Not a deep TE class IMO.
Tell me more about Fannin...I have not seen him play this year...his stats this year are impressive...I see him listed at 230...will that be an issue?
I'm a PSU fan and they played Bowling Green this year. Fannin had the best game of any opposing player all year. The one thing I remember is him being very tough to tackle, which after PSU's performance vs Jeanty is really saying something. He was a problem.
Bowling Green was winning at halftime largely because of Fannin. He and Warren are both great players but very different playstyles. I'm hoping Fannin goes under the radar a bit so I can scoop him late in dynasty.
Tex
Jared Feinberg
If the #Panthers were to trade back and take Penn State TE Tyler Warren, I’d be for it.
+ alignment versatility
+ ball skills
+ physicality at POA and w/ ball in his hands
+ quality blocker in run game
Clip 1 (blocking ability), Clip 2 (pass catching ability vs. ORE)
#NFLDraft
David J. Gautieri
Tyler Warren is going to be very high in my 2025 rookie rankings.
93.2 PFF Receiving Grade this year.
Almost 3.00 YPRR (2.93).
70%+ career contested-catch success-rate.
6.7 career YAC/reception (16 broken tackles this season).
Diverse utilization (35.5% in-line rate, 46.6% slot-rate, 12.6% out-wide).
Can’t wait to see the athletic testing.
He outperformed Pitts at the collegiate level when comparing the numbers. Pitts had a great rookie season but fell off but we need to see more to try and answer your question properly.Do you think he will be more productive than Kyle Pitts?He won’t, he’s too good.I have Fannin number one - followed by Warren and Loveland.It's Warren and Loveland for me. Not a deep TE class IMO.
Tell me more about Fannin...I have not seen him play this year...his stats this year are impressive...I see him listed at 230...will that be an issue?
I'm a PSU fan and they played Bowling Green this year. Fannin had the best game of any opposing player all year. The one thing I remember is him being very tough to tackle, which after PSU's performance vs Jeanty is really saying something. He was a problem.
Bowling Green was winning at halftime largely because of Fannin. He and Warren are both great players but very different playstyles. I'm hoping Fannin goes under the radar a bit so I can scoop him late in dynasty.
Tex
The thing with Pitts wasn't so much about his production in college, although he did have nice numbers his senior year (43 for 770 and 12)He outperformed Pitts at the collegiate level when comparing the numbers. Pitts had a great rookie season but fell off but we need to see more to try and answer your question properly.Do you think he will be more productive than Kyle Pitts?He won’t, he’s too good.I have Fannin number one - followed by Warren and Loveland.It's Warren and Loveland for me. Not a deep TE class IMO.
Tell me more about Fannin...I have not seen him play this year...his stats this year are impressive...I see him listed at 230...will that be an issue?
I'm a PSU fan and they played Bowling Green this year. Fannin had the best game of any opposing player all year. The one thing I remember is him being very tough to tackle, which after PSU's performance vs Jeanty is really saying something. He was a problem.
Bowling Green was winning at halftime largely because of Fannin. He and Warren are both great players but very different playstyles. I'm hoping Fannin goes under the radar a bit so I can scoop him late in dynasty.
Tex
He looks the part but I’m just starting to dig into his numbers.
Tex
The thing with Pitts wasn't so much about his production in college, although he did have nice numbers his senior year (43 for 770 and 12)He outperformed Pitts at the collegiate level when comparing the numbers. Pitts had a great rookie season but fell off but we need to see more to try and answer your question properly.Do you think he will be more productive than Kyle Pitts?He won’t, he’s too good.I have Fannin number one - followed by Warren and Loveland.It's Warren and Loveland for me. Not a deep TE class IMO.
Tell me more about Fannin...I have not seen him play this year...his stats this year are impressive...I see him listed at 230...will that be an issue?
I'm a PSU fan and they played Bowling Green this year. Fannin had the best game of any opposing player all year. The one thing I remember is him being very tough to tackle, which after PSU's performance vs Jeanty is really saying something. He was a problem.
Bowling Green was winning at halftime largely because of Fannin. He and Warren are both great players but very different playstyles. I'm hoping Fannin goes under the radar a bit so I can scoop him late in dynasty.
Tex
He looks the part but I’m just starting to dig into his numbers.
Tex
What made him an exciting prospect was more about his elite size, speed and potential. He looked like he could be Calvin Johnson playing TE, a potential mismatch nightmare for NFL defenses. Unfortunately something just never clicked for him at the NFL level, and looking back, he was extremely raw for a guy that wound up going #4 in the draft.
Warren looks like a much safer prospect at TE. He's not Kyle Pitts, but he's not Brock Bowers either. He's more of a prototypical TE that should excel at the next level. He's going to go very high in this draft.
ETA - Fannin was an elite receiver this year. Teams knew what was coming and they still couldn't stop him. Good teams, bad teams, elite defenses, it did not matter. His weight might be a problem as a traditional TE in the NFL. I believe his combine testing will be very important to his draft stock because I'm not sure how effective he is/will be as a blocker. He was used a lot out wide and in the slot this season and could not be stopped by anyone. He does play much faster than his reported 40 time. This might be a lazy comparison, but he looks like an upgraded version of Isaiah Likely to me. He's a very interesting prospect.
The thing with Pitts wasn't so much about his production in college, although he did have nice numbers his senior year (43 for 770 and 12)He outperformed Pitts at the collegiate level when comparing the numbers. Pitts had a great rookie season but fell off but we need to see more to try and answer your question properly.Do you think he will be more productive than Kyle Pitts?He won’t, he’s too good.I have Fannin number one - followed by Warren and Loveland.It's Warren and Loveland for me. Not a deep TE class IMO.
Tell me more about Fannin...I have not seen him play this year...his stats this year are impressive...I see him listed at 230...will that be an issue?
I'm a PSU fan and they played Bowling Green this year. Fannin had the best game of any opposing player all year. The one thing I remember is him being very tough to tackle, which after PSU's performance vs Jeanty is really saying something. He was a problem.
Bowling Green was winning at halftime largely because of Fannin. He and Warren are both great players but very different playstyles. I'm hoping Fannin goes under the radar a bit so I can scoop him late in dynasty.
Tex
He looks the part but I’m just starting to dig into his numbers.
Tex
What made him an exciting prospect was more about his elite size, speed and potential. He looked like he could be Calvin Johnson playing TE, a potential mismatch nightmare for NFL defenses. Unfortunately something just never clicked for him at the NFL level, and looking back, he was extremely raw for a guy that wound up going #4 in the draft.
Warren looks like a much safer prospect at TE. He's not Kyle Pitts, but he's not Brock Bowers either. He's more of a prototypical TE that should excel at the next level. He's going to go very high in this draft.
ETA - Fannin was an elite receiver this year. Teams knew what was coming and they still couldn't stop him. Good teams, bad teams, elite defenses, it did not matter. His weight might be a problem as a traditional TE in the NFL. I believe his combine testing will be very important to his draft stock because I'm not sure how effective he is/will be as a blocker. He was used a lot out wide and in the slot this season and could not be stopped by anyone. He does play much faster than his reported 40 time. This might be a lazy comparison, but he looks like an upgraded version of Isaiah Likely to me. He's a very interesting prospect.