What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Colts trade for Booger McFarland (1 Viewer)

It's a good pickup. Booger comes into the same scheme with the same role and helps solidify a key position in that scheme to make it all work well.

 
Nice move for the Colts. They were not stopping the run against any teams...this can only help.

 
I am totally amazed that Polian pulled this off. Not that it was impossible, but that it was Polian that did it. He is notorious for not making in-season deals.

I pray this shores us up in the middle. We also need to get Bob Sanders back from his knee surgery. I think it will be another week for Sanders.

If Booger can hold his own, the Colts will take the step forward towards a Super Bowl. We'll see.

I do think this might spell the end for Corey Simon.

 
This move makes a bigger impact than the Corey Simon move last year. With the easy transition for Booger, he should be able to have an impact as soon as this Sunday. Corey Simon was already on his way out of Indy and probably the NFL. His "mysterious" illness aside, he was a huge loss to that D-line. Unbelievable maneuver.

 
A 2nd seems like a steep price for a run stuffer if you ask me. Very shrewd move by the Bucs and very desperate move by the Colts.

 
btw, it was Hovan that improved the run D for the Bucs last year. Booger has been in and out of the doghouse here for years -- always wanted Sapp respect and money but never showed he was worth either --took a lot of plays off, and then the injuries too. He never commanded the attention Sapp in his prime did in the form of double-teams, and still never got to the quarterback. He was just sort of there.

Probably right in the middle tier of DTs in the league, but for some reason people think he's better than he is. Guess I'm glad they were able to get a 2nd-rounder for him, even though I would think Indy would be desperate enough to pony up a first or at least add a player to the mix. :shrug:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not sure how other Bucsfans feel but Booger has been a nonfactor for the Bucs for awhile...in terms of premier DTs around the league...he is not even close to someone like Williams for SD.

It's beter than what the Colts have bu he is not gonna completely turnaround their rush defense

 
He's horribly overrated. Good luck Indy.
:goodposting: I feel the same exact way...always was supposed to be the ying or yang to Sapp...he could not beat one on one blocks when Sapp was double teamed...he clogs the middle a bit but this guy is really overrated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
btw, it was Hovan that improved the run D for the Bucs last year. Booger has been in and out of the doghouse here for years -- always wanted Sapp respect and money but never showed he was worth either --took a lot of plays off, and then the injuries too. He never commanded the attention Sapp in his prime did in the form of double-teams, and still never got to the quarterback. He was just sort of there.Probably right in the middle tier of DTs in the league, but for some reason people think he's better than he is. Guess I'm glad they were able to get a 2nd-rounder for him, even though I would think Indy would be desperate enough to pony up a first or at least add a player to the mix. :shrug:
Couldn't agree more Capella, well said.
 
It's not a mania on my part. It is being grateful they are trying something. Booger is absolutely better than what the Colts have to offer right now. Sure they might have overpaid for him. But to do nothing is disgraceful with the way their run D has been thus far.

As for what he offers, until this season, IIRC, the Bucs D has been top 10 or so for the last several seasons. He has to have played some part of that?!

The Colts window is closing for the offense. GB Polian for at least trying. That's all I was asking.

A late 2nd is fine by me for a decent run-clogging interior D lineman.

 
It's not a mania on my part. It is being grateful they are trying something. Booger is absolutely better than what the Colts have to offer right now. Sure they might have overpaid for him. But to do nothing is disgraceful with the way their run D has been thus far.As for what he offers, until this season, IIRC, the Bucs D has been top 10 or so for the last several seasons. He has to have played some part of that?!The Colts window is closing for the offense. GB Polian for at least trying. That's all I was asking.A late 2nd is fine by me for a decent run-clogging interior D lineman.
I know. I just really wanted to use the word Booger-mania. :lmao: I don't blame them for trying something, even if they did overpay for it a bit. It may work out fairly well in fact. You never really know how well a guy does in a new system until he's been there awhile.
 
btw, it was Hovan that improved the run D for the Bucs last year. Booger has been in and out of the doghouse here for years -- always wanted Sapp respect and money but never showed he was worth either --took a lot of plays off, and then the injuries too. He never commanded the attention Sapp in his prime did in the form of double-teams, and still never got to the quarterback. He was just sort of there.

Probably right in the middle tier of DTs in the league, but for some reason people think he's better than he is. Guess I'm glad they were able to get a 2nd-rounder for him, even though I would think Indy would be desperate enough to pony up a first or at least add a player to the mix. :shrug:
So I shouldn't bench Portis this week?
 
btw, it was Hovan that improved the run D for the Bucs last year. Booger has been in and out of the doghouse here for years -- always wanted Sapp respect and money but never showed he was worth either --took a lot of plays off, and then the injuries too. He never commanded the attention Sapp in his prime did in the form of double-teams, and still never got to the quarterback. He was just sort of there.

Probably right in the middle tier of DTs in the league, but for some reason people think he's better than he is. Guess I'm glad they were able to get a 2nd-rounder for him, even though I would think Indy would be desperate enough to pony up a first or at least add a player to the mix. :shrug:
So I shouldn't bench Portis this week?
I just quoted your post dgreen to let you know that you knew who they were going in and you let them off the hook!I'm pretty sure that Dungy knows what he's getting in booger, so in my opinion this can only help.

 
btw, it was Hovan that improved the run D for the Bucs last year. Booger has been in and out of the doghouse here for years -- always wanted Sapp respect and money but never showed he was worth either --took a lot of plays off, and then the injuries too. He never commanded the attention Sapp in his prime did in the form of double-teams, and still never got to the quarterback. He was just sort of there.

Probably right in the middle tier of DTs in the league, but for some reason people think he's better than he is. Guess I'm glad they were able to get a 2nd-rounder for him, even though I would think Indy would be desperate enough to pony up a first or at least add a player to the mix. :shrug:
So I shouldn't bench Portis this week?
I just quoted your post dgreen to let you know that you knew who they were going in and you let them off the hook!
:lmao: Different dgreen.

d = Darrell

 
Not sure how other Bucsfans feel but Booger has been a nonfactor for the Bucs for awhile...in terms of premier DTs around the league...he is not even close to someone like Williams for SD.It's beter than what the Colts have bu he is not gonna completely turnaround their rush defense
He's been a nonfactor ever since Dungy left. Coincidence? Maybe, maybe not. All Gruden has done is ride Dungy's hard work to a SB victory and subsequent suckage. If anyone can make McFarland a factor again it's Dungy.
 
Im just saying that McFarland is lucky because he isnt in TB anymore where the team is horrible. Now he is in Indy where the team wins all the time.

 
Guzalot said:
All Gruden has done is ride Dungy's hard work to a SB victory and subsequent suckage.
:lmao: way to show off that GED guy.
Is that all you have? Schoolyard taunts? :rolleyes: Post an actual counterargument or ####. Seriously.
We've been down this road at least a million times here. Seriously.
I'm sorry, I guess I mistook you for someone with an actual thought to share. I guess I gave you too much credit.
What exactly is your argument? Do you understand how cap-strapped the Bucs were after 03? Do you realize how many premium draft picks they gave up for Gruden? Do you realize the picks Rich McKay gave up for Kenyatta Walker? Do you realize the Gruden was able to take the same exact team (plus the addition of Keenan McCardell) and do somethingDungy was absolutely incapable of doing? If you're just going to make an ignorant drive-by comment, don't act shocked to get called on the carpet for it.And then when you say "subsequent suckage", I guess you leave out the 11-5 season and division title last year, right?

Seriously, the Bucs went multiple years without any premium draft picks and little to no cap room (and the cap room they had, they were forced to spend on oline help due to the disaster that was left there by the previous regime) -- I could go on all day about this if you like, but I assume you won't have much of a rebuttal, except "GRUDEN SUCKS OMG".

It's easy to paint with broad brushstrokes. Let me know when you actually have some insight to add.

 
Guzalot said:
All Gruden has done is ride Dungy's hard work to a SB victory and subsequent suckage.
:lmao: way to show off that GED guy.
Is that all you have? Schoolyard taunts? :rolleyes: Post an actual counterargument or ####. Seriously.
We've been down this road at least a million times here. Seriously.
I'm sorry, I guess I mistook you for someone with an actual thought to share. I guess I gave you too much credit.
What exactly is your argument? Do you understand how cap-strapped the Bucs were after 03? Do you realize how many premium draft picks they gave up for Gruden? Do you realize the picks Rich McKay gave up for Kenyatta Walker? Do you realize the Gruden was able to take the same exact team (plus the addition of Keenan McCardell) and do somethingDungy was absolutely incapable of doing? If you're just going to make an ignorant drive-by comment, don't act shocked to get called on the carpet for it.And then when you say "subsequent suckage", I guess you leave out the 11-5 season and division title last year, right?

Seriously, the Bucs went multiple years without any premium draft picks and little to no cap room (and the cap room they had, they were forced to spend on oline help due to the disaster that was left there by the previous regime) -- I could go on all day about this if you like, but I assume you won't have much of a rebuttal, except "GRUDEN SUCKS OMG".

It's easy to paint with broad brushstrokes. Let me know when you actually have some insight to add.
See, that's an actual argument. How hard was that? I can actualy respect that. Act like an adult and get treated like an adult, it's a novel concept. Even I can see that, and all I have is this lousy GED.
 
Guzalot said:
All Gruden has done is ride Dungy's hard work to a SB victory and subsequent suckage.
:lmao: way to show off that GED guy.
Is that all you have? Schoolyard taunts? :rolleyes: Post an actual counterargument or ####. Seriously.
We've been down this road at least a million times here. Seriously.
I'm sorry, I guess I mistook you for someone with an actual thought to share. I guess I gave you too much credit.
What exactly is your argument? Do you understand how cap-strapped the Bucs were after 03? Do you realize how many premium draft picks they gave up for Gruden? Do you realize the picks Rich McKay gave up for Kenyatta Walker? Do you realize the Gruden was able to take the same exact team (plus the addition of Keenan McCardell) and do somethingDungy was absolutely incapable of doing? If you're just going to make an ignorant drive-by comment, don't act shocked to get called on the carpet for it.And then when you say "subsequent suckage", I guess you leave out the 11-5 season and division title last year, right?

Seriously, the Bucs went multiple years without any premium draft picks and little to no cap room (and the cap room they had, they were forced to spend on oline help due to the disaster that was left there by the previous regime) -- I could go on all day about this if you like, but I assume you won't have much of a rebuttal, except "GRUDEN SUCKS OMG".

It's easy to paint with broad brushstrokes. Let me know when you actually have some insight to add.
See, that's an actual argument. How hard was that? I can actualy respect that. Act like an adult and get treated like an adult, it's a novel concept. Even I can see that, and all I have is this lousy GED.
Waiting for your counter. :popcorn:
 
Guzalot said:
All Gruden has done is ride Dungy's hard work to a SB victory and subsequent suckage.
:lmao: way to show off that GED guy.
Is that all you have? Schoolyard taunts? :rolleyes: Post an actual counterargument or ####. Seriously.
We've been down this road at least a million times here. Seriously.
I'm sorry, I guess I mistook you for someone with an actual thought to share. I guess I gave you too much credit.
What exactly is your argument? Do you understand how cap-strapped the Bucs were after 03? Do you realize how many premium draft picks they gave up for Gruden? Do you realize the picks Rich McKay gave up for Kenyatta Walker? Do you realize the Gruden was able to take the same exact team (plus the addition of Keenan McCardell) and do somethingDungy was absolutely incapable of doing? If you're just going to make an ignorant drive-by comment, don't act shocked to get called on the carpet for it.And then when you say "subsequent suckage", I guess you leave out the 11-5 season and division title last year, right?

Seriously, the Bucs went multiple years without any premium draft picks and little to no cap room (and the cap room they had, they were forced to spend on oline help due to the disaster that was left there by the previous regime) -- I could go on all day about this if you like, but I assume you won't have much of a rebuttal, except "GRUDEN SUCKS OMG".

It's easy to paint with broad brushstrokes. Let me know when you actually have some insight to add.
See, that's an actual argument. How hard was that? I can actualy respect that. Act like an adult and get treated like an adult, it's a novel concept. Even I can see that, and all I have is this lousy GED.
Waiting for your counter. :popcorn:
Enjoy the popcorn.
 
All Gruden has done is ride Dungy's hard work to a SB victory and subsequent suckage.
:lmao: way to show off that GED guy.
Is that all you have? Schoolyard taunts? :rolleyes: Post an actual counterargument or ####. Seriously.
We've been down this road at least a million times here. Seriously.
And your position has always placed all the blame on Dungy while at the same time giving Gruden every excuse for the exact same reasons. How many draft picks were sacrificed for MeShawn Johnson again? And it was Dungys fault that MeShawn was not the player to get the Bucs to the big game?To you the only thing that matters is the Super Bowl. The Super Bowl was won by the great defense that Dungy built not by Grudens offensive "genius". I am not saying Gruden is a bad coach but the credit you give him is misplaced in my honest opinion which is only exasperated further by your disrespect and discrediting everything that Dungy did for the Bucs.Seriously.Now back on topic it will not suprise me at all if Dungy is able to get Booger to play well enough for the Colts defense to improve.
 
All Gruden has done is ride Dungy's hard work to a SB victory and subsequent suckage.
:lmao: way to show off that GED guy.
Is that all you have? Schoolyard taunts? :rolleyes: Post an actual counterargument or ####. Seriously.
We've been down this road at least a million times here. Seriously.
And your position has always placed all the blame on Dungy while at the same time giving Gruden every excuse for the exact same reasons. How many draft picks were sacrificed for MeShawn Johnson again? And it was Dungys fault that MeShawn was not the player to get the Bucs to the big game?To you the only thing that matters is the Super Bowl. The Super Bowl was won by the great defense that Dungy built not by Grudens offensive "genius". I am not saying Gruden is a bad coach but the credit you give him is misplaced in my honest opinion which is only exasperated further by your disrespect and discrediting everything that Dungy did for the Bucs.Seriously.Now back on topic it will not suprise me at all if Dungy is able to get Booger to play well enough for the Colts defense to improve.
Uhmm just to keep the record straight.....Dungy's defense + Gruden being the one that created Oakland's offense = Superbowl win.Gruden inherited the talent, but knowing his old teams weaknesses helped too!Anyone not willing to give them both credit doesn't know what he's talking about.
 
And your position has always placed all the blame on Dungy while at the same time giving Gruden every excuse for the exact same reasons. How many draft picks were sacrificed for MeShawn Johnson again? And it was Dungys fault that MeShawn was not the player to get the Bucs to the big game?To you the only thing that matters is the Super Bowl. The Super Bowl was won by the great defense that Dungy built not by Grudens offensive "genius". I am not saying Gruden is a bad coach but the credit you give him is misplaced in my honest opinion which is only exasperated further by your disrespect and discrediting everything that Dungy did for the Bucs.Seriously.Now back on topic it will not suprise me at all if Dungy is able to get Booger to play well enough for the Colts defense to improve.
Kind of hard to defend Dungy isn't it? His last two playoff games ended up in complete routs at the hands of Philly. Gruden steps in the next year, takes the team to its best record ever and goes on the road to the very same place Dungy couldn't win at and takes a convincing victory. And no, the Super Bowl was not just won by the defense Dungy built (love how Kiffin never gets any credit on this board) -- go look at the playoff game logs that year, and watch the Philly tape again, and watch how Gruden completely abuses Jom Johnson in that game by creating mismatches all over the field (hint: the Jurevicius run when matched up in single coverage with the linebacker). Those are all things Gruden added that Dungy's staff was completely incapable of doing.I don't disrespect or discredit Dungy at all. I also don't worship at his altar like a lot of people do. He, along with Monte and Rich McKay (and Lovie Smith and Marinelli) helped change this franchise and make them one of the better teams in the NFL in the past decade. BUT, Dungy was also at the helm for one of the best defenses in recent NFL history, and was only able to squeeze a few playoffs wins out of them, and no trip to the Super Bowl, due to his ultraconservative nature and inability to put together an offense he could rely on, despite numerous coordinator changes, pro bowl talent such as Keyshawn, Alstott and Warrick Dunn being brought in, and a dizzying amount of high-round NFL draft talent being selected (and failing). Seriously, don't even get me wound up here. I could write a book on how Tony Dungy took a potential multiple Super Bowl winner and ended up doing nothing more with it than reaching one NFCCG, and getting absolutely annilhated at the hands of the Eagles in the playoffs in back to back years.
 
and all that said, I do like Tony Dungy the man quite a lot, and hope he is able to find a way to win a Super Bowl one day. I'm just not counting on it.

 
Guzalot said:
All Gruden has done is ride Dungy's hard work to a SB victory and subsequent suckage.
:lmao: way to show off that GED guy.
Is that all you have? Schoolyard taunts? :rolleyes: Post an actual counterargument or ####. Seriously.
We've been down this road at least a million times here. Seriously.
I'm sorry, I guess I mistook you for someone with an actual thought to share. I guess I gave you too much credit.
What exactly is your argument? Do you understand how cap-strapped the Bucs were after 03? Do you realize how many premium draft picks they gave up for Gruden? Do you realize the picks Rich McKay gave up for Kenyatta Walker? Do you realize the Gruden was able to take the same exact team (plus the addition of Keenan McCardell) and do somethingDungy was absolutely incapable of doing? If you're just going to make an ignorant drive-by comment, don't act shocked to get called on the carpet for it.And then when you say "subsequent suckage", I guess you leave out the 11-5 season and division title last year, right?

Seriously, the Bucs went multiple years without any premium draft picks and little to no cap room (and the cap room they had, they were forced to spend on oline help due to the disaster that was left there by the previous regime) -- I could go on all day about this if you like, but I assume you won't have much of a rebuttal, except "GRUDEN SUCKS OMG".

It's easy to paint with broad brushstrokes. Let me know when you actually have some insight to add.
See, that's an actual argument. How hard was that? I can actualy respect that. Act like an adult and get treated like an adult, it's a novel concept. Even I can see that, and all I have is this lousy GED.
Waiting for your counter. :popcorn:
Enjoy the popcorn.
This is why I don't give anybody credit here. Oh well.
 
And your position has always placed all the blame on Dungy while at the same time giving Gruden every excuse for the exact same reasons. How many draft picks were sacrificed for MeShawn Johnson again? And it was Dungys fault that MeShawn was not the player to get the Bucs to the big game?To you the only thing that matters is the Super Bowl. The Super Bowl was won by the great defense that Dungy built not by Grudens offensive "genius". I am not saying Gruden is a bad coach but the credit you give him is misplaced in my honest opinion which is only exasperated further by your disrespect and discrediting everything that Dungy did for the Bucs.Seriously.Now back on topic it will not suprise me at all if Dungy is able to get Booger to play well enough for the Colts defense to improve.
Kind of hard to defend Dungy isn't it? His last two playoff games ended up in complete routs at the hands of Philly. Gruden steps in the next year, takes the team to its best record ever and goes on the road to the very same place Dungy couldn't win at and takes a convincing victory. And no, the Super Bowl was not just won by the defense Dungy built (love how Kiffin never gets any credit on this board) -- go look at the playoff game logs that year, and watch the Philly tape again, and watch how Gruden completely abuses Jom Johnson in that game by creating mismatches all over the field (hint: the Jurevicius run when matched up in single coverage with the linebacker). Those are all things Gruden added that Dungy's staff was completely incapable of doing.I don't disrespect or discredit Dungy at all. I also don't worship at his altar like a lot of people do. He, along with Monte and Rich McKay (and Lovie Smith and Marinelli) helped change this franchise and make them one of the better teams in the NFL in the past decade. BUT, Dungy was also at the helm for one of the best defenses in recent NFL history, and was only able to squeeze a few playoffs wins out of them, and no trip to the Super Bowl, due to his ultraconservative nature and inability to put together an offense he could rely on, despite numerous coordinator changes, pro bowl talent such as Keyshawn, Alstott and Warrick Dunn being brought in, and a dizzying amount of high-round NFL draft talent being selected (and failing). Seriously, don't even get me wound up here. I could write a book on how Tony Dungy took a potential multiple Super Bowl winner and ended up doing nothing more with it than reaching one NFCCG, and getting absolutely annilhated at the hands of the Eagles in the playoffs in back to back years.
I agree to a point Capellla, but Gruden has been doing the same thing. The team has been going downhill since that Superbowl win.Tampa just went from a good defensive coach to a good offensive coach.At least Dungy has been able to keep that offense he inherited together, despite all the cap problems that having that many stars creates.Granted Dungy hasn't done alot better in creating a defense than Gruden has built an offense, but he's doing a better job of keeping what he inherited.
 
Bruce Allen = #1 GM :)

He was brought in to fix the mess created by Rich Mckay, and has done a pretty good job so far. Next year we will have roughly +$20 mil of cap space, and 3 picks in the top 64. And, unlike many teams that take decades to rebuild, we have managed to win a division title in a "rebuilding" year.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
And your position has always placed all the blame on Dungy while at the same time giving Gruden every excuse for the exact same reasons. How many draft picks were sacrificed for MeShawn Johnson again? And it was Dungys fault that MeShawn was not the player to get the Bucs to the big game?

To you the only thing that matters is the Super Bowl. The Super Bowl was won by the great defense that Dungy built not by Grudens offensive "genius".

I am not saying Gruden is a bad coach but the credit you give him is misplaced in my honest opinion which is only exasperated further by your disrespect and discrediting everything that Dungy did for the Bucs.

Seriously.

Now back on topic it will not suprise me at all if Dungy is able to get Booger to play well enough for the Colts defense to improve.
Kind of hard to defend Dungy isn't it? His last two playoff games ended up in complete routs at the hands of Philly. Gruden steps in the next year, takes the team to its best record ever and goes on the road to the very same place Dungy couldn't win at and takes a convincing victory. And no, the Super Bowl was not just won by the defense Dungy built (love how Kiffin never gets any credit on this board) -- go look at the playoff game logs that year, and watch the Philly tape again, and watch how Gruden completely abuses Jom Johnson in that game by creating mismatches all over the field (hint: the Jurevicius run when matched up in single coverage with the linebacker). Those are all things Gruden added that Dungy's staff was completely incapable of doing.I don't disrespect or discredit Dungy at all. I also don't worship at his altar like a lot of people do. He, along with Monte and Rich McKay (and Lovie Smith and Marinelli) helped change this franchise and make them one of the better teams in the NFL in the past decade. BUT, Dungy was also at the helm for one of the best defenses in recent NFL history, and was only able to squeeze a few playoffs wins out of them, and no trip to the Super Bowl, due to his ultraconservative nature and inability to put together an offense he could rely on, despite numerous coordinator changes, pro bowl talent such as Keyshawn, Alstott and Warrick Dunn being brought in, and a dizzying amount of high-round NFL draft talent being selected (and failing).

Seriously, don't even get me wound up here. I could write a book on how Tony Dungy took a potential multiple Super Bowl winner and ended up doing nothing more with it than reaching one NFCCG, and getting absolutely annilhated at the hands of the Eagles in the playoffs in back to back years.
I agree to a point Capellla, but Gruden has been doing the same thing. The team has been going downhill since that Superbowl win.Tampa just went from a good defensive coach to a good offensive coach.

At least Dungy has been able to keep that offense he inherited together, despite all the cap problems that having that many stars creates.

Granted Dungy hasn't done alot better in creating a defense than Gruden has built an offense, but he's doing a better job of keeping what he inherited.
I guess I don't see what Gruden was able to do. He had to let Keyshawn go. I guess McCardell wanted more than they thought he was worth. Brad Johnson was absolutely done at the end of 04 -- I still have no idea how he has been able to rebound for the Vikings. He looked miserable that year, don't know if he was arm-dead or what but he couldn't even throw an out pass. Griese came in and played well, but the Bears offered him a nice contract this year. He then had to develop Simms and now Gradkowski, and has only had Caddy for a year. He has turned Galloway into a semi-stud, after his disaster at Dallas. They've also spent multiple premium picks on olineman the past 3 years to try and build up that line. Once again, all this with very little cap room and quite a large hit on those premium draft picks.

I just don't see how it's the same thing. You can only do so much. :shrug: And people keep saying they went downhill, as if the 11-5 season last year didn't happen. :shrug:

 
I don't want to totally hijack the thread, but every team that does well loses quality players, has cap problems or both. Look at the players New England, Denver, Pitt, and Philly have lost over the past 4-5 years and they are still winning. Gruden has a losing record since the Super Bowl and outside of Caddy and Galloway it's tough to find an impact player that Gruden can claim. The strength of the Bucs is still the defense that is dominated by holdovers from the past regime. That doesn't make Gruden a bad coach, but I think there's plenty there to at least allow the question of, "What has Chuckie done lately?' Even with the 11-5 season his record since the Super Bowl is not impressive.

 
I don't want to totally hijack the thread, but every team that does well loses quality players, has cap problems or both. Look at the players New England, Denver, Pitt, and Philly have lost over the past 4-5 years and they are still winning.
Philly went 6-10 last year. :lmao: It blows me away the short-term memory the people here have. Denver won 6 games the year after it's second Super Bowl (but has been consistently good lately). Pitt went 6-10 as recenty as '03. NE is an obvious exception, but nobody is comparing Gruden to BB. Since he won the SB, he has had one pretty outstanding season (05), one really, really bad season (04), and one pretty mediocre season (03). I don't think that's enough to hang the guy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think it was a good trade by both teams. Helps the colts with depth this year. Helps the bucs with the draft.

I would not think this move would lead you to believe the colts will be in the superbowl. Good tackling by 11 guys would be a start on the defensive side of the ball.

 
I don't want to totally hijack the thread, but every team that does well loses quality players, has cap problems or both. Look at the players New England, Denver, Pitt, and Philly have lost over the past 4-5 years and they are still winning.
Philly went 5-11 last year. :lmao: It blows me away the short-term memory the people here have. Denver won 6 games the year after it's second Super Bowl (but has been consistently good lately). Pitt went 6-10 as recenty as '03. NE is an obvious exception, but nobody is comparing Gruden to BB. Since he won the SB, he has had one pretty outstanding season (05), one really, really bad season (04), and one pretty mediocre season (03). I don't think that's enough to hang the guy.
I'm not forgetting anything. With the TO nonsense and McNabb having the sport hernia Philly had one down season. Denver's last bad season was how long ago? Pitt has pretty steady inspite of '03. The Bucs have been 7-9, 5-11, 11-6 and 1-4 since the Super Bowl. I don't see how you can compare the Bucs to those other teams. And back to this thread, the colts have lost players, been cap strapped and unable to sign many free agents also and have continued to play well. Maybe New England is the acception to some degree but even removing them doesn't make the Bucs look any better.
 
Not sure how other Bucsfans feel but Booger has been a nonfactor for the Bucs for awhile...in terms of premier DTs around the league...he is not even close to someone like Williams for SD.It's beter than what the Colts have bu he is not gonna completely turnaround their rush defense
He's been a nonfactor ever since Dungy left. Coincidence? Maybe, maybe not. All Gruden has done is ride Dungy's hard work to a SB victory and subsequent suckage. If anyone can make McFarland a factor again it's Dungy.
C'mon people...dig a little deeper.Monte Kiffen and Rod Marinell were still around post-Dungy, the Bucs D was perenial top-5...and Booger still stunk.
 
Not sure how other Bucsfans feel but Booger has been a nonfactor for the Bucs for awhile...in terms of premier DTs around the league...he is not even close to someone like Williams for SD.It's beter than what the Colts have bu he is not gonna completely turnaround their rush defense
He's been a nonfactor ever since Dungy left. Coincidence? Maybe, maybe not. All Gruden has done is ride Dungy's hard work to a SB victory and subsequent suckage. If anyone can make McFarland a factor again it's Dungy.
C'mon people...dig a little deeper.Monte Kiffen and Rod Marinell were still around post-Dungy, the Bucs D was perenial top-5...and Booger still stunk.
If they were still top 5, and he was the starting DT, what made him "stink"? Are you basing this off of lower stats?I mean, I would be happy if the Colts D improved and Booger didn't register a tackle. There is more to playing Nose than tackles IMHO. If it allows your LBs to go unblocked and they make the tackles, that is fine by me.Help me understand why Booger "stinks", please? Serious question.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top