FF Wiseguy
Footballguy
A trade was accepted in the league I run yesterday.
Team A gives
DeSean Jackson
Brian Hartline
Ahmad Bradshaw
Team B Gives
Arian Foster
Ben Tate
Kenbrell Thompkins
The trade was proposed long before the T-Rich trade was announced, and was accepted after the trade was announced. The owner getting Bradshaw is complaining that the trade was made under the assumption of Bradshaw as starter, and thus should be invalidated.
Here's my question: Do you judge the trade based on the value at time of proposal, or at time of acceptance? I realize it's poor etiquette to accept a trade where a player's value has changed drastically since its original proposal, but to me, it does not invalidate a trade.
For the purposes of this argument, set aside the value of the players involved. I feel the trade is not overly lopside no matter how you value bradshaw.
To me, the trade is judged on value at time of proposal. But I'm open to being told I'm wrong.
Team A gives
DeSean Jackson
Brian Hartline
Ahmad Bradshaw
Team B Gives
Arian Foster
Ben Tate
Kenbrell Thompkins
The trade was proposed long before the T-Rich trade was announced, and was accepted after the trade was announced. The owner getting Bradshaw is complaining that the trade was made under the assumption of Bradshaw as starter, and thus should be invalidated.
Here's my question: Do you judge the trade based on the value at time of proposal, or at time of acceptance? I realize it's poor etiquette to accept a trade where a player's value has changed drastically since its original proposal, but to me, it does not invalidate a trade.
For the purposes of this argument, set aside the value of the players involved. I feel the trade is not overly lopside no matter how you value bradshaw.
To me, the trade is judged on value at time of proposal. But I'm open to being told I'm wrong.