I lean towards
@rockaction 's take on this in regards to Zep, and I love Zep. But you cannot lift whole verses from someone else's songs, turn the amps to 11, and change the name of the record to a fruit without acknowledging the originator (or, whoever owns the rights) so that they get paid.
I don’t agree with them not crediting others where appropriate. But they obviously did much more than “turn the amps to 11 and change the name of the record.”
Sure, it is reasonable to say the other debuts were more original. That doesn’t mean the music was better.
You just managed to avoid the meat of the argument and give us a total straw man with revamped premises and goalpost shifting.
78% of the runtime (the total time of the tracks) on their debut is universally considered lifted.
It's not original in the least. And originality is certainly something to factor into one's decision about where to rank an album.
If you'd like to debate it, or keep at it—how about debating anything that I said in response?
Because you commented on my comment, and you have no answer for it, so you're going to take Uruk's hyperbole (who was making a sarcastic point not to be taken too literally), make it literal, shift the goalpost, and then make your counterargument???
Dude, don't. Just Win Baby!
I made no strawman and shifted no goalpost.
I'm not interested in debating your argument, and I could not care less about "winning" it. I'm not disputing what you assert Led Zeppelin did. And I don't particularly desire a lecture.
Let me make this as clear as I can for you.
1. "I don’t agree with them not crediting others where appropriate."
2. I think the music on Led Zeppelin I is better than the music on most of the other debut albums. Where they reused other artists' material, IMO they made it better, mostly much better.
3. Everyone is free to use whatever criteria they prefer to rank albums. For me, Led Zeppelin I ranks high. For you it doesn't. That's fine. We're all just posting our individual opinions here.
ETA:
Looking back, I responded to this statement by
@rockaction : "
I don’t think LZ1 beats any of these. Maybe Meat Loaf and Arcade Fire, but I don’t think necessarily so. LZ got plenty of love here for a hard rock band that borrowed so liberally from others that came before."
I responded with this: "Couldn't disagree more. I like many of these other albums, some quite a lot, but very few warrant being rated in the company of LZI. It's all opinions, so I'll just leave it at that."
I can see that I wasn't clear, which led to this entire tangent. I couldn't disagree more with your first sentence, which is your opinion. That's why I concluded with itls all opinions. As a long time Led Zeppelin fan, I'm aware of all the history you proceeded to post, and it's not something I would disagree with or characterize as opinion.