rockaction
Footballguy
Sure, 50 lists is a tiny sample size and we’ve seen personal tastes have a major affect on the rankings, but that kind of was the idea. At this point I’m glad there wasn’t a 100 participants because of all the work but it would have made for a better countdown of course.It's fine either way. I'm not calling out anyone for being dishonest or anything. Just saying that I think it would be ok if someone put ELO albums if they felt like those 15 albums were some of the best ever made and you shouldn't feel guilty.It might make for a boring countdown but if you think V album is better than X, Y and Z albums then you should list em'. Who cares if it's all the same bands-it's being honest.
You could have done that here. It’s a self-imposed limitation and people treated it differently. I have no regrets doing that and only say anything by way of explaining why I picked that particular one as opposed to the others by that artist.
I figured. Just saying we all had the option and I think the limiting comes in because there’s a feeling we want a diversity of artists. The four Beastie Boys and four or five Tool albums let me know this was a non-absolute version of the Prisoner’s Dilemma and that the self-limitation didn’t achieve the goal of those who did that. It’s a loaded term and I say it dispassionately but that’s the result. Cant think of a better word. We actually did it right—we need more people. That’s the takeaway. Everybody was awesome. It’s too small a sample size, and tweaking it would skew it in a different unforeseen way, so that is not a gripe.
You kidding? I volunteer you to handle 200 entries! Nah, I’m just describing what happened and I’m really neutral about it and love all of the Beastie albums. Each one, actually.