Patriots want to have the league look into tampering against the JetsI have a bad bad lifeWhy does Mewelde Moore never look like he can turn the cornerKornheiser is fantastic, Theisman has met his match...Although I do feel they need a better play-by-play guy than Mike Tirico.How the heck can somebody make the point that a DH can beat out a position player for MVP... It should only happened if the DH is at least 35% better than the position player.. A good position player can impact the game in so many different ways...Chad Johnson has done two things in the last 2 years1) made a TON of money with endorsements2) made a TON of fantasy football players huge Bengals fansFantasy Football is VERY good for players on small-market players... The best players are shown in a way they never would/could have been 20 years ago.Longwell didn't even look close on that... GO BACK TO GREENBAY they need a bad kicker
If Cooley doesn't make another catch...someone out there will lose a game because of that play.If your league rewards points for negative yards, he's a stud.![]()
GB leagues with PPR.trader jake said:If Cooley doesn't make another catch...someone out there will lose a game because of that play.zamboni said:If your league rewards points for negative yards, he's a stud.![]()
Saunders didn't need to work miracles with Cooley, guy. He was already a pretty good tight end.Okay, seeing we are going to take this dumb thread seriously, what made anybody think that Saunders was going to work miracles with Cooley? After all, can you name the TE that Saunders worked with prior to Gonzalez? Of course not. The idea that Saunders was some sort of TE guru was complete foolishness.
Come on.... no way you thought he was the next Gonzalez last year.Saunders didn't need to work miracles with Cooley, guy. He was already a pretty good tight end.Okay, seeing we are going to take this dumb thread seriously, what made anybody think that Saunders was going to work miracles with Cooley? After all, can you name the TE that Saunders worked with prior to Gonzalez? Of course not. The idea that Saunders was some sort of TE guru was complete foolishness.
Do you have a point?Come on.... no way you thought he was the next Gonzalez last year.Saunders didn't need to work miracles with Cooley, guy. He was already a pretty good tight end.Okay, seeing we are going to take this dumb thread seriously, what made anybody think that Saunders was going to work miracles with Cooley? After all, can you name the TE that Saunders worked with prior to Gonzalez? Of course not. The idea that Saunders was some sort of TE guru was complete foolishness.
I thought he would be a top 5 TE. If the original poster really thought that adding Saunders would make him #1, then you're right, it is pretty foolish.Come on.... no way you thought he was the next Gonzalez last year.Saunders didn't need to work miracles with Cooley, guy. He was already a pretty good tight end.Okay, seeing we are going to take this dumb thread seriously, what made anybody think that Saunders was going to work miracles with Cooley? After all, can you name the TE that Saunders worked with prior to Gonzalez? Of course not. The idea that Saunders was some sort of TE guru was complete foolishness.
Does this thread?Do you have a point?