What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Cowboys To Use Two TE Set As Base Offense (1 Viewer)

Maven

Footballguy
The Cowboys plan to use the two-tight-end set as their base offense because they can throw or run with Jason Witten and Martellus Bennett on the field. Both are too big to cover with safeties and too fast to cover with linebackers. But that could mean a decline in Witten's numbers. "There is going to be some give and take in there," Witten said. "But he showed he needs to have a role on this team. It's going to put defenses in a tough situation. But I'm not worried about how many catches I have. It's a lot bigger than catching balls. It's about wins."

Source: Star-Telegram

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Cowboys plan to use the two-tight-end set as their base offense because they can throw or run with Jason Witten and Martellus Bennett on the field. Both are too big to cover with safeties and too fast to cover with linebackers. But that could mean a decline in Witten's numbers. "There is going to be some give and take in there," Witten said. "But he showed he needs to have a role on this team. It's going to put defenses in a tough situation. But I'm not worried about how many catches I have. It's a lot bigger than catching balls. It's about wins."Source: Star-Telegram
Bennett is a stud in the making. the two-TE sets with him and Witten, and the RB's are gonna be money! Witten is a great blocker, and very smart player. hopefully Bennett is learning how to be a complete TE. the skies the limit for this kid.if Romo can go thru his progressions quickly, someone will be open. this base says, POWER, but they can do a lot from it.gotta love Witten. he's a pro's pro.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
GB Bankerguy and all the other Dallas heads for talking up Bennett in the pre-season. Several of my rosters thank you!

 
GB Bankerguy and all the other Dallas heads for talking up Bennett in the pre-season. Several of my rosters thank you!
i stashed Bennett in a deeper league. if nothing else, he will be a very servicable bye week fill in with upside.
 
bicycle_seat_sniffer said:
I think Witten will be fine, the cowboys are going to throw alot to Witten-Bennett-Felix-Barber. To me it's Roy and Crayton who will suffer.
I think this is right. The WRs have more to fear than Witten.
 
Gr00vus said:
GB Bankerguy and all the other Dallas heads for talking up Bennett in the pre-season. Several of my rosters thank you!
Bennett should be a very pleasant addition to your rosters especially where you likely drafted him. As far as this "announcement" on 2 TE sets, this was known all summer.
 
I'm not too far different from Bankerguy on expectations for Dallas. Witten will be #1 pass catcher with about 80, followed by Roy Williams at around 60-65. Then I think there will be a hodgepodge of Crayton, Bennett, and the 2 RBs somewhere between 30 and 50 catches.

The value of Bennett is his redzone ability. He's physically a mis-match in the redzone for almost any defender. And with defenses having to deal with Witten, Roy and the RBs who are all big redzone threats, Bennett's likely to have a very high TD to catch ratio. Last year, he had 4 TDs in 20 catches.

I estimate him in the high teens to about 20 for TE rankings. If, heavan forbid, Witten goes down, then you're looking at a top 10 TE.

 
Correct. I predict Bennett to be third in receptions for the club behind Witten and Williams respectively.
Where would you rank Bennett among all TEs?
Depends on your scoring.I expect something around (This might be conservative on rec/yards):45 receptions550 yards6-7 TD's (He will be a BIG red zone threat)
Hmmm...so you really think that Dallas could have 2 top 10 TE's? (Not arguing with you - actually debating dropping Sheffler for MB now.)You numbers would put him somewhere around 10-12 based on FBG's projections.
 
Gr00vus said:
GB Bankerguy and all the other Dallas heads for talking up Bennett in the pre-season. Several of my rosters thank you!
Bennett should be a very pleasant addition to your rosters especially where you likely drafted him. As far as this "announcement" on 2 TE sets, this was known all summer.
It was known they'd be using a lot of 2TE sets... but was it known that it'd be the base offense?
Hmmm...so you really think that Dallas could have 2 top 10 TE's? (Not arguing with you - actually debating dropping Sheffler for MB now.)You numbers would put him somewhere around 10-12 based on FBG's projections.
Not as crazy as you might think. In 2001, Denver was a pass-heavy offense that essentially went down to a single receiver after Ed McCaffrey broke his leg. The result? Well, for one, Rod Smith wound up making a serious run at the single-season receptions record. For another, Desmond Clark finished as TE4 (51/566/6), Byron Chamberlain finished as TE7 (57/666/3)... and Dwayne Carswell (a blocking TE) chipped in a TE16 finish for good measure (34/299/4).
 
Hmmm...so you really think that Dallas could have 2 top 10 TE's? (Not arguing with you - actually debating dropping Sheffler for MB now.)

You numbers would put him somewhere around 10-12 based on FBG's projections.

I stand by my projections, so what ever those stats translate into your league. In mine, he's TE 13. Bennett has dominated in both pre-season play and camp. The Cowboys are switching to the 2TE set for the base offense-which should be just over 50% of the plays. Crayton/Hurd/Austin are not striking fear into opposing defenses. With the loss of T.O. some of those catches are have get spread around. :)

 
Gr00vus said:
GB Bankerguy and all the other Dallas heads for talking up Bennett in the pre-season. Several of my rosters thank you!
Bennett should be a very pleasant addition to your rosters especially where you likely drafted him. As far as this "announcement" on 2 TE sets, this was known all summer.
It was known they'd be using a lot of 2TE sets... but was it known that it'd be the base offense?
Hmmm...so you really think that Dallas could have 2 top 10 TE's? (Not arguing with you - actually debating dropping Sheffler for MB now.)

You numbers would put him somewhere around 10-12 based on FBG's projections.
Not as crazy as you might think. In 2001, Denver was a pass-heavy offense that essentially went down to a single receiver after Ed McCaffrey broke his leg. The result? Well, for one, Rod Smith wound up making a serious run at the single-season receptions record. For another, Desmond Clark finished as TE4 (51/566/6), Byron Chamberlain finished as TE7 (57/666/3)... and Dwayne Carswell (a blocking TE) chipped in a TE16 finish for good measure (34/299/4).
I've known since prior to mini camps. I'm too lazy to go and find links right now, but many knowledgable Cowboy fans will know this to be true.
 
So, somebody in my league just dropped Shiancoe. I have Olsen as my starter, but I drafted Bennett as my backup in the very last rounds of the draft. Should I sit on Bennett for his upside since I have Olsen anyway, or drop Bennett for Shiancoe for the most sure thing?

I know this is an Asst. Coach type question, but it may help others to peg the value of Bennett relative to someone like Shiancoe.

 
So, somebody in my league just dropped Shiancoe. I have Olsen as my starter, but I drafted Bennett as my backup in the very last rounds of the draft. Should I sit on Bennett for his upside since I have Olsen anyway, or drop Bennett for Shiancoe for the most sure thing? I know this is an Asst. Coach type question, but it may help others to peg the value of Bennett relative to someone like Shiancoe.
Shiancoe > Bennett but it's close. Maybe see who else hits the WW first?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Without searching too hard.....

Bennett Sees Bigger Role In Offense

Posted by jellis at 5/28/2009 12:29 PM CDT on truebluefanclub.com

It's hard to make generalizations based on a couple OTA practices in May, but one thing that has stood out so far is that Cowboys quarterbacks seem to be looking for second-year tight end Martellus Bennett more often than they did last season.

Bennett says he's been doing more than tweeting this off-season. He's stronger and more physical, he says, and he believes he'll have a more important role in 2009 than he did as a rookie.

"I've been working on my game a whole lot, so I think they're going to use me that much more," Bennett said. "There's definitely a lot more stuff on the offense (for me).

"Just learning the basics of the offense last year was the main thing I had to do. I think they feel like I've been in it a year so they can do more with me this year. Some of it was in last year, but not as much as there is now. It's just I think they think I'm a better player than I was last year, smarter and all that."

The Cowboys also appeared to be splitting their tight ends out wide more often the last time the media was allowed to watch practice. On one occasion Bennett was paired up against cornerback Terence Newman, who had to climb up the 6-7 tight end's back to cause an incompletion. In a game situation, it likely would have been pass interference.

Rather than go shopping for a big wide receiver like Matt Jones, maybe the Cowboys could use Bennett more often on alley oops in the red zone. The matchup problems he creates with his size could be a huge help for Jason Garrett an Co.

-Josh Ellis

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Without searching too hard.....

Bennett Sees Bigger Role In Offense

Posted by jellis at 5/28/2009 12:29 PM CDT on truebluefanclub.com

It's hard to make generalizations based on a couple OTA practices in May, but one thing that has stood out so far is that Cowboys quarterbacks seem to be looking for second-year tight end Martellus Bennett more often than they did last season.

Bennett says he's been doing more than tweeting this off-season. He's stronger and more physical, he says, and he believes he'll have a more important role in 2009 than he did as a rookie.

"I've been working on my game a whole lot, so I think they're going to use me that much more," Bennett said. "There's definitely a lot more stuff on the offense (for me).

"Just learning the basics of the offense last year was the main thing I had to do. I think they feel like I've been in it a year so they can do more with me this year. Some of it was in last year, but not as much as there is now. It's just I think they think I'm a better player than I was last year, smarter and all that."

The Cowboys also appeared to be splitting their tight ends out wide more often the last time the media was allowed to watch practice. On one occasion Bennett was paired up against cornerback Terence Newman, who had to climb up the 6-7 tight end's back to cause an incompletion. In a game situation, it likely would have been pass interference.

Rather than go shopping for a big wide receiver like Matt Jones, maybe the Cowboys could use Bennett more often on alley oops in the red zone. The matchup problems he creates with his size could be a huge help for Jason Garrett an Co.

-Josh Ellis
The article you posted was of the "Bennett is talented"/"Bennett looks great"/"the coaches are looking to get Bennett more involved" variety. I agree that that's been known for quite a while.The current article is of the "Bennett is going to START for the Cowboys on offense" variety. I had never seen that before. It's one thing to say that a player is great and will be getting reps, and another thing entirely to say that he's an actual starter on offense. It's the difference between "Mike Vick is looking good and is an incredible athlete and will have some packages drawn up to take advantage of his incredible abilities" and "Mike Vick is the starting (QB/RB/WR) for the Philadelphia Eagles".

 
Without searching too hard.....

Bennett Sees Bigger Role In Offense

Posted by jellis at 5/28/2009 12:29 PM CDT on truebluefanclub.com

It's hard to make generalizations based on a couple OTA practices in May, but one thing that has stood out so far is that Cowboys quarterbacks seem to be looking for second-year tight end Martellus Bennett more often than they did last season.

Bennett says he's been doing more than tweeting this off-season. He's stronger and more physical, he says, and he believes he'll have a more important role in 2009 than he did as a rookie.

"I've been working on my game a whole lot, so I think they're going to use me that much more," Bennett said. "There's definitely a lot more stuff on the offense (for me).

"Just learning the basics of the offense last year was the main thing I had to do. I think they feel like I've been in it a year so they can do more with me this year. Some of it was in last year, but not as much as there is now. It's just I think they think I'm a better player than I was last year, smarter and all that."

The Cowboys also appeared to be splitting their tight ends out wide more often the last time the media was allowed to watch practice. On one occasion Bennett was paired up against cornerback Terence Newman, who had to climb up the 6-7 tight end's back to cause an incompletion. In a game situation, it likely would have been pass interference.

Rather than go shopping for a big wide receiver like Matt Jones, maybe the Cowboys could use Bennett more often on alley oops in the red zone. The matchup problems he creates with his size could be a huge help for Jason Garrett an Co.

-Josh Ellis
The article you posted was of the "Bennett is talented"/"Bennett looks great"/"the coaches are looking to get Bennett more involved" variety. I agree that that's been known for quite a while.The current article is of the "Bennett is going to START for the Cowboys on offense" variety. I had never seen that before. It's one thing to say that a player is great and will be getting reps, and another thing entirely to say that he's an actual starter on offense. It's the difference between "Mike Vick is looking good and is an incredible athlete and will have some packages drawn up to take advantage of his incredible abilities" and "Mike Vick is the starting (QB/RB/WR) for the Philadelphia Eagles".
I'll try to find something more definative. Although, I'm not sure why I have to prove this.
 
Without searching too hard.....

Bennett Sees Bigger Role In Offense

Posted by jellis at 5/28/2009 12:29 PM CDT on truebluefanclub.com

It's hard to make generalizations based on a couple OTA practices in May, but one thing that has stood out so far is that Cowboys quarterbacks seem to be looking for second-year tight end Martellus Bennett more often than they did last season.

Bennett says he's been doing more than tweeting this off-season. He's stronger and more physical, he says, and he believes he'll have a more important role in 2009 than he did as a rookie.

"I've been working on my game a whole lot, so I think they're going to use me that much more," Bennett said. "There's definitely a lot more stuff on the offense (for me).

"Just learning the basics of the offense last year was the main thing I had to do. I think they feel like I've been in it a year so they can do more with me this year. Some of it was in last year, but not as much as there is now. It's just I think they think I'm a better player than I was last year, smarter and all that."

The Cowboys also appeared to be splitting their tight ends out wide more often the last time the media was allowed to watch practice. On one occasion Bennett was paired up against cornerback Terence Newman, who had to climb up the 6-7 tight end's back to cause an incompletion. In a game situation, it likely would have been pass interference.

Rather than go shopping for a big wide receiver like Matt Jones, maybe the Cowboys could use Bennett more often on alley oops in the red zone. The matchup problems he creates with his size could be a huge help for Jason Garrett an Co.

-Josh Ellis
The article you posted was of the "Bennett is talented"/"Bennett looks great"/"the coaches are looking to get Bennett more involved" variety. I agree that that's been known for quite a while.The current article is of the "Bennett is going to START for the Cowboys on offense" variety. I had never seen that before. It's one thing to say that a player is great and will be getting reps, and another thing entirely to say that he's an actual starter on offense. It's the difference between "Mike Vick is looking good and is an incredible athlete and will have some packages drawn up to take advantage of his incredible abilities" and "Mike Vick is the starting (QB/RB/WR) for the Philadelphia Eagles".
I'll try to find something more definative. Although, I'm not sure why I have to prove this.
You don't - SSOG just can't find other worthwhile threads to argue in. Bump that LHUCKS thread about Moreno, fire up an alias parroting LHUCKS's opinion and he'll move on. Besides - you're small fry here. He only replied with a couple of sentences - his heart isn't in this one.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here you go:

Yes I realize this doesn't spell it out for you either.

Hopefully the other 2 I provided (below) help make it more clear.

(RotoWire) The Cowboys are considering switching to a two-tight end set as their main formation, the Ft. Worth Star-Telegram reports. That would leave room for one less receiver in several packages, which would likely boil down to Austin or Patrick Crayton.

Analysis: While the switch would boost Martellus Bennett's value as the #2 TE, the Cowboys' #3 WR wouldn't see as many snaps which would likely cut into Austin's value unless he's able to pass Patrick Crayton outright on the depth chart. Austin still merits consideration as a sleeper, but until we see how much he's going to be used don't think of him as anything more than a late-round flyer.

and this one....

Martellus Bennett-TE - Cowboys Aug. 7 - 9:59 pm et

Cowboys executive VP Stephen Jones suggested the team's wide receivers will lose targets to tight ends and running backs this season.

"The second receiver doesn't always have to be a receiver," Jones said. "It can be [Jason] Witten. It can be Martellus [bennett]. We've got three running backs." The Dallas Morning News joins ESPN.com's Matt Mosley in predicting that Bennett will double last year's production (20/283/4) as the main beneficiary of T.O.'s exit.

and more....

Martellus Bennett-TE - Cowboys Aug. 6 - 2:35 am et

Through roughly one week of camp, it's "become increasingly evident" that the Cowboys' base offense will involve a two-tight end set.

"Every day you see him make a play," coach Wade Phillips said of No. 2 TE Martellus Bennett. "Two tights" uses one back (Marion Barber) and is often a power running formation. Also, one of the TEs is bound to get matched up on a linebacker. Expect both Bennett and Jason Witten's numbers to rise.

 
I'll try to find something more definative. Although, I'm not sure why I have to prove this.
You don't have to prove it- I'm definitely willing to take you at your word. If you say that the Cowboys long ago announced that the two-TE was going to be their base offense (as opposed to merely a package which they would use a lot), then I believe you. I was just confused about whether that was, in fact, what you are saying, since the article you posted didn't say that at all.Edit: Sorry for coming off as a tool, I wasn't doubting your insight or questioning your knowledge, I was just genuinely unsure of your answer.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Without searching too hard.....

Bennett Sees Bigger Role In Offense

Posted by jellis at 5/28/2009 12:29 PM CDT on truebluefanclub.com

It's hard to make generalizations based on a couple OTA practices in May, but one thing that has stood out so far is that Cowboys quarterbacks seem to be looking for second-year tight end Martellus Bennett more often than they did last season.

Bennett says he's been doing more than tweeting this off-season. He's stronger and more physical, he says, and he believes he'll have a more important role in 2009 than he did as a rookie.

"I've been working on my game a whole lot, so I think they're going to use me that much more," Bennett said. "There's definitely a lot more stuff on the offense (for me).

"Just learning the basics of the offense last year was the main thing I had to do. I think they feel like I've been in it a year so they can do more with me this year. Some of it was in last year, but not as much as there is now. It's just I think they think I'm a better player than I was last year, smarter and all that."

The Cowboys also appeared to be splitting their tight ends out wide more often the last time the media was allowed to watch practice. On one occasion Bennett was paired up against cornerback Terence Newman, who had to climb up the 6-7 tight end's back to cause an incompletion. In a game situation, it likely would have been pass interference.

Rather than go shopping for a big wide receiver like Matt Jones, maybe the Cowboys could use Bennett more often on alley oops in the red zone. The matchup problems he creates with his size could be a huge help for Jason Garrett an Co.

-Josh Ellis
The article you posted was of the "Bennett is talented"/"Bennett looks great"/"the coaches are looking to get Bennett more involved" variety. I agree that that's been known for quite a while.The current article is of the "Bennett is going to START for the Cowboys on offense" variety. I had never seen that before. It's one thing to say that a player is great and will be getting reps, and another thing entirely to say that he's an actual starter on offense. It's the difference between "Mike Vick is looking good and is an incredible athlete and will have some packages drawn up to take advantage of his incredible abilities" and "Mike Vick is the starting (QB/RB/WR) for the Philadelphia Eagles".
I'll try to find something more definative. Although, I'm not sure why I have to prove this.
You don't - SSOG just can't find other worthwhile threads to argue in. Bump that LHUCKS thread about Moreno, fire up an alias parroting LHUCKS's opinion and he'll move on. Besides - you're small fry here. He only replied with a couple of sentences - his heart isn't in this one.
Who's a small fry?
 
Who's a small fry?
YOU! Look up. Only 3 sentences in the last one and NO statistical analysis whatsoever! Usually by now we'll have had two walls of text from SSOG. Instead just a tepid, tacit agreement. You both know I'm just kidding, right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'll try to find something more definative. Although, I'm not sure why I have to prove this.
You don't have to prove it- I'm definitely willing to take you at your word. If you say that the Cowboys long ago announced that the two-TE was going to be their base offense (as opposed to merely a package which they would use a lot), then I believe you. I was just confused about whether that was, in fact, what you are saying, since the article you posted didn't say that at all.Edit: Sorry for coming off as a tool, I wasn't doubting your insight or questioning your knowledge, I was just genuinely unsure of your answer.
No worries, although I admit I wasn't sure for a second. Hopefully I have shown that I wasn't talking out of my butt.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here is a fantastic article by Rafael Vela that talks about the impact Martellus Bennett has on the Dallas offense.

http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2009/9/14/1...nnett#storyjump

Up From the Depths: Aquaman Bennett Helps The Cowboys Leave The Bucs High & Dry

by Rafael Vela on Sep 14, 2009 8:35 AM PDT

Early on Dallas' second offensive drive, Jason Garrett deployed in a base offset-I right set with Martellus Bennett as his lone tight end. Bennett started the play in the right slot and motioned to a spot just behind left guard Kyle Kosier. At the snap, Kosier dropped as if in pass coverage, while Bennett and the rest of his line mates fired out across the line of scrimmage.

This was a wham-trap, which requires the tight end to make the key interior block on the 300 lb. defensive tackle lined up over Kosier. Kosier dropped to pick up the DE crashing from the edge. LT Flozell Adams released that end and blocked down on the middle linebacker.

At the core of the play, Bennett turned Bucs tackle Chris Hovan, creating a lane which Felix Jones cruised for a 19-yard gain.

Martellus has arrived, ladies and gentlemen. Jason Witten can move out DTs and the Cowboys have only trusted him with this play in recent years. Anthony Fasano and Tony Curtis both faied their auditions on these types of blocks. That Dallas trusted Bennett with this duty, and that he repaid the trust with a solid block, means Aquaman can now handle all the roles Witten used to handle. This dimension means Dallas has two near complete tight ends, and can deploy both anywhere the field.

Jason Garrett did so yesterday and got some ridiculous matchups in Dallas' favor. Bennett only caught one ball for thirteen yards, but the matchup headaches he created freed several of his mates for big plays. Here are four examples of how the Bennett-enriched two-TE set set up the Tampa Bay secondary.

1. In the second quarter the Cowboys put Bennett and Witten on the left side of their formation, with Patrick Crayton and Roy Williams in a slot set on the right. Bennett was split wide, like a receiver, with a Witten in a traditional TE spot next to Flozell Adams.

The Bucs played man, meaning their corners matched up on the Dallas wideouts and a safety behind them. The Bucs put FS Jermaine Phillips on Bennett. The benefits of this secondary contortion fell to Witten. With the Bucs secondary spread out, he was matched on strong outside backer Quincy Black, with no help over the top. Bennett and Witten ran a post, corner combo, with Bennett pulling Phillips to the middle of the field. Witten blew away from Black on the open left side of the field and gained fourteen yards.

2. Another play where Bennett lined up wide and aided Witten. Facing third and long, Dallas stayed in a two-TE set with 3rd down back Tashard Choice (more on him in a minute) behind Romo. Dallas put Romo in the shotgun, with Witten flanking him on the left and Choice right. Williams and Crayton this time lined up in a slot set left, with Bennett in the right slot.

Before the snap, Choice went in motion and lined up wide right outside Bennett. The spread look left Witten as the lone back in the backfield. It also gave him a clean release off the line at Bucs middle backer Barrett Ruud. Witten ran wide, then cut sharply inside Ruud and took Romo's toss for another easy first down.

With Bennett drawing safeties, Witten, usually option one or two in Dallas' attack, is assured single coverage on a linebacker. Not many linebackers can go 60 alone on Jason Witten.

3. 3rd quarter. Dallas again goes slot right with Crayton and Williams and puts Bennett wide left. Tampa again puts Phillips on number 80. Romo this time makes Bennett the primary, throwing an easy twelve yard out over the overmatched safety.

The obviousness of the mismatch led to a Bucs adjustment that helped Dallas get its second touchdown. Two plays later, Bennett lined up wide left, with Witten wide right. This time, Tampa Bay matched its corners on the TEs. When Roy Williams motioned into the right slot, he was covered by strong safety Sabby Piscatelli. Williams beat him easily on a seam route and ran 66 yards with a Romo pass.

4. The mismatch problems moved Bucs DC Jim Bates to junk his base defensive set when Dallas went with two TEs and one back. On the next series Tampa used its 4-2-5 nickel in a vain attempt to match up. I say futile because the mis-matches Dallas forced on Patrick Crayton's 80 yard touchdown reception were incredible.

On 2nd and ten at its 20 Bennett again lined up wide left. Witten lined up in as a traditional TE right, next to Marc Colombo. Patrick Crayton was wide right, with Williams in the right slot. Barber was the lone back behind Romo. Williams motioned left and lined up in the left slot just before the snap.

The Bucs put CB Aqib Talib on Bennett, the nickel back on Crayton and Ronde Barber on Williams -- or so it seemed. Barber came on a corner blitz. He had sacked Tony Romo on such a blitz in the first quarter and was Tampa's best pass rushing option of the day.

The play call had Romo fake a handoff to Barber and look for Witten releasing into the right flat. The nickel corner on that side released Crayton to the safety behind him and rolled up on Witten.

Let's look for a moment at the matchups Bates was willing to risk in order to send Barber after Romo: he has his best corner on a blitz; he has his second best corner on Bennett; he has his third corner on Witten.

This means Roy Williams is alone on the Bucs middle linebacker who had to sprint from his spot over center to get in space. Williams ran a short route but had he run anything upfield, Romo could have given him a second easy, long touchdown reception. As it was, Romo looked right for Crayton, who sprinted well past Piscatelli, whose angle to the sideline was too flat to let him stay with Crayton. The Cowboy was ten yards behind Piscatelli when he caught Romo's pass and he easily outraced FS Phillips to the end zone.

By showing that he can block, and that he can catch, Martellus Bennett made life much, much easier for the stars in Dallas' passing arsenal. He's also making Jason Garrett look smart, which is a much easier task when all Dallas' offense weapons can get on the field together.

 
Here is a fantastic article by Rafael Vela that talks about the impact Martellus Bennett has on the Dallas offense.

http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2009/9/14/1...nnett#storyjump

Up From the Depths: Aquaman Bennett Helps The Cowboys Leave The Bucs High & Dry

by Rafael Vela on Sep 14, 2009 8:35 AM PDT

Early on Dallas' second offensive drive, Jason Garrett deployed in a base offset-I right set with Martellus Bennett as his lone tight end. Bennett started the play in the right slot and motioned to a spot just behind left guard Kyle Kosier. At the snap, Kosier dropped as if in pass coverage, while Bennett and the rest of his line mates fired out across the line of scrimmage.

This was a wham-trap, which requires the tight end to make the key interior block on the 300 lb. defensive tackle lined up over Kosier. Kosier dropped to pick up the DE crashing from the edge. LT Flozell Adams released that end and blocked down on the middle linebacker.

At the core of the play, Bennett turned Bucs tackle Chris Hovan, creating a lane which Felix Jones cruised for a 19-yard gain.

Martellus has arrived, ladies and gentlemen. Jason Witten can move out DTs and the Cowboys have only trusted him with this play in recent years. Anthony Fasano and Tony Curtis both faied their auditions on these types of blocks. That Dallas trusted Bennett with this duty, and that he repaid the trust with a solid block, means Aquaman can now handle all the roles Witten used to handle. This dimension means Dallas has two near complete tight ends, and can deploy both anywhere the field.

Jason Garrett did so yesterday and got some ridiculous matchups in Dallas' favor. Bennett only caught one ball for thirteen yards, but the matchup headaches he created freed several of his mates for big plays. Here are four examples of how the Bennett-enriched two-TE set set up the Tampa Bay secondary.

1. In the second quarter the Cowboys put Bennett and Witten on the left side of their formation, with Patrick Crayton and Roy Williams in a slot set on the right. Bennett was split wide, like a receiver, with a Witten in a traditional TE spot next to Flozell Adams.

The Bucs played man, meaning their corners matched up on the Dallas wideouts and a safety behind them. The Bucs put FS Jermaine Phillips on Bennett. The benefits of this secondary contortion fell to Witten. With the Bucs secondary spread out, he was matched on strong outside backer Quincy Black, with no help over the top. Bennett and Witten ran a post, corner combo, with Bennett pulling Phillips to the middle of the field. Witten blew away from Black on the open left side of the field and gained fourteen yards.

2. Another play where Bennett lined up wide and aided Witten. Facing third and long, Dallas stayed in a two-TE set with 3rd down back Tashard Choice (more on him in a minute) behind Romo. Dallas put Romo in the shotgun, with Witten flanking him on the left and Choice right. Williams and Crayton this time lined up in a slot set left, with Bennett in the right slot.

Before the snap, Choice went in motion and lined up wide right outside Bennett. The spread look left Witten as the lone back in the backfield. It also gave him a clean release off the line at Bucs middle backer Barrett Ruud. Witten ran wide, then cut sharply inside Ruud and took Romo's toss for another easy first down.

With Bennett drawing safeties, Witten, usually option one or two in Dallas' attack, is assured single coverage on a linebacker. Not many linebackers can go 60 alone on Jason Witten.

3. 3rd quarter. Dallas again goes slot right with Crayton and Williams and puts Bennett wide left. Tampa again puts Phillips on number 80. Romo this time makes Bennett the primary, throwing an easy twelve yard out over the overmatched safety.

The obviousness of the mismatch led to a Bucs adjustment that helped Dallas get its second touchdown. Two plays later, Bennett lined up wide left, with Witten wide right. This time, Tampa Bay matched its corners on the TEs. When Roy Williams motioned into the right slot, he was covered by strong safety Sabby Piscatelli. Williams beat him easily on a seam route and ran 66 yards with a Romo pass.

4. The mismatch problems moved Bucs DC Jim Bates to junk his base defensive set when Dallas went with two TEs and one back. On the next series Tampa used its 4-2-5 nickel in a vain attempt to match up. I say futile because the mis-matches Dallas forced on Patrick Crayton's 80 yard touchdown reception were incredible.

On 2nd and ten at its 20 Bennett again lined up wide left. Witten lined up in as a traditional TE right, next to Marc Colombo. Patrick Crayton was wide right, with Williams in the right slot. Barber was the lone back behind Romo. Williams motioned left and lined up in the left slot just before the snap.

The Bucs put CB Aqib Talib on Bennett, the nickel back on Crayton and Ronde Barber on Williams -- or so it seemed. Barber came on a corner blitz. He had sacked Tony Romo on such a blitz in the first quarter and was Tampa's best pass rushing option of the day.

The play call had Romo fake a handoff to Barber and look for Witten releasing into the right flat. The nickel corner on that side released Crayton to the safety behind him and rolled up on Witten.

Let's look for a moment at the matchups Bates was willing to risk in order to send Barber after Romo: he has his best corner on a blitz; he has his second best corner on Bennett; he has his third corner on Witten.

This means Roy Williams is alone on the Bucs middle linebacker who had to sprint from his spot over center to get in space. Williams ran a short route but had he run anything upfield, Romo could have given him a second easy, long touchdown reception. As it was, Romo looked right for Crayton, who sprinted well past Piscatelli, whose angle to the sideline was too flat to let him stay with Crayton. The Cowboy was ten yards behind Piscatelli when he caught Romo's pass and he easily outraced FS Phillips to the end zone.

By showing that he can block, and that he can catch, Martellus Bennett made life much, much easier for the stars in Dallas' passing arsenal. He's also making Jason Garrett look smart, which is a much easier task when all Dallas' offense weapons can get on the field together.
This was a very insightful article, and as a Bennett owner, I appreciate you posting it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top