Crazy Heavy QB Scoring (1 Viewer)

[maksdaddy]

Quick question.

Would it be law to take QB in first round with this whacky scoring?

1 qb

2 rb

3 wr

1 te

1 k

1d

1 pt per completion, 1 point per 20 yds passing, -2 int

1 pt per rush, 1 pt per 10 yds

1 pt per catch, 1 pt per 10 yds

-2 fumble

Does this scoring overly inflate the value of a QB to the point Brees goes #1, Rodgers #2, etc...

 

[Insein]

Quick question.

Would it be law to take QB in first round with this whacky scoring?

1 qb

2 rb

3 wr

1 te

1 k

1d

1 pt per completion, 1 point per 20 yds passing, -2 int

1 pt per rush, 1 pt per 10 yds

1 pt per catch, 1 pt per 10 yds

-2 fumble

Does this scoring overly inflate the value of a QB to the point Brees goes #1, Rodgers #2, etc...

Is it 6pt tds? Either way yes.

 

[Rick James]

I think it over-inflates the top tier RBs more than anything. 1 point per rush is crazy. AP would have a floor of 20 points per week, and that's if he goes 20 carries for 0 yards and 0 TDs.

That's nuts.

 

[steveski]

WR's are worthless in this league. Grab the top tier QB's and the few true workhorse RB's as soon as you can.

A terrible RB getting 20 carries for 50 yards and 0 TD's would get you 25 points. A big game for a WR with 8/100/1 would get you the same amount of points.

 

[maksdaddy]

Yes, sorry 6pt per td across the board.

seems like that's the approach. top few picks would be tough decision but top qb has to be considered..

stupid scoring to say the least. Vicks big year he put up over ,75 alone one week.

thanks!

 

[QuizGuy66]

The difference between the top and mediocre quarterbacks is extreme in this league.

Interestingly a bad workhorse back is as good as a good change-of-pace, back.

BJGE must have been good in this format last year.

-QG