This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Sounds like Cleveland wants to utilize Cribbs much more. Any homers have any insight? I'm thinking of picking him up and plugging him in my lineup since he plays CIN @ home.
I'm going to stay away. It would've been cool if CLE and Cribbs had backed up the hype by letting him throw the ball some but he's only got two pass attempts and zero completions. Would've been great to rack up some QB points from a WR.
I'm going to stay away. It would've been cool if CLE and Cribbs had backed up the hype by letting him throw the ball some but he's only got two pass attempts and zero completions. Would've been great to rack up some QB points from a WR.
from what i've seen, i just don't think Cribbs's deep ball is that accurate.
also, defenses are learning how to defend these packages at this point, and they don't seemed to be as fooled now.
but if you're between him and some guy who's going to get you 5 points anyway, i say go for it, because they will likely have him in at reciever and in for a few snaps again this game.
from what i've seen, i just don't think Cribbs's deep ball is that accurate. also, defenses are learning how to defend these packages at this point, and they don't seemed to be as fooled now.but if you're between him and some guy who's going to get you 5 points anyway, i say go for it, because they will likely have him in at reciever and in for a few snaps again this game.
Thanks for the insight. I'm not getting much from my WRs at this point anyway in my 16 team league.Cotchery (hit & miss)Witten (we use TEs as WRs in this league - 3 WRs in lineup, no TEs)HixonClaytonAvery
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.