Is anyone missing that the Saints are the bottom of the NFL, not the top of collegiate ball like USC was? And the defenses they face are pro caliber not college level? And the Saints OL by comparison is nowhere near as dominant as the Trojans?
Deuce's numbers were destined to be hampered by his return from his ACL injury and Bush will likely take away half of his production.
N.O. ranked 22nd in rushing attempts, 18th in rushing yards, and 27th in rushing TD in 2005. They ranked 26th, 27th, and 11th in 2004. Unless they dramatically alter their strategy, IMO cutting up a pie that has not been huge to begin with will not yield great results. I have a hard time seeing how Deuce could rank in the Top 25 RBs.
New QB, new coaching staff, new offensive centerpiece. My projections for NO are going to be dramatically different from their season-end rankings last year. I don't see how NO rushes fewer than 450 times, and like I said, I'm actually thinking they go for as many as 550.
Here were the last dozen teams to have 550 rushing attempts in a season . . .04 Steelers 15-1
03 Ravens 10-6
01 Steelers 13-3
97 Steelers 11-5
96 Bills 10-6
94 Cowboys 12-4
93 Bills 12-4
93 Giants 11-5
90 Bears 11-5
89 Broncos 11-5
89 Giants 12-4
89 Chiefs 8-7-1
For starters, it shows that is is somewhat unusual for a team to get that many rushing attempts. Second, it takes a winning record. And third, the huge majority of those teams had very strong defenses to allow the offense to grind the ball out on offense. I personally do not see the 2006 Saints looking much like any of the teams on this list, but I suppose anything can happen . . .
Most of us are using "touches" not "rushes." Using the numbers I had before 225 for Bush, 275 for Duece. I am assuming 75 pass catches (50 Bush, 25 duece) in that number.
I then projected 175 rushes and 250 rushes for 425 rushes which in fact is below average for an NFL team if I am not mistaken. Now from a fantasy standpoint those number won't excite a lot of people, but it is the formula I would use to make the most of both players.
Is it below average for an NFL team's top two RBs? Most NFL teams give some carries to more than two RBs, plus WRs and QBs... so you can't merely look at NFL team carries. Top two RB rushes last season:ARI 268
ATL 401
BAL 384
BUF 370
CAR 384
CHI 390
CIN 398
CLE 330
DAL 395
DEN 412
DET 292
GB 220
HOU 320
IND 400
JAX 346
KC 455
MIA 372
MIN 281
NE 263
NO 261
NYG 396
NYJ 301
OAK 332
PHI 212
PIT 365
SD 397
SF 303
SEA 441
STL 318
TB 361
TEN 312
WAS 440
NFL AVG 347.5
The average for the top two RBs is 77.5 carries less than what you are projecting. And only 6 teams had 400+ carries for their top 2 RBs, with only 3 teams actually reaching your projection of 425.
I don't see it, espeically when the two backs you are talking about includes one rookie and the other coming off a serious knee injury. If they split touches as evenly as you are projecting, but you lower your projections to more reasonable totals, neither of them will be good value (barring injury).