What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Darwin’s racism (1 Viewer)

Shocking that the section of our population that can least afford the expense of an additional child is more likely to have an abortion than the section that is more likely to be able to afford that expense.
 
Shocking that the section of our population that can least afford the expense of an additional child is more likely to have an abortion than the section that is more likely to be able to afford that expense.

There's a solution for that which does not include an abortion. Care to take a whack at it and see if you can guess what it is?

And these aren't new solutions either. They've been around for quite some time now.
 
Shocking that the section of our population that can least afford the expense of an additional child is more likely to have an abortion than the section that is more likely to be able to afford that expense.

There's a solution for that which does not include an abortion. Care to take a whack at it and see if you can guess what it is?

And these aren't new solutions either. They've been around for quite some time now.
Pearl Necklace?
 
I never felt taught that Caucasians were more evolutionarily developed
Yet those are the authors words from his book. The white civilized races would exterminate the less evolved more ape like savages. I guess you have to actually read the book and study beyond what you were told to get to the truth. They had a Pygmy man in a human zoo next to an orangutan illustrating a supposed missing link. There is no missing link because we didn’t evolve from apes. Apes cannot become humans that’s why we still have apes. They would have all evolved by now if the racist monkey theory were true. But it’s another lie we have been spoon fed. I see The NY Times called the Pygmy man a lesser human. They have been on the wrong side of history since they began printing newspapers. Lies being paraded as science. Just like CO2 and Nitrogen are now bad for the environment according to “science.” Plants can’t grow without CO2 and nitrogen. The green movement is just a con job. Next they will be saying cover up your face because breathing freely is too dangerous for you and others. Too much oxygen in the brain might help you think too clearly. Follow the science! The Pied piper is now a government bought and paid for scientist.
 
Last edited:
I never felt taught that Caucasians were more evolutionarily developed
Yet those are the authors words from his book. The white civilized races would exterminate the less evolved more ape like savages. I guess you have to actually read the book and study beyond what you were told to get to the truth. They had a Pygmy man in a human zoo next to an orangutan illustrating a supposed missing link. There is no missing link because we didn’t evolve from apes. Apes cannot become humans that’s why we still have apes. They would have all evolved by now if the racist monkey theory were true. But it’s another lie we have been spoon fed.
So how did humans get here? And why is evolution observable in the very short amount of time we've been aware of it if it's an invalid concept?

And if you say god created Adam and Eve, etc. What about all the other religions that have different origin of man stories? Are they all wrong?
 
Sounds like you agree with The NY Times that the Pygmy man was a lesser human being and displaying him alongside an orangutan at the world fair was merely a scientific endeavor showcasing evolution.
 
What is shocking is that you agree with Margaret Sanger because it’s your outlook you are supporting reply to Apalmer
 
I have no idea who Margaret Sanger

google her



from the link "“For generations, American public school children learned from their biology textbooks the pseudoscience that Caucasians are more advanced on the evolutionary ladder than Africans,” David Klinghoffer, another senior fellow at the Discovery Institute, wrote for Evolution News and Science Today."

12 years of public school, 3 years in college, I never was taught the above. Ever. And I grew up in an almost 100% white community
 
I have no idea who Margaret Sanger

google her



from the link "“For generations, American public school children learned from their biology textbooks the pseudoscience that Caucasians are more advanced on the evolutionary ladder than Africans,” David Klinghoffer, another senior fellow at the Discovery Institute, wrote for Evolution News and Science Today."

12 years of public school, 3 years in college, I never was taught the above. Ever. And I grew up in an almost 100% white community
When (which decades) was he claiming this was commonly in biology texts?
 
When (which decades) was he claiming this was commonly in biology texts?

for generations is the claim

again - I never felt or saw any connections to Darwinism or racism being taught in schools, that's all

Right. If this claim is true (I don’t know), my guess is it would have been something like 100 years ago.
Yeah, and for generations, doctors were taught that bloodletting and manure were state of the art treatments. That's why we can't trust vaccinations now. For years, people were taught that Earth was the center of the universe and everything else revolved around it. That's why we can't trust people who now claim the earth is round. It's what passes for logic in some circles.
 
Yeah, and for generations, doctors were taught that bloodletting and manure were state of the art treatments. That's why we can't trust vaccinations now. For years, people were taught that Earth was the center of the universe and everything else revolved around it. That's why we can't trust people who now claim the earth is round. It's what passes for logic in some circles.

whatever analogies you tried to make failed .... Darwinism might be racist ..... I guess it could be looked at like that and maybe even tied in with other theories and facts etc ....

but it wasn't taught in any school I went to or have heard about even

one author's opinion looks to me
 
Yes one man’s opinion. Darwins opinion that is. Certainly nothing is factual about apes evolving into humans. Even though you did not perceive it in school to be racist it is now and was then based on the racist iewpoont Darwin makes in his own words. Time to tear down the statues!
 
Shocking that the section of our population that can least afford the expense of an additional child is more likely to have an abortion than the section that is more likely to be able to afford that expense.
This is a racist response. You assume blacks are all poor. Typical. Further you think because they are black and poor that explains why forty percent of abortions are and in your opinion probably should occur in poor black communities.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top