What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

DeAndre Levy owners... (1 Viewer)

Link

Free agent pickup Stephen Tulloch started drills at right outside linebacker, with DeAndre Levy manning the middle, just as head coach Jim Schwartz intimated earlier this week.
I just wanted to update the news here and caution everyone not to read too much into it right now. I think they are going to try a lot of combinations out before settling on where they all play. I will still be shocked if Tulloch plays anywhere other than MLB.
 
I have both Tulloch and Levy and have no idea what to do
First, be patient. Camp and preseason will sort a lot of things out. The biggest mistake I see made is daily overreaction to every blurb that gets posted. Schwartz is basically leaving no stone unturned in his efforts to determine where they play. They will lineup in a lot of different ways. They will try a lot of combinations in their nickel defense in preseason and camp. Right now, my guess is that Tulloch plays the middle, Levy WLB, and Durant SLB. I will be shocked if Tulloch plays anywhere other than MLB. I think Levy will be a 3-down LB, and the other LB in the nickel will be determined in camp. I think it's a toss up with a slight edge to Tulloch. But camp will work these things out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks AB

I have been checking out mlive.com for trainng camp reports. Is there a better place for Lions updates?

 
Anything new on Levy today?

I'm up tonight in our draft and I'll be looking right at him and a few other LBs. I'd love to think that he will win the MLB spot, but I just can't see it happening. I suppose most of us would still be pretty happy if he was a 3 down WLB.

Are we looking at one of these two scenarios? I just don't want to draft him and then next week see him kick over to SLB like Chaney did. The other LBs I can take are older but carry little risk for this season. Of course, they don't have Levy's upside either.

 
Anything new on Levy today? I'm up tonight in our draft and I'll be looking right at him and a few other LBs. I'd love to think that he will win the MLB spot, but I just can't see it happening. I suppose most of us would still be pretty happy if he was a 3 down WLB. Are we looking at one of these two scenarios? I just don't want to draft him and then next week see him kick over to SLB like Chaney did. The other LBs I can take are older but carry little risk for this season. Of course, they don't have Levy's upside either.
I believe Levy was in the middle again today. But there is no way anyone can know how this will shake out this soon. I know if it were me, I would not count on Levy staying in the middle. It could happen, but it's a big risk to count on it. The only thing I feel comfortable about (right now) regarding the Lions' LBs is that I strongly believe that Levy will play 3 downs...but even that isn't a guarantee.
 
if the bigger and faster LB aren't same person ( :) ), they might prefer to have bigger, stouter run defender in the middle, faster more explosive guy at WLB (or was there word they may use a more ROLB/LOLB (sort of like JAX)?

tulloch was no doubt a coup for DET (durant could be also be, if healthy), and must be their best LB in a while... my only question, i thought one reason TEN let him walk is that they thought to many of his voluminous tackles were too far past the LOS for their liking... interesting that they replaced him with ruud, who has a similar rep (but bigger?)...

the DET DL is destined to be special, dominant if things break right... wherever they ultimately lineup, the MLB/WLB should be free to run and chase down ball carriers a lot in the future...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Any of the 3 could lead the team in tackles. I've seen OLBs and MLBs lead Jim Schwartz's defense in tackles. Chances are the most talented guy playing 3 downs will lead the LBs. I'd say (for tackle-only purposes) Tulloch>Durant>Levy. Plus, he's the most durable and playing for a contract. I'd take any of the three b/c in the NFL things change!!!

 
Any of the 3 could lead the team in tackles. I've seen OLBs and MLBs lead Jim Schwartz's defense in tackles. Chances are the most talented guy playing 3 downs will lead the LBs. I'd say (for tackle-only purposes) Tulloch>Durant>Levy. Plus, he's the most durable and playing for a contract. I'd take any of the three b/c in the NFL things change!!!
Well Donfue I hate to break it to you but the only LB right now locked for 3 downs is Levy, regardless if he is at MLB or WLB!! the other LB will be determined in camp between Tulloch and Durant, Levy has looked very sharp and more comfortable on the field in coverage and from what I have heard and read he is probable the safest LB to own on the team for FF.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'therokie0070 said:
'DonFue said:
Any of the 3 could lead the team in tackles. I've seen OLBs and MLBs lead Jim Schwartz's defense in tackles. Chances are the most talented guy playing 3 downs will lead the LBs. I'd say (for tackle-only purposes) Tulloch>Durant>Levy. Plus, he's the most durable and playing for a contract. I'd take any of the three b/c in the NFL things change!!!
Well Donfue I hate to break it to you but the only LB right now locked for 3 downs is Levy, regardless if he is at MLB or WLB!! the other LB will be determined in camp between Tulloch and Durant, Levy has looked very sharp and more comfortable on the field in coverage and from what I have heard and read he is probable the safest LB to own on the team for FF.
I have been very vocal about the fact that Levy is the most likely to play 3 downs and I think it would be a shock if he doesn't. That being said, I would hesitate to say "locked in" at this point. Nothing is etched in stone yet.
 
'therokie0070 said:
Well Donfue I hate to break it to you but the only LB right now locked for 3 downs is Levy,
Nobody is "locked" at the momentAnd yes, you're a Levy owner....we got it.......
I am currently have 10 money league teams and I own him in 1, so by no means am I posting this because I am a homer or Levy owner. I am basing my opinion off the coaches comment and what he has done so far in camp.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'therokie0070 said:
Well Donfue I hate to break it to you but the only LB right now locked for 3 downs is Levy,
Nobody is "locked" at the momentAnd yes, you're a Levy owner....we got it.......
I am currently have 10 money league teams and I own him in 1, so by no means am I posting this because I am a homer or Levy owner. I am basing my opinion off the coaches comment and what he has done so far in camp.
If you have seen a coach comment on Levy being "locked in" as a 3 down LB...or anything else, please post a link because if it's true, it is major news that people should know about. I have not seen anything from the coaches or local writers that suggest anything like that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
All this has done is muddy the IDP waters for all 3, and unless it settles itself fairly soon there are gonna be plenty of owners ticked off that they drafted whoever and got hosed while others will be giddy that whoever is in a much better spot than they were on August X when they drafted.

Ugh and double ugh. :yucky:

 
Tulloch back to the middle...http://www.mlive.com/lions/index.ssf/2011/08/camp_observations_stephen_tull_1.html
Kowalski thinks it is permanent. He is the best beat writer around here. Levy is lining up at ROLB and Durant at LOLB.Assuming the above holds true (I think it will), the only thing left to figure out is who plays in the nickel.
 
This one may come down to who plays the dime. One of the 3 will have a green dot and play EVERY down, one will play the nickle and one will be an unlucky talent. I think the green dot has to go to Levy or Tulloch b/c they know the system. Its not looking good for Durant but Levy is very injury-prone and talent usually gets a chance at some point.

 
from Kowalski today...http://www.mlive.com/lions/index.ssf/2011/08/camp_observations_matthew_staf_1.html

... The No. 1 nickel appears to feature linebackers DeAndre Levy and Justin Durant. The backup nickel is Stephen Tulloch and Ashlee Palmer.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
from Kowalski today...http://www.mlive.com/lions/index.ssf/2011/08/camp_observations_matthew_staf_1.html ... The No. 1 nickel appears to feature linebackers DeAndre Levy and Justin Durant. The backup nickel is Stephen Tulloch and Ashlee Palmer.
I don't understand why Tulloch signed a one year deal with the Lions, seriously
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2011/08/09/camping-trip-a-day-with-the-detroit-lions/

Linebacker



When I asked Jim Schwartz where he felt he’d got to with his linebacker upgrade in free agency, he was a little more non-committal than I’d hoped. He stressed that DeAndre Levy, Stephen Tulloch and even Ashlee Palmer could and had played both inside and outside (not sure when Tulloch was outside but maybe it was early in his career at the Titans), there was a lot of flexibility at that position and he’d hopefully finalize the position by the third preseason game.

.

Given that the starters of Tulloch, Levy and Justin Durant, looked set, I’m guessing what he meant was the role of the other nickel LB, alongside Tulloch, was up for grabs. I saw both Durant and Levy with the job alternately during practice which is potentially concerning. Worst case scenario: that Levy hasn’t proved himself up to the job and that Durant, who despite being a first-rate run stuffer has previously struggled in coverage, has become a port in a storm. The best: Durant improved markedly over the off-season in that regard – I’ll let you decide the most likely scenario.

 
http://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2011/08/09/camping-trip-a-day-with-the-detroit-lions/

Linebacker



When I asked Jim Schwartz where he felt he’d got to with his linebacker upgrade in free agency, he was a little more non-committal than I’d hoped. He stressed that DeAndre Levy, Stephen Tulloch and even Ashlee Palmer could and had played both inside and outside (not sure when Tulloch was outside but maybe it was early in his career at the Titans), there was a lot of flexibility at that position and he’d hopefully finalize the position by the third preseason game.

.

Given that the starters of Tulloch, Levy and Justin Durant, looked set, I’m guessing what he meant was the role of the other nickel LB, alongside Tulloch, was up for grabs. I saw both Durant and Levy with the job alternately during practice which is potentially concerning. Worst case scenario: that Levy hasn’t proved himself up to the job and that Durant, who despite being a first-rate run stuffer has previously struggled in coverage, has become a port in a storm. The best: Durant improved markedly over the off-season in that regard – I’ll let you decide the most likely scenario.
Yesterday at practice, Levy and Durant were in the first team nickel packages, Tulloch and Palmer were with the 2nd team. I have no clue why he makes the assumption that Tulloch is already going to be one of the nickel LBs with Levy and Durant battling for the 2nd.
 
Link

The Lions are continuing to use different combinations with their nickel defense. Depending on the package, you'll see either DeAndre Levy and Stephen Tulloch in the nickel at linebacker or Levy and Justin Durant. Depending on who is playing that scheme better, that situation could change throughout the season.
 
(Rotoworld) Stephen Tulloch started the Lions' preseason opener at middle linebacker, as expected.

Analysis: DeAndre Levy moved to the weak side, and was the middle linebacker with Detroit's second-team defense. Levy could still be an IDP asset, but Tulloch is the Lions linebacker to target behind Ndamukong Suh and eventually Nick Fairley.

 
strange...anybody watch the game and take notice? still too early to tell what's going to happen here?

(KFFL) Detroit Lions LB Stephen Tulloch started at outside linebacker in the preseason opener Friday, Aug. 12, against the Cincinnati Bengals, with LBs DeAndre Levy in the middle and Justin Durant on the other side.

the gamebook from nfl.com has levy as MLB. (not that i think week 1 of preseason means much while they play around with packages. just that there are various reports floating around.)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Let me clarify as I watch some of this game again. He is listed at MLB on the starting lineup for sure. My eyes are showing otherwise on most of the snaps Tulloch is lined up in the middle.

 
Let me clarify as I watch some of this game again. He is listed at MLB on the starting lineup for sure. My eyes are showing otherwise on most of the snaps Tulloch is lined up in the middle.
According to everything I have read and heard from the locals, Tulloch played in the middle. Levy did play in the middle too, but only after Tulloch left. Norton said Tulloch and Durant played in the nickel. Not sure what to make of that. Levy played in the nickel at practices, sometimes with Tulloch, sometimes with Durant. My opinion: I think the loss of OTAs changes how teams are handling preseason games. Normally, they would know a lot more about things like this, but it's tough when they have only have a week or so of practices with the free agents. I'm not going to overreact to the first game or 2 in preseason. I will still be shocked if Levy is not in the nickel when the season starts.
 
Based on my best efforts

2nd series 7:50 left in the first

1st and 10 – LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy

2nd and 4 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy

1st and 10 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy

2nd and 6 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy

3rd and 2 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy

Next Series 2:58 left in the first. Drive starts from around midfield

1st and 10 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy

2nd and 16 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy

3rd and 9 – Nickel D – Durant and Tulloch

1st and 10 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy (Suh attempts to behead Dalton)

1st and 10 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy (1:22 Redzone – Levy lined up on the LOS)

2nd and 8 Nickel D – Durant and Tulloch

End First Quarter

 
Let me clarify as I watch some of this game again. He is listed at MLB on the starting lineup for sure. My eyes are showing otherwise on most of the snaps Tulloch is lined up in the middle.
According to everything I have read and heard from the locals, Tulloch played in the middle. Levy did play in the middle too, but only after Tulloch left. Norton said Tulloch and Durant played in the nickel. Not sure what to make of that. Levy played in the nickel at practices, sometimes with Tulloch, sometimes with Durant.

My opinion: I think the loss of OTAs changes how teams are handling preseason games. Normally, they would know a lot more about things like this, but it's tough when they have only have a week or so of practices with the free agents.

I'm not going to overreact to the first game or 2 in preseason. I will still be shocked if Levy is not in the nickel when the season starts.
My guess on this is that if the coaches are trying to get an idea of who is better in coverage, they want them both out there to evaluate. I believe they already know what they have in Levy for coverage, so they are running the other two out there in a competition for the other spot. Note this is just a theory and not backed by any hard evidence.
 
Based on my best efforts2nd series 7:50 left in the first1st and 10 – LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy2nd and 4 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy1st and 10 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy2nd and 6 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy3rd and 2 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB LevyNext Series 2:58 left in the first. Drive starts from around midfield1st and 10 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy2nd and 16 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy3rd and 9 – Nickel D – Durant and Tulloch 1st and 10 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy (Suh attempts to behead Dalton)1st and 10 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy (1:22 Redzone – Levy lined up on the LOS)2nd and 8 Nickel D – Durant and TullochEnd First Quarter
With this, shouldn't Tulloch remain the one to own here, and as a 3 down MLB with that line in front of him remain a top end #2 LB?
 
Based on my best efforts2nd series 7:50 left in the first1st and 10 – LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy2nd and 4 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy1st and 10 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy2nd and 6 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy3rd and 2 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB LevyNext Series 2:58 left in the first. Drive starts from around midfield1st and 10 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy2nd and 16 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy3rd and 9 – Nickel D – Durant and Tulloch 1st and 10 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy (Suh attempts to behead Dalton)1st and 10 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy (1:22 Redzone – Levy lined up on the LOS)2nd and 8 Nickel D – Durant and TullochEnd First Quarter
With this, shouldn't Tulloch remain the one to own here, and as a 3 down MLB with that line in front of him remain a top end #2 LB?
Wasn't he always even if he played only 2 downs? When he was the MLB he would be a tackling machine.
 
Based on my best efforts2nd series 7:50 left in the first1st and 10 – LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy2nd and 4 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy1st and 10 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy2nd and 6 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy3rd and 2 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB LevyNext Series 2:58 left in the first. Drive starts from around midfield1st and 10 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy2nd and 16 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy3rd and 9 – Nickel D – Durant and Tulloch 1st and 10 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy (Suh attempts to behead Dalton)1st and 10 - LOLB Durant, MLB Tulloch, ROLB Levy (1:22 Redzone – Levy lined up on the LOS)2nd and 8 Nickel D – Durant and TullochEnd First Quarter
With this, shouldn't Tulloch remain the one to own here, and as a 3 down MLB with that line in front of him remain a top end #2 LB?
It's too early to predict that the nickel LBs will be Tulloch and Durant. During practice, Levy played with either Tulloch or Durant in the nickel. I'm not sure we will know for sure until after the 3rd preseason game, if not later.
 
So...is Levy droppable now? :kicksrock:
See the post immediately about yours.
I assume you meant above? My league's free-agency opens next week and need to drop a player in order to make a pickup. If he ends up being a useless IDP asset, I'd rather drop him over a young WR. (dynasty)
Sorry, I meant above. The point I made in that post is that nobody knows at this point who will play nickel for the Lions. I still think Levy will play in the nickel when all is said and done, but it is certainly not a guarantee.
 
For what it's worth, tonight it was the Durant LOLB, Tulloch MLB, and Levy ROLB for normal sets. The nickel package for most of the 1st quarter was Durrant and Levy. However, the final defensive series of the 1st quarter had Tulloch and Levy in the Nickel.

:confused:

 
'Multiple Scores said:
Tillich is the guy to own. This being debatable seems almost comical.
the debate isn't whether tulloch is more valuable than levy, but the OP bears on levy's intrinsic value... of course, which two LBs are in the nickle (what the debate is about) will impact on levy's ultimate value...some teams produce more than one (in GBs case, more than two) LBs that are valuable, so relative cost needs to be factored in... for now, tulloch is more expensive... if levy is cheaper and does almost as good (if he is in nickle and tulloch isn't, for instance), he could be the better value...i like tulloch better, too, aside from relative value, but in discussions like these, the importance of relative value should be implicitly accounted for... in the shark pool, there is a thread titled kendricks is the guy to have over julius thomas... well, i like kendricks a lot, and he should do better right away, but julius arguably has even greater upside (presumably has a lower floor, too), and is much cheaper... imo, the broader implications of that thread's intended comparison (kendricks and julius), potentially very interesting, in the absence of attacking the question of RELATIVE value, was unfortunately incompletely explored as phrased...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'Multiple Scores said:
Tillich is the guy to own. This being debatable seems almost comical.
the debate isn't whether tulloch is more valuable than levy, but the OP bears on levy's intrinsic value... of course, which two LBs are in the nickle (what the debate is about) will impact on levy's ultimate value...some teams produce more than one (in GBs case, more than two) LBs that are valuable, so relative cost needs to be factored in... for now, tulloch is more expensive... if levy is cheaper and does almost as good (if he is in nickle and tulloch isn't, for instance), he could be the better value...i like tulloch better, too, aside from relative value, but in discussions like these, the importance of relative value should be implicitly accounted for... in the shark pool, there is a thread titled kendricks is the guy to have over julius thomas... well, i like kendricks a lot, and he should do better right away, but julius arguably has even greater upside (presumably has a lower floor, too), and is much cheaper... imo, the broader implications of that thread's intended comparison (kendricks and julius), potentially very interesting, in the absence of attacking the question of RELATIVE value, was unfortunately incompletely explored as phrased...
Yes it it about choices and value-Tulloch high or get other players and Bishop or Hawthorne later.ADP redraft LB-I'd rather have Lofton Bishop and Hawthorne this year and they are cheaper and in some cases much cheaper. Hawthorne is going 72 spots later than Tulloch. 1. Willis, Patrick SFO LB 53.57 1 127 652. Mayo, Jerod NEP LB 63.75 2 125 643. Timmons, Lawrence PIT LB 73.81 3 192 624. Beason, Jon CAR LB 85.92 4 166 625. Laurinaitis, James STL LB 91.72 7 214 586. Posluszny, Paul JAC LB 92.23 11 226 607. Matthews, Clay GBP LB 98.70 40 217 568. Tulloch, Stephen DET LB 107.00 14 262 569. Lofton, Curtis ATL LB 109.22 17 227 5010. Lewis, Ray BAL LB 111.91 13 294 5511. Greenway, Chad MIN LB 118.51 12 285 5112. Harrison, James PIT LB 123.76 28 265 5513. Johnson, Derrick KCC LB 124.94 16 193 5214. Williams, DJ DEN LB 126.16 18 213 5115. Bishop, Desmond GBP LB 129.02 10 295 25 Hawthorne 177.09
 
'therokie0070 said:
'Multiple Scores said:
Tillich is the guy to own. This being debatable seems almost comical.
The only thing comical is Tillich :banned: If Tulloch is only a 2 down LB and Levy is a 3 down LB I don't see how you could say this is not debatable!!!
There are issues that are more important than comparing Tulloch to Levy. The more important question is when to draft each of them. The only thing that seems etched in stone is that Tulloch is at MLB, Levy at ROLB , and Durant at LOLB. That's all we know. They have tried various combinations in the nickel packages.While it's not etched in stone, I am pretty convinced that Levy will be in the nickel packages. If that holds true, I'd probably rank him as a mid to low LB3. If Tulloch plays every down, he has LB1 potential. Even if Tulloch is a 2 down LB, he may get enough tackles to be a top 25-30 LB. So right now, the decision of who plays in the nickel has huge ramifications for Tulloch. Of course, I must add that nothing is etched in stone, including Levy being in the nickel. I personally feel about 95% certain that Levy will play in the nickel and have already drafted him with that conclusion in mind.
 
'Multiple Scores said:
Tillich is the guy to own. This being debatable seems almost comical.
Strongly disagree.The question isn't so much which linebacker to own, as much as how much more valuable one may be than the other and what tier each belongs in.I think Tulloch v Levy is a very important debate, as is whether Tulloch is a LB2, LB3 or LB4 and whether Levy is a LB3 or LB4.If Tulloch doesn't play in the nickel packages and Levy only plays in certain subpackages, then I won't want either as more than a LB5. Your mileage, of course, may vary.
 
running a decent amount of nickel against the pats sets, and the first 2 series, it was tulloch and levy.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top