At the combine backs did this carrying a football. This is why their times don't look so great compared to other positions. I'm wondering of DeAngelo carried a ball and posted this crazy time...6.57 three cone!![]()
Not LT, but I'm wondering if he can be Portis with slightly better receiving skillsSolid numbers from Williams. You'd like to see a slightly better vert, but 34.5" is a very respectable number. The 10'9" in the long jump is exceptional. He's not Tomlinson 2.0, but he seems to have enough physical ability to be a RB1 in the NFL.
DeAngelo is not a good receiver and only caught 30 passes in the last two years. He did have 35 in 2003 but that's far from his strengh.Not LT, but I'm wondering if he can be Portis with slightly better receiving skillsSolid numbers from Williams. You'd like to see a slightly better vert, but 34.5" is a very respectable number. The 10'9" in the long jump is exceptional. He's not Tomlinson 2.0, but he seems to have enough physical ability to be a RB1 in the NFL.
Receiving G/S No Yds Avg Tds LG 2002 10/1 *5 *51 10.1 0 32 2003 11/11 *35 *384 10.9 3 80 2004 12/12 *18 *210 11.7 1 68 2005 11/11 *12 *78 7.1 1 29 Total 44/35 70 723 10.3 5 80
I think Portis is a bit more explosive than Williams. I see Williams as being a lighter, but more explosive Domanick Davis.Not LT, but I'm wondering if he can be Portis with slightly better receiving skillsSolid numbers from Williams. You'd like to see a slightly better vert, but 34.5" is a very respectable number. The 10'9" in the long jump is exceptional. He's not Tomlinson 2.0, but he seems to have enough physical ability to be a RB1 in the NFL.
Right, nothing really wrong with the size, but is San Fran really looking to draft Williams in the 6 hole? Im not knocking him, but the Niners wont take him and alot of other teams will pass because RB is a position where you can still get value in round 2.He's only 5'9" so 207 isnt much lighter than you'd want. If he bulks up 5 pounds he's right there where I'd want my running back.
If you think 5'9" and 207 is light how about 5'11" and 201? I would rather 5'9" and 201 than 5'11" and this is Reggie Bush. does that scare anyone?Right, nothing really wrong with the size, but is San Fran really looking to draft Williams in the 6 hole? Im not knocking him, but the Niners wont take him and alot of other teams will pass because RB is a position where you can still get value in round 2.He's only 5'9" so 207 isnt much lighter than you'd want. If he bulks up 5 pounds he's right there where I'd want my running back.
Before anyone chimes in saying that Bush can add more weight to his 5'11" frame keep in mind that many scouts commented exactly the opposite. They said that he looked ripped and massive for his frame indicating that he might be near max and that it would be hard to add bulk. Steroids are a wonderfull thing though so who knows.If you think 5'9" and 207 is light how about 5'11" and 201? I would rather 5'9" and 201 than 5'11" and this is Reggie Bush. does that scare anyone?Right, nothing really wrong with the size, but is San Fran really looking to draft Williams in the 6 hole? Im not knocking him, but the Niners wont take him and alot of other teams will pass because RB is a position where you can still get value in round 2.He's only 5'9" so 207 isnt much lighter than you'd want. If he bulks up 5 pounds he's right there where I'd want my running back.
So if what Chaos is saying is correct, can Bush be a great player at 205? Can he even be a good player?Before anyone chimes in saying that Bush can add more weight to his 5'11" frame keep in mind that many scouts commented exactly the opposite. They said that he looked ripped and massive for his frame indicating that he might be near max and that it would be hard to add bulk. Steroids are a wonderfull thing though so who knows.If you think 5'9" and 207 is light how about 5'11" and 201? I would rather 5'9" and 201 than 5'11" and this is Reggie Bush. does that scare anyone?Right, nothing really wrong with the size, but is San Fran really looking to draft Williams in the 6 hole? Im not knocking him, but the Niners wont take him and alot of other teams will pass because RB is a position where you can still get value in round 2.He's only 5'9" so 207 isnt much lighter than you'd want. If he bulks up 5 pounds he's right there where I'd want my running back.
I see him as a shorter, lighter, shiftier Jerome Bettis, without the size, strength, and plowing ability, but with greater speed and agility.I think Portis is a bit more explosive than Williams.
I see Williams as being a lighter, but more explosive Domanick Davis.
I see him as a shorter, lighter, shiftier Jerome Bettis, without the size, strength, and plowing ability, but with greater speed and agility.I think Portis is a bit more explosive than Williams.
I see Williams as being a lighter, but more explosive Domanick Davis.
There has been two concerns voiced about Williams (I know that as I research him, I am looking at these concerns) his injury history and his tendency to run outside vs running inside. I currently like Williams, and I am viewing him as a Westbrook or a Westbrook plus clone.I watched and taped the Bowl game last year where Williams did put on a clinic for RBs, and even against that level of competition I was kinda amazed as how he choose to break a run to the outside. I had watched him a few other times where I had gotten that same impression of him. So a very real concern of mine is can Williams be a good or even a decent between the tackles RB in the NFL? Also at The NFL Draft Showcase or The NFL Draft Countdown, I remember reading that during the combines, that doctors had detected a stress fracture in his foot.I see him as a shorter, lighter, shiftier Jerome Bettis, without the size, strength, and plowing ability, but with greater speed and agility.I think Portis is a bit more explosive than Williams.
I see Williams as being a lighter, but more explosive Domanick Davis.
Everybody knows that football doppelgangers are a premium in the NFL.I see him as a shorter, lighter, shiftier Jerome Bettis, without the size, strength, and plowing ability, but with greater speed and agility.I think Portis is a bit more explosive than Williams.
I see Williams as being a lighter, but more explosive Domanick Davis.He also reminds me of Marino except that Williams can't pass, can run faster, and can catch. Maybe a bit shorter too, but other then that they are football doppelgangers.
I cant say they will pick him. They did coach him at the senior bowl and said he was the most impressive player there. So they definately like him. Do they take him or fill a more pressing need? Who knows. It might come down to who else is available. If Vince Young falls, I think its a real possibility. Maybe they even trade down a couple spots first as the next few teams definately dont need a RB. Of course I also think its possible he doesnt even make it to the sixth spot. That's just me.Right, nothing really wrong with the size, but is San Fran really looking to draft Williams in the 6 hole? Im not knocking him, but the Niners wont take him and alot of other teams will pass because RB is a position where you can still get value in round 2.He's only 5'9" so 207 isnt much lighter than you'd want. If he bulks up 5 pounds he's right there where I'd want my running back.
CTSU, I think this is a case where you simply havent watched Deangelo play enough. I have seen him live about 20 times over the last 4 years and I can assure you that he is exceptional catching the ball out of the backfield.The Tigers system simply did not use Denagelo that match out of the backfield. He was used more as a decoy in short passing situations where Tommy West loved to use all different varieties of quick hitting WR screens. I just dont think using # of receptions is an accurate judge of catching ability when scouting a college RB. There are very few programs out there throwing to their RB 70 times in a season.DeAngelo is not a good receiver and only caught 30 passes in the last two years. He did have 35 in 2003 but that's far from his strengh.Not LT, but I'm wondering if he can be Portis with slightly better receiving skillsSolid numbers from Williams. You'd like to see a slightly better vert, but 34.5" is a very respectable number. The 10'9" in the long jump is exceptional. He's not Tomlinson 2.0, but he seems to have enough physical ability to be a RB1 in the NFL.
Receiving G/S No Yds Avg Tds LG 2002 10/1 *5 *51 10.1 0 32 2003 11/11 *35 *384 10.9 3 80 2004 12/12 *18 *210 11.7 1 68 2005 11/11 *12 *78 7.1 1 29 Total 44/35 70 723 10.3 5 80