What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Deangelo Williams (1 Viewer)

Garts

Footballguy
Looks liek Stewarts role as the goalline guy is over.

I know he had a sore calf, but Williams looked great at the the stripe yesterday and would have maybe had a 5th if Delhomme didn't take it on a boot.

This guy is the steal of many team's draft.....

And he's averaging 5 yards per carry.

 
Stewart is strictly a COP back. :lol:

I just had to say that because it's so funny. Man is he slowwwwwww..... 10 yard lead and he gets run down.

 
Looks liek Stewarts role as the goalline guy is over.I know he had a sore calf, but Williams looked great at the the stripe yesterday and would have maybe had a 5th if Delhomme didn't take it on a boot.This guy is the steal of many team's draft.....And he's averaging 5 yards per carry.
Don't change your mind, its only a 1 game abberition. Weird things happen now and then in the NFL. Williams has been in the league 3 years now. If he were a goal-line, short yardage back it would presented itself plenty of times in the past but it hasn't. He is looking to live up to his potential as he was targeted in the NFL/fantasy rookie draft though. He was drafted anywhere from #2 through #4 RB's (behind Bush, but in the mix with Addai and Maroney. He was looking like the bust of that RB crop but is now reclaiming his worth and value. Patience has been rewarded for Williams owners in dynasty leagues.
 
Stewart is strictly a COP back. :goodposting: I just had to say that because it's so funny. Man is he slowwwwwww..... 10 yard lead and he gets run down.
Hasn't Stewart been wearing a walking boot the past 2 weeks? I thought I read that somewhere. The might explain things if true because throughout college and earlier this year, he looked faster than on that run he had yesterday.
 
he was quoted as saying that he cramped right up after he hit the hole. you could definitely see him drop the tranny after he got free. almost like they cut to the same video of another guy running half as fast.

 
he was quoted as saying that he cramped right up after he hit the hole. you could definitely see him drop the tranny after he got free. almost like they cut to the same video of another guy running half as fast.
The dude needs to put the boot back on and watch the real stud RB showcase the talent that John Fox only now sees.
 
What's funny about two of those TD runs was that S.Smith was tackled on the 1 yard twice. In my game, the Smith owner was playing the Williams owner this week, nothing like a 24 point swing! BTW, the Williams owner won by 19. OUCH.

 
I was swearing after each one as I had Delhomme and S Smith going yesterday. It cost me a side bet and a win.

:thumbup:

 
Stewart is strictly a COP back. :banned: I just had to say that because it's so funny. Man is he slowwwwwww..... 10 yard lead and he gets run down.
Hasn't Stewart been wearing a walking boot the past 2 weeks? I thought I read that somewhere. The might explain things if true because throughout college and earlier this year, he looked faster than on that run he had yesterday.
Yes he has; I was following that too with him on my team. I expect that he'll largely be the COP through the rest of this season--but wouldn't be surprised to see him get the numbers again this year for a game or two. Next year....Look Out!! Carolina loves having two primaries and will play to the hot hand!! :thumbup:
 
One game aberration perhaps, but it still sucked having to play against DeWill this week... 4 damn 1 yd TDs!!! Ugh... And Lynch got 134 yds on only 16 carries in a 10-7 game!!! [/end of rant]

 
My brother was telling me this morning that Stewart said he didn't get warmed up before he went in. Shame on him. At least do a little stretching to stay loose during the game.

 
My brother was telling me this morning that Stewart said he didn't get warmed up before he went in. Shame on him. At least do a little stretching to stay loose during the game.
Have a little sympathy. I needed a beer yesterday and figured I'd have enough time to grab one between Stewart breaking free and reaching paydirt. I pushed it a little to hard w/o stretchisng and cramped up on the way back from the fridge just in time to see Stewart get caught.
 
It's too bad the ball was only on the one on those four TDs because it looked like he would have broken at least two of them for huge gains if the end zone wasn't right there. If for instance the plays started from the Carolina 1, maybe he goes 99 yards as I don't think anyone catches him. In a league with yardage bonuses he could have had an even HUGER day.

 
It's too bad the ball was only on the one on those four TDs because it looked like he would have broken at least two of them for huge gains if the end zone wasn't right there. If for instance the plays started from the Carolina 1, maybe he goes 99 yards as I don't think anyone catches him. In a league with yardage bonuses he could have had an even HUGER day.
Especially if Green Bay chose to play their short-yardgae goal line defense when they had 99 yards to protect.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's too bad the ball was only on the one on those four TDs because it looked like he would have broken at least two of them for huge gains if the end zone wasn't right there. If for instance the plays started from the Carolina 1, maybe he goes 99 yards as I don't think anyone catches him. In a league with yardage bonuses he could have had an even HUGER day.
Chances are they would try and defend that other 98 yards and not just the first 1 yard... :goodposting:
 
It's too bad the ball was only on the one on those four TDs because it looked like he would have broken at least two of them for huge gains if the end zone wasn't right there. If for instance the plays started from the Carolina 1, maybe he goes 99 yards as I don't think anyone catches him. In a league with yardage bonuses he could have had an even HUGER day.
Especially if Green Bay chose to play their short-yardgae goal line defense when they had 99 yards to protect.
I'm not saying take away the TDs - I'm saying you swap one or two of those 1-yd plunges for 99 yarders and he's racking up some sick yardage. There was nothing but daylight infront of him - besides the endzone section packed with fans. Unfortunately due to where the play began though there was no more yardage to be gained. See what I'm saying?
 
It's too bad the ball was only on the one on those four TDs because it looked like he would have broken at least two of them for huge gains if the end zone wasn't right there. If for instance the plays started from the Carolina 1, maybe he goes 99 yards as I don't think anyone catches him. In a league with yardage bonuses he could have had an even HUGER day.
Especially if Green Bay chose to play their short-yardgae goal line defense when they had 99 yards to protect.
I'm not saying take away the TDs - I'm saying you swap one or two of those 1-yd plunges for 99 yarders and he's racking up some sick yardage. There was nothing but daylight infront of him - besides the endzone section packed with fans. Unfortunately due to where the play began though there was no more yardage to be gained. See what I'm saying?
:confused:
 
It's too bad the ball was only on the one on those four TDs because it looked like he would have broken at least two of them for huge gains if the end zone wasn't right there. If for instance the plays started from the Carolina 1, maybe he goes 99 yards as I don't think anyone catches him. In a league with yardage bonuses he could have had an even HUGER day.
Especially if Green Bay chose to play their short-yardgae goal line defense when they had 99 yards to protect.
I'm not saying take away the TDs - I'm saying you swap one or two of those 1-yd plunges for 99 yarders and he's racking up some sick yardage. There was nothing but daylight infront of him - besides the endzone section packed with fans. Unfortunately due to where the play began though there was no more yardage to be gained. See what I'm saying?
:confused: I :lmao: the Land of Make Believe!

 
It's too bad the ball was only on the one on those four TDs because it looked like he would have broken at least two of them for huge gains if the end zone wasn't right there. If for instance the plays started from the Carolina 1, maybe he goes 99 yards as I don't think anyone catches him. In a league with yardage bonuses he could have had an even HUGER day.
Especially if Green Bay chose to play their short-yardgae goal line defense when they had 99 yards to protect.
I'm not saying take away the TDs - I'm saying you swap one or two of those 1-yd plunges for 99 yarders and he's racking up some sick yardage. There was nothing but daylight infront of him - besides the endzone section packed with fans. Unfortunately due to where the play began though there was no more yardage to be gained. See what I'm saying?
:shrug: I :goodposting: the Land of Make Believe!
:X :lmao:
 
It's too bad the ball was only on the one on those four TDs because it looked like he would have broken at least two of them for huge gains if the end zone wasn't right there. If for instance the plays started from the Carolina 1, maybe he goes 99 yards as I don't think anyone catches him. In a league with yardage bonuses he could have had an even HUGER day.
Especially if Green Bay chose to play their short-yardgae goal line defense when they had 99 yards to protect.
I'm not saying take away the TDs - I'm saying you swap one or two of those 1-yd plunges for 99 yarders and he's racking up some sick yardage. There was nothing but daylight infront of him - besides the endzone section packed with fans. Unfortunately due to where the play began though there was no more yardage to be gained. See what I'm saying?
:mellow: I :wub: the Land of Make Believe!
:lmao: :lmao:
TD-only leagues? :shrug:
 
It's too bad the ball was only on the one on those four TDs because it looked like he would have broken at least two of them for huge gains if the end zone wasn't right there. If for instance the plays started from the Carolina 1, maybe he goes 99 yards as I don't think anyone catches him. In a league with yardage bonuses he could have had an even HUGER day.
Especially if Green Bay chose to play their short-yardgae goal line defense when they had 99 yards to protect.
I'm not saying take away the TDs - I'm saying you swap one or two of those 1-yd plunges for 99 yarders and he's racking up some sick yardage. There was nothing but daylight infront of him - besides the endzone section packed with fans. Unfortunately due to where the play began though there was no more yardage to be gained. See what I'm saying?
:mellow: I :wub: the Land of Make Believe!
:lmao: :lmao:
TD-only leagues? :shrug:
Does your mommy know you're still on the computer?
 
he was quoted as saying that he cramped right up after he hit the hole. you could definitely see him drop the tranny after he got free. almost like they cut to the same video of another guy running half as fast.
Just like Bonaduce?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's too bad the ball was only on the one on those four TDs because it looked like he would have broken at least two of them for huge gains if the end zone wasn't right there. If for instance the plays started from the Carolina 1, maybe he goes 99 yards as I don't think anyone catches him. In a league with yardage bonuses he could have had an even HUGER day.
Especially if Green Bay chose to play their short-yardgae goal line defense when they had 99 yards to protect.
I'm not saying take away the TDs - I'm saying you swap one or two of those 1-yd plunges for 99 yarders and he's racking up some sick yardage. There was nothing but daylight infront of him - besides the endzone section packed with fans. Unfortunately due to where the play began though there was no more yardage to be gained. See what I'm saying?
:football: I :wub: the Land of Make Believe!
:lmao: :lmao:
TD-only leagues? :thumbup:
Does your mommy know you're still on the computer?
Does your mommy know you stink at math and don't know 99 is way more than 1 in leagues that count yardage?
 
It's too bad the ball was only on the one on those four TDs because it looked like he would have broken at least two of them for huge gains if the end zone wasn't right there. If for instance the plays started from the Carolina 1, maybe he goes 99 yards as I don't think anyone catches him. In a league with yardage bonuses he could have had an even HUGER day.
Especially if Green Bay chose to play their short-yardgae goal line defense when they had 99 yards to protect.
I'm not saying take away the TDs - I'm saying you swap one or two of those 1-yd plunges for 99 yarders and he's racking up some sick yardage. There was nothing but daylight infront of him - besides the endzone section packed with fans. Unfortunately due to where the play began though there was no more yardage to be gained. See what I'm saying?
:popcorn: I :wub: the Land of Make Believe!
:popcorn: :lmao:
TD-only leagues? :confused:
Does your mommy know you're still on the computer?
Does your mommy know you stink at math and don't know 99 is way more than 1 in leagues that count yardage?
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
 
The thing I would be worried about as a Stewart owner is that D.Williams has now shown he can get that tough yard in a short yardage situation...supposedly one of the places Stewart has an advantage over DW.

I'm not saying Stewart is now relegated to the bench, just that the staff may not be all that concerned about keeping Williams in there for a short yardage situation now.

 
It's too bad the ball was only on the one on those four TDs because it looked like he would have broken at least two of them for huge gains if the end zone wasn't right there. If for instance the plays started from the Carolina 1, maybe he goes 99 yards as I don't think anyone catches him. In a league with yardage bonuses he could have had an even HUGER day.
Especially if Green Bay chose to play their short-yardgae goal line defense when they had 99 yards to protect.
I'm not saying take away the TDs - I'm saying you swap one or two of those 1-yd plunges for 99 yarders and he's racking up some sick yardage. There was nothing but daylight infront of him - besides the endzone section packed with fans. Unfortunately due to where the play began though there was no more yardage to be gained. See what I'm saying?
:lmao: I :wub: the Land of Make Believe!
:lmao: :lmao:
TD-only leagues? :lmao:
Does your mommy know you're still on the computer?
Does your mommy know you stink at math and don't know 99 is way more than 1 in leagues that count yardage?
REPEAT AFTER ME: IT'S NOT THE SAME DEFENSIVE ALIGNMENT!!!1
 
I don't think its a big deal.

I wouldn't be surprised at all to see Stewart back in there this week. Bottom line is a guy got hurt and another took advantage. I doubt its a trend and both backs have been very useful and productive.

 
It's too bad the ball was only on the one on those four TDs because it looked like he would have broken at least two of them for huge gains if the end zone wasn't right there. If for instance the plays started from the Carolina 1, maybe he goes 99 yards as I don't think anyone catches him. In a league with yardage bonuses he could have had an even HUGER day.
Especially if Green Bay chose to play their short-yardgae goal line defense when they had 99 yards to protect.
I'm not saying take away the TDs - I'm saying you swap one or two of those 1-yd plunges for 99 yarders and he's racking up some sick yardage. There was nothing but daylight infront of him - besides the endzone section packed with fans. Unfortunately due to where the play began though there was no more yardage to be gained. See what I'm saying?
:lmao: I :wub: the Land of Make Believe!
:lmao: :lmao:
TD-only leagues? :confused:
Does your mommy know you're still on the computer?
Does your mommy know you stink at math and don't know 99 is way more than 1 in leagues that count yardage?
REPEAT AFTER ME: IT'S NOT THE SAME DEFENSIVE ALIGNMENT!!!1
Yea... but 99 is more than 1!

 
It's too bad the ball was only on the one on those four TDs because it looked like he would have broken at least two of them for huge gains if the end zone wasn't right there. If for instance the plays started from the Carolina 1, maybe he goes 99 yards as I don't think anyone catches him. In a league with yardage bonuses he could have had an even HUGER day.
Especially if Green Bay chose to play their short-yardgae goal line defense when they had 99 yards to protect.
I'm not saying take away the TDs - I'm saying you swap one or two of those 1-yd plunges for 99 yarders and he's racking up some sick yardage. There was nothing but daylight infront of him - besides the endzone section packed with fans. Unfortunately due to where the play began though there was no more yardage to be gained. See what I'm saying?
:lmao: I :wub: the Land of Make Believe!
:lmao: :lmao:
TD-only leagues? :confused:
Does your mommy know you're still on the computer?
Does your mommy know you stink at math and don't know 99 is way more than 1 in leagues that count yardage?
REPEAT AFTER ME: IT'S NOT THE SAME DEFENSIVE ALIGNMENT!!!1
Yea... but 99 is more than 1!
:no: You seem to get it so let me ask you this:

My buddy Seth who shares the team with me is trying to convince me that we're better off not starting DWill (maybe Dunn instead?) because Carolina seems to get tripped up at the 1 often (aka "a lot"), so the yardage opportunity on TDs is suspect (remember - league heavily weighted to yardage). He did some analysis on opportunity lost last week and he came up with 396 yards assuming all the TDs went for 99 - haven't checked the math but gotta admit it's somewhat compelling (1 pt/10yds). What I want to know is this: is there data on teams that get tripped up on the one, so that yardage on TDs is minimal compared with when they get tripped up on the other team's one and start the next play from that point forward (or somewhere deep in the opponent's territory) - and then busting one?

It's playoff time baby - do not want to throw several Benjamins w/out lookng at all angles!

TIA

 
Yea... but 99 is more than 1!
:shrug: You seem to get it so let me ask you this:My buddy Seth who shares the team with me is trying to convince me that we're better off not starting DWill (maybe Dunn instead?) because Carolina seems to get tripped up at the 1 often (aka "a lot"), so the yardage opportunity on TDs is suspect (remember - league heavily weighted to yardage). He did some analysis on opportunity lost last week and he came up with 396 yards assuming all the TDs went for 99 - haven't checked the math but gotta admit it's somewhat compelling (1 pt/10yds). What I want to know is this: is there data on teams that get tripped up on the one, so that yardage on TDs is minimal compared with when they get tripped up on the other team's one and start the next play from that point forward (or somewhere deep in the opponent's territory) - and then busting one?It's playoff time baby - do not want to throw several Benjamins w/out lookng at all angles!TIA
ummmmmmm... I was sarcastically mocking you.there's only been one 99 yard run in NFL history. defenses stack the line on GL plays.... they don't do that as heavily any further back because that makes them susceptible to a big play. I feel moronic explaining this because it's football 101 remedial... but I get the impression you are actually serious... and I feel bad for you.
 
Yea... but 99 is more than 1!
:shrug: You seem to get it so let me ask you this:My buddy Seth who shares the team with me is trying to convince me that we're better off not starting DWill (maybe Dunn instead?) because Carolina seems to get tripped up at the 1 often (aka "a lot"), so the yardage opportunity on TDs is suspect (remember - league heavily weighted to yardage). He did some analysis on opportunity lost last week and he came up with 396 yards assuming all the TDs went for 99 - haven't checked the math but gotta admit it's somewhat compelling (1 pt/10yds). What I want to know is this: is there data on teams that get tripped up on the one, so that yardage on TDs is minimal compared with when they get tripped up on the other team's one and start the next play from that point forward (or somewhere deep in the opponent's territory) - and then busting one?It's playoff time baby - do not want to throw several Benjamins w/out lookng at all angles!TIA
ummmmmmm... I was sarcastically mocking you.there's only been one 99 yard run in NFL history. defenses stack the line on GL plays.... they don't do that as heavily any further back because that makes them susceptible to a big play. I feel moronic explaining this because it's football 101 remedial... but I get the impression you are actually serious... and I feel bad for you.
Not cool to mock, though you seem like a Shark so I'll defer despite the disrespect. Thanks for the info. No need to feel bad though chief - 10 and 3 with a 1st round bye, just looking for an edge. :thumbup:
 
Yea... but 99 is more than 1!
:goodposting: You seem to get it so let me ask you this:My buddy Seth who shares the team with me is trying to convince me that we're better off not starting DWill (maybe Dunn instead?) because Carolina seems to get tripped up at the 1 often (aka "a lot"), so the yardage opportunity on TDs is suspect (remember - league heavily weighted to yardage). He did some analysis on opportunity lost last week and he came up with 396 yards assuming all the TDs went for 99 - haven't checked the math but gotta admit it's somewhat compelling (1 pt/10yds). What I want to know is this: is there data on teams that get tripped up on the one, so that yardage on TDs is minimal compared with when they get tripped up on the other team's one and start the next play from that point forward (or somewhere deep in the opponent's territory) - and then busting one?It's playoff time baby - do not want to throw several Benjamins w/out lookng at all angles!TIA
ummmmmmm... I was sarcastically mocking you.there's only been one 99 yard run in NFL history. defenses stack the line on GL plays.... they don't do that as heavily any further back because that makes them susceptible to a big play. I feel moronic explaining this because it's football 101 remedial... but I get the impression you are actually serious... and I feel bad for you.
You should rethink this post, Toolio.
 
Yea... but 99 is more than 1!
:lmao: You seem to get it so let me ask you this:My buddy Seth who shares the team with me is trying to convince me that we're better off not starting DWill (maybe Dunn instead?) because Carolina seems to get tripped up at the 1 often (aka "a lot"), so the yardage opportunity on TDs is suspect (remember - league heavily weighted to yardage). He did some analysis on opportunity lost last week and he came up with 396 yards assuming all the TDs went for 99 - haven't checked the math but gotta admit it's somewhat compelling (1 pt/10yds). What I want to know is this: is there data on teams that get tripped up on the one, so that yardage on TDs is minimal compared with when they get tripped up on the other team's one and start the next play from that point forward (or somewhere deep in the opponent's territory) - and then busting one?It's playoff time baby - do not want to throw several Benjamins w/out lookng at all angles!TIA
ummmmmmm... I was sarcastically mocking you.there's only been one 99 yard run in NFL history. defenses stack the line on GL plays.... they don't do that as heavily any further back because that makes them susceptible to a big play. I feel moronic explaining this because it's football 101 remedial... but I get the impression you are actually serious... and I feel bad for you.
You should rethink this post, Toolio.
There's nothing I'd change, Cunntstible.
 
It's too bad the ball was only on the one on those four TDs because it looked like he would have broken at least two of them for huge gains if the end zone wasn't right there. If for instance the plays started from the Carolina 1, maybe he goes 99 yards as I don't think anyone catches him. In a league with yardage bonuses he could have had an even HUGER day.
Especially if Green Bay chose to play their short-yardgae goal line defense when they had 99 yards to protect.
I'm not saying take away the TDs - I'm saying you swap one or two of those 1-yd plunges for 99 yarders and he's racking up some sick yardage. There was nothing but daylight infront of him - besides the endzone section packed with fans. Unfortunately due to where the play began though there was no more yardage to be gained. See what I'm saying?
I kind of know what you're saying. On Deangelo's third one-yard plunge, I noticed that Steve Smith (who I own) was in single coverage at the top of the screen. As soon as Delhomme handed off to Williams, Smith's defender drifted lazily towards the pile. If Delhomme would have faked that hand-off and Smith would have run a fly pattern, it would have been an easy pitch-and-catch 99 yarder. (assuming it wasn't only a one yard field). I made a note to upgrade Smith in my rankings next week.
 
It's too bad the ball was only on the one on those four TDs because it looked like he would have broken at least two of them for huge gains if the end zone wasn't right there. If for instance the plays started from the Carolina 1, maybe he goes 99 yards as I don't think anyone catches him. In a league with yardage bonuses he could have had an even HUGER day.
Especially if Green Bay chose to play their short-yardgae goal line defense when they had 99 yards to protect.
I'm not saying take away the TDs - I'm saying you swap one or two of those 1-yd plunges for 99 yarders and he's racking up some sick yardage. There was nothing but daylight infront of him - besides the endzone section packed with fans. Unfortunately due to where the play began though there was no more yardage to be gained. See what I'm saying?
I kind of know what you're saying. On Deangelo's third one-yard plunge, I noticed that Steve Smith (who I own) was in single coverage at the top of the screen. As soon as Delhomme handed off to Williams, Smith's defender drifted lazily towards the pile. If Delhomme would have faked that hand-off and Smith would have run a fly pattern, it would have been an easy pitch-and-catch 99 yarder. (assuming it wasn't only a one yard field). I made a note to upgrade Smith in my rankings next week.
:lmao:
 
It's too bad the ball was only on the one on those four TDs because it looked like he would have broken at least two of them for huge gains if the end zone wasn't right there. If for instance the plays started from the Carolina 1, maybe he goes 99 yards as I don't think anyone catches him. In a league with yardage bonuses he could have had an even HUGER day.
Especially if Green Bay chose to play their short-yardgae goal line defense when they had 99 yards to protect.
I'm not saying take away the TDs - I'm saying you swap one or two of those 1-yd plunges for 99 yarders and he's racking up some sick yardage. There was nothing but daylight infront of him - besides the endzone section packed with fans. Unfortunately due to where the play began though there was no more yardage to be gained. See what I'm saying?
I kind of know what you're saying. On Deangelo's third one-yard plunge, I noticed that Steve Smith (who I own) was in single coverage at the top of the screen. As soon as Delhomme handed off to Williams, Smith's defender drifted lazily towards the pile. If Delhomme would have faked that hand-off and Smith would have run a fly pattern, it would have been an easy pitch-and-catch 99 yarder. (assuming it wasn't only a one yard field). I made a note to upgrade Smith in my rankings next week.
It's kind of the same thing I saw with Larry Fitzgerald a few weeks ago. They were on the 1 and Fitz ran a fade and caught the TD, and the single defender out there fell down when trying to break up the pass. If they had thrown that 4 yard fade from their own 1 yard line, he would've gone for 99 yards on the play. I bumped him up based on that the next week, but he didn't have any 99 yard TDs. I was very befuddled. Maybe this week is the week.
 
It's too bad the ball was only on the one on those four TDs because it looked like he would have broken at least two of them for huge gains if the end zone wasn't right there. If for instance the plays started from the Carolina 1, maybe he goes 99 yards as I don't think anyone catches him. In a league with yardage bonuses he could have had an even HUGER day.
:yes: :lmao:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top