Cunningham has surpassed Stacy on the depth chart, and Pead is suspended week 1 and has never done anything but look like crap in the NFL. So it's likely that Cunningham will split in some manner with Richardson week 1, and who knows he could impress.Sorry, I put the poll together really quickly, I re wrote the names correctly and re worded the question in better terms. I personally like michael cox, esp in return leagues. Anyone know a lot about the stl RB situation?
only behind Tate this year, organization moves next offseason will say how they really feel about him.Wood is hard to evaluate stuck behind Foster and Tate.
Benny Cunningham will be playing this weekend. I think that's the clearest path to playing time...MAC_32 said:Even before he went to Cleveland, Dennis Johnson. Wood has the clearest path to playing time though.
So you're saying I should focus my efforts on acquiring RB1's and RB2's instead of RB3's? That's some gamebreaking fantasy football theory right there. I think I'm gonna take this theory to practice and go to my "Deep dynasty" league and drop my RB3's and pickup RB1's and RB2's. Thanks.I've wasted a lot of time and effort on stashing dynasty RBs over the years. For depth and for good play-sure this is a sound theory. If you're looking for a star, he'll rarely ever be a 3rd stringer.
I know full well that several have done it, but don't discount that there are 32 3rd stringers every year and that is a very small percentage.
In my experience, most people are like I have been and waste way too much time and energy on hope and discredit the 3rd string status. NFL GMs rarely ever enter an offseason saying we have a good 3rd stringer that'll start for us; instead they draft or trade for a starter. 3rd stringers generally need to have one (maybe two) injuries happen on their team and then they shine and earn more playing time.
Less than a week after the Browns claimed Dennis Johnson off waivers, they have just released him...MAC_32 said:Even before he went to Cleveland, Dennis Johnson. Wood has the clearest path to playing time though.
Didn't say a thing about what you should do.So you're saying I should focus my efforts on acquiring RB1's and RB2's instead of RB3's? That's some gamebreaking fantasy football theory right there. I think I'm gonna take this theory to practice and go to my "Deep dynasty" league and drop my RB3's and pickup RB1's and RB2's. Thanks.I've wasted a lot of time and effort on stashing dynasty RBs over the years. For depth and for good play-sure this is a sound theory. If you're looking for a star, he'll rarely ever be a 3rd stringer.
I know full well that several have done it, but don't discount that there are 32 3rd stringers every year and that is a very small percentage.
In my experience, most people are like I have been and waste way too much time and energy on hope and discredit the 3rd string status. NFL GMs rarely ever enter an offseason saying we have a good 3rd stringer that'll start for us; instead they draft or trade for a starter. 3rd stringers generally need to have one (maybe two) injuries happen on their team and then they shine and earn more playing time.
ETA: That's strange, I went to my "Deep dynasty" league and all the RB1's and RB2's seem to already be rostered. What a bizarre coincidence.
I've certainly been guilty of spending too much time researching 3rd RBs that rarely even suit up for a game, but dumpster diving in general has always been the most effective way to improve my overall team value. Some people are masters of the trade to increase team value, but not me. I work on throwing enough darts at the board to be holding the next Wille Parker, Arian Foster, Alfred Morris, etc. Wood and Cunningham seem like the best bets in this group.I've wasted a lot of time and effort on stashing dynasty RBs over the years. For depth and for good play-sure this is a sound theory. If you're looking for a star, he'll rarely ever be a 3rd stringer.
I know full well that several have done it, but don't discount that there are 32 3rd stringers every year is a very small percentage.
In my experience, most people are like I have been and waste way too much time and energy on hope and discredit the 3rd string status. NFL GMs rarely ever enter an offseason saying we have a good 3rd stringer that'll start for us; instead they draft or trade for a starter. 3rd stringers generally need to have one (maybe two) injuries happen on their team and then they shine and earn more playing time.
Reflecting back, for me, my efforts on WRs (or even TE a bit) have been far more productive.I've certainly been guilty of spending too much time researching 3rd RBs that rarely even suit up for a game, but dumpster diving in general has always been the most effective way to improve my overall team value. Some people are masters of the trade to increase team value, but not me. I work on throwing enough darts at the board to be holding the next Wille Parker, Arian Foster, Alfred Morris, etc. Wood and Cunningham seem like the best bets in this group.I've wasted a lot of time and effort on stashing dynasty RBs over the years. For depth and for good play-sure this is a sound theory. If you're looking for a star, he'll rarely ever be a 3rd stringer.
I know full well that several have done it, but don't discount that there are 32 3rd stringers every year is a very small percentage.
In my experience, most people are like I have been and waste way too much time and energy on hope and discredit the 3rd string status. NFL GMs rarely ever enter an offseason saying we have a good 3rd stringer that'll start for us; instead they draft or trade for a starter. 3rd stringers generally need to have one (maybe two) injuries happen on their team and then they shine and earn more playing time.
He's back to the practice squad now.Less than a week after the Browns claimed Dennis Johnson off waivers, they have just released him...Even before he went to Cleveland, Dennis Johnson. Wood has the clearest path to playing time though.