You didn't ask me, but I am at home sick and a bit bored, so...
My first question when I read that was if you think there should be different things taught at rural vs. urban schools. I just thought the inclusion of rural was interesting.
IMO the discussion in the 2-3 threads this morning that all seemed to revolve around this was a perfect example of what I think is going on. There was the link the other day about privilege bingo. Steady had the example of his kid's assignment on what things you agree with BLM about. As they were presented, I would say no - both those are wrong. Where it gets difficult is that IMO neither were at their core bad concepts to have in HS, they were just presented in really bad and decisive ways. Like was posted about the bingo thing, it could easily be a discussion about people's different backgrounds and struggles - it doesn't need to be a simplistic bingo game. In Steady's example BLM and the protests were big news last year, so I don't doubt there were discussions or assignments about it. However, it's dumb and adds division if the assignment is "list 3 things you agree with BLM about". The topic could be assigned and framed in a way that allows for opinions or more like "what events were the BLM protests about?"
Like so much in the age of SM and clickbait news - there is no nuance. Instead of jumping to those examples = CRT = storm the school board in protest we should be able to ask those questions - are the core ideas bad or just presented badly?, because a few teachers presents them badly, should we do away with teaching these things? , etc? Like has been said in these threads a bit, we need to be better at looking at each case and going from there.