Trump does something wrong, in your first thought is to make it about identity politics. Solid work.Trump does something wrong, in your first thought is to make it about identity politics. Solid work.Link
Another day, another abuse of power. Those darn non-white, non-hetero, and now all females who don't have control over their own bodies wanting equal rights though, right?
Trump does something wrong, in your first thought is to make it about identity politics. Solid work.Trump does something wrong, in your first thought is to make it about identity politics. Solid work.
You can say that again. You can say that again.Trump does something wrong, in your first thought is to make it about identity politics. Solid work.Trump does something wrong, in your first thought is to make it about identity politics. Solid work.
Link
Another day, another abuse of power. Those darn non-white, non-hetero, and now all females who don't have control over their own bodies wanting equal rights though, right?
After quick reflection, you're correct. I shouldn't have included that part even though I stand by my point of these people being used as a deflection to rile up supporters and ignore Trump's actions. I'm going to edit out.Trump does something wrong, in your first thought is to make it about identity politics. Solid work.Trump does something wrong, in your first thought is to make it about identity politics. Solid work.
White male and straight, wow. Politics, ladies and gentlemenWhen it's your identity, you're vested. If you haven't opened any other thread, like J6, there's plenty of defending Trump by blaming everyone that isn't white, male and straight.
For example
And what did the IG say about that as well as the article telling you the House Republican investigation found no connection to Obama.Weaponize the IRS? Wherever would someone get an idea like that?
Obama's IRS Targets conservative groups
Stop it. They were caught and had to settle Quit pushing the same falsehoods over and over.And what did the IG say about that as well as the article telling you the House Republican investigation found no connection to Obama.
But why the whataboutism?
After quick reflection, you're correct. I shouldn't have included that part even though I stand by my point of these people being used as a deflection to rile up supporters and ignore Trump's actions. I'm going to edit out.Trump does something wrong, in your first thought is to make it about identity politics. Solid work.Trump does something wrong, in your first thought is to make it about identity politics. Solid work.
Literally nothing I stated was false.Stop it. They were caught and had to settle Quit pushing the same falsehoods over and over.
Full stop. The IRS Admitted itLiterally nothing I stated was false.
This is right in the article you quoted.
“Republicans claimed the targeting of conservative groups showed political bias in the IRS under former Democratic President Barack Obama. House Republican investigators found no connection to the Obama administration, according to a 2014 report.“
And I asked you what the IG said about it in his investigation.
Dont accuse me of spreading falsehoods when I am posting facts.
I did not dispute the IRS having fault.Full stop. The IRS Admitted it
”The IRS admitted it was wrong when it based screenings of the groups’ applications on their names or policy positions, subjected the groups to heightened scrutiny and delays and demanded unnecessary information from the groups, the agreement in the Washington case said.”
You just failed to mention itI did not dispute the IRS having fault.
HTH
I disputed the headline and sentiment presented as a whataboutism deflection from the current topic.You just failed to mention it
True, but statistically very unlikely. Given that two of these guys got the treatment is pretty damning.According to your article there's no proof of wrongdoing. They're basing this accusation on statistics. Which is valid, and worthy of investigating, but as of now it's just conjecture.
It seems pretty obvious that Trump did this. I’m not sure that Obama is also guilty- that’s not as obvious IMO.True, but statistically very unlikely. Given that two of these guys got the treatment is pretty damning.
This was wrong when Obama did it and it's wrong here. ####### move.
Or as I like to call it....Footballguys.com PSFWhite male and straight, wow. Politics, ladies and gentlemen
Is that one or two charges?I disputed the headline and sentiment presented as a whataboutism deflection from the current topic.
But Obama!Weaponize the IRS? Wherever would someone get an idea like that?
Obama's IRS Targets conservative groups
I don't think that's obvious.It seems pretty obvious that Trump did this. I’m not sure that Obama is also guilty- that’s not as obvious IMO.
Probably so…will the house investigate? IG?I don't think that's obvious.
I think the most likely culprit is a MAGA acolyte working within the IRS who took it upon himself, especially given the IRS did similar under the Obama administration.
Well deserved comparison. What Obama's IRS did was awful.But Obama!
This is a fantastic post.I honestly don't know what to think. It obviously seems very unusual that they both would be subjected to these random audits. But from what I understand there are a ton of safeguards in place at the IRS to prevent exactly these types of abuses, and the McCabe audit occurred after Trump was already out of office (but while the IRS commissioner he had appointed was still in charge). I certainly find it plausible that Trump might have wanted these audits to happen, but I have yet to hear any evidence that he had the power to make them happen.
This is a classic case where immediately jumping to a conclusion, either positive or negative, says more about you than about the underlying story. This is a strange enough set of facts that it clearly merits an investigation, and beyond that we should all wait and see what that investigation produces
Yes, definitely. But from what I understand -- which is limited to what I read in the NYT article that broke this story -- the IRS simply doesn't work that way. Neither the president nor the director can order them to audit an individual, nor can a rando employee slip their folder into the audit pile.IRS should never be able to be weaponized to go after political opponents. If someone in the agency intentionally targeted these two, they should be removed from their position immediately.
The government in general shouldn't be used to go after political opponents or in the case of Florida against corporations whose societal views don't jive with theirs.This is a fantastic post.
IRS should never be able to be weaponized to go after political opponents. If someone in the agency intentionally targeted these two, they should be removed from their position immediately.
I think that's certainly a possibility.I don't think that's obvious.
I think the most likely culprit is a MAGA acolyte working within the IRS who took it upon himself, especially given the IRS did similar under the Obama administration.
Except Comey had to spend an extra $5K on the audit in order to get his $347 refundAnnnd ohhhhhh by the way, the miserable tax cheat and racist apartment renter's plan backfired, as the IRS wound up cutting a check for overpayment.![]()
True, but statistically very unlikely. Given that two of these guys got the treatment is pretty damning.
This was wrong when Obama did it and it's wrong here. ####### move.
Whoa. That's for real?Except Comey had to spend an extra $5K on the audit in order to get his $347 refund
I balance that very valid set of statements with knowledge that the odds of this kind of audit are 1/30,000. That it would happen to Comey and McCabe is eyebrow raising.Sure, which is why I specifically said it was worth investigating. But, from the article posted people in the IRS are adamant that it couldn't have happened as a targeted action. I can't imagine there are a lot of people at the IRS who are fans of Trump. They have no reason to lie. So, investigate, but let's not go slinging arrows until we have some actual evidence of wrongdoing beyond conjecture based on stats.
Definitely remember reading that, but can't remember where. Maybe in the original NYT piece?Whoa. That's for real?
It seems pretty obvious that Trump did this. I’m not sure that Obama is also guilty- that’s not as obvious IMO.
Lol. The post doesn't even try anymore.
good stuff. IRS agents must be ready to shoot American citizens