he also traded a 1st and 3rd draft picks for roy williams then payed him 26m guaranteed. mebbe he will force the ball there.primitivepursuit said:That's a lot of $ Jerry shelled out for Miles to be a #2. How long before he meddles with Garrett and has more passes tossed his way.
Here in lies my dilemma. I have both Bryant and Austin with Mile Williams TB and S Moss. I can either start a combinaton of 2 RB and 2 WR or 1 RB and 3 WR.My RB's are A Foster McCoy Gore... Foster tough match up so @ the moment but was thinkingFosterGoreBryantWilliams TBORGoreBryantM AustinWilliamsPeak said:If we're looking at Dez (1a) and Austin (1b), who would be willing to start both this week vs Det? Is that a viable option? You would hedge your bets on who outperforms the other, but is it a smart play? I would most likely start Dez over Austin, but I don't see playing them both. Although I think one can make a strong case to do so.
I dont care about your teamHere in lies my dilemma. I have both Bryant and Austin with Mile Williams TB and S Moss. I can either start a combinaton of 2 RB and 2 WR or 1 RB and 3 WR.My RB's are A Foster McCoy Gore... Foster tough match up so @ the moment but was thinkingFosterGoreBryantWilliams TBORGoreBryantM AustinWilliamsPeak said:If we're looking at Dez (1a) and Austin (1b), who would be willing to start both this week vs Det? Is that a viable option? You would hedge your bets on who outperforms the other, but is it a smart play? I would most likely start Dez over Austin, but I don't see playing them both. Although I think one can make a strong case to do so.
You really think it's that simple? They have good chemistry but mostly before Dez has become a major part of the offense.I believe this is a 1a/1b thing, call it Fitz/Boldin, Marvin/Wayne, whatever you like.austin and romo have ridiculous chemistry together. if romo is the qb in dallas, austin is the #1.
I dont care about your teamHere in lies my dilemma. I have both Bryant and Austin with Mile Williams TB and S Moss. I can either start a combinaton of 2 RB and 2 WR or 1 RB and 3 WR.My RB's are A Foster McCoy Gore... Foster tough match up so @ the moment but was thinkingFosterGoreBryantWilliams TBORGoreBryantM AustinWilliamsPeak said:If we're looking at Dez (1a) and Austin (1b), who would be willing to start both this week vs Det? Is that a viable option? You would hedge your bets on who outperforms the other, but is it a smart play? I would most likely start Dez over Austin, but I don't see playing them both. Although I think one can make a strong case to do so.
Dang... so Dez = Ochocinco ?Miles Austin = BatmanDez Bryant = Robin
I don't think it's a nightmare for Bryant owners. He's caught a TD in every game Kitna has played except one and in that game he put up 7-84. He's the No. 1 WR in this offense with a QB and head coach who are fixated on getting him the ball as often as possible. I think he's a Must Start going forward as a strong WR2 with WR1 upside.The nightmare is for Austin owners.I think it's going to be one of those fantasy nightmares for you guys from here on out.
Nice to see you fella ramble. I dropped Austin and am running with... D Bryant, A Gates, M Wallace, B Lloyd, and Collie. Just cant run 2 Dallas receivers on my team with that horrid Dallas Aw-Fense. Thanks.
Well not so bad considering the amount of targets given to both Austin and Dez. Kitna clearly looks for Austin in the redzone too.I don't think it's a nightmare for Bryant owners. He's caught a TD in every game Kitna has played except one and in that game he put up 7-84. He's the No. 1 WR in this offense with a QB and head coach who are fixated on getting him the ball as often as possible. I think he's a Must Start going forward as a strong WR2 with WR1 upside.The nightmare is for Austin owners.I think it's going to be one of those fantasy nightmares for you guys from here on out.