Duel Full ServiceDfs?![]()
Never heard of draft kings until recently
Didn't ESPN just drop a ton of money into DraftKings? I think Fox did as well.They must be making a ton of money to advertise this much.
ESPN at least intended to, but bailed due to potential reputation issues re: Disney.Didn't ESPN just drop a ton of money into DraftKings? I think Fox did as well.They must be making a ton of money to advertise this much.
I'm sure they are...Think of the popularity of fantasy, then they found a way to monetize it.They must be making a ton of money to advertise this much.
Eilers Research, which studies the industry, estimates that daily games will generate around $2.6 billion in entry fees this year and grow 41 percent annually, reaching $14.4 billion in 2020.
FanDuel and DraftKings, which dominate the daily sports niche, have drawn the interest of big investors. FanDuel, the market leader, has raised $88 million from investors like Comcast, NBC, KKR and Shamrock Ventures. DraftKings has raised about $76 million from investors like Atlas Venture and Redpoint Ventures.
The N.B.A. has a stake in FanDuel, and the site has signed exclusive multiyear deals with 13 basketball teams and CBS Sports. Major League Baseball has thrown in with DraftKings, which now has an exclusive deal with ESPN.
Both companies have been valued at $1 billion, though neither has turned a profit. And both have pursued high-profile sponsorships: Floyd Mayweather wore a FanDuel logo on his trunks in May when he defeated Manny Pacquiao. Last month, DraftKings sponsored the Belmont Stakes, where American Pharoah became the first Triple Crown winner in 37 years.
“Last year, the two combined to spend $100 million,” said Adam Krejcik, a managing director at Eilers Research. “This year, each will spend that amount on marketing and advertising. They are spending absolutely crazy.”
Taking 10 cents of every dollar wagered is a pretty good gigThey must be making a ton of money to advertise this much.
How the hell can neither of these companies be profitable? Unreal.Eilers Research, which studies the industry, estimates that daily games will generate around $2.6 billion in entry fees this year and grow 41 percent annually, reaching $14.4 billion in 2020.FanDuel and DraftKings, which dominate the daily sports niche, have drawn the interest of big investors. FanDuel, the market leader, has raised $88 million from investors like Comcast, NBC, KKR and Shamrock Ventures. DraftKings has raised about $76 million from investors like Atlas Venture and Redpoint Ventures.
The N.B.A. has a stake in FanDuel, and the site has signed exclusive multiyear deals with 13 basketball teams and CBS Sports. Major League Baseball has thrown in with DraftKings, which now has an exclusive deal with ESPN.
Both companies have been valued at $1 billion, though neither has turned a profit. And both have pursued high-profile sponsorships: Floyd Mayweather wore a FanDuel logo on his trunks in May when he defeated Manny Pacquiao. Last month, DraftKings sponsored the Belmont Stakes, where American Pharoah became the first Triple Crown winner in 37 years.
Last year, the two combined to spend $100 million, said Adam Krejcik, a managing director at Eilers Research. This year, each will spend that amount on marketing and advertising. They are spending absolutely crazy.
They are spending a boatload of cash getting entrenched in the market right now with an eye on future revenues... think Uber vs Lyft, though with a slightly more level playing field.How the hell can neither of these companies be profitable? Unreal.Last year, the two combined to spend $100 million, said Adam Krejcik, a managing director at Eilers Research. This year, each will spend that amount on marketing and advertising. They are spending absolutely crazy.
Advertising, overlays, tons of give aways and related expenses, massive contrived overhead. It's a race to build customer bases with massive cash flow supporting the expenditures. Five years of big losses will come with great current and future tax advantages.How the hell can neither of these companies be profitable? Unreal.Eilers Research, which studies the industry, estimates that daily games will generate around $2.6 billion in entry fees this year and grow 41 percent annually, reaching $14.4 billion in 2020.FanDuel and DraftKings, which dominate the daily sports niche, have drawn the interest of big investors. FanDuel, the market leader, has raised $88 million from investors like Comcast, NBC, KKR and Shamrock Ventures. DraftKings has raised about $76 million from investors like Atlas Venture and Redpoint Ventures.
The N.B.A. has a stake in FanDuel, and the site has signed exclusive multiyear deals with 13 basketball teams and CBS Sports. Major League Baseball has thrown in with DraftKings, which now has an exclusive deal with ESPN.
Both companies have been valued at $1 billion, though neither has turned a profit. And both have pursued high-profile sponsorships: Floyd Mayweather wore a FanDuel logo on his trunks in May when he defeated Manny Pacquiao. Last month, DraftKings sponsored the Belmont Stakes, where American Pharoah became the first Triple Crown winner in 37 years.
Last year, the two combined to spend $100 million, said Adam Krejcik, a managing director at Eilers Research. This year, each will spend that amount on marketing and advertising. They are spending absolutely crazy.
Aren't there other DFS services besides Draft Kings & FanDuel? I think I even saw a Yahoo DFS ad, but I'm not sure if it is Yahoo that runs it.They are spending a boatload of cash getting entrenched in the market right now with an eye on future revenues... think Uber vs Lyft, though with a slightly more level playing field.How the hell can neither of these companies be profitable? Unreal.Last year, the two combined to spend $100 million, said Adam Krejcik, a managing director at Eilers Research. This year, each will spend that amount on marketing and advertising. They are spending absolutely crazy.
Yes, yes, probably.Aren't there other DFS services besides Draft Kings & FanDuel? I think I even saw a Yahoo DFS ad, but I'm not sure if it is Yahoo that runs it.They are spending a boatload of cash getting entrenched in the market right now with an eye on future revenues... think Uber vs Lyft, though with a slightly more level playing field.How the hell can neither of these companies be profitable? Unreal.Last year, the two combined to spend $100 million, said Adam Krejcik, a managing director at Eilers Research. This year, each will spend that amount on marketing and advertising. They are spending absolutely crazy.
All the smaller companies are benefiting from the advertising by the big 2.
There's a whole bunch of dfs sites. Maurile covers them for fbg.Yeah Yahoo and CBS both into it now
Can't even go to my fantasy league page without a HEY DONT FORGET TO PLAY DFS popup or banner ad
I signed up last year with the free promo.I threw down $25 this year for the first time.
So they got me, hook line and sinker
yeah, Im not loving it. and the more I read that fbg ebook, seems like heavily shark infested waters. And to be honest, I dont care enough to do the workI signed up last year with the free promo.I threw down $25 this year for the first time.
So they got me, hook line and sinker
Dropped like 50 in. Doubled it.
Then blew it all playing the bigger games.
Won't go back most likely
Yep. Seems fishy.Anyone else get their directv screens freeze on a fanduel ad? It's been happening to me for a couple of weeks
I saw this getting mentioned a lot on Twitter a few days ago.Yep. Seems fishy.Anyone else get their directv screens freeze on a fanduel ad? It's been happening to me for a couple of weeks
YepAcerFC said:yeah, Im not loving it. and the more I read that fbg ebook, seems like heavily shark infested waters. And to be honest, I dont care enough to do the workbelljr said:I signed up last year with the free promo.Dropped like 50 in. Doubled it.AcerFC said:I threw down $25 this year for the first time.
So they got me, hook line and sinker
Then blew it all playing the bigger games.
Won't go back most likely
The business aspect of it might be bubble-ish. None of the sites are making money right now, and while they do expect to turn a profit someday, that day may be a long way off, and it might be impossible to ever be profitable with less than a 10% rake. (I don't understand why not, as 10% seems high to me, but that's the thinking from industry insiders.)Aerial Assault said:Not into it. It strikes me as the latest dot-com craze (complete with ridiculous economics that don't make any sense) but is probably here to stay in some manner. However, I think its "hot" factor will wear off soon. And it looks to me like it's probably quasi-illegal in 10-15 states, just at a quick glance. (No moralizing intended, just an amused/bemused observation.)
Not for long, I predict. The degenerate gamblers will generate huge profits for the DFS operators and the media that run DFS advertising for a few years and then the government/casino interests will shut it down just like online poker. I can hardly listen to Sirius/XM Fantasy radio anymore because all the commercials are for DFS services and then the shows continue to shill for DFS non-stop. Tony Cincotta, who is on SIrius/XM fantasy in the early mornings, is the worst.James Daulton said:Making money hand over fist. Americans love football, fantasy football, and gambling. Basically the only easy way to do all three legally.
Genius.
I find it really hard to believe that they're not making money. Their revenue is all cash and their cost can not be that high. Sure, they're spending a ton on advertising, but once they back down on that the cash will continue to roll in. Methinks some book cooking is going on.The business aspect of it might be bubble-ish. None of the sites are making money right now, and while they do expect to turn a profit someday, that day may be a long way off, and it might be impossible to ever be profitable with less than a 10% rake. (I don't understand why not, as 10% seems high to me, but that's the thinking from industry insiders.)Aerial Assault said:Not into it. It strikes me as the latest dot-com craze (complete with ridiculous economics that don't make any sense) but is probably here to stay in some manner. However, I think its "hot" factor will wear off soon. And it looks to me like it's probably quasi-illegal in 10-15 states, just at a quick glance. (No moralizing intended, just an amused/bemused observation.)
As a hobby, though, it's not a fad. It's way more fun than season-long fantasy sports.
Mine just started doing this. The DirecTV facebook page is FULL of people complaining about it.Aaron Rudnicki said:Yep. Seems fishy.NREC34 said:Anyone else get their directv screens freeze on a fanduel ad? It's been happening to me for a couple of weeks
Just talking about this with a co-worker. My experience was early in the NFL season you could win some money. But after week 4 or 5 you're playing against the pros. I compared it with poker in a casino. You'll win a bit, but over the long haul you're not winning unless you're playing big. Pros running their algorithms playing 1000's of games a week for big money. After a couple of seasons, I choose to stick with my friendly FFL leagues.AcerFC said:yeah, Im not loving it. and the more I read that fbg ebook, seems like heavily shark infested waters. And to be honest, I dont care enough to do the workbelljr said:I signed up last year with the free promo.AcerFC said:I threw down $25 this year for the first time.
So they got me, hook line and sinker
Dropped like 50 in. Doubled it.
Then blew it all playing the bigger games.
Won't go back most likely
That's your opinion, not a fact. I personally find season-long fantasy sports much more fun and infinitely more interesting from a strategic perspective and several others.The business aspect of it might be bubble-ish. None of the sites are making money right now, and while they do expect to turn a profit someday, that day may be a long way off, and it might be impossible to ever be profitable with less than a 10% rake. (I don't understand why not, as 10% seems high to me, but that's the thinking from industry insiders.)Aerial Assault said:Not into it. It strikes me as the latest dot-com craze (complete with ridiculous economics that don't make any sense) but is probably here to stay in some manner. However, I think its "hot" factor will wear off soon. And it looks to me like it's probably quasi-illegal in 10-15 states, just at a quick glance. (No moralizing intended, just an amused/bemused observation.)
As a hobby, though, it's not a fad. It's way more fun than season-long fantasy sports.
That there's any difference between the two is your opinion.That's your opinion, not a fact.
I think you're spot-on about how this will go.Not for long, I predict. The degenerate gamblers will generate huge profits for the DFS operators and the media that run DFS advertising for a few years and then the government/casino interests will shut it down just like online poker. I can hardly listen to Sirius/XM Fantasy radio anymore because all the commercials are for DFS services and then the shows continue to shill for DFS non-stop. Tony Cincotta, who is on SIrius/XM fantasy in the early mornings, is the worst.James Daulton said:Making money hand over fist. Americans love football, fantasy football, and gambling. Basically the only easy way to do all three legally.
Genius.
Heh.That there's any difference between the two is your opinion.That's your opinion, not a fact.
You need to win at a 55.56% clip (two people each pay $5, the site pays out $9 and keeps $1 for itself).Don't they have a 10% vig? So you have to win at a 61% clip to be profitable?
Feels like this is a house will always clean up business.
Ahhh, not as bad... I thought they just took a 10% vig on every dollar wagered.You need to win at a 55.56% clip (two people each pay $5, the site pays out $9 and keeps $1 for itself).Don't they have a 10% vig? So you have to win at a 61% clip to be profitable?
Feels like this is a house will always clean up business.
For the last several years (i.e., the industry's whole history), the number of players has tripled or quadrupled each year.If you aren't in this year, you prob never will be. Furthermore the attrition rate has to be somewhere in the 10-30% range, maybe higher.
They claim they will pay out $95 billion this year. Imagine how much they rake.Quez said:They must be making a ton of money to advertise this much.
They're "making" a ton of money by getting capital contributions from investors.They claim they will pay out $95 billion this year. Imagine how much they rake.Quez said:They must be making a ton of money to advertise this much.
This is understood and speaks to my point... The hockey stick eventually stops - For some it just slows down to typical growth. IMO, with the in your face marketing blasts this year, everyone knows them and what they do. If you aren't on board now, you prob never will be. With all the marketing and new players coming on this year, the attrition will be huge (on a numbers basis, IDK if the percentage basis increases/decreases, though if I had to bet, I'd say increases) and they'll need to spend 2-3x next year to recoup new players. Just my .02.For the last several years (i.e., the industry's whole history), the number of players has tripled or quadrupled each year.If you aren't in this year, you prob never will be. Furthermore the attrition rate has to be somewhere in the 10-30% range, maybe higher.
That means that, at any given time, the large majority of the people playing are brand new to the game.
I don't know what the attrition rate is. The large majority of players are losing players, but that's the same with sports betting, poker, etc., and people keep playing those games anyway.