Bingo...This isn't sustainable ...is it? I just can't imagine the kind of volume they need continue to lose. They are gonna have to find a way to cater to the masses vs. the sharks they are feeding right now.mquinnjr said:This story, combined with Mystery Achiever's comment that 1.3% of players make 90% of the market make this feel like the sports equivalent of the Ashley Madison.com business model, where the bots siphon money from the un-enlightened.yepI thought I read a couple months ago (believe someone on here mentioned it) that DraftKings and Fanduel allow botsAnother reason I have zero interest... If I was to take it seriously, I'd find an MIT nerd, pay him $20k to design an algorithm for selecting players and then kick some ###.CNBC is also covering this topic all day incl. appearances from Fanduel and Draftkings CEOs.
Here's a fun stat: 1.3% of players win 90% of the money.
I'm sure by the time my program was flawless, the sites would shut down. Pretty sure there are a bunch of bots already in the mix.
https://dfsreport.com/5244/scripts-bots-and-draftkings-terms-of-service/
It is for that reason, that I am out on DFS.
If I were an investor I would be really concerned about the business'es sustainability.
The pros DO know the players and DO watch the games....Reading about people sitting in their places for hours a day and fielding DFS lineups using players they've never heard of and know nothing about, using software-driven statistical models to win, is simultaneously funny and sad. For me, if I don't know the players and am just conducting a computer simulation, yeah, that's . . . not the least bit fun or interesting. I'll leave that to Skynet and continue to play games I actually enjoy.
MT just stated that he plays college DFS without knowing anything about the players. The Bloomberg article linked upthread about the math guy who spends 10-15 hours a day writing scripts didn't contain any information about his football knowledge. Moreover, it is clear from numerous other sources that to be successful, you need to reduce the entire endeavor to a software-driven probabilities exercise. That's not the least bit interesting or fun to me, and as a result, I'm both amused and saddened by the cynical ad appeals enticing rubes with promises of instant riches, when in fact you need almost a full-time bank of computers even to compete, let alone win. Talk about taking the fun out of something.The pros DO know the players and DO watch the games....Reading about people sitting in their places for hours a day and fielding DFS lineups using players they've never heard of and know nothing about, using software-driven statistical models to win, is simultaneously funny and sad. For me, if I don't know the players and am just conducting a computer simulation, yeah, that's . . . not the least bit fun or interesting. I'll leave that to Skynet and continue to play games I actually enjoy.
You guys are getting a little ridiculous with all the assumptions you are making here.
knew it was a scammquinnjr said:This story, combined with Mystery Achiever's comment that 1.3% of players make 90% of the market make this feel like the sports equivalent of the Ashley Madison.com business model, where the bots siphon money from the un-enlightened.yepI thought I read a couple months ago (believe someone on here mentioned it) that DraftKings and Fanduel allow botsAnother reason I have zero interest... If I was to take it seriously, I'd find an MIT nerd, pay him $20k to design an algorithm for selecting players and then kick some ###.CNBC is also covering this topic all day incl. appearances from Fanduel and Draftkings CEOs.
Here's a fun stat: 1.3% of players win 90% of the money.
I'm sure by the time my program was flawless, the sites would shut down. Pretty sure there are a bunch of bots already in the mix.
https://dfsreport.com/5244/scripts-bots-and-draftkings-terms-of-service/
It is for that reason, that I am out on DFS.
lol OK guy, I just don't care enough, its not what I play FF for, trying to grind out a small profit, I play DFS to try and hit the home run. Its like playing carribean stud poker at the casino, I don't care about the 20 bucks I lose, Im hoping for a lightning strike.Any one who is plugged in or plays DFS seriously knows that it is beatable. NFL is the easiest sport because there are a lot of casuals. It is estimated millions more players will be in NFL this season. Try to improve or look for advice if you aren't winning instead of making assumptions that it is rigged or unfair.
The goal of the cash games are to build your bankroll so you may eventually be able to play higher and higher stakes. If you just go for GPP's, you will likely lose money over time unless you place in GPP's and hit one, etc. A cash player if he wins consistently can use the profits from cash and use some of it to play GPP's. This way they can keep going and hopefully they hit a big GPP eventually. If one keeps chasing GPP's they will need to reload and probably have a tougher time because they don't play as much as they could if they were generating income from cash games.lol OK guy, I just don't care enough, its not what I play FF for, trying to grind out a small profit, I play DFS to try and hit the home run. Its like playing carribean stud poker at the casino, I don't care about the 20 bucks I lose, Im hoping for a lightning strike.Any one who is plugged in or plays DFS seriously knows that it is beatable. NFL is the easiest sport because there are a lot of casuals. It is estimated millions more players will be in NFL this season. Try to improve or look for advice if you aren't winning instead of making assumptions that it is rigged or unfair.
Yeah pretty much sick of the ads too. Hopefully it slows down after week1 but i doubt itBack to the advertising topic, this morning I kept hearing DraftKings's radio ad for free entry into the Millionaire Maker. No mention whatsoever that you must 1st make a deposit to be eligible. They don't mention in TV ads,either, but I didn't pay attention to whether there is any tiny on-screen print about it.
It will, they'll bankrupt themselves if they kept at this pace for a season.Yeah pretty much sick of the ads too. Hopefully it slows down after week1 but i doubt itBack to the advertising topic, this morning I kept hearing DraftKings's radio ad for free entry into the Millionaire Maker. No mention whatsoever that you must 1st make a deposit to be eligible. They don't mention in TV ads,either, but I didn't pay attention to whether there is any tiny on-screen print about it.
Yes, Dodds kept a blog throughout the season last year.Was it last year that an FBG bigwig chronicled his DFS experience here? If I remember correctly he finished the season up pretty big.
IIRC, didn't he start with a very large bank roll, like 15K? Or am I misremembering?Yes, Dodds kept a blog throughout the season last year.Was it last year that an FBG bigwig chronicled his DFS experience here? If I remember correctly he finished the season up pretty big.
He started with $50K in 2013 and ran it up to like $94K by the end of the season. Then he started with a mere $40K last year and was down $11K after the first four weeks, but ran it up to around $58K by the end of the season.IIRC, didn't he start with a very large bank roll, like 15K? Or am I misremembering?Yes, Dodds kept a blog throughout the season last year.Was it last year that an FBG bigwig chronicled his DFS experience here? If I remember correctly he finished the season up pretty big.
are you indenting your paragraphs?Fantasysports1 said:The goal of the cash games are to build your bankroll so you may eventually be able to play higher and higher stakes. If you just go for GPP's, you will likely lose money over time unless you place in GPP's and hit one, etc. A cash player if he wins consistently can use the profits from cash and use some of it to play GPP's. This way they can keep going and hopefully they hit a big GPP eventually. If one keeps chasing GPP's they will need to reload and probably have a tougher time because they don't play as much as they could if they were generating income from cash games.bicycle_seat_sniffer said:lol OK guy, I just don't care enough, its not what I play FF for, trying to grind out a small profit, I play DFS to try and hit the home run. Its like playing carribean stud poker at the casino, I don't care about the 20 bucks I lose, Im hoping for a lightning strike.Fantasysports1 said:Any one who is plugged in or plays DFS seriously knows that it is beatable. NFL is the easiest sport because there are a lot of casuals. It is estimated millions more players will be in NFL this season. Try to improve or look for advice if you aren't winning instead of making assumptions that it is rigged or unfair.
Yep. No interest in this crap.
No offense but these margins, while pretty good, do not seem all that great with all things considered. Going to back to the cheatsheets.net days, Dodds has been an expert in the FF realm. In these other articles linked, the top 1-2% whales that dominate the DFS have winnings in the hundreds of thousands if not upwards of a million.Maurile Tremblay said:He started with $50K in 2013 and ran it up to like $94K by the end of the season. Then he started with a mere $40K last year and was down $11K after the first four weeks, but ran it up to around $58K by the end of the season.Amused to Death said:IIRC, didn't he start with a very large bank roll, like 15K? Or am I misremembering?snellman said:Yes, Dodds kept a blog throughout the season last year.chauncey said:Was it last year that an FBG bigwig chronicled his DFS experience here? If I remember correctly he finished the season up pretty big.
The guys who are winning hundreds of thousands are betting millions. The guys who are winning millions are betting tens of millions. (I don't mean the guys who get lucky and win a Millionaire Maker contest on a $27 entry fee. I mean the pros whose results are in line with their long-term expectations.)In these other articles linked, the top 1-2% whales that dominate the DFS have winnings in the hundreds of thousands if not upwards of a million.
yeah that's BSNow I'm having to close a pop up ad every time I look at my fantasy team on yahoo. These guys are relentless and I hope they go out of business.
It will, they'll bankrupt themselves if they kept at this pace for a season.Yeah pretty much sick of the ads too. Hopefully it slows down after week1 but i doubt itBack to the advertising topic, this morning I kept hearing DraftKings's radio ad for free entry into the Millionaire Maker. No mention whatsoever that you must 1st make a deposit to be eligible. They don't mention in TV ads,either, but I didn't pay attention to whether there is any tiny on-screen print about it.
He face is chimp-like and punchable.I want to kick Dave Gomes in the balls.
this is essentially the equivalent of winning the lottery.My wife was sitting with me when she saw that. Her response, "that guy is full of ####" lolI saw a good one before...
"I deposited $35 and I've won $2.1MM"
this is essentially the equivalent of winning the lottery.
Same here. Wife caught that line and said roughly the same thing. I pointed out the phrasing - "deposited" and "won" - walks that line between being a completely true statement and not telling the whole story.My wife was sitting with me when she saw that. Her response, "that guy is full of ####" lolI saw a good one before...
"I deposited $35 and I've won $2.1MM"
this is essentially the equivalent of winning the lottery.
I have GB who won $1M on a FB game last season, right around Thanksgiving weekend on a $25'ish bet. But I chalk that up to pure luck.My wife was sitting with me when she saw that. Her response, "that guy is full of ####" lolI saw a good one before...
"I deposited $35 and I've won $2.1MM"
this is essentially the equivalent of winning the lottery.
This is where I'm at - put in $50 last year, currently have $42 in the bank with another $10 in play pending tonight's outcomes. It just gives me something to do, but I would never put real $ into it.I play low stakes, generally win more than lose, and find it an enjoyable diversion.
Deposited $50 last year, ended with $150, if the bankroll gets over $300 I'll pull out $200. It's a lot of fun when you're using play money. Way to much stress if real $'s were involved. I love to read stories about the NFL and players anyway so it's not like I'm spending time on it I would be spending doing anything more productive.This is where I'm at - put in $50 last year, currently have $42 in the bank with another $10 in play pending tonight's outcomes. It just gives me something to do, but I would never put real $ into it.I play low stakes, generally win more than lose, and find it an enjoyable diversion.
For me though, if it's a conduit to getting poker back and legal (and easy), I'm game.
Yep, exactly. I was up to maybe $120 on football. Got bored in the offseason and played basketball even though I know nothing about the NBA. Threw away from $60 on that.Deposited $50 last year, ended with $150, if the bankroll gets over $300 I'll pull out $200. It's a lot of fun when you're using play money. Way to much stress if real $'s were involved. I love to read stories about the NFL and players anyway so it's not like I'm spending time on it I would be spending doing anything more productive.This is where I'm at - put in $50 last year, currently have $42 in the bank with another $10 in play pending tonight's outcomes. It just gives me something to do, but I would never put real $ into it.For me though, if it's a conduit to getting poker back and legal (and easy), I'm game.I play low stakes, generally win more than lose, and find it an enjoyable diversion.
Bots don't do the projecting, per se (though many pros use advanced statistical modeling to gain an advantage).Someone explain to me like I'm 10 how bots can predict nfl stats each weekend.