This. It costs a ton and we already know what we need to know. Not gonna make any earth shattering discoveries there. No point in going back.What is the purpose of going back?
Didn't we mine the moon for Tang? That was a moon shattering discovery.This. It costs a ton and we already know what we need to know. Not gonna make any earth shattering discoveries there. No point in going back.What is the purpose of going back?
at first they called it moon dust but then they changed it to Tang.Didn't we mine the moon for Tang? That was a moon shattering discovery.This. It costs a ton and we already know what we need to know. Not gonna make any earth shattering discoveries there. No point in going back.What is the purpose of going back?
Moontangat first they called it moon dust but then they changed it to Tang.Didn't we mine the moon for Tang? That was a moon shattering discovery.This. It costs a ton and we already know what we need to know. Not gonna make any earth shattering discoveries there. No point in going back.What is the purpose of going back?
If they go back I hope they don't take beans.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOmsd54BICk&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Poulan Weedeater Independence Moon, duhWhich moon?
Depends on if the Chinese find any evidence of us being there.So when the Chinese finally land there are there going to be people who actually think the Chinese landed there but we did not?
Or are they still going to think no one ever landed there?
Neil did say he had one less pair of boxer shorts when he got back.Depends on if the Chinese find any evidence of us being there.So when the Chinese finally land there are there going to be people who actually think the Chinese landed there but we did not?
Or are they still going to think no one ever landed there?
Yes they did but the pictures and footage we saw were faked
Wasnt sure how to vote
can someone bump Keerock's "I weep" thread?
Are you one of the No votes? If so, please explain why you think it was all a hoax. Seriously, how did you come to your conclusion? What evidence do you see that leads you to there?not a chance,
Same people probably think the earth is flat.:facepalm: for anyone not voting the first option
I need to find that threadBillsfan?
at all the yes votes. Do you know how far away the moon is? Even if we did shoot a rocket at the moon 45 years ago the rocket wouldn't be there yet.
Thank you for posting this
seriously....that thread still around.This is like the FFA in syndication.Billsfan?
You can't be serious. Ok do this, how fast can a ship travel through space? Now divide that into the distance to the moon and what do you get?at all the yes votes. Do you know how far away the moon is? Even if we did shoot a rocket at the moon 45 years ago the rocket wouldn't be there yet.
Adjusting for headwind, about 45 years.You can't be serious. Ok do this, how fast can a ship travel through space? Now divide that into the distance to the moon and what do you get?at all the yes votes. Do you know how far away the moon is? Even if we did shoot a rocket at the moon 45 years ago the rocket wouldn't be there yet.
To build lakes,condos and walmarts!What is the purpose of going back?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landingsJust wondering were the rover is on the moon. The hubble should be able to take a picture of what the astronauts left behind. How come we have yet to see a picture? Just want someone to explain this.